summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-07-16psql: Fix note on project naming in output of \copyright.Nathan Bossart
This adjusts the wording to match the changes in commits 5987553fde, a233a603ba, and pgweb commit 2d764dbc08. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aHVo791guQR6uqwT%40nathan Backpatch-through: 13
2025-07-15Silence uninitialized-value warnings in compareJsonbContainers().Tom Lane
Because not every path through JsonbIteratorNext() sets val->type, some compilers complain that compareJsonbContainers() is comparing possibly-uninitialized values. The paths that don't set it return WJB_DONE, WJB_END_ARRAY, or WJB_END_OBJECT, so it's clear by manual inspection that the "(ra == rb)" code path is safe, and indeed we aren't seeing warnings about that. But the (ra != rb) case is much less obviously safe. In Assert-enabled builds it seems that the asserts rejecting WJB_END_ARRAY and WJB_END_OBJECT persuade gcc 15.x not to warn, which makes little sense because it's impossible to believe that the compiler can prove of its own accord that ra/rb aren't WJB_DONE here. (In fact they never will be, so the code isn't wrong, but why is there no warning?) Without Asserts, the appearance of warnings is quite unsurprising. We discussed fixing this by converting those two Asserts into pg_assume, but that seems not very satisfactory when it's so unclear why the compiler is or isn't warning: the warning could easily reappear with some other compiler version. Let's fix it in a less magical, more future-proof way by changing JsonbIteratorNext() so that it always does set val->type. The cost of that should be pretty negligible, and it makes the function's API spec less squishy. Reported-by: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/988bf1bc-3f1f-99f3-bf98-222f1cd9dc5e@xs4all.nl Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0c623e8a204187b87b4736792398eaf1@postgrespro.ru Backpatch-through: 13
2025-07-11Fix inconsistent quoting of role names in ACLs.Tom Lane
getid() and putid(), which parse and deparse role names within ACL input/output, applied isalnum() to see if a character within a role name requires quoting. They did this even for non-ASCII characters, which is problematic because the results would depend on encoding, locale, and perhaps even platform. So it's possible that putid() could elect not to quote some string that, later in some other environment, getid() will decide is not a valid identifier, causing dump/reload or similar failures. To fix this in a way that won't risk interoperability problems with unpatched versions, make getid() treat any non-ASCII as a legitimate identifier character (hence not requiring quotes), while making putid() treat any non-ASCII as requiring quoting. We could remove the resulting excess quoting once we feel that no unpatched servers remain in the wild, but that'll be years. A lesser problem is that getid() did the wrong thing with an input consisting of just two double quotes (""). That has to represent an empty string, but getid() read it as a single double quote instead. The case cannot arise in the normal course of events, since we don't allow empty-string role names. But let's fix it while we're here. Although we've not heard field reports of problems with non-ASCII role names, there's clearly a hazard there, so back-patch to all supported versions. Reported-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3792884.1751492172@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch-through: 13
2025-07-11Fix the handling of two GUCs during upgrade.Amit Kapila
Previously, the check_hook functions for max_slot_wal_keep_size and idle_replication_slot_timeout would incorrectly raise an ERROR for values set in postgresql.conf during upgrade, even though those values were not actively used in the upgrade process. To prevent logical slot invalidation during upgrade, we used to set special values for these GUCs. Now, instead of relying on those values, we directly prevent WAL removal and logical slot invalidation caused by max_slot_wal_keep_size and idle_replication_slot_timeout. Note: PostgreSQL 17 does not include the idle_replication_slot_timeout GUC, so related changes were not backported. BUG #18979 Reported-by: jorsol <jorsol@gmail.com> Author: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> Reviewed by: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Backpatch-through: 17, where it was introduced Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/219561.1751826409@sss.pgh.pa.us Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18979-a1b7fdbb7cd181c6@postgresql.org
2025-07-10pg_dump: Fix object-type sort priority for large objects.Nathan Bossart
