| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Oversights in commits d08741eab5 and d952373a98.
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aMxbfSJ2wLWd32x-%40nathan
|
|
Initially this was to fix the "catched" typo, but I (David) wasn't quite
clear on what the previous comment meant about being "effective". I
expect this means efficiency, so I've reworded the comment to indicate
that.
While this is only a comment fixup, for the sake of possibly minimizing
possible future backpatching pain, I've opted to backpatch to 18 since
this code is new to that version and the release isn't out the door yet.
Author: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNmSYWPud1sfBvpKbCJeRkWeZYuqatxtV9U9LvAFXBEiBw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
Commit 216a784829c introduced parallel apply workers, allowing multiple
processes to share a replication origin. To support this,
replorigin_session_setup() was extended to accept a pid argument
identifying the process using the origin.
This commit exposes that capability through the SQL interface function
pg_replication_origin_session_setup() by adding an optional pid parameter.
This enables multiple processes to coordinate replication using the same
origin when using SQL-level replication functions.
This change allows the non-builtin logical replication solutions to
implement parallel apply for large transactions.
Additionally, an existing internal error was made user-facing, as it can
now be triggered via the exposed SQL API.
Author: Doruk Yilmaz <doruk@mixrank.com>
Author: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMPB6wfe4zLjJL8jiZV5kjjpwBM2=rTRme0UCL7Ra4L8MTVdOg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAE2gYzyTSNvHY1+iWUwykaLETSuAZsCWyryokjP6rG46ZvRgQA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Based on suggestions by Tom Lane
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20250916.114644.275726106301941878.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
|
When deciding which code path to use depending on the state of recovery,
XLogFlush() and XLogNeedsFlush() have been relying on different
criterias:
- XLogFlush() relied on XLogInsertAllowed().
- XLogNeedsFlush() relied on RecoveryInProgress().
Currently, the checkpointer is allowed to insert WAL records while
RecoveryInProgress() returns true for an end-of-recovery checkpoint,
where XLogInsertAllowed() matters. Using RecoveryInProgress() in
XLogNeedsFlush() did not really matter for its existing callers, as the
checkpointer only called XLogFlush(). However, a feature under
discussion, by Melanie Plageman, needs XLogNeedsFlush() to be able to
work in more contexts, the end-of-recovery checkpoint being one.
This commit changes XLogNeedsFlush() to use XLogInsertAllowed() instead
of RecoveryInProgress(), making the checks in both routines more
consistent. While on it, an assertion based on XLogNeedsFlush() is
added at the end of XLogFlush(), triggered when flushing a physical
position (not for the normal recovery patch that checks for updates of
the minimum recovery point). This assertion would fail for example in
the recovery test 015_promotion_pages if XLogNeedsFlush() is changed to
use RecoveryInProgress(). This should be hopefully enough to ensure
that the checks done in both routines remain consistent.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_a1vZRZRWO3_jv_X13RYoqLRVipGO0237g5PKzPa2YX6g@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Commit bb3ec16e14 moved partition pruning metadata into PlannedStmt.
At executor startup this metadata is used to initialize the EState
fields es_part_prune_infos, es_part_prune_states, and
es_part_prune_results. EvalPlanQualStart() failed to copy those
fields into the child EState, causing NULL dereference when Append
ran partition pruning during a recheck. This can occur with DELETE
or UPDATE on partitioned tables that use runtime pruning, e.g. with
generic plans.
Fix by copying all partition pruning state into the EPQ estate.
Add an isolation test that reproduces the crash with concurrent
UPDATE and DELETE on a partitioned table, where the DELETE session
hits the crash during its EPQ recheck after the UPDATE commits.
Bug: #19056
Reported-by: Fei Changhong <feichanghong@qq.com>
Diagnozed-by: Fei Changhong <feichanghong@qq.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19056-a677cef9b54d76a0%40postgresql.org
|
|
This change is a tighter rework of 7d85d87f4d5c, which tried to improve
the code so as it would work should PgStat_HashKey gain new fields that
create padding bytes. However, the previous change is proving to not be
enough as some code paths of pgstats do not pass PgStat_HashKey by
reference (valgrind would warn when padding is added to the structure,
through a new field).
