| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When a partition is detached, any triggers that had been cloned from its
parent were not properly disentangled from its parent triggers.
This resulted in triggers that could not be dropped because they
depended on the trigger in the trigger in the no-longer-parent table:
ALTER TABLE t DETACH PARTITION t1;
DROP TRIGGER trig ON t1;
ERROR: cannot drop trigger trig on table t1 because trigger trig on table t requires it
HINT: You can drop trigger trig on table t instead.
Moreover the table can no longer be re-attached to its parent, because
the trigger name is already taken:
ALTER TABLE t ATTACH PARTITION t1 FOR VALUES FROM (1)TO(2);
ERROR: trigger "trig" for relation "t1" already exists
The former is a bug introduced in commit 86f575948c77. (The latter is
not necessarily a bug, but it makes the bug more uncomfortable.)
To avoid the complexity that would be needed to tell whether the trigger
has a local definition that has to be merged with the one coming from
the parent table, establish the behavior that the trigger is removed
when the table is detached.
Backpatch to pg11.
Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20200408152412.GZ2228@telsasoft.com
|
|
Commit 0d861bbb, which introduced deduplication to nbtree, added some
logic to take large posting list tuples into account when choosing a
split point. We subtract firstright posting list overhead from the
projected new high key size when calculating leftfree/rightfree values
for an affected candidate split point. Posting list tuples aren't
special to nbtsplitloc.c, but taking them into account like this makes a
huge difference in practice. Posting list tuples are frequently tuple
size outliers.
However, commit 0d861bbb missed a closely related issue: split interval
itself is calculated based on the assumption that tuples on the page
being split are roughly equisized. That assumption was acceptable back
when commit fab25024 taught the logic for choosing a split point about
suffix truncation, but it's pretty questionable now that very large
tuple sizes are common. This oversight led to unbalanced page splits in
low cardinality multi-column indexes when deduplication was used: page
splits that don't give sufficient weight to how unbalanced the split is
when the interval happens to include some large posting list tuples (and
when most other tuples on the page are not so large).
Nail this down by calculating an initial split interval in a way that's
attuned to the actual cost that we want to keep under control (not a
fuzzy proxy for the cost): apply a leftfree + rightfree evenness test to
each candidate split point that actually gets included in the split
interval (for the default strategy). This replaces logic that used a
percentage of all legal split points for the page as the basis of the
initial split interval.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt5aT2uUB2Bs+JBLdwe0XTX67+xeLFcaNvCKxO=QBVQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Although selfuncs.c will never call a target operator with null inputs,
some functions might return null anyway. The existing coding will fail
if that happens (since FunctionCall2Coll will punt), which seems
undesirable given that matchingsel() has such a broad range of potential
applicability --- in fact, we already have a problem because we apply it
to jsonb_path_exists_opr, which can return null. Hence, rejigger the
underlying functions mcv_selectivity and histogram_selectivity to cope,
treating a null result as false.
While we are at it, we can move the InitFunctionCallInfoData overhead
out of the inner loops, which isn't a huge number of cycles but might
save something considering we are likely calling functions as cheap
as int4eq(). Plus, the number of loop cycles to be expected is much
more than it was when this code was written, since typical settings
of default_statistics_target are higher.
In view of that consideration, let's apply the same change to
var_eq_const, eqjoinsel_inner, and eqjoinsel_semi. We do not expect
equality functions to ever return null for non-null inputs (and
certainly that code has been that way a long time without complaints),
but the cycle savings seem attractive, especially in the eqjoinsel loops
where there's potentially an O(N^2) savings.
Similar code exists in ineq_histogram_selectivity and
get_variable_range, but I forebore from changing those for now.
The performance argument for changing ineq_histogram_selectivity
is really weak anyway, since that will only iterate log2(N) times.
Nikita Glukhov and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9d3b0959-95d6-c37e-2c0b-287bcfe5c705@postgrespro.ru
|
|
"operator" is a reserved word in C++, so per project conventions,
don't use it as an identifier in header files.
My oversight in commit a80818605.
|
|
Older gcc versions don't like duplicate typedefs, so get rid of
that in favor of doing it like we do it elsewhere, ie just use
a "struct" declaration when trying to avoid importing a whole
header file.
Also, there seems no reason to include stringinfo.h here at all,
so get rid of that addition too.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/27239.1587415696@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
basebackup.c is already a pretty big and complicated file, so it
makes more sense to keep the backup manifest support routines
in a separate file, for clarity and ease of maintenance.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoavRak5OdP76P8eJExDYhPEKWjMb0sxW7dF01dWFgE=uA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
... as added in the prior commit.
