| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
I was confused by what "intended to be parallel serially" meant, until
Robert Haas and David G. Johnston explained it. Rephrase the comment to
make it more clear, using David's suggested wording.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1fec9022-41e8-e484-70ce-2179b08c2092%40iki.fi
|
|
This comment was copy-pasted from nodeAppend.c to nodeMergeAppend.c, but
while committing 5220bb7533, I modified wrong copy of it.
Spotted by David Rowley
|
|
This expands the support for the run-time partition pruning which was added
for Append in 499be013de to also allow unneeded subnodes of a MergeAppend
to be removed.
Author: David Rowley
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKJS1f_F_V8D7Wu-HVdnH7zCUxhoGK8XhLLtd%3DCu85qDZzXrgg%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
GatherMergePath (introduced in 10) and CustomPath (introduced in 9.5)
have gone missing. The order of the Path nodes was inconsistent with
what is listed in nodes.h, so make the order consistent at the same time
to ease future checks and additions.
Author: Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBQMLoc=ohH-oocuAPsELrmk8_EsRJjOyR8FQLZkbE0wA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Instead of MergeAppendPath, MergeAppend nodes were considered. This
code is not covered by any tests now, which should be addressed at some
point.
This is an oversight from f49842d, which introduced partition-wise joins
in v11, so back-patch down to that.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180718062202.GC8565@paquier.xyz
|
|
This script supposed that if it turned hot_standby_feedback on and then
shut down the standby server, at least one feedback message would be
guaranteed to be sent before the standby stops. But there is no such
guarantee, if the standby's walreceiver process is slow enough --- and
we've seen multiple failures in the buildfarm showing that that does
happen in practice. While we could rearrange the walreceiver logic to
make it less likely, it seems probably impossible to create a really
bulletproof guarantee of that sort; and if we tried, we might create
situations where the walreceiver wouldn't react in a timely manner to
shutdown commands. It seems better instead to remove the script's
assumption that feedback will occur before shutdown.
But once we do that, these last few tests seem quite redundant with
the earlier tests in the script. So let's just drop them altogether
and save some buildfarm cycles.
Backpatch to v10 where these tests were added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1922.1531592205@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
The initial version of the included-index-column feature stated that
included columns couldn't be the same as any key column of the index.
While it'd be pretty silly to do that, since the included column would be
entirely redundant, we've never prohibited redundant index columns before
so it's not very consistent to do so here. Moreover, the prohibition
was itself badly implemented, so that it failed to reject columns that
were effectively identical but not spelled quite alike, as reported by
Aditya Toshniwal.
(Moreover, it's not hard to imagine that for some non-btree index types,
such cases would be non-silly anyhow: the index might use a lossy
representation for key columns but be able to support retrieval of the
original form of included columns.)
Hence, let's just drop the prohibition.
In passing, do some copy-editing on the documentation for the
included-column feature.
Yugo Nagata; documentation and test corrections by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAM9w-_mhBCys4fQNfaiQKTRrVWtoFrZ-wXmDuE9Nj5y-Y7aDKQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Historically, we've allowed auxiliary processes to take buffer pins without
tracking them in a ResourceOwner. However, that creates problems for error
recovery. In particular, we've seen multiple reports of assertion crashes
in the startup process when it gets an error while holding a buffer pin,
as for example if it gets ENOSPC during a write. In a non-assert build,
the process would simply exit without releasing the pin at all. We've
gotten away with that so far just because a failure exit of the startup
process translates to a database crash anyhow; but any similar behavior
in other aux processes could result in stuck pins and subsequent problems
in vacuum.
To improve this, institute a policy that we must *always* have a resowner
backing any attempt to pin a buffer, which we can enforce just by removing
the previous special-case code in resowner.c. Add infrastructure to make
it easy to create a process-lifespan AuxProcessResourceOwner and clear
out its contents at appropriate times. Replace existing ad-hoc resowner
management in bgwriter.c and other aux processes with that. (Thus, while
the startup process gains a resowner where it had none at all before, some
other aux process types are replacing an ad-hoc resowner with this code.)
Also use the AuxProcessResourceOwner to manage buffer pins taken during
StartupXLOG and ShutdownXLOG, even when those are being run in a bootstrap
process or a standalone backend rather than a true auxiliary process.