Per discussion, let's document and check that PgStat_HashKey has no
padding rather than try to complicate the code of pgstats so as it is
able to work around that.
This removes a couple of memset(0) calls that should not be required.
While on it, this commit adds a static assertion checking that no
padding is introduced in the structure, by checking that the size of
PgStat_HashKey matches with the sum of the size of all its fields.
The object ID part of the hash key is already 8 bytes, which should be
plenty enough already. A comment is added to discourage the addition of
new fields.
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0t9omat+HVSakJXwTMWvhpYFcAZb41RPWKwrKFUgmAFBQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This code is heavily used and already has decent test coverage, but
it lacks a dedicated test suite. This commit changes that.
Author: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0tQ%2BEYSTOd2hQ8RXdsNfGBLAtOe-YmnsTE6ZVg0E-4qew%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0vpr0P2rbA%3D_K0_SCHM7bmfVX4wEO9FAyopN1eWCYORhA%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
When shared memory is re-initialized after a crash, the named
LWLock tranche request array that was copied to shared memory will
no longer be accessible. To fix, save the pointer to the original
array in postmaster's local memory, and switch to it when
re-initializing the LWLock-related shared memory.
Oversight in commit ed1aad15e0. Per buildfarm member batta.
Reported-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aMoejB3iTWy1SxfF%40paquier.xyz
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f8ca018f-3479-49f6-a92c-e31db9f849d7%40gmail.com
|
|
Author: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Steven Niu <niushiji@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20250917112814.096f660ea4c3c64630475e62@sraoss.co.jp
|
|
Previously, pg_restore did not skip security labels on publications or
subscriptions even when --no-publications or --no-subscriptions was specified.
As a result, it could issue SECURITY LABEL commands for objects that were
never created, causing those commands to fail.
This commit fixes the issue by ensuring that security labels on publications
and subscriptions are also skipped when the corresponding options are used.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxHCt00pR9h51AVu6+yPD5J7JQn=7dQXxqacj0XyDhc-fA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
StrategyInitialize() calls InitBufTable() with maximum number of entries that
the buffer lookup table can ever have. Thus there should not be any need to
allocate more element after initialization. Hence mark the hash table as fixed
sized.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAExHW5v0jh3F_wj86yC=qBfWk0uiT94qy=Z41uzAHLHh0SerRA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
If an aggregate function call contains a sub-select that has
an RTE referencing a CTE outside the aggregate, we must treat
that reference like a Var referencing the CTE's query level
for purposes of determining the aggregate's level. Otherwise
we might reach the nonsensical conclusion that the aggregate
should be evaluated at some query level higher than the CTE,
ending in a planner error or a broken plan tree that causes
executor failures.
Bug: #19055
Reported-by: BugForge <dllggyx@outlook.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19055-6970cfa8556a394d@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Commit 2a600a93 made Datum 8 bytes wide everywhere. It was no longer
appropriate to use TypeSizeT on 32 bit systems, and JIT compilation
would fail with various type check errors. Introduce a separate
LLVMTypeRef with the name TypeDatum. TypeSizeT is still used in some
places for actual size_t values.
Reported-by: Dmitry Mityugov <d.mityugov@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tested-by: Dmitry Mityugov <d.mityugov@postgrespro.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0a9f0be59171c2e8f1b3bc10f4fcf267%40postgrespro.ru
|
|
The pending entry was not used when incrementing its data, directly
manipulating the shared memory pointer, without even locking it. This
could mean losing statistics under concurrent activity. The flush
callback was a no-op.
This code serves as a base template for extensions for the custom
cumulative statistics, so let's be clean and use a pending entry for the
incrementations, whose data is then flushed to the corresponding entry
in the shared hashtable when all the stats are reported, in its own
flush callback.