Commit a45c78e328 moved large object metadata from SECTION_PRE_DATA to SECTION_DATA but neglected to move PRIO_LARGE_OBJECT in dbObjectTypePriorities accordingly. While this hasn't produced any known live bugs, it causes problems for a proposed patch that optimizes upgrades with many large objects. Fixing the priority might also make the topological sort step marginally faster by reducing the number of ordering violations that have to be fixed. Reviewed-by: Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani@google.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aBkQLSkx1zUJ-LwJ%40nathan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aG_5DBCjdDX6KAoD%40nathan Backpatch-through: 17
2025-07-09Fix tab-completion for COPY and \copy options.Masahiko Sawada
Commit c273d9d8ce4 reworked tab-completion of COPY and \copy in psql and added support for completing options within WITH clauses. However, the same COPY options were suggested for both COPY TO and COPY FROM commands, even though some options are only valid for one or the other. This commit separates the COPY options for COPY FROM and COPY TO commands to provide more accurate auto-completion suggestions. Back-patch to v14 where tab-completion for COPY and \copy options within WITH clauses was first supported. Author: Atsushi Torikoshi <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com> Reviewed-by: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/079e7a2c801f252ae8d522b772790ed7@oss.nttdata.com Backpatch-through: 14
2025-07-08Fix low-probability memory leak in XMLSERIALIZE(... INDENT).Tom Lane
xmltotext_with_options() did not consider the possibility that pg_xml_init() could fail --- most likely due to OOM. If that happened, the already-parsed xmlDoc structure would be leaked. Oversight in commit 483bdb2af. Bug: #18981 Author: Dmitry Kovalenko <d.kovalenko@postgrespro.ru> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18981-9bc3c80f107ae925@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 16
2025-07-07Restore the ability to run pl/pgsql expression queries in parallel.Tom Lane
pl/pgsql's notion of an "expression" is very broad, encompassing any SQL SELECT query that returns a single column and no more than one row. So there are cases, for example evaluation of an aggregate function, where the query involves significant work and it'd be useful to run it with parallel workers. This used to be possible, but commits 3eea7a0c9 et al unintentionally disabled it. The simplest fix is to make exec_eval_expr() pass maxtuples = 0 rather than 2 to exec_run_select(). This avoids the new rule that we will never use parallelism when a nonzero "count" limit is passed to ExecutorRun(). (Note that the pre-3eea7a0c9 behavior was indeed unsafe, so reverting that rule is not in the cards.) The reason for passing 2 before was that exec_eval_expr() will throw an error if it gets more than one returned row, so we figured that as soon as we have two rows we know that will happen and we might as well stop running the query. That choice was cost-free when it was made; but disabling parallelism is far from cost-free, so now passing 2 amounts to optimizing a failure case at the expense of useful cases. An expression query that can return more than one row is certainly broken. People might now need to wait a bit longer to discover such breakage; but hopefully few will use enormously expensive cases as their first test of new pl/pgsql logic. Author: Dipesh Dhameliya <dipeshdhameliya125@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABgZEgdfbnq9t6xXJnmXbChNTcWFjeM_6nuig41tm327gYi2ig@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
2025-07-04Fix new pg_upgrade query not to rely on regnamespaceÁlvaro Herrera
That was invented in 9.5, and pg_upgrade claims to support back to 9.0. But we don't need that with a simple query change, tested by Tom Lane. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202507041645.afjl5rssvrgu@alvherre.pgsql
2025-07-04pg_upgrade: Add missing newline in error messageÁlvaro Herrera
Minor oversight in 347758b12063
2025-07-04pg_upgrade: check for inconsistencies in not-null constraints w/inheritanceÁlvaro Herrera
With tables defined like this, CREATE TABLE ip (id int PRIMARY KEY); CREATE TABLE ic (id int) INHERITS (ip); ALTER TABLE ic ALTER id DROP NOT NULL; pg_upgrade fails during the schema restore phase due to this error: ERROR: column "id" in child table must be marked NOT NULL This can only be fixed by marking the child column as NOT NULL before the upgrade, which could take an arbitrary amount of time (because ic's data must be scanned). Have pg_upgrade's check mode warn if that condition is found, so that users know what to adjust before running the upgrade for real. Author: Ali Akbar <the.apaan@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Backpatch-through: 13 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACQjQLoMsE+1pyLe98pi0KvPG2jQQ94LWJ+PTiLgVRK4B=i_jg@mail.gmail.com