(We'd like to have tab-completion for the other object types too, but
they don't have sub-command completion yet.)
Author: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALtqXTcogrFEVP9uou5vFtnGsn+vHZUu9+9a0inarfYVOHScYQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Commit f2fcad27d59c (9.6 era) added the ability to mark objects as
dependent an extension, but forgot to add a way for such dependencies to
be removed. This commit fixes that oversight.
Strictly speaking this should be backpatched to 9.6, but due to lack of
demand we're not doing so at this time.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200217225333.GA30974@alvherre.pgsql
Reviewed-by: ahsan hadi <ahsan.hadi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
|
|
The views pg_stat_progress_* had not gotten the memo that
pg_read_all_stats is supposed to be able to read all statistics. Also
make a pass over all text-returning pg_stat_xyz functions that could
return "insufficient privilege" and make sure they also respect
pg_read_all_status.
Reported-by: Andrey M. Borodin
Reviewed-by: Andrey M. Borodin, Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/13145F2F-8458-4977-9D2D-7B2E862E5722@yandex-team.ru
|
|
|
|
The normalization-check target needs to be run last, after moving the
newly generated files into place. Also, we need an additional
dependency so that unicode_norm.o is rebuilt first. Otherwise,
norm_test will still test the old files but against the new expected
results, which will probably fail.
|
|
We have repeatedly seen the buildfarm reach the Assert(false) in
SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority. This apparently is due to failing to
consider the possibility that the sync_standby_priority values in
shared memory might be inconsistent; but they will be whenever only
some of the walsenders have updated their values after a change in
the synchronous_standby_names setting. That function is vastly too
complex for what it does, anyway, so rewriting it seems better than
trying to apply a band-aid fix.
Furthermore, the API of SyncRepGetSyncStandbys is broken by design:
it returns a list of WalSnd array indexes, but there is nothing
guaranteeing that the contents of the WalSnd array remain stable.
Thus, if some walsender exits and then a new walsender process
takes over that WalSnd array slot, a caller might make use of
WAL position data that it should not, potentially leading to
incorrect decisions about whether to release transactions that
are waiting for synchronous commit.
To fix, replace SyncRepGetSyncStandbys with a new function
SyncRepGetCandidateStandbys that copies all the required data
from shared memory while holding the relevant mutexes. If the
associated walsender process then exits, this data is still safe to
make release decisions with, since we know that that much WAL *was*
sent to a valid standby server. This incidentally means that we no
longer need to treat sync_standby_priority as protected by the
SyncRepLock rather than the per-walsender mutex.
SyncRepGetSyncStandbys is no longer used by the core code, so remove
it entirely in HEAD. However, it seems possible that external code is
relying on that function, so do not remove it from the back branches.
Instead, just remove the known-incorrect Assert. When the bug occurs,
the function will return a too-short list, which callers should treat
as meaning there are not enough sync standbys, which seems like a
reasonably safe fallback until the inconsistent state is resolved.
Moreover it's bug-compatible with what has been happening in non-assert
builds. We cannot do anything about the walsender-replacement race
condition without an API/ABI break.
The bogus assertion exists back to 9.6, but 9.6 is sufficiently
different from the later branches that the patch doesn't apply at all.
I chose to just remove the bogus assertion in 9.6, feeling that the
probability of a bad outcome from the walsender-replacement race
condition is too low to justify rewriting the whole patch for 9.6.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21519.1585272409@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
In some corner cases, this could also lead to corrupted values being
included in the tuple.
Users who are concerned that they are affected by this should first
upgrade and then perform a base backup of their database and restore onto
an off-line server. They should then query each table with generated
columns to ensure there are no rows where the generated expression does
not match a newly calculated version of the GENERATED ALWAYS expression.
If no crashes occur and no rows are returned then you're not affected.
Fixes bug #16369.
Reported-by: Cameron Ezell
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16369-5845a6f1bef59884@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12 (where GENERATED ALWAYS columns were added.)
|
|
This reverts commit 9e24109f1a4e4d8d1d372b004d6a0dd06e673fe7.
This caused build errors when building without openssl, and it's
simplest just to revert it.
|
|
This should have been protected by #ifdef USE_OPENSSL in commit
896fcdb230.
Per the real complaint this time from Daniel Gustafsson.
|
|
Apparently in some language versions of Visual Studio nmake outputs some
material after the version number and before the end of the line. This
has been seen in Chinese versions. Therefore, we no longer demand that
the version string comes at the end of a line.