Author: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0v0U0yhPbY+bqChomkPbyUrRQ3rQXnZf_SB-svDiQOpgQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
The shared memory size was calculated based on an offset of io_handles,
which is itself a pointer included in the structure. We tend to
overestimate the shared memory size overall, so this was unlikely an
issue in practice, but let's be correct and use the full size of the
structure in the calculation, so as the pointer for io_handles is
included.
Oversight in da7226993fd4.
Author: Madhukar Prasad <madhukarprasad@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKi+wrbC2dTzh_vKJoAZXV5wqTbhY0n4wRNpCjJ=e36aoo0kFw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
The EvalPlanQual recheck for TID Range Scan wasn't rechecking the TID qual
still passed after following update chains. This could result in tuples
being updated or deleted by plans using TID Range Scans where the ctid of
the new (updated) tuple no longer matches the clause of the scan. This
isn't desired behavior, and isn't consistent with what would happen if the
chosen plan had used an Index or Seq Scan, and that could lead to hard to
predict behavior for scans that contain TID quals and other quals as the
planner has freedom to choose TID Range or some other non-TID scan method
for such queries, and the chosen plan could change at any moment.
Here we fix this by properly implementing the recheck function for TID
Range Scans.
Backpatch to 14, where TID Range Scans were added
Reported-by: Sophie Alpert <pg@sophiebits.com>
Author: Sophie Alpert <pg@sophiebits.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4a6268ff-3340-453a-9bf5-c98d51a6f729@app.fastmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14
|
|
The EvalPlanQual recheck for TID Scan wasn't rechecking the TID qual
still passed after following update chains. This could result in tuples
being updated or deleted by plans using TID Scans where the ctid of the
new (updated) tuple no longer matches the clause of the scan. This isn't
desired behavior, and isn't consistent with what would happen if the
chosen plan had used an Index or Seq Scan, and that could lead to hard to
predict behavior for scans that contain TID quals and other quals as the
planner has freedom to choose TID or some other scan method for such
queries, and the chosen plan could change at any moment.
Here we fix this by properly implementing the recheck function for TID
Scans.
Backpatch to 13, oldest supported version
Reported-by: Sophie Alpert <pg@sophiebits.com>
Author: Sophie Alpert <pg@sophiebits.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4a6268ff-3340-453a-9bf5-c98d51a6f729@app.fastmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
This reverts commit 98fc31d6499163a0a781aa6f13582a07f09cd7c6.
That change allowed DROP OWNED BY to drop grants of the target
role to other roles, arguing that nobody would need those
privileges anymore. But that's not so: if you're not superuser,
you still need admin privilege on the target role so you can
drop it.
It's not clear whether or how the dependency-based approach
to solving the original problem can be adapted to keep these
grants. Since v18 release is fast approaching, the sanest
thing to do seems to be to revert this patch for now. The
race-condition problem is low severity and not worth taking
risks for.
I didn't force a catversion bump in 98fc31d64, so I won't do
so here either.
Reported-by: Dipesh Dhameliya <dipeshdhameliya125@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABgZEgczOFicCJoqtrH9gbYMe_BV3Hq8zzCBRcMgmU6LRsihUA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
The COMMENT should depend on the separately-dumped constraint, not the
domain. Sufficient restore parallelism might fail the COMMENT command
by issuing it before the constraint exists. Back-patch to v13, like
commit 0858f0f96ebb891c8960994f023ed5a17b758a38.
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20250913020233.fa.nmisch@google.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Up to now we've contented ourselves with a one-size-fits-all error
hint when we fail to find any match to a function or procedure call.
That was mostly okay in the beginning, but it was never great, and
since the introduction of named arguments it's really not adequate.
We at least ought to distinguish "function name doesn't exist" from
"function name exists, but not with those argument names". And the
rules for named-argument matching are arcane enough that some more
detail seems warranted if we match the argument names but the call
still doesn't work.