2025-07-04Disable commit timestamps during bootstrapMichael Paquier
Attempting to use commit timestamps during bootstrapping leads to an assertion failure, that can be reached for example with an initdb -c that enables track_commit_timestamp. It makes little sense to register a commit timestamp for a BootstrapTransactionId, so let's disable the activation of the module in this case. This problem has been independently reported once by each author of this commit. Each author has proposed basically the same patch, relying on IsBootstrapProcessingMode() to skip the use of commit_ts during bootstrap. The test addition is a suggestion by me, and is applied down to v16. Author: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> Author: Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213@163.com> Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSCPR01MB14966FF9E4C4145F37B937E52F5102@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87plejmnpy.fsf@163.com Backpatch-through: 13
2025-07-03Obtain required table lock during cross-table updates, redux.Tom Lane
Commits 8319e5cb5 et al missed the fact that ATPostAlterTypeCleanup contains three calls to ATPostAlterTypeParse, and the other two also need protection against passing a relid that we don't yet have lock on. Add similar logic to those code paths, and add some test cases demonstrating the need for it. In v18 and master, the test cases demonstrate that there's a behavioral discrepancy between stored generated columns and virtual generated columns: we disallow changing the expression of a stored column if it's used in any composite-type columns, but not that of a virtual column. Since the expression isn't actually relevant to either sort of composite-type usage, this prohibition seems unnecessary; but changing it is a matter for separate discussion. For now we are just documenting the existing behavior. Reported-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> Author: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: CACJufxGKJtGNRRSXfwMW9SqVOPEMdP17BJ7DsBf=tNsv9pWU9g@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
2025-07-02Correctly copy the target host identification in PQcancelCreate.Tom Lane
PQcancelCreate failed to copy struct pg_conn_host's "type" field, instead leaving it zero (a/k/a CHT_HOST_NAME). This seemingly has no great ill effects if it should have been CHT_UNIX_SOCKET instead, but if it should have been CHT_HOST_ADDRESS then a null-pointer dereference will occur when the cancelConn is used. Bug: #18974 Reported-by: Maxim Boguk <maxim.boguk@gmail.com> Author: Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18974-575f02b2168b36b3@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 17
2025-07-01Fix missing FSM vacuum opportunities on tables without indexes.Masahiko Sawada
Commit c120550edb86 optimized the vacuuming of relations without indexes (a.k.a. one-pass strategy) by directly marking dead item IDs as LP_UNUSED. However, the periodic FSM vacuum was still checking if dead item IDs had been marked as LP_DEAD when attempting to vacuum the FSM every VACUUM_FSM_EVERY_PAGES blocks. This condition was never met due to the optimization, resulting in missed FSM vacuum opportunities. This commit modifies the periodic FSM vacuum condition to use the number of tuples deleted during HOT pruning. This count includes items marked as either LP_UNUSED or LP_REDIRECT, both of which are expected to result in new free space to report. Back-patch to v17 where the vacuum optimization for tables with no indexes was introduced. Reviewed-by: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBL8m6B9GSzQfYxVaEgvD7-Kr3AJaS-hJPHC+avm-29zw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 17
2025-07-02Fix bug in archive streamer with LZ4 decompressionMichael Paquier
When decompressing some input data, the calculation for the initial starting point and the initial size were incorrect, potentially leading to failures when decompressing contents with LZ4. These initialization points are fixed in this commit, bringing the logic closer to what exists for gzip and zstd. The contents of the compressed data is clear (for example backups taken with LZ4 can still be decompressed with a "lz4" command), only the decompression part reading the input data was impacted by this issue. This code path impacts pg_basebackup and pg_verifybackup, which can use the LZ4 decompression routines with an archive streamer, or any tools that try to use the archive streamers in src/fe_utils/. The issue is easier to reproduce with files that have a low-compression rate, like ones filled with random data, for a size of at least 512kB, but this could happen with anything as long as it is stored in a data folder. Some tests are added based on this idea, with a file filled with random bytes grabbed from the backend, written at the root of the data folder. This is proving good enough to reproduce the original problem. Author: Mikhail Gribkov <youzhick@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMEv5_uQS1Hg6KCaEP2JkrTBbZ-nXQhxomWrhYQvbdzR-zy-wA@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 15