Per complaint from Cuiping Lin.
Backpatch to all live branches.
|
|
In commit 4dc6355210 I neglected to put #ifdef USE_OPENSSL around the
declarations of the new items. This is remedied here.
Per complaint from Daniel Gustafsson.
|
|
recordExtObjInitPriv and removeExtObjInitPriv were sloppy about
calling ReleaseSysCache. The cases cannot occur given current usage
in ALTER EXTENSION ADD/DROP, since we wouldn't get here for these
relkinds; but it seems wise to clean up better.
In passing, extend test logic in test_pg_dump to exercise the
dropped-column code paths here.
Since the case is unreachable at present, there seems no great
need to back-patch; hence fix HEAD only.
Kyotaro Horiguchi, with test case and comment adjustments by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200417.151831.1153577605111650154.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
|
The result of the query used to retrieve the WAL segment size from the
backend was not getting freed in two code paths. Both pg_basebackup and
pg_receivewal exit immediately if a failure happened on this query, so
this was not an actual problem, but it could be an issue if this code
gets used for other tools in different ways, be they future tools in
this code tree or external, existing, ones.
Oversight in commit fc49e24, so backpatch down to 11.
Author: Jie Zhang
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/970ad9508461469b9450b64027842331@G08CNEXMBPEKD06.g08.fujitsu.local
Backpatch-through: 11
|
|
It was previously thought that remove_useless_groupby_columns() needed to
keep track of which constraints the generated plan depended upon, however,
this is unnecessary. The confusion likely arose regarding this because of
check_functional_grouping(), which does need to track the dependency to
ensure VIEWs with columns which are functionally dependant on the GROUP BY
remain so. For remove_useless_groupby_columns(), cached plans will just
become invalidated when the primary key's underlying index is removed
through the normal relcache invalidation code.
Here we just remove the unneeded code which records the dependency and
updates the comments. The previous comments claimed that we could not use
UNIQUE constraints for the same optimization due to lack of a
pg_constraint record for NOT NULL constraints (which are required because
NULLs can be duplicated in a unique index). Since we don't actually need a
pg_constraint record to handle the invalidation, it looks like we could
add code to do this in the future. But not today.
We're not really fixing any bug in the code here, this fix is just to set
the record straight on UNIQUE constraints. This code was added back in
9.6, but due to lack of any bug, we'll not be backpatching this.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrdYa=VhOoMe4ZZjZ-G4ALnD-xuAeUNCRTL+PYMVN8OnQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Earlier we were inconsistent in allowing the usage of parallel and
full options. Change it such that we disallow them only when they are
combined in a way that we don't support.
In passing, improve the comments in some of the existing tests of parallel
vacuum.
Reported-by: Tushar Ahuja
Author: Justin Pryzby, Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko, Michael Paquier, Mahendra Singh Thalor and
Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/58c8d171-e665-6fa3-a9d3-d9423b694dae%40enterprisedb.com
|
|
Since 0d8c9c1, pg_basebackup would generate an error if connected to a
backend version older than 12 where backup manifests are not supported.
Avoiding this error is possible by using the --no-manifest option.
This error handling could be confusing for some users, where patching a
backup script that interacts with multiple backend versions would cause
the addition of --no-manifest to potentially not generate a backup
manifest even for Postgres 13 and newer versions. As we want to
encourage the use of backup manifests as much as possible, this commit
silently disables manifests where not supported, instead of generating
an error.
While on it, rework a bit the code to make it more consistent with the
surroundings when generating the BASE_BACKUP command.
Per discussion with Andres Freund, Stephen Frost, Robert Haas, Álvaro
Herrera, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Tom Lane, David Steele, and me.
Author: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200410080910.GZ1606@paquier.xyz
|
|
Spotted during post-commit review of the nbtree deduplication commit
(commit 0d861bbb).
|
|
A query used to read default ACL information from the catalogs did not
free a set of PQExpBuffer.
Oversight in commit e2090d9, so backpatch down to 9.6.
Author: Jie Zhang
Reviewed-by: Sawada Masahiko
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/05bcbc5857f948efa0b451b85a48ae10@G08CNEXMBPEKD06.g08.fujitsu.local
Backpatch-through: 9.6
|
|
This commit prevents pg_basebackup from receiving backup_manifest file
when --no-manifest is specified. Previously, when pg_basebackup was
writing a tarfile to stdout, it tried to receive backup_manifest file even
when --no-manifest was specified, and reported an error.
Also remove unused -m option from pg_basebackup.