This patch creates a framework for dealing with these problems:
FuncnameGetCandidates and related code will now pass back a bitmask of
flags showing how far the match succeeded. This allows a considerable
amount of granularity in the reports. The set-bits-in-a-bitmask
approach means that when there are multiple candidate functions, the
report will reflect the match(es) that got the furthest, which seems
correct. Also, we can avoid mentioning "maybe add casts" unless
failure to match argument types is actually the issue.
Extend the same return-a-bitmask approach to OpernameGetCandidates.
The issues around argument names don't apply to operator syntax,
but it still seems worth distinguishing between "there is no
operator of that name" and "we couldn't match the argument types".
While at it, adjust these messages and related ones to more strictly
separate "detail" from "hint", following our message style guidelines'
distinction between those.
Reported-by: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1756041.1754616558@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
In our previous discussions around making our regression tests
pass in FIPS mode, we concluded that we didn't need to support
the different error message wording observed with pre-3.0 OpenSSL.
However there are still a few LTS distributions soldiering along
with such versions, and now we have some in the buildfarm.
So let's add the variant expected-files needed to make them happy.
This commit only covers the core regression tests. Previous
discussion suggested that we might need some adjustments in
contrib as well, but it's not totally clear to me what those
would be. Rather than work it out from first principles,
I'll wait to see what the buildfarm shows.
Back-patch to v17 which is the oldest branch that claims
to support this case.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/443709.1757876535@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 17
|
|
JsonConstructorExpr can produce non-NULL output with a NULL input, so
it should be treated as a non-strict construct. Failing to do so can
lead to incorrect query behavior.
For example, in the reported case, when pulling up a subquery that is
under an outer join, if the subquery's target list contains a
JsonConstructorExpr that uses subquery variables and it is mistakenly
treated as strict, it will be pulled up without being wrapped in a
PlaceHolderVar. As a result, the expression will be evaluated at the
wrong place and will not be forced to null when the outer join should
do so.
Back-patch to v16 where JsonConstructorExpr was introduced.
Bug: #19046
Reported-by: Runyuan He <runyuan@berkeley.edu>
Author: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19046-765b6602b0a8cfdf@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 16
|
|
Previously we built the .map files for GB18030 (version 2000) from an
XML file. The 2022 version for this encoding is only available as a
Unicode Character Mapping (UCM) file, so as preparatory refactoring
switch to this format as the source for building version 2000.
As we do with most input files for the conversion mappings, download
the file on demand. In order to generate the same mappings we have
now, we must download from a previous upstream commit, rather than
the head since the latter contains a correction not present in our
current .map files.
The XML file is still used by EUC_CN, so we cannot delete it from our
repository. GB18030 is a superset of EUC_CN, so it may be possible to
build EUC_CN from the same UCM file, but that is left for future work.
Author: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/966d9fc.169.198741fe60b.Coremail.jiaoshuntian%40highgo.com
|
|
Fix for commit 3c86223c998. That commit moved the typedef of pg_int64
from postgres_ext.h to libpq-fe.h, because the only remaining place
where it might be used is libpq users, and since the type is obsolete,
the intent was to limit its scope.
The problem is that if someone builds an extension against an
older (pre-PG18) server version and a new (PG18) libpq, they might get
two typedefs, depending on include file order. This is not allowed
under C99, so they might get warnings or errors, depending on the
compiler and options. The underlying types might also be
different (e.g., long int vs. long long int), which would also lead to
errors. This scenario is plausible when using the standard Debian
packaging, which provides only the newest libpq but per-major-version
server packages.
The fix is to undo that part of commit 3c86223c998. That way, the
typedef is in the same header file across versions. At least, this is
the safest fix doable before PostgreSQL 18 releases.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/25144219-5142-4589-89f8-4e76948b32db%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Previously, pg_dump incorrectly queried pg_seclabel to retrieve security labels
for subscriptions, which are stored in pg_shseclabel as they are global objects.
This could result in security labels for subscriptions not being dumped.
This commit fixes the issue by updating pg_dump to query the pg_seclabels view,
which aggregates entries from both pg_seclabel and pg_shseclabel.