2025-07-01Update comment for IndexInfo.ii_NullsNotDistinctPeter Eisentraut
Commit 7a7b3e11e61 added the ii_NullsNotDistinct field, but the comment was not updated. Author: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> Reviewed-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ME0P300MB04453E6C7EA635F0ECF41BFCB6832%40ME0P300MB0445.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
2025-07-01Fix outdated comment for IndexInfoPeter Eisentraut
Commit 78416235713 removed the ii_OpclassOptions field, but the comment was not updated. Author: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> Reviewed-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ME0P300MB04453E6C7EA635F0ECF41BFCB6832%40ME0P300MB0445.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
2025-07-01Make sure IOV_MAX is defined.Tom Lane
We stopped defining IOV_MAX on non-Windows systems in 75357ab94, on the assumption that every non-Windows system defines it in <limits.h> as required by X/Open. GNU Hurd, however, doesn't follow that standard either. Put back the old logic to assume 16 if it's not defined. Author: Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> Co-authored-by: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6862e8d1.050a0220.194b8d.76fa@mx.google.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6846e0c3.df0a0220.39ef9b.c60e@mx.google.com Backpatch-through: 16
2025-07-01Make safeguard against incorrect flags for fsync more portable.Tom Lane
The existing code assumed that O_RDONLY is defined as 0, but this is not required by POSIX and is not true on GNU Hurd. We can avoid the assumption by relying on O_ACCMODE to mask the fcntl() result. (Hopefully, all supported platforms define that.) Author: Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> Co-authored-by: Samuel Thibault Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6862e8d1.050a0220.194b8d.76fa@mx.google.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/68480868.5d0a0220.1e214d.68a6@mx.google.com Backpatch-through: 13
2025-07-01Fix typos in commentsAmit Langote
Commit 19d8e2308bc added enum values with the prefix TU_, but a few comments still referred to TUUI_, which was used in development versions of the patches committed as 19d8e2308bc. Author: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20250701110216.8ac8a9e4c6f607f1d954f44a@sraoss.co.jp Backpatch-through: 16
2025-06-29Obtain required table lock during cross-table constraint updates.Tom Lane
Sometimes a table's constraint may depend on a column of another table, so that we have to update the constraint when changing the referenced column's type. We need to have lock on the constraint's table to do that. ATPostAlterTypeCleanup believed that this case was only possible for FOREIGN KEY constraints, but it's wrong at least for CHECK and EXCLUDE constraints; and in general, we'd probably need exclusive lock to alter any sort of constraint. So just remove the contype check and acquire lock for any other table. This prevents a "you don't have lock" assertion failure, though no ill effect is observed in production builds. We'll error out later anyway because we don't presently support physically altering column types within stored composite columns. But the catalog-munging is basically all there, so we may as well make that part work. Bug: #18970 Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Diagnosed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18970-a7d1cfe1f8d5d8d9@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 13
2025-06-27Use correct DatumGet*() function in test_shm_mq_main().Nathan Bossart
This is purely cosmetic, as dsm_attach() interprets its argument as a dsm_handle (i.e., an unsigned integer), but we might as well fix it. Oversight in commit 4db3744f1f. Author: Jianghua Yang <yjhjstz@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAZLFmRxkUD5jRs0W3K%3DUe4_ZS%2BRcAb0PCE1S0vVJBn3sWH2UQ%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
2025-06-26Remove unused check in heap_xlog_insert()Melanie Plageman