Also fix typo in BASE_BACKUP command documentation.
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/01e3ed3a-8729-5aaa-ca84-e60e3ca59db8@oss.nttdata.com
|
|
A comment from the Berkeley days incorrectly claimed that the page
management code cares about the contents of the hole in the center of
the page (at least in the case of the left half of an nbtree page
split). Commit 8fa30f906be added an addendum that stated that the
original comment was "probably obsolete". It's definitely obsolete,
though, so remove the original comment plus the addendum.
|
|
Commit 913bbd88d overlooked that the result of coerce_to_target_type
might need collation fixups. Per report from Andreas Joseph Krogh.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/VisenaEmail.72.37d08ec2b8cb8fb5.17179940cd3@tc7-visena
|
|
The consensus of the project appears to be that this provides little
benefit and is simply an annoyance.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/27481.1586618092@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Back in commits 1df92eeafe, f884a96819, and 592123efbb I used some
hackish code to set the script search path, unaware despite decades of
perl that there was a completely standard way to do this. This patch
changes those cases to use the standard perl FindBin package.
|
|
Nest the "update metapage as part of insert into root-like page" branch
inside the broader "insert into internal page" branch. This improves
readability.
|
|
This fixes some comments and documentation new as of Postgres 13, and is
a follow-up of the work done in dd0f37e.
Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200408165653.GF2228@telsasoft.com
|
|
Clearly it's not okay for nbtree to split a page that is the only page
on its level, and then find that it has to split the parent one level up
in turn. There is simply no code to handle the split_only_page case in
the _bt_insertonpg() "newitem won't fit" branch (only the "newitem fits"
branch handles split_only_page). Add a defensive assertion that will
fail if a split_only_page call to _bt_insertonpg() somehow ends up
splitting the target/parent page.
I (pgeoghegan) believe that we don't need split_only_page handling for
the "newitem won't fit" branch because anybody calling _bt_insertonpg()
like this would have to hold a lock on the same one and only child page.
|
|
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby
Author: Justin Pryzby, with few changes by me
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Sawada Masahiko
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200322021801.GB2563@telsasoft.com
|
|
It seems like a good idea for nbtree's retail insert code to be
absolutely consistent with nbtree's page split code for anything that
naturally requires equivalent handling. Anything that concerns
inserting newitem (which is handled as part of the page split atomic
action when a page split is required) should work in exactly the same
way. With that in mind, make _bt_insertonpg() handle 'cbuf' in a way
that matches _bt_split().
|
|
Per buildfarm member hoverfly, a slow walsender could make the test
fail. Back-patch to v10, where the test was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200414013849.GA886648@rfd.leadboat.com
|
|
An nbtree split point can be thought of as a point between two adjoining
tuples from an imaginary version of the page being split that includes
the incoming/new item (in addition to the items that really are on the
page). These adjoining tuples are called the lastleft and firstright
tuples.
The variables that represent split points contained a field called
firstright, which is an offset number of the first data item from the
original page that goes on the new right page. The corresponding tuple
from origpage was usually the same thing as the actual firstright tuple,
but not always: the firstright tuple is sometimes the new/incoming item
instead. This situation seems unnecessarily confusing.
Make things clearer by renaming the origpage offset returned by
_bt_findsplitloc() to "firstrightoff". We now have a firstright tuple
and a firstrightoff offset number which are comparable to the
newitem/lastleft tuples and the newitemoff/lastleftoff offset numbers
respectively. Also make sure that we are consistent about how we
describe nbtree page split point state.
Push the responsibility for dealing with pg_upgrade'd !heapkeyspace
indexes down to lower level code, relieving _bt_split() from dealing
with it directly. This means that we always have a palloc'd left page
high key on the leaf level, no matter what. This enables simplifying
some of the code (and code comments) within _bt_split().
Finally, restructure the page split code to make it clearer why suffix
truncation (which only takes place during leaf page splits) is
completely different to the first data item truncation that takes place
during internal page splits. Tuples are marked as having fewer
attributes stored in both cases, and the firstright tuple is truncated
in both cases, so it's easy to imagine somebody missing the distinction.
|
|
This replaces a few occurrences of ugly code with a more clean and
idiomatic usage. The problem was highlighted by perlcritic, but we're
not enforcing the policy that led to the discovery.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200412074245.GB623763@rfd.leadboat.com
|
|
We've had a mixture of the warnings pragma, the -w switch on the shebang
line, and no warnings at all. This patch removes the -w swicth and add
the warnings pragma to all perl sources missing it. It raises the
severity of the TestingAndDebugging::RequireUseWarnings perlcritic
policy to level 5, so that we catch any future violations.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200412074245.GB623763@rfd.leadboat.com
|
|
This makes it easier to do a web search for details of the policy that's
been violated, as well as displaying the name that might be needed for a
policy override.