While querying pg_shseclabel directly for subscriptions was an alternative,
using pg_seclabels is simpler and sufficient.
In addition, pg_dump is updated to dump security labels on event triggers,
which were previously omitted.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxHCt00pR9h51AVu6+yPD5J7JQn=7dQXxqacj0XyDhc-fA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
This commit addresses two sources of instability in the 035_conflicts
test:
Unstable VACUUM usage:
The test previously relied on VACUUM to remove a deleted column, which can
be unreliable due to concurrent background writer or checkpoint activity
that may lock the page containing the deleted tuple. Since the test
already verifies that replication_slot.xmin has advanced sufficiently to
confirm the feature's correctness, so, the VACUUM step is removed to
improve test stability.
Timing-sensitive retention resumption check:
The test includes a check to confirm that retention of conflict-relevant
information resumes after setting max_retention_duration to 0. However, in
some cases, the apply worker resumes retention immediately after the
inactive slot is removed from synchronized_standby_slots, even before
max_retention_duration is updated. This can happen if remote changes are
applied in under 1ms, causing the test to timeout while waiting for a
later log position. To ensure consistent behavior, this commit delays the
removal of synchronized_standby_slots until after max_retention_duration
is set to 0.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TY4PR01MB16907805DE4816E53C54708159414A@TY4PR01MB16907.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
Commit 7202d72787d added in passing some const qualifiers, but the one
on the postmaster_child_launch() startup_data argument was incorrect,
because the function itself modifies the pointed-to data. This is
hidden from the compiler because of casts. The qualifiers on the
functions called by postmaster_child_launch() are still correct.
|
|
Previously, pg_restore did not skip comments on policies even when
--no-policies was specified. As a result, it could issue COMMENT commands
for policies that were never created, causing those commands to fail.
This commit fixes the issue by ensuring that comments on policies
are also skipped when --no-policies is used.
Backpatch to v18, where --no-policies was added in pg_restore.
Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxHCt00pR9h51AVu6+yPD5J7JQn=7dQXxqacj0XyDhc-fA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
Previously, pg_restore did not skip comments on publications or subscriptions
even when --no-publications or --no-subscriptions was specified. As a result,
it could issue COMMENT commands for objects that were never created,
causing those commands to fail.
This commit fixes the issue by ensuring that comments on publications and
subscriptions are also skipped when the corresponding options are used.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxHCt00pR9h51AVu6+yPD5J7JQn=7dQXxqacj0XyDhc-fA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Add logic to _bt_set_startikey that determines whether row compare keys
are guaranteed to be satisfied by every tuple on a page that is about to
be read by _bt_readpage. This works in essentially the same way as the
existing scalar inequality logic. Testing has shown that the new logic
improves performance to about the same degree as the existing scalar
inequality logic (compared to the unoptimized case). In other words,
the new logic makes many row compare scans significantly faster.
Note that the new row compare inequality logic is only effective when
the same individual row member is the deciding subkey for all tuples on
the page (obviously, all tuples have to satisfy the row compare, too).
This is what makes the new row compare logic very similar to the
existing logic for scalar inequalities. Note, in particular, that this
makes it safe to ignore whether all row compare members are against
either ASC or DESC index attributes (i.e. it doesn't matter if
individual subkeys don't all use the same inequality strategy).
Also stop refusing to set pstate.startikey to an offset beyond any
nonrequired key (don't add logic that'll do that for an individual row
compare subkey, either). We can fully rely on our firstchangingattnum
tests instead. This will do the right thing when a page has a group of
tuples with NULLs in a lower-order attribute that makes the tuples fail
to satisfy a row compare key -- we won't incorrectly conclude that all
tuples must satisfy the row compare, just because firsttup and lasttup
happen to. Our firstchangingattnum test prevents that from happening.
(Note that the original "avoid evaluating nbtree scan keys" mechanism
added by commit e0b1ee17 couldn't support row compares due to issues
with tuples that contain NULLs in a lower-order subkey's attribute.
