| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Formerly, the bootstrap backend looked up the OIDs corresponding to
names in regproc catalog entries using brute-force searches of pg_proc.
It was somewhat remarkable that that worked at all, since it was used
while populating other pretty-fundamental catalogs like pg_operator.
And it was also quite slow, and getting slower as pg_proc gets bigger.
This patch moves the lookup work into genbki.pl, so that the values in
postgres.bki for regproc columns are always numeric OIDs, an option
that regprocin() already supported. Perl isn't the world's speediest
language, so this about doubles the time needed to run genbki.pl (from
0.3 to 0.6 sec on my machine). But we only do that at most once per
build. The time needed to run initdb drops significantly --- on my
machine, initdb --no-sync goes from 1.8 to 1.3 seconds. So this is
a small net win even for just one initdb per build, and it becomes
quite a nice win for test sequences requiring many initdb runs.
Strip out the now-dead code for brute-force catalog searching in
regprocin. We'd also cargo-culted similar logic into regoperin
and some (not all) of the other reg*in functions. That is all
dead code too since we currently have no need to load such values
during bootstrap. I removed it all, reasoning that if we ever
need such functionality it'd be much better to do it in a similar
way to this patch.
There might be some simplifications possible in the backend now that
regprocin doesn't require doing catalog reads so early in bootstrap.
I've not looked into that, though.
Andreas Karlsson, with some small adjustments by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30896.1492006367@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
This removes the pg_dump option --no-subscription-connect and makes it
the default. Dumping a subscription so that it activates right away
when restored is not very useful, because the state of the publication
server is unclear.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e4fbfad5-c6ac-fd50-6777-18c84b34eb2f@2ndquadrant.com
|
|
Dump subscriptions if the current user is a superuser, otherwise write a
warning and skip them. Remove the pg_dump option
--include-subscriptions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e4fbfad5-c6ac-fd50-6777-18c84b34eb2f@2ndquadrant.com
|
|
|
|
Free each SASL message after sending it. It's not a lot of wasted memory,
and it's short-lived, but the authentication code in general tries to
pfree() stuff, so let's follow the example.
Adding the pfree() revealed a little bug in build_server_first_message().
It attempts to keeps a copy of the sent message, but it was missing a
pstrdup(), so the pointer started to dangle, after adding the pfree()
into CheckSCRAMAuth().
Reword comments and debug messages slightly, while we're at it.
Reviewed by Michael Paquier.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6490b975-5ee1-6280-ac1d-af975b19fb9a@iki.fi
|
|
It was created as equivalent of pg_stats, but since the code underlying
pg_statistic_ext is more convenient than the one for pg_statistic,
pg_stats_ext is no longer useful.
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9zAkPUf9nQrqpFBAsrOHvb5eYa2FVNsmCJy1wegcO_TQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amit Langote, additional line by me
|
|
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoC32YgtateNqTFXzTJmHHe6hXs4cpJTND3n-Ts8f-aMqw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Commit f5ab0a14e made this test take substantially longer than it used
to. With a bit more care, we can get the runtime back down while
achieving the same, or even a bit better, code coverage.
Mithun Cy
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD__Ouh-qaEb+rD7Uy-4g3xQYOrhPzHs-a_TrFAjiQ5azAW5+w@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Commit 5e6d8d2bb allowed parallel workers to execute parallel-safe
subplans, but it transmitted the query's entire list of subplans to
the worker(s). Since execMain.c blindly does ExecInitNode and later
ExecEndNode on every list element, this resulted in parallel-unsafe plan
nodes nonetheless getting started up and shut down in parallel workers.
That seems mostly harmless as far as core plan node types go (but
maybe not so much for Gather?). But it resulted in postgres_fdw
opening and then closing extra remote connections, and it's likely
that other non-parallel-safe FDWs or custom scan providers would have
worse reactions.
To fix, just make ExecSerializePlan replace parallel-unsafe subplans
with NULLs in the cut-down plan tree that it transmits to workers.
This relies on ExecInitNode and ExecEndNode to do nothing on NULL
input, but they do anyway. If anything else is touching the dropped
subplans in a parallel worker, that would be a bug to be fixed.
(This thus provides a strong guarantee that we won't try to do
something with a parallel-unsafe subplan in a worker.)