8e03eb92e9a reverted the commit 39b66a91bd which allowed freezing in the heap_insert() code path but forgot to remove the corresponding check in heap_xlog_insert(). This code is extraneous but not harmful. However, cleaning it up makes it very clear that, as of now, we do not support any freezing of pages in the heap_insert() path. Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/CAAKRu_Zp4Pi-t51OFWm1YZ-cctDfBhHCMZ%3DEx6PKxv0o8y2GvA%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 14
2025-06-25Avoid scribbling of VACUUM optionsMichael Paquier
This fixes two issues with the handling of VacuumParams in vacuum_rel(). This code path has the idea to change the passed-in pointer of VacuumParams for the "truncate" and "index_cleanup" options for the relation worked on, impacting the two following scenarios where incorrect options may be used because a VacuumParams pointer is shared across multiple relations: - Multiple relations in a single VACUUM command. - TOAST relations vacuumed with their main relation. The problem is avoided by providing to the two callers of vacuum_rel() copies of VacuumParams, before the pointer is updated for the "truncate" and "index_cleanup" options. The refactoring of the VACUUM option and parameters done in 0d831389749a did not introduce an issue, but it has encouraged the problem we are dealing with in this commit, with b84dbc8eb80b for "truncate" and a96c41feec6b for "index_cleanup" that have been added a couple of years after the initial refactoring. HEAD will be improved with a different patch that hardens the uses of VacuumParams across the tree. This cannot be backpatched as it introduces an ABI breakage. The backend portion of the patch has been authored by Nathan, while I have implemented the tests. The tests rely on injection points to check the option values, making them faster, more reliable than the tests originally proposed by Shihao, and they also provide more coverage. This part can only be backpatched down to v17. Reported-by: Shihao Zhong <zhong950419@gmail.com> Author: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGRkXqTo+aK=GTy5pSc-9cy8H2F2TJvcrZ-zXEiNJj93np1UUw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
2025-06-24Prevent excessive delays before launching new logrep workers.Tom Lane
The logical replication launcher process would sometimes sleep for as much as 3 minutes before noticing that it is supposed to launch a new worker. This could happen if (1) WaitForReplicationWorkerAttach absorbed a process latch wakeup that was meant to cause ApplyLauncherMain to do work, or (2) logicalrep_worker_launch reported failure, either because of resource limits or because the new worker terminated immediately. In case (2), the expected behavior is that we retry the launch after wal_retrieve_retry_interval, but that didn't reliably happen. It's not clear how often such conditions would occur in the field, but in our subscription test suite they are somewhat common, especially in tests that exercise cases that cause quick worker failure. That causes the tests to take substantially longer than they ought to do on typical setups. To fix (1), make WaitForReplicationWorkerAttach re-set the latch before returning if it cleared it while looping. To fix (2), ensure that we reduce wait_time to no more than wal_retrieve_retry_interval when logicalrep_worker_launch reports failure. In passing, fix a couple of perhaps-hypothetical race conditions, e.g. examining worker->in_use without a lock. Backpatch to v16. Problem (2) didn't exist before commit 5a3a95385 because the previous code always set wait_time to wal_retrieve_retry_interval when launching a worker, regardless of success or failure of the launch. That behavior also greatly mitigated problem (1), so I'm not excited about adapting the remainder of the patch to the substantially-different code in older branches. Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/817604.1750723007@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch-through: 16
2025-06-24Test that vacuum removes tuples older than OldestXminMelanie Plageman
If vacuum fails to prune a tuple killed before OldestXmin, it will decide to freeze its xmax and later error out in pre-freeze checks. Add a test reproducing this scenario to the recovery suite which creates a table on a primary, updates the table to generate dead tuples for vacuum, and then, during the vacuum, uses a replica to force GlobalVisState->maybe_needed on the primary to move backwards and precede the value of OldestXmin set at the beginning of vacuuming the table. This test is coverage for a case fixed in 83c39a1f7f3. The test was originally committed to master in aa607980aee but later reverted in efcbb76efe4 due to test instability. The test requires multiple index passes. In Postgres 17+, vacuum uses a TID store for the dead TIDs that is very space efficient. With the old minimum maintenance_work_mem of 1 MB, it required a large number of dead rows to generate enough dead TIDs to force multiple index vacuuming passes. Once the source code changes were made to allow a minimum maintenance_work_mem value of 64kB, the test could be made much faster and more stable. Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_ZJBkidusDut6i%3DbDCiXzJEp93GC1%2BNFaZt4eqanYF3Kw%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 17