In passing, remove some other ad-hoc resource owner creations that had
gotten cargo-culted into various other places. As far as I can tell
that was all unnecessary, and if it had been necessary it was incomplete,
due to lacking any provision for clearing those resowners later.
(Also worth noting in this connection is that a process that hasn't called
InitBufferPoolBackend has no business accessing buffers; so there's more
to do than just add the resowner if we want to touch buffers in processes
not covered by this patch.)
Although this fixes a very old bug, no back-patch, because there's no
evidence of any significant problem in non-assert builds.
Patch by me, pursuant to a report from Justin Pryzby. Thanks to
Robert Haas and Kyotaro Horiguchi for reviews.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180627233939.GA10276@telsasoft.com
|
|
A collection of typos I happened to spot while reading code, as well as
grepping for common mistakes.
Backpatch to all supported versions, as applicable, to avoid conflicts
when backporting other commits in the future.
|
|
This should tame the beast, as there are no other places where off_t is
used in the new error messages.
Reported again by longfin, which complained about walsender.c while I
spotted the other two ones while double-checking.
|
|
This error from from 811b6e3, which causes compilation warnings with OSX
10.3 and clang.
Reported by Tom Lane, via buildfarm member longfin.
|
|
Some error messages related to file handling are using the code path
context to define their state. For example, 2PC-related errors are
referring to "two-phase status files", or "relation mapping file" is
used for catalog-to-filenode mapping, however those prove to be
difficult to translate, and are not more helpful than just referring to
the path of the file being worked on. So simplify all those error
messages by just referring to files with their path used. In some
cases, like the manipulation of WAL segments, the context is actually
helpful so those are kept.
Calls to the system function read() have also been rather inconsistent
with their error handling sometimes not reporting the number of bytes
read, and some other code paths trying to use an errno which has not
been set. The in-core functions are using a more consistent pattern
with this patch, which checks for both errno if set or if an
inconsistent read is happening.
So as to care about pluralization when reading an unexpected number of
byte(s), "could not read: read %d of %zu" is used as error message, with
%d field being the output result of read() and %zu the expected size.
This simplifies the work of translators with less variations of the same
message.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180520000522.GB1603@paquier.xyz
|
|
Getting a pg_index tuple from syscache when the open index relation is
available is pointless -- just use the one from relcache.
Noticed while reviewing code for cb9db2ab0674.
No backpatch.
|
|
The existing error message was complaining that the column is not an
expression, which is not correct. Introduce a suitable wording
variation and a test.
Co-authored-by: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180628182803.e4632d5a.nagata@sraoss.co.jp
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
|
|
The original code was unable to prune partitions that could not possibly
contain NULL values, when the query specified less than all columns in a
multicolumn partition key. Reorder the if-tests so that it is, and add
more commentary and regression tests.
Reported-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Co-authored-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFjFpRc7qjLUfXLVBBC_HAnx644sjTYM=qVoT3TJ840HPbsTXw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Since the old logic was completely unaware of subtransactions, a
change made in a subsequently-aborted subtransaction would still cause
workers to be stopped at toplevel transaction commit. Fix that by
managing a stack of worker lists rather than just one.
Amit Khandekar and Robert Haas
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9eaG_mWqiOTA2LfAug-VRNn1hrhf50Xi1YroxL37QkZNg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This allows overriding the choice of custom or generic plan.
Author: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAFj8pRAGLaiEm8ur5DWEBo7qHRWTk9HxkuUAz00CZZtJj-LkCA%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Update links that resulted in redirects. Most are changes from http to
https, but there are also some other minor edits. (There are still some
redirects where the target URL looks less elegant than the one we
currently have. I have left those as is.)
|
|
In final_cost_hashjoin(), commit 9c7f5229a allowed inner_unique cases
to follow a code path previously used only for SEMI/ANTI joins; but it
neglected to fix an if-test within that path that assumed SEMI and ANTI
were the only possible cases. This resulted in a wrong value for
hashjointuples, and an ensuing bad cost estimate, for inner_unique normal
joins. Fortunately, for inner_unique normal joins we can assume the number
of joined tuples is the same as for a SEMI join; so there's no need for
more code, we just have to invert the test to check for ANTI not SEMI.
It turns out that in two contrib tests in which commit 9c7f5229a
changed the plan expected for a query, the change was actually wrong
and induced by this estimation error, not by any real improvement.