That original mechanism relied on requiredness markings, which the
replacement _bt_set_startikey mechanism never really needed.)
Follow up to commit 8a510275, which added the _bt_set_startikey
optimization. _bt_set_startikey is now feature complete; there's no
remaining kind of nbtree scan key that it still doesn't support.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznL6Z3H_GTQze9d8T_Ls=cYbnd-_9f-Jo7aYgTGRUD58g@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Virtual generated columns in constraint expressions need to be
expanded because the optimizer matches these expressions to qual
clauses. Failing to do so can cause us to miss opportunities for
constraint exclusion.
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/204804c0-798f-4c72-bd1f-36116024fda3%40eisentraut.org
|
|
The previous change (commit f225473cbae) was still not on target,
because it talked about relation kinds, which are not what is being
checked here. Provide a more accurate message.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxEZ48toGH0Em_6vdsT57Y3L8pLF=DZCQ_gCii6=C3MeXw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
fmgr.h defined some types such as fmNodePtr which is just Node *, but
it made its own types to avoid having to include various header files.
With C11, we can now instead typedef the original names without fear
of conflicts.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/10d32190-f31b-40a5-b177-11db55597355@eisentraut.org
|
|
This was just a workaround to avoid including the header file that
defines the Port type. With C11, we can now just re-define the Port
type without the possibility of a conflict.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/10d32190-f31b-40a5-b177-11db55597355@eisentraut.org
|
|
There are a number of forward declarations that use struct but not the
customary typedef, because that could have led to repeat typedefs,
which was not allowed. This is now allowed in C11, so we can update
these to provide the typedefs as well, so that the later uses of the
types look more consistent.
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/10d32190-f31b-40a5-b177-11db55597355@eisentraut.org
|
|
Now that we can have repeat typedefs with C11, we don't need to use
"struct ExplainState" anymore but can instead make a typedef where
necessary. This doesn't change anything but makes it look nicer.
(There are more opportunities for similar changes, but this is broken
out because there was a separate discussion about it, and it's
somewhat bulky on its own.)
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/f36c0a45-98cd-40b2-a7cc-f2bf02b12890%40eisentraut.org#a12fb1a2c1089d6d03010f6268871b00
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/10d32190-f31b-40a5-b177-11db55597355@eisentraut.org
|
|
This is allowed in C11, so we don't need the workarounds anymore.
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/10d32190-f31b-40a5-b177-11db55597355@eisentraut.org
|
|
This commit resumes automatic retention of conflict-relevant data for a
subscription. Previously, retention would stop if the apply process failed
to advance its xmin (oldest_nonremovable_xid) within the configured
max_retention_duration and user needs to manually re-enable
retain_dead_tuples option. With this change, retention will resume
automatically once the apply worker catches up and begins advancing its
xmin (oldest_nonremovable_xid) within the configured threshold.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716BE80DAEB0EE2A6A5D1F5949D2@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
LLVM-21 renamed llvm::GlobalValue::getGUID() to
getGUIDAssumingExternalLinkage(), so add a version guard.
Author: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/d25e6e4a-d1b4-84d3-2f8a-6c45b975f53d%40applied-asynchrony.com
|
|
Move some variables to a smaller scope. Initialize chunk_data before
storing a pointer to it; this avoids compiler warnings on clang-21, or
respectively us having to work around it by initializing it to zero
before the variable is used (as was done in commit e92677e8633).
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6604ad6e-5934-43ac-8590-15113d6ae4b1%40eisentraut.org
|
|
If extensions of equal names were installed in different directories
in the path, the views pg_available_extensions and
pg_available_extension_versions would show all of them, even though
only the first one was actually reachable by CREATE EXTENSION. To
fix, have those views skip extensions found later in the path if they
have names already found earlier.
Also add a bit of documentation that only the first extension in the
path can be used.