2025-06-21Doc: improve documentation about width_bucket().Tom Lane
Specify whether the bucket bounds are inclusive or exclusive, and improve some other vague language. Explain the behavior that occurs when the "low" bound is greater than the "high" bound. Make width_bucket_numeric's comment more like that for width_bucket_float8, in particular noting that infinite bounds are rejected (since they became possible in v14). Reported-by: Ben Peachey Higdon <bpeacheyhigdon@gmail.com> Author: Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net> Co-authored-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2BD74F86-5B89-4AC1-8F13-23CED3546AC1@gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
2025-06-20Use SnapshotDirty when checking for conflicting index names.Tom Lane
While choosing an autogenerated name for an index, look for pre-existing relations using a SnapshotDirty snapshot, instead of the previous behavior that considered only committed-good pg_class rows. This allows us to detect and avoid conflicts against indexes that are still being built. It's still possible to fail due to a race condition, but the window is now just the amount of time that it takes DefineIndex to validate all its parameters, call smgrcreate(), and enter the index's pg_class row. Formerly the race window covered the entire time needed to create and fill an index, which could be very long if the table is large. Worse, if the conflicting index creation is part of a larger transaction, it wouldn't be visible till COMMIT. So this isn't a complete solution, but it should greatly ameliorate the problem, and the patch is simple enough to be back-patchable. It might at some point be useful to do the same for pg_constraint entries (cf. ChooseConstraintName, ConstraintNameExists, and related functions). However, in the absence of field complaints, I'll leave that alone for now. The relation-name test should be good enough for index-based constraints, while foreign-key constraints seem to be okay since they require exclusive locks to create. Bug: #18959 Reported-by: Maximilian Chrzan <maximilian.chrzan@here.com> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18959-f63b53b864bb1417@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 13
2025-06-20Improve runtime and output of tests for replication slots checkpointing.Alexander Korotkov
The TAP tests that verify logical and physical replication slot behavior during checkpoints (046_checkpoint_logical_slot.pl and 047_checkpoint_physical_slot.pl) inserted two batches of 2 million rows each, generating approximately 520 MB of WAL. On slow machines, or when compiled with '-DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE', this caused the tests to run for 8-9 minutes and occasionally time out, as seen on the buildfarm animal prion. This commit modifies the mentioned tests to utilize the $node->advance_wal() function, thereby reducing runtime. Once we do not use the generated data, the proposed function is a good alternative, which cuts the total wall-clock run time. While here, remove superfluous '\n' characters from several note() calls; these appeared literally in the build-farm logs and looked odd. Also, remove excessive 'shared_preload_libraries' GUC from the config and add a check for 'injection_points' extension availability. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Author: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> Author: Vitaly Davydov <v.davydov@postgrespro.ru> Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fbc5d94e-6fbd-4a64-85d4-c9e284a58eb2%40gmail.com Backpatch-through: 17
2025-06-19Improve log messages and docs for slot synchronization.Amit Kapila
Improve the clarity of LOG messages when a failover logical slot synchronization fails, making the reasons more explicit for easier debugging. Update the documentation to outline scenarios where slot synchronization can fail, especially during the initial sync, and emphasize that pg_sync_replication_slot() is primarily intended for testing and debugging purposes. We also discussed improving the functionality of pg_sync_replication_slot() so that it can be used reliably, but we would take up that work for next version after some more discussion and review. Reported-by: Suraj Kharage <suraj.kharage@enterprisedb.com> Author: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> Backpatch-through: 17, where it was introduced Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAF1DzPWTcg+m+x+oVVB=y4q9=PYYsL_mujVp7uJr-_oUtWNGbA@mail.gmail.com