Hence this patch also reverts those changes.
Per report from RK Korlapati. Backpatch to v10 where the error was
introduced.
David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+SNy03bhq0fodsfOkeWDCreNjJVjsdHwUsb7AG=jpe0PtZc_g@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Now that the documentation sources are in XML rather than SGML, some of
the documentation about the editor, or more specifically Emacs, setup
needs updating. The updated instructions recommend using nxml-mode,
which works mostly out of the box, with some small tweaks in
emacs.samples and .dir-locals.el.
Also remove some obsolete stuff in .dir-locals.el. I did, however,
leave the sgml-mode settings in there so that someone using Emacs
without emacs.samples gets those settings when editing a *.sgml file.
|
|
As of commit 37a795a60, populate_recordset_worker() tried to pass back
(as rsi.setDesc) a tupdesc that it also had cached in its fn_extra.
But the core executor would free the passed-back tupdesc, risking a
crash if the function were called again in the same query. The safest
and least invasive way to fix that is to make an extra tupdesc copy
to pass back.
While at it, I failed to resist the temptation to get rid of unnecessary
get_fn_expr_argtype() calls here and in populate_record_worker().
Per report from Dmitry Dolgov; thanks to Michael Paquier and
Andrew Gierth for investigation and discussion.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+q6zcWzN9ztCfR47ZwgTr1KLnuO6BAY6FurxXhovP4hxr+yOQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The patch that ended up as commit 3de241dba86f ("Foreign keys on
partitioned tables") lacked pg_dump tests, so the pg_dump code that was
there to support it inadvertently stopped working when in later
development I modified the backend code not to emit pg_trigger rows for
the partitioned table itself.
Bug analysis and code fix is by Michaël. I (Álvaro) added the test.
Reported-by: amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b94n=UsNVhgs97vCaWEZAMe-tGDRVuZ73oePQH=eaJKGSA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Previously convert_tuples_by_name_map naively performed a search of each
outdesc column starting at the first column in indesc and searched each
indesc column until a match was found. When partitioned tables had many
columns this could result in slow generation of the tuple conversion maps.
For INSERT and UPDATE statements that touched few rows, this could mean a
very large overhead indeed.
We can do a bit better with this loop. It's quite likely that the columns
in partitioned tables and their partitions are in the same order, so it
makes sense to start searching for each column outer column at the inner
column position 1 after where the previous match was found (per idea from
Alexander Kuzmenkov). This makes the best case search O(N) instead of
O(N^2). The worst case is still O(N^2), but it seems unlikely that would
happen.
Likewise, in the planner, make_inh_translation_list's search for the
matching column could often end up falling back on an O(N^2) type search.
This commit also improves that by first checking the column that follows
the previous match, instead of the column with the same attnum. If we
fail to match here we fallback on the syscache's hashtable lookup.
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Alexander Kuzmenkov
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKJS1f9-wijVgMdRp6_qDMEQDJJ%2BA_n%3DxzZuTmLx5Fz6cwf%2B8A%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
When reading an existing FSM or VM page that was found to be corrupt by the
buffer manager, the code applied PageInit() to reinitialize the page, but
did so without any locking. There is thus a hazard that two backends might
concurrently do PageInit, which in itself would still be OK, but the slower
one might then zero over subsequent data changes applied by the faster one.
Even that is unlikely to be fatal; but it's not desirable, so add locking
to prevent it.
This does not add any locking overhead in the normal code path where the
page is OK. It's not immediately obvious that that's safe, but I believe
it is, for reasons explained in the added comments.
Problem noted by R P Asim. It's been like this for a long time, so
back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANXE4Te4G0TGq6cr0-TvwP0H4BNiK_-hB5gHe8mF+nz0mcYfMQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Starting and aborting transactions in security definer procedures
doesn't work. StartTransaction() insists that the security context
stack is empty, so this would currently cause a crash, and
AbortTransaction() resets it. This could be made to work by
reorganizing the code, but right now we just prohibit it.
Reported-by: amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAAJ_b96Gupt_LFL7uNyy3c50-wbhA68NUjiK5%3DrF6_w%3Dpq_T%3DQ%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
The scripts and instructions have been nonfunctional at least since
PostgreSQL 10 (commit 510074f9f0131a04322d6a3d2a51c87e6db243f9) and
nobody has stepped up to fix them. So right now just remove them until
someone wants to resurrect them.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/B74C0219-6BA9-46E1-A524-5B9E8CD3BDB3%40yesql.se
|
|
If the authentication method modified the system catalogs through a
separate database connection (say, to create a new role on the fly),
make sure syscache sees the changes before we try to find the user.
Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D3_h0_cgmz5PMyab4xk_OFrg6G5VCN%3DnF4chFXM9iFOqA%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
When dumping INSERT statements, optionally add ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING.
Author: Surafel Temesgen
Reviewed-by: Takeshi Ideriha, Nico Williams, Dilip Kumar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALAY4q-PQ9cOEzs2%2BQHK5ObfF_4QbmBaYXbZx6BGGN66Q-n8FA%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
All attributes and arguments using a slot name map to the data type
"name", but this function has been using "text". This is cosmetic, as
even if text is used then the slot name would be truncated to 64
characters anyway and stored as such. The documentation already said
so and the function already assumed that the argument was of this type
when fetching its value.
Bump catalog version.
Author: Sawada Masahiko
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoADYz_-eAqH5AVFaCaojcRgwpo9PW=u8kgTMys63oB8Cw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Temporary WAL segments are created in pg_wal and named as xlogtemp.pid
before being renamed to the real deal when creating a new segment. If
an instance crashes after the temporary segment is created and before
the rename is done, then the server would finish with unremovable data.
After an instance crash, scan pg_wal and remove any such segments. With
repetitive unlucky crashes this would contribute to disk bloat and
presents risks of ENOSPC especially with max_wal_size close to the
maximum allowed.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Yugo Nagata, Heikki Linnakangas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180514054955.GF1528@paquier.xyz
|
|
In ad9a274778d2d88c46b90309212b92ee7fdf9afe, shmem_exit_inprogress was
introduced. But we need to reset it after shmem_exit(), because unlike
the similar proc_exit(), shmem_exit() can also be called for cleanup
when the process will not exit.
Reported-by: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
|
|
When truncating a table that is referenced by foreign keys in
partitioned tables, the check to ensure the referencing table are also
truncated spuriously failed. This is because it was relying on
relhastriggers as a proxy for the table having FKs, and that's wrong for
partitioned tables. Fix it to consider such tables separately. There
may be a better way ... but this code is pretty inefficient already.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquiër <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180711000624.zmeizicibxeehhsg@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
|
|
For the moment, this just records which system catalogs have toast
tables right now. Future patches will possibly change that set.
from Tom Lane via Joe Conway
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/84ddff04-f122-784b-b6c5-3536804495f8@joeconway.com/
|
|
An update that causes the tuple to be moved to a different partition was
missing out on re-constructing the to-be-updated tuple, based on the latest
tuple in the update chain. Instead, it's simply deleting the latest tuple
and inserting a new tuple in the new partition based on the old tuple.
Commit 2f17844104 didn't consider this case, so some of the updates were
getting lost.
In passing, change the argument order for output parameter in ExecDelete
and add some commentary about it.
Reported-by: Pavan Deolasee
Author: Amit Khandekar, with minor changes by me
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Amit Kapila and Alvaro Herrera
Backpatch-through: 11
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9fRbEzDqdeDq1jxqZUb47kJn+tQ7=Bcgjc8quqKsDViKQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
When it comes to SELECT ... FOR or LOCK, NOWAIT means to not wait for
something to happen, and issue an error. SKIP LOCKED means to not wait
for something to happen but to move on without issuing an error. The
internal option of autovacuum and autoanalyze mentioned above, used only
when wraparound is not involved was named NOWAIT, but behaves like SKIP
LOCKED which is confusing.
Author: Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180307050345.GA3095@paquier.xyz
|
|
The code path where the assertion is added helps to check that
autovacuum always includes a relation OID when doing a vacuum on it.
Extracted from a larger patch set to add support for SKIP LOCKED with
manual VACUUM commands.
Author: Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9EF7EBE4-720D-4CF1-9D0E-4403D7E92990@amazon.com
|
|
WAL senders sending logically-decoded data fail to properly report in
"streaming" state when starting up, hence as long as one extra record is
not replayed, such WAL senders would remain in a "catchup" state, which
is inconsistent with the physical cousin.