Various perlcritic settings changes are being discussed, but this one
should be uncontroversial.
|
|
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby and Euler Taveira
Author: Justin Pryzby and Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAB-hujrP8ZfUkvL5OYETipQwA=e3n7oqHFU=4ZLxWS_Cza3kQQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Move the file name to a format parameter to ease translatability. Add
error code where missing. Make the wording consistent.
|
|
Also, use "verify" rather than "validate" to refer to the process
being undertaken here. Per discussion, that is a more appropriate
term.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/172c9d9b-1d0a-1b94-1456-376b1e017322@2ndquadrant.com
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobLgMh6p8FmLbj_rv9Uhd7tPrLnAyLgGd2SoSj=qD-bVg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The placement of the fall-through comment in this code appears not to
work to suppress the warning in recent gcc. Move it to the bottom of
the case group, and add an assertion that we didn't get there through
some other code path. Also improve wording of nearby comments.
Julien Rouhaud, comment hacking by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_aLdPGU5wCpaowNLF-Q8328iR7mj1yJAhMOVsdLwY+sdg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Specifically, remember lookup_type_cache() results instead of retrieving
them once per comparison. Under CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, this reduced
src/test/subscription/t/001_rep_changes.pl elapsed time by an order of
magnitude, which reduced check-world elapsed time by 9%.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200406085420.GC162712@rfd.leadboat.com
|
|
Before sleeping, WalSndWaitForWal() sends a keepalive if MyWalSnd->write
< sentPtr. That is important in logical replication. When the latest
physical LSN yields no logical replication messages (a common case),
that keepalive elicits a reply, and processing the reply updates
pg_stat_replication.replay_lsn. WalSndLoop() lacks that; when
WalSndLoop() slept, replay_lsn advancement could stall until
wal_receiver_status_interval elapsed. This sometimes stalled
src/test/subscription/t/001_rep_changes.pl for up to 10s.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200406063649.GA3738151@rfd.leadboat.com
|
|
Before discarding the old hash table in ExecReScanHashJoin, capture
its statistics, ensuring that we report the maximum hashtable size
across repeated rescans of the hash input relation. We can repurpose
the existing code for reporting hashtable size in parallel workers
to help with this, making the patch pretty small. This also ensures
that if rescans happen within parallel workers, we get the correct
maximums across all instances.
Konstantin Knizhnik and Tom Lane, per diagnosis by Thomas Munro
of a trouble report from Alvaro Herrera.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200323165059.GA24950@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
ExecReScanHashJoin will destroy the join's hash table if it expects
that the inner relation will produce different rows on rescan.
Up to now it's not bothered to clear the additional pointer to that
hash table that exists in the child HashState node. However, it's
possible for the query to terminate without building a fresh hash
table (this happens if the outer relation is found to be empty
during the final rescan). So we can end with a dangling pointer
to a deleted hash table. That was harmless originally, but since
9.0 EXPLAIN ANALYZE has used that pointer to print hash table
statistics. In debug builds this reproducibly results in garbage
statistics. In non-debug builds there's frequently no ill effects,
but in principle one could get wrong EXPLAIN ANALYZE output, or
perhaps even a crash if free() has released the hashtable memory
back to the OS.
To fix, just make sure we clear the additional pointer when destroying
the hash table. In problematic cases, EXPLAIN ANALYZE will then print
no hashtable statistics (reverting to its pre-9.0 behavior). This isn't
ideal, but since the problem manifests only in unusual corner cases,
it's hard to justify taking any risks to do better in the back
branches. A follow-on patch will improve matters in HEAD.
Konstantin Knizhnik and Tom Lane, per diagnosis by Thomas Munro
of a trouble report from Alvaro Herrera.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200323165059.GA24950@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
Introduced by 83fd4532a72179c370e318075a10e0e2aa832024. To fix, the
tuple descriptors need to be copied into the current memory context.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/04d78603-edae-9243-9dde-fe3037176a7d@2ndquadrant.com
|
|
Introduced by 83fd4532a72179c370e318075a10e0e2aa832024
|
|
Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAG-ACPWPB8Lc_aFj25eiPFqi31YB5vmaZnb39mbHSf5Yej=miA@mail.gmail.com
|