2025-06-16Fix re-distributing previously distributed invalidation messages during ↵Masahiko Sawada
logical decoding. Commit 4909b38af0 introduced logic to distribute invalidation messages from catalog-modifying transactions to all concurrent in-progress transactions. However, since each transaction distributes not only its original invalidation messages but also previously distributed messages to other transactions, this leads to an exponential increase in allocation request size for invalidation messages, ultimately causing memory allocation failure. This commit fixes this issue by tracking distributed invalidation messages separately per decoded transaction and not redistributing these messages to other in-progress transactions. The maximum size of distributed invalidation messages that one transaction can store is limited to MAX_DISTR_INVAL_MSG_PER_TXN (8MB). Once the size of the distributed invalidation messages exceeds this threshold, we invalidate all caches in locations where distributed invalidation messages need to be executed. Back-patch to all supported versions where we introduced the fix by commit 4909b38af0. Note that this commit adds two new fields to ReorderBufferTXN to store the distributed transactions. This change breaks ABI compatibility in back branches, affecting third-party extensions that depend on the size of the ReorderBufferTXN struct, though this scenario seems unlikely. Additionally, it adds a new flag to the txn_flags field of ReorderBufferTXN to indicate distributed invalidation message overflow. This should not affect existing implementations, as it is unlikely that third-party extensions use unused bits in the txn_flags field. Bug: #18938 #18942 Author: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> Reported-by: Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@deepbluecap.com> Reported-by: John Hutchins <john.hutchins@wicourts.gov> Reported-by: Laurence Parry <greenreaper@hotmail.com> Reported-by: Max Madden <maxmmadden@gmail.com> Reported-by: Braulio Fdo Gonzalez <brauliofg@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/680bdaf6-f7d1-4536-b580-05c2760c67c6@deepbluecap.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18942-0ab1e5ae156613ad@postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18938-57c9a1c463b68ce0@postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD1FGCT2sYrP_70RTuo56QTizyc+J3wJdtn2gtO3VttQFpdMZg@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANO2=B=2BT1hSYCE=nuuTnVTnjidMg0+-FfnRnqM6kd23qoygg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
2025-06-14Add TAP tests to check replication slot advance during the checkpointAlexander Korotkov
The new tests verify that logical and physical replication slots are still valid after an immediate restart on checkpoint completion when the slot was advanced during the checkpoint. This commit introduces two new injection points to make these tests possible: * checkpoint-before-old-wal-removal - triggered in the checkpointer process just before old WAL segments cleanup; * logical-replication-slot-advance-segment - triggered in LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation() when restart_lsn was changed enough to point to the next WAL segment. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/1d12d2-67235980-35-19a406a0%4063439497 Author: Vitaly Davydov <v.davydov@postgrespro.ru> Author: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> Backpatch-through: 17
2025-06-14Keep WAL segments by the flushed value of the slot's restart LSNAlexander Korotkov
The patch fixes the issue with the unexpected removal of old WAL segments after checkpoint, followed by an immediate restart. The issue occurs when a slot is advanced after the start of the checkpoint and before old WAL segments are removed at the end of the checkpoint. The idea of the patch is to get the minimal restart_lsn at the beginning of checkpoint (or restart point) creation and use this value when calculating the oldest LSN for WAL segments removal at the end of checkpoint. This idea was proposed by Tomas Vondra in the discussion. Unlike 291221c46575, this fix doesn't affect ABI and is intended for back branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/1d12d2-67235980-35-19a406a0%4063439497 Author: Vitaly Davydov <v.davydov@postgrespro.ru> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> Backpatch-through: 13
2025-06-11Make _bt_killitems drop pins it acquired itself.Peter Geoghegan