This can be easily reproduced by for example using pg_recvlogical and
restarting the upstream server. The TAP tests have been slightly
modified to detect the failure and strengthened so as future tests also
make sure that a node is in streaming state when waiting for its
catchup.
Backpatch down to 9.4 where this code has been introduced.
Reported-by: Sawada Masahiko
Author: Simon Riggs, Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Petr Jelinek, Michael Paquier, Vaishnavi Prabakaran
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoB2ZbCCqOx=bgKMcLrAvs1V0ZMqzs7wBTuDySezTGtMZA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Generally, if the comparison operators for a datatype or pair of datatypes
are leakproof, the corresponding btree comparison support function can be
considered so as well. But we had not originally worried about marking
support functions as leakproof, reasoning that they'd not likely be used in
queries so the marking wouldn't matter. It turns out there's at least one
place where it does matter: calc_arraycontsel() finds the target datatype's
default btree comparison function and tries to use that to estimate
selectivity, but it will be blocked in some cases if the function isn't
leakproof. This leads to unnecessarily poor selectivity estimates and bad
plans, as seen in bug #15251.
Hence, run around and apply proleakproof markings where the corresponding
btree comparison operators are leakproof. (I did eyeball each function
to verify that it wasn't doing anything surprising, too.)
This isn't a full solution to bug #15251, and it's not back-patchable
because of the need for a catversion bump. A more useful response probably
is to consider whether we can check permissions on the parent table instead
of the child. However, this change will help in some cases where that
won't, and it's easy enough to do in HEAD, so let's do so.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3876.1531261875@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
We should only run apply_pathtarget_labeling_to_tlist if CP_LABEL_TLIST
was specified, because only in that case has use_physical_tlist checked
that the labeling will succeed; otherwise we may get an "ORDER/GROUP BY
expression not found in targetlist" error. (This subsumes the previous
test about gating_clauses, because we reset "flags" to zero earlier
if there are gating clauses to apply.)
The only known case in which a failure can occur is with a ProjectSet
path directly atop a table scan path, although it seems likely that there
are other cases or will be such in future. This means that the failure
is currently only visible in the v10 branch: 9.6 didn't have ProjectSet,
while in v11 and HEAD, apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths for some weird
reason is using create_projection_path not apply_projection_to_path,
masking the problem because there's a ProjectionPath in between.
Nonetheless this code is clearly wrong on its own terms, so back-patch
to 9.6 where this logic was introduced.
Per report from Regina Obe.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/001501d40f88$75186950$5f493bf0$@pcorp.us
|
|
nodeWindowAgg.c failed to cope with the possibility that no ordering
columns are defined in the window frame for GROUPS mode or RANGE OFFSET
mode, leading to assertion failures or odd errors, as reported by Masahiko
Sawada and Lukas Eder. In RANGE OFFSET mode, an ordering column is really
required, so add an Assert about that. In GROUPS mode, the code would
work, except that the node initialization code wasn't in sync with the
execution code about when to set up tuplestore read pointers and spare
slots. Fix the latter for consistency's sake (even though I think the
changes described below make the out-of-sync cases unreachable for now).
Per SQL spec, a single ordering column is required for RANGE OFFSET mode,
and at least one ordering column is required for GROUPS mode. The parser
enforced the former but not the latter; add a check for that.
We were able to reach the no-ordering-column cases even with fully spec
compliant queries, though, because the planner would drop partitioning
and ordering columns from the generated plan if they were redundant with
earlier columns according to the redundant-pathkey logic, for instance
"PARTITION BY x ORDER BY y" in the presence of a "WHERE x=y" qual.
While in principle that's an optimization that could save some pointless
comparisons at runtime, it seems unlikely to be meaningful in the real
world. I think this behavior was not so much an intentional optimization
as a side-effect of an ancient decision to construct the plan node's
ordering-column info by reverse-engineering the PathKeys of the input
path. If we give up redundant-column removal then it takes very little
code to generate the plan node info directly from the WindowClause,
ensuring that we have the expected number of ordering columns in all
cases. (If anyone does complain about this, the planner could perhaps
be taught to remove redundant columns only when it's safe to do so,
ie *not* in RANGE OFFSET mode. But I doubt anyone ever will.)
With these changes, the WindowAggPath.winpathkeys field is not used for
anything anymore, so remove it.
