| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
per gripe from Alvaro Herrera.
|
|
During queries coming from ri_triggers.c, we need to omit partitions
that are marked pending detach -- otherwise, the RI query is tricked
into allowing a row into the referencing table whose corresponding row
is in the detached partition. Which is bogus: once the detach operation
completes, the row becomes an orphan.
However, the code was not doing that in repeatable-read transactions,
because relcache kept a copy of the partition descriptor that included
the partition, and used it in the RI query. This commit changes the
partdesc cache code to only keep descriptors that aren't dependent on
a snapshot (namely: those where no detached partition exist, and those
where detached partitions are included). When a partdesc-without-
detached-partitions is requested, we create one afresh each time; also,
those partdescs are stored in PortalContext instead of
CacheMemoryContext.
find_inheritance_children gets a new output *detached_exist boolean,
which indicates whether any partition marked pending-detach is found.
Its "include_detached" input flag is changed to "omit_detached", because
that name captures desired the semantics more naturally.
CreatePartitionDirectory() and RelationGetPartitionDesc() arguments are
identically renamed.
This was noticed because a buildfarm member that runs with relcache
clobbering, which would not keep the improperly cached partdesc, broke
one test, which led us to realize that the expected output of that test
was bogus. This commit also corrects that expected output.
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3269784.1617215412@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
A new PostgresVersion object type is created and this is used in
PostgresNode using the output of `pg_config --version` and the result
stored in the PostgresNode object. This object can be compared to other
PostgresVersion objects, or to a number or string.
PostgresNode is currently believed to be compatible with versions down
to release 12, so PostgresNode will issue a warning if used with a
version prior to that.
No attempt has been made to deal with incompatibilities in older
versions - that remains work to be undertaken in a subsequent
development cycle.
Based on code from Mark Dilger and Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a80421c0-3d7e-def1-bcfe-24777f15e344@dunslane.net
|
|
Creating a trigger on a relation to which an apply operation is
triggered would cause a relation leak once the change gets committed,
as the executor would miss that the relation needs to be closed
beforehand. This issue got introduced with the refactoring done in
1375422c, where it becomes necessary to track relations within
es_opened_result_relations to make sure that they are closed.
We have discussed using ExecInitResultRelation() coupled with
ExecCloseResultRelations() for the relations in need of tracking by the
apply operations in the subscribers, which would simplify greatly the
opening and closing of indexes, but this requires a larger rework and
reorganization of the worker code, particularly for the tuple routing
part. And that's not really welcome post feature freeze. So, for now,
settle down to the same solution as TRUNCATE which is to fill in
es_opened_result_relations with the relation opened, to make sure that
ExecGetTriggerResultRel() finds them and that they get closed.
The code is lightly refactored so as a relation is not registered three
times for each DML code path, making the whole a bit easier to follow.
Reported-by: Tang Haiying, Shi Yu, Hou Zhijie
Author: Amit Langote, Masahiko Sawada, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB611383FA0FE92EB9DE21946AFB769@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
Per observation from Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1901125.1617904665@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
On ALTER TABLE .. DETACH CONCURRENTLY, we add a new table constraint
that duplicates the partition constraint. But if the partition already
has another constraint that implies that one, then that's unnecessary.
We were already avoiding the addition of a duplicate constraint if there
was an exact 'equal' match -- this just improves the quality of the check.
Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210410184226.GY6592@telsasoft.com
|
|
|
|
This has been found to cause hangs where tcp usage is forced.
Alexey Kodratov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/82e271a9a11928337fcb5b5e57b423c0@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch to all live branches
|
|
Since pg_depend can contain duplicate entries, we need to eliminate
those in information schema views that build on pg_depend, using
DISTINCT. Some of the older views already did that correctly, but
some of the more recently added ones didn't. (In some of these views,
it might not be possible to reproduce the issue because of how the
implementation happens to deduplicate dependencies while recording
them, but it seems better to keep this consistent in all cases.)
|
|
Should be %u rather than %d.
|
|
|
|
Use %lld and cast to long long int instead.
|
|
|
|
This compatibility has been added in 45b9805, but psql forgot the call.