This is, I think, the last fix directly occasioned by Andreas Seltenreich's
bug report of a few days ago.
Tom Lane and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87tw5x4vcu.fsf@credativ.de
|
|
Specifically, use '--summary' with 'git show'.
|
|
We'd managed to avoid doing this so far, but it seems pretty obvious
that it would be forced on us some day, and this is much the cleanest
way of approaching the open problem that parallel-unsafe subplans are
being transmitted to parallel workers. Anyway there's no space cost
due to alignment considerations, and the time cost is pretty minimal
since we're just copying the flag from the corresponding Path node.
(At least in most cases ... some of the klugier spots in createplan.c
have to work a bit harder.)
In principle we could perhaps get rid of SubPlan.parallel_safe,
but I thought it better to keep that in case there are reasons to
consider a SubPlan unsafe even when its child plan is parallel-safe.
This patch doesn't actually do anything with the new flags, but
I thought I'd commit it separately anyway.
Note: although this touches outfuncs/readfuncs, there's no need for
a catversion bump because Plan trees aren't stored on disk.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87tw5x4vcu.fsf@credativ.de
|
|
This is not handled uniformly throughout the code, but at least nearby
code can be consistent.
|
|
validateCheckConstraint() shouldn't try to access the storage for
a partitioned table, because it no longer has any. Creating a
_RETURN table on a partitioned table shouldn't be allowed, both
because there's no value in it and because trying to do so would
involve a validation scan against its nonexistent storage.
Amit Langote, reviewed by Tom Lane. Regression test outputs
updated to pass by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/e5c3cbd3-1551-d6f8-c9e2-51777d632fd2@lab.ntt.co.jp
|
|
While at it also update the comments in walmethods.h to make it less
likely for mistakes like this to appear in the future (thanks to Tom for
improvements to the comments).
And finally, in passing change the return type of walmethod.getlasterror
to being const, also per suggestion from Tom.
|
|
Commit a4777f355 was a shade too mechanical: we don't want to override
MSVC's own definition of _MSC_VER, as that breaks tests on its numerical
value. Per buildfarm.
|
|
Commit f0e44751d7175fa3394da2c8f85e3ceb3cdbfe63 should have updated
this code, but did not.
Amit Langote
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/52d9c443-ec78-5c8a-7a77-0f34aad12b82@lab.ntt.co.jp
|
|
To prevent future bugs along the lines of the one corrected by commit
8ff518699f19dd0a5076f5090bac8400b8233f7f, or find any that remain
in the current code, add an Assert() that the difference between
parallel_register_count and parallel_terminate_count is in a sane
range.
Kuntal Ghosh, with considerable tidying-up by me, per a suggestion
from Neha Khatri. Reviewed by Tomas Vondra.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFO0U+-E8yzchwVnvn5BeRDPgX2z9vZUxQ8dxx9c0XFGBC7N1Q@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Commit b460f5d6693103076dc554aa7cbb96e1e53074f9 failed to contemplate
the possibilit that a parallel worker registered before a crash would
be unregistered only after the crash; if that happened, we'd end up
with parallel_terminate_count > parallel_register_count and the
system would refuse to launch any more parallel workers.
The easiest way to fix that seems to be to forget BGW_NEVER_RESTART
workers in ResetBackgroundWorkerCrashTimes() rather than leaving them
around to be cleaned up after the conclusion of the restart, so that
they go away before rather than after shared memory is reset.
To make sure that this fix is water-tight, don't allow parallel
workers to be anything other than BGW_NEVER_RESTART, so that after
recovering from a crash, 0 is guaranteed to be the correct starting
value for parallel_register_count. The core code wouldn't do this
anyway, but somebody might try to do it in extension code.
Report by Thomas Vondra. Patch by me, reviewed by Kuntal Ghosh.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAGz5QC+AVEVS+3rBKRq83AxkJLMZ1peMt4nnrQwczxOrmo3CNw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Commit 98e6e89040a0534ca26914c66cae9dd49ef62ad9 made inadequate
provision for the case of a single-page shared tidbitmap. It
allocate space for a shared PagetableEntry, but failed to
initialize it.