The test cases added here are not actually very interesting given the
removal of the redundant-column-removal logic, but they would represent
important corner cases if anyone ever tries to put that back.
Tom Lane and Masahiko Sawada. Back-patch to v11 where RANGE OFFSET
and GROUPS modes were added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDrWqycq-w_+Bx1cjc+YUhZ11XTj9rfxNiNDojjBx8Fjw@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/153086788677.17476.8002640580496698831@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
It appears that there are more files, whose header comment paths are
wrong. So, fix those paths. No backpatching per proposal of Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsJyYbOj59MOQL%2B4XxdcomLSLfLqBtAvwR%2BpsCqj3ELdQ%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
We include <float.h> in every place that needs isnan(), because MSVC
used to require it. However, since MSVC 2013 that's no longer necessary
(cf. commit cec8394b5ccd), so we can retire the inclusion to a
version-specific stanza in win32_port.h, where it doesn't need to
pollute random .c files. The header is of course still needed in a few
places for other reasons.
I (Álvaro) removed float.h from a few more files than in Emre's original
patch. This doesn't break the build in my system, but we'll see what
the buildfarm has to say about it all.
Author: Emre Hasegeli
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAE2gYzyc0+5uG+Cd9-BSL7NKC8LSHLNg1Aq2=8ubjnUwut4_iw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Header comment of shm_mq.c was mistakenly specifying path to shm_mq.h.
It was introduced in ec9037df. So, theoretically it could be
backpatched to 9.4, but it doesn't seem to worth it.
|
|
Use FreeBSD 11.2's new support for detecting parent process death to
make PostmasterIsAlive() very cheap, as was done for Linux in an
earlier commit.
Author: Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7261eb39-0369-f2f4-1bb5-62f3b6083b5e@iki.fi
|
|
Linux provides a way to ask for a signal when your parent process dies.
Use that to make PostmasterIsAlive() very cheap.
Based on a suggestion from Andres Freund.
Author: Thomas Munro, Heikki Linnakangas
Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7261eb39-0369-f2f4-1bb5-62f3b6083b5e%40iki.fi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180411002643.6buofht4ranhei7k%40alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Such replication slots are physical slots freshly created without WAL
being reserved, which is the default behavior, which have not been used
yet as WAL consumption resources to retain WAL. This prevents advancing
a slot to a position older than any WAL available, which could falsify
calculations for WAL segment recycling.
This also cleans up a bit the code, as ReplicationSlotRelease() would be
called on ERROR, and improves error messages.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Álvaro Herrera, Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180626071305.GH31353@paquier.xyz
|
|
We fail to handle polymorphic types properly when they are used as
partition keys: we were unnecessarily adding a RelabelType node on top,
which confuses code examining the nodes. In particular, this makes
predtest.c-based partition pruning not to work, and ruleutils.c to emit
expressions that are uglier than needed. Fix it by not adding RelabelType
when not needed.
In master/11 the new pruning code is separate so it doesn't suffer from
this problem, since we already fixed it (in essentially the same way) in
e5dcbb88a15d, which also added a few tests; back-patch those tests to
pg10 also. But since UPDATE/DELETE still uses predtest.c in pg11, this
change improves partitioning for those cases too. Add tests for this.
The ruleutils.c behavior change is relevant in pg11/master too.
Co-authored-by: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/54745d13-7ed4-54ac-97d8-ea1eec95ae25@lab.ntt.co.jp
|
|
PostgreSQL nowadays offers some kind of dynamic shared memory feature on
all supported platforms. Having the choice of "none" prevents us from
relying on DSM in core features. So this patch removes the choice of
"none".
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
|
|
The EEOP_INNER_SYSVAR and EEOP_OUTER_SYSVAR executor opcodes are not
exercised by normal queries, because setrefs.c will resolve the references
to system columns in the scan nodes already. Join nodes refer to them by
their position in the child node's target list, like user columns.
The only place where those opcodes are used, is in evaluating a trigger's
WHEN condition that references system columns. Trigger evaluation abuses
the INNER/OUTER Vars to refer to the OLD and NEW tuples. The code to handle
the opcodes is pretty straightforward, but it seems like a good idea to
have some test coverage for them, anyway, so that they don't get removed or
broken by accident.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat, with some changes by me.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRerUFX=T0nSnCoroXAJMoo-xah9J+pi7+xDUx86PtQmew@mail.gmail.com
|