Author: Wei Wang
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS3PR01MB6275935F62E161BCD393D6559E489@OS3PR01MB6275.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
While tracking down the bug fixed in the preceding commit, I got quite
annoyed by the low quality of spg_desc's output. Add missing fields,
try to make the formatting consistent.
|
|
Commit f003d9f87 left this macro with inadequate (or, one could say,
too much) parenthesization. Which was catastrophic to the correctness
of calls such as "if (!XLogRecHasBlockRef(record, 1)) ...". There
are only a few of those, which perhaps explains why we didn't notice
immediately (with our general weakness of WAL replay testing being
another factor). I found it by debugging intermittent replay failures
like
2021-04-08 14:33:30.191 EDT [29463] PANIC: failed to locate backup block with ID 1
2021-04-08 14:33:30.191 EDT [29463] CONTEXT: WAL redo at 0/95D3438 for SPGist/ADD_NODE: off 1; blkref #0: rel 1663/16384/25998, blk 1
|
|
log_statement is issued before query_id can be computed, so properly
clear the value, and document the interaction.
Reported-by: Fujii Masao, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YHPkU8hFi4no4NSw@paquier.xyz
Author: Julien Rouhaud
|
|
Previously, it was pg_stat_activity.queryid to match the
pg_stat_statements queryid column. This is an adjustment to patch
4f0b0966c8. This also adjusts some of the internal function calls to
match. Catversion bumped.
Reported-by: Álvaro Herrera, Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210408032704.GA7498@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
I didn't particularly like this function name, as it fails to
express what's going on. Also, returning the sort expression
alone isn't too helpful --- typically, a caller would also
need some other fields of the EquivalenceMember. But the
sole caller really only needs a bool result, so let's make
it "bool relation_can_be_sorted_early()".
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/91f3ec99-85a4-fa55-ea74-33f85a5c651f@swarm64.com
|
|
An oversight introduced by the incremental-sort patches caused
"could not find pathkey item to sort" errors in some situations
where a sort key involves an aggregate or window function.
The basic problem here is that find_em_expr_usable_for_sorting_rel
isn't properly modeling what prepare_sort_from_pathkeys will do
later. Rather than hoping we can keep those functions in sync,
let's refactor so that they actually share the code for
identifying a suitable sort expression.
With this refactoring, tlist.c's tlist_member_ignore_relabel
is unused. I removed it in HEAD but left it in place in v13,
in case any extensions are using it.
Per report from Luc Vlaming. Back-patch to v13 where the
problem arose.
James Coleman and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/91f3ec99-85a4-fa55-ea74-33f85a5c651f@swarm64.com
|
|
Commit b34ca595ab provided for installation-aware instances of
PostgresNode. However, it turns out that IPC::Run works against this by
caching the path to a binary and not consulting the path again, even if
it has changed. We work around this by calling Postgres binaries with
the installed path rather than just a bare name to be looked up in the
environment path, if there is an installed path. For the common case
where there is no installed path we continue to use the bare command
name.
Diagnosis and solution from Mark Dilger
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E8F512F8-B4D6-4514-BA8D-2E671439DA92@enterprisedb.com
|
|
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210420121659.odjueyd4rpilorn5@nol
|
|
Document VACUUM's soft assumption that any LP_DEAD items encountered
during pruning will become LP_UNUSED items before VACUUM finishes up.
This is integral to the accounting used by VACUUM to generate its final
report on the table to the stats collector. It also affects how VACUUM
determines which heap pages are truncatable. In both cases VACUUM is
concerned with the likely contents of the page in the near future, not
the current contents of the page.
This state of affairs created the false impression that VACUUM's dead
tuple accounting had significant difference with similar accounting used
during ANALYZE. There were and are no substantive differences, at least
when the soft assumption completely works out. This is far clearer now.
Also document cases where things don't quite work out for VACUUM's dead
tuple accounting. It's possible that a significant number of LP_DEAD
items will be left behind by VACUUM, and won't be recorded as remaining
dead tuples in VACUUM's statistics collector report. This behavior
dates back to commit a96c41fe, which taught VACUUM to run without index
and heap vacuuming at the user's request. The failsafe mechanism added
to VACUUM more recently by commit 1e55e7d1 takes the same approach to
dead tuple accounting.
Reported-By: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=Jmtu18PrsYq3EvvZJGOmZqSO2u3bvKpx9xJa5uhNp=Q@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Should be signed, not unsigned.
|
|
In the new test after resetting the stats, we were not waiting for the
stats message to be delivered. Also, we need to decode the results for
the new test, otherwise, it will show the old stats.