Report by Thomas Munro. Patch by Dilip Kumar, with some comment
changes by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=19Cmnfbi-j2Bw-a6yGPeHE1OVhKvvKz9bRBTJGKfGHMA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This commit also does
- add REPLICATION_SUBSCRIBERS into config_group
- mark max_logical_replication_workers and max_sync_workers_per_subscription
as REPLICATION_SUBSCRIBERS parameters
- move those parameters into "Subscribers" section in postgresql.conf.sample
Author: Masahiko Sawada, Petr Jelinek and me
Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoAonSCoa=v=87ZO3vhfUZA1k_E2XRNHTt=xioWGUa+0ug@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This used to mean "Visual C++ except in those parts where Borland C++
was supported where it meant one of those". Now that we don't support
Borland C++ anymore, simplify by using _MSC_VER which is the normal way
to detect Visual C++.
|
|
This removes the support for building just libpq using Borland C++ or
Visual C++. This has not worked properly for years, and given the number
of complaints it's clearly not worth the maintenance burden.
Building libpq using the standard MSVC build system is of course still
supported, along with mingw.
|
|
heap_drop_with_catalog and RangeVarCallbackForDropRelation should
lock the parent before locking the target relation.
Amit Langote
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/29588799-a8ce-b0a2-3dae-f39ff6d35922@lab.ntt.co.jp
|
|
As a consequence of commit 1d63f7d2d, on platforms with CLOCK_MONOTONIC,
you got some random timescale or other instead of standard Unix timestamps
as expected. I'd attempted to fix pgbench for that change in commits
74baa1e3b and 67a875355, but missed this place. Fix in the same way as
those previous commits, ie, just eat the cost of an extra gettimeofday();
one extra syscall per progress report isn't worth sweating over. Per
report from Jeff Janes.
In passing, use snprintf not sprintf for this purpose. I don't think
there's any chance of actual buffer overrun, but it just looks safer.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1zrQaPwBN+NcBd3pWCb=vWaiL=mmWfJjDJjh-a7eVr-Og@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Commit 96a7128b made pg_dump and pg_dumpall sync their output by
default. However, there's no great need for that in testing, and it
could impose a performance penalty, so we add the --no-sync flag to most
of the test cases.
Michael Paquier
|
|
The previously used ShareRowExclusiveLock, while technically probably
more correct, led to deadlocks during seemingly unrelated operations and
thus a poor experience. Use RowExclusiveLock, like for most similar
catalog operations. In some care cases, the user might see an error
from DDL commands.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/13592.1490851519%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
|
|
The backend local copy of dsa_area_control->freed_segment_counter was
not properly initialized / maintained. This could, if unlucky, lead
to keeping attached to a segment for too long.
Found via valgrind bleat on buildfarm animal skink.
Author: Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170407164935.obsf2jipjfos5zei@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
This extends the castNode() notation introduced by commit 5bcab1114 to
provide, in one step, extraction of a list cell's pointer and coercion to
a concrete node type. For example, "lfirst_node(Foo, lc)" is the same
as "castNode(Foo, lfirst(lc))". Almost half of the uses of castNode
that have appeared so far include a list extraction call, so this is
pretty widely useful, and it saves a few more keystrokes compared to the
old way.
As with the previous patch, back-patch the addition of these macros to
pg_list.h, so that the notation will be available when back-patching.
Patch by me, after an idea of Andrew Gierth's.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14197.1491841216@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
Author: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reported-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
|
|
We decided in f1b4c771ea74f42447dccaed42ffcdcccf3aa694 to pass the
original slot to ExecConstraints(), but that breaks when there are
BEFORE ROW triggers involved. So we need to do reverse-map the tuples
back to the original descriptor instead, as Amit originally proposed.
Amit Langote, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat. One overlooked comment
fixed by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/b3a17254-6849-e542-2353-bde4e880b6a4@lab.ntt.co.jp
|
|
Commit 4deb41381 modified isolationtester's query to see whether a
session is blocked to also check for waits occurring in GetSafeSnapshot.
However, it did that in a way that enormously increased the query's
runtime under CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, causing the buildfarm members
that use that to run about four times slower than before, and in some
cases fail entirely. To fix, push the entire logic into a dedicated
backend function. This should actually reduce the CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS
runtime from what it was previously, though I've not checked that.