Reported-by: Pierrick <pierrick.chovelon@dalibo.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8f5a0517-1cb8-4085-ae89-77e7454e27ba%40dalibo.com
|
|
The TimescaleDB extension expects to be able to change an nbtree scan's
keys across rescans. The issue arises in the extension's implementation
of loose index scan. This is arguably a misuse of the index AM API,
though apparently it worked until recently. It stopped working when the
skipScan flag was added to BTScanOpaqueData by commit 8a510275, though.
The flag wouldn't reliably track whether the scan (actually, the current
rescan) has any skip arrays, leading to confusion in _bt_set_startikey.
nbtree preprocessing will now defensively initialize the scan's skipScan
flag in all cases, including the case where _bt_preprocess_array_keys
returns early due to the (re)scan not using arrays. While nbtree isn't
obligated to support this use case (at least not according to my reading
of the index AM API), it still seems like a good idea to be consistent
here, on general robustness grounds.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Natalya Aksman <natalya@timescale.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJumhcirfMojbk20+W0YimbNDkwdECvJprQGQ-XqK--ph09nQw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
Commit e3ffc3e91 fixed the translation of character classes in
SIMILAR TO regular expressions. Unfortunately the fix broke a corner
case: if there is an escape character right after the opening bracket
(for example in "[\q]"), a closing bracket right after the escape
sequence would not be seen as closing the character class.
There were two more oversights: a backslash or a nested opening bracket
right at the beginning of a character class should remove the special
meaning from any following caret or closing bracket.
This bug suggests that this code needs to be more readable, so also
rename the variables "charclass_depth" and "charclass_start" to
something more meaningful, rewrite an "if" cascade to be more
consistent, and improve the commentary.
Reported-by: Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Stephan Springl <springl-psql@bfw-online.de>
Author: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFCRh-8NwJd0jq6P=R3qhHyqU7hw0BTor3W0SvUcii24et+zAw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
pg_regress has a --no-locale option that forces the temporary database to
have C locale. However, currently, locale C only exists in the 'builtin'
locale provider. This makes 'pg_regress --no-locale' fail when the default
locale provider is not 'builtin'. This commit makes 'pg_regress --no-locale'
specify both LOCALE='C' and LOCALE_PROVIDER='builtin'.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b54921f95e23b4391b1613e9053a3d58%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Oleg Tselebrovskiy <o.tselebrovskiy@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
|
|
It's not quite clear to me why this didn't show up in my local
check-world testing, but some of the buildfarm evidently runs
this test with a different database name. Adjust the test
so that that doesn't affect the reported error messages.
|
|
If the database or user had no entry in pg_db_role_setting,
RESET silently did nothing --- including not checking the
validity of the given GUC name. This is quite inconsistent
and surprising, because you *would* get such an error if there
were any pg_db_role_setting entry, even though it contains
values for unrelated GUCs.
While this is clearly a bug, changing it in stable branches seems
unwise. The effect will be that some ALTER commands that formerly
were no-ops will now be errors, and people don't like that sort of
thing in minor releases.
Author: Vitaly Davydov <v.davydov@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30783e-68c28a00-9-41004480@130449754
|
|
Commit a0b99fc12 caused pg_event_trigger_dropped_objects()
to not fill the object_name field for schemas, which it
should have; and caused it to fill the object_name field
for default values, which it should not have.
In addition, triggers and RLS policies really should behave
the same way as we're making column defaults do; that is,
they should have is_temporary = true if they belong to a
temporary table.
Fix those things, and upgrade event_trigger.sql's woefully
inadequate test coverage of these secondary output columns.
As before, back-patch only to v15.
Reported-by: Sergey Shinderuk <s.shinderuk@postgrespro.ru>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/bd7b4651-1c26-4d30-832b-f942fabcb145@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
This unblocks rejection of that syntax. One copy was a misspelling of
"SET TABLESPACE pg_default" that instead made no persistent changes.
The other copy just needed to populate a DATABASEOID syscache entry.
This slightly raises database.sql test coverage of catcache.c, while
dbcommands.c coverage remains the same.
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1802710.1757608564@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