In passing,
a. Change docs added by commit f5fc2f5b23 as per suggestion by
Justin Pryzby.
b. Bump the PGSTAT_FILE_FORMAT_ID as commit f5fc2f5b23 changes the file
format of stats.
Reported-by: Tom Lane based on buildfarm reports
Author: Vignesh C, Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210319185247.ldebgpdaxsowiflw@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210416070310.GG3315@telsasoft.com
|
|
A couple of tests have been using 0 as magic constant while SEEK_SET can
be used instead. This makes the code easier to understand, and more
consistent with the changes done in 3c5b068.
Per discussion with Andrew Dunstan.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YHrc24AgJQ6tQ1q0@paquier.xyz
|
|
Add a few words of comment to explain why SIGURG doesn't follow the
dummy_handler pattern used for SIGUSR2, since that might otherwise
appear to be a bug.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4006115.1618577212%40sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
Should be %u rather than %d.
|
|
As it stands, find_expr_references_walker() pays attention to leaf-node
collation fields while ignoring the input collations of actual function
and operator nodes. That seems exactly backwards from a semantic
standpoint, and it leads to reporting dependencies on collations that
really have nothing to do with the expression's behavior.
Hence, rewrite to look at function input collations instead. This
isn't completely perfect either; it fails to account for the behavior
of record_eq and its siblings. (The previous coding at least gave an
approximation of that, though I think it could be fooled pretty easily
into considering the columns of irrelevant composite types.) We may
be able to improve on this later, but for now this should satisfy the
buildfarm members that didn't like ef387bed8.
In passing fix some oversights in GetTypeCollations(), and get
rid of its duplicative de-duplications. (I'm worried that it's
still potentially O(N^2) or worse, but this makes it a little
better.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3564817.1618420687@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Ooops, forgot to s/system_views.sql/system_functions.sql/g
in this part of 767982e36.
No need for an additional catversion bump, I think, since
these strings are gone by the time initdb finishes.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3956760.1618529139@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Adopt the new pre-parsed representation for all built-in and
information_schema SQL-language functions, except for a small
number that can't presently be converted because they have
polymorphic arguments.
This eliminates residual hazards around search-path safety of
these functions, and might provide some small performance benefits
by reducing parsing costs. It seems useful also to provide more
test coverage for the SQL-standard-body feature.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3956760.1618529139@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Invent system_functions.sql to carry the function definitions that
were formerly in system_views.sql. The function definitions were
already a quarter of the file and are about to be more, so it seems
appropriate to give them their own home.
In passing, fix an oversight in dfb75e478: it neglected to call
check_input() for system_constraints.sql.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3956760.1618529139@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
In order to avoid getting old logfile contents certain functions in
PostgresNode were doing one of two things. On Windows it rotated the
logfile and restarted the server, while elsewhere it truncated the log
file. Both of these are unnecessary. We borrow from the buildfarm which
does this instead: note the size of the logfile before we start, and
then when fetching the logfile skip to that position before accumulating
contents. This is spelled differently on Windows but the effect is the
same. This is largely centralized in TestLib's slurp_file function,
which has a new optional parameter, the offset to skip to before
starting to reading the file. Code in the client becomes much neater.
Backpatch to all live branches.
Michael Paquier, slightly modified by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YHajnhcMAI3++pJL@paquier.xyz
|
|
recordMultipleDependencies had the wrong scope for its "version"
variable, allowing a version label to leak from the collation entry it
was meant for to subsequent non-collation entries. This is relatively
hard to trigger because of the OID-descending order that the inputs
will normally arrive in: subsequent non-collation items will tend to
be pinned. But it can be exhibited easily with a custom collation.
Also, don't special-case the default collation, but instead ignore
pinned-ness of a collation when we've found a version for it. This
avoids creating useless pg_depend entries, and removes a not-very-
future-proof assumption that C, POSIX, and DEFAULT are the only
pinned collations.
A small problem is that, because the default collation may or may
not have a version, the regression tests can't assume anything about
whether dependency entries will be made for it. This seems OK though
since it's now handled just the same as other collations, and we have
test cases for both versioned and unversioned collations.
Fixes oversights in commit 257836a75. Thanks to Julien Rouhaud
for review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3564817.1618420687@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
This is only a latent bug, since these calls are only reached for
non-text output formats, and currently none of those will print
the units. Still, we should get it right in case that ever changes.
Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210415163846.GA3315@telsasoft.com
|
|
Only track BEGIN...END blocks if they are in a CREATE [OR REPLACE]
{FUNCTION|PROCEDURE} statement. Ignore if in parentheses.
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cee01d26fe55bc086b3bcf10bfe4e8d450e2f608.camel@cybertec.at
|
|
|
|
This adds the statistics about total transactions count and total
transaction data logically sent to the decoding output plugin from
ReorderBuffer. Users can query the pg_stat_replication_slots view to check
these stats.
Suggested-by: Andres Freund
Author: Vignesh C and Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210319185247.ldebgpdaxsowiflw@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Without this, we lose error cursor positions, as shown in the
modified regression test result.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2197698.1617984583@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
This reverts commit b3ee4c503872f3d0a5d6a7cbde48815f555af15b.
We don't need it in the wake of the preceding commit, which
added an upstream check that the querystring isn't null.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2197698.1617984583@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Commit e717a9a18 changed the longstanding rule that prosrc is NOT NULL
because when a SQL-language function is written in SQL-standard style,
we don't currently have anything useful to put there. This seems a poor
decision though, as it could easily have negative impacts on external
PLs (opening them to crashes they didn't use to have, for instance).
SQL-function-related code can just as easily test "is prosqlbody not
null" as "is prosrc null", so there's no real gain there either.
Hence, revert the NOT NULL marking removal and adjust related logic.
For now, we just put an empty string into prosrc for SQL-standard
functions. Maybe we'll have a better idea later, although the
history of things like pg_attrdef.adsrc suggests that it's not
easy to maintain a string equivalent of a node tree.
This also adds an assertion that queryDesc->sourceText != NULL
to standard_ExecutorStart. We'd been silently relying on that
for awhile, so let's make it less silent.
Also fix some overlooked documentation and test cases.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2197698.1617984583@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
These queries could show unexpected entries if the core system,
or concurrently-running test scripts, created any functions that
would appear in the information_schema views. Restrict them
to showing functions belonging to this test's schema, as the
far-older nearby test case does.
Per experimentation with conversion of some built-in functions
to SQL-function-body style.
|
|
This reverts commit 3a5130672296ed4e682403a77a9a3ad3d21cef75.
Per discussion, this patch had too many issues to resolve at this
point of the development cycle. We'll try again in the future.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/alpine.DEB.2.21.1904132231510.8961@lancre
|
|
|
|
6568cef, that introduced the option, had an inconsistent behavior when
it comes to configuration tables set up by pg_extension_config_dump, as
the data of all configuration tables would included in a dump even for
extensions not listed by a set of --extension switches.
The contents dumped changed depending on the schema where an extension
was installed when an extension was not listed. For example, an
extension installed under the public schema would have its configuration
data not dumped even when not listed with --extension, which was
inconsistent with the case of an extension installed on a non-public
schema, where the configuration would be dumped.
Per discussion with Noah, we have settled down to the simple rule of
dumping configuration data of an extension if it is listed in
--extension (default is unchanged and backward-compatible, to dump
everything on sight if there are no extensions directly listed). This
avoids some weird cases where the dumps depended on a --schema for one.
More tests are added to cover the gap, where we cross-check more
behaviors depending on --schema when an extension is not listed.
Reported-by: Noah Misch
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210404220802.GA728316@rfd.leadboat.com
|
|
That field went away in commit edca44b15, but it seems that
commit 45be99f8c re-introduced some comments mentioning it.
Noted by James Coleman, though this isn't exactly his
proposed new wording. Also thanks to Justin Pryzby for
software archaeology.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe8fxZjq3na+XkNx4C78gDqykH-7dbnzygm9Qa9nuDTePg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
We don't need to mention the attribute number in these messages, because
there's a dedicated column for that, but we should mention the toast
value ID, because that's really useful for any follow-up troubleshooting
the user wants to do. This also rewords some of the messages to hopefully
read a little better.
Also, use VARATT_EXTERNAL_GET_POINTER in case we're accessing a TOAST
pointer that isn't aligned on a platform that's fussy about alignment,
so that we don't crash while corruption-checking the user's data.
Mark Dilger, reviewed by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/7D3B9BF6-50D0-4C30-8506-1C1851C7F96F@enterprisedb.com
|
|
|