In passing, expose a SQL function to check for safe-snapshot blockage,
comparable to pg_blocking_pids. This is more or less free given the
infrastructure built to solve the other problem, so we might as well.
Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170407165749.pstcakbc637opkax@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Commit ac2b09508 was not terribly carefully reviewed. Band-aid it to
not fail on non-RestrictInfo input, per report from Andreas Seltenreich.
Also make it do something more reasonable with variable-free clauses,
and improve nearby comments.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87inmf5rdx.fsf@credativ.de
|
|
Oversight in 60f11b87a.
|
|
Fix by forcing database encoding to UTF-8, regardless of the current
locale.
Pointed out by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8934.1491614631@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Defaults match the fixed behavior of prior releases, but now DBAs
have better options to tune serializable workloads.
It might be nice to be able to set this per relation, but that part
will need to wait for another release.
Author: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
|
|
If there can certainly be no more than one matching inner row for a given
outer row, then the executor can move on to the next outer row as soon as
it's found one match; there's no need to continue scanning the inner
relation for this outer row. This saves useless scanning in nestloop
and hash joins. In merge joins, it offers the opportunity to skip
mark/restore processing, because we know we have not advanced past the
first possible match for the next outer row.
Of course, the devil is in the details: the proof of uniqueness must
depend only on joinquals (not otherquals), and if we want to skip
mergejoin mark/restore then it must depend only on merge clauses.
To avoid adding more planning overhead than absolutely necessary,
the present patch errs in the conservative direction: there are cases
where inner_unique or skip_mark_restore processing could be used, but
it will not do so because it's not sure that the uniqueness proof
depended only on "safe" clauses. This could be improved later.
David Rowley, reviewed and rather heavily editorialized on by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqF6Sw-TK98bW48TdtFJ+3a7D2mFyZ7++=D-RyPsL76gw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
When the 64bit atomics simulation is in use, we can't necessarily
guarantee the correct alignment of the atomics due to lack of compiler
support for doing so- that's fine from a safety perspective, because
everything is protected by a lock, but we asserted the alignment in
all cases. Weaken them. Per complaint from Alvaro Herrera.
My #ifdefery for PG_HAVE_8BYTE_SINGLE_COPY_ATOMICITY wasn't
sufficient. Fix that. Per complaint from Alexander Korotkov.
|
|
Using %ld as we were doing raises compiler warnings on 32 bit platforms.
Reported by Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170407214022.fidezl2e6rk3tuiz@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Instead of allocating memory in brin_deform_tuple and brin_copy_tuple
over and over during a scan, allow reuse of previously allocated memory.
This is said to make for a measurable performance improvement.
Author: Jinyu Zhang, Álvaro Herrera
Reviewed by: Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/495deb78.4186.1500dacaa63.Coremail.beijing_pg@163.com
|
|
When adding atomics back in b64d92f1a, I added 64bit support as
optional; there wasn't yet a direct user in sight. That turned out to
be a bit short-sighted, it'd already have been useful a number of times.
Add a fallback implementation of 64bit atomics, just like the one we
have for 32bit atomics.
Additionally optimize reads/writes to 64bit on a number of platforms
where aligned writes of that size are atomic. This can now be tested
with PG_HAVE_8BYTE_SINGLE_COPY_ATOMICITY.
Author: Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20160330230914.GH13305@awork2.anarazel.de
|
|
on MSVC 2010
Author: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
|
|
per cpluspluscheck
|
|
The WAL-writing piece was forgetting to set the pages-per-range value.
Also, fix the declared type of struct member heapBlk, which I mistakenly
set as OffsetNumber rather than BlockNumber.
Problem was introduced by commit c655899ba9ae (April 1st). Any system
that tries to replay the new WAL record written before this fix is
likely to die on replay and require pg_resetwal.
Reported by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191.1491524824@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobuz2C-YiQ87h8h0gECCV=F+SE=HBNaAU75rR5FEwtEhQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobgWHcXDcChX2+BqJDk2dkPVF85ZrJFhUyHHQmw8diTpA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Noted by Amit Langote.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aad31672-4983-d95d-d24e-6b42fee9b985@lab.ntt.co.jp
|