Teach nbtree's _bt_killitems to leave the so->currPos page that it sets LP_DEAD items on in whatever state it was in when _bt_killitems was called. In particular, make sure that so->dropPin scans don't acquire a pin whose reference is saved in so->currPos.buf. Allowing _bt_killitems to change so->currPos.buf like this is wrong. The immediate consequence of allowing it is that code in _bt_steppage (that copies so->currPos into so->markPos) will behave as if the scan is a !so->dropPin scan. so->markPos will therefore retain the buffer pin indefinitely, even though _bt_killitems only needs to acquire a pin (along with a lock) for long enough to mark known-dead items LP_DEAD. This issue came to light following a report of a failure of an assertion from recent commit e6eed40e. The test case in question involves the use of mark and restore. An initial call to _bt_killitems takes place that leaves so->currPos.buf in a state that is inconsistent with the scan being so->dropPin. A subsequent call to _bt_killitems for the same position (following so->currPos being saved in so->markPos, and then restored as so->currPos) resulted in the failure of an assertion that tests that so->currPos.buf is InvalidBuffer when the scan is so->dropPin (non-assert builds got a "resource was not closed" WARNING instead). The same problem exists on earlier releases, though the issue is far more subtle there. Recent commit e6eed40e introduced the so->dropPin field as a partial replacement for testing so->currPos.buf directly. Earlier releases won't get an assertion failure (or buffer pin leak), but they will allow the second _bt_killitems call from the test case to behave as if a buffer pin was consistently held since the original call to _bt_readpage. This is wrong; there will have been an initial window during which no pin was held on the so->currPos page, and yet the second _bt_killitems call will neglect to check if so->currPos.lsn continues to match the page's now-current LSN. As a result of all this, it's just about possible that _bt_killitems will set the wrong items LP_DEAD (on release branches). This could only happen with merge joins (the sole user of nbtree mark/restore support), when a concurrently inserted index tuple used a recently-recycled TID (and only when the new tuple was inserted onto the same page as a distinct concurrently-removed tuple with the same TID). This is exactly the scenario that _bt_killitems' check of the page's now-current LSN against the LSN stashed in currPos was supposed to prevent. A follow-up commit will make nbtree completely stop conditioning whether or not a position's pin needs to be dropped on whether the 'buf' field is set. All call sites that might need to drop a still-held pin will be taught to rely on the scan-level so->dropPin field recently introduced by commit e6eed40e. That will make bugs of the same general nature as this one impossible (or make them much easier to detect, at least). Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Reported-By: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/545be1e5-3786-439a-9257-a90d30f8b849@gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
2025-06-10Don't reduce output request size on non-Unix-socket connections.Tom Lane
Traditionally, libpq's pqPutMsgEnd has rounded down the amount-to-send to be a multiple of 8K when it is eagerly writing some data. This still seems like a good idea when sending through a Unix socket, as pipes typically have a buffer size of 8K or some fraction/multiple of that. But there's not much argument for it on a TCP connection, since (a) standard MTU values are not commensurate with that, and (b) the kernel typically applies its own packet splitting/merging logic. Worse, our SSL and GSSAPI code paths both have API stipulations that if they fail to send all the data that was offered in the previous write attempt, we mustn't offer less data in the next attempt; else we may get "SSL error: bad length" or "GSSAPI caller failed to retransmit all data needing to be retried". The previous write attempt might've been pqFlush attempting to send everything in the buffer, so pqPutMsgEnd can't safely write less than the full buffer contents. (Well, we could add some more state to track exactly how much the previous write attempt was, but there's little value evident in such extra complication.) Hence, apply the round-down only on AF_UNIX sockets, where we never use SSL or GSSAPI. Interestingly, we had a very closely related bug report before, which I attempted to fix in commit d053a879b. But the test case we had then seemingly didn't trigger this pqFlush-then-pqPutMsgEnd scenario, or at least we failed to recognize this variant of the bug. Bug: #18907 Reported-by: Dorjpalam Batbaatar <htgn.dbat.95@gmail.com> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18907-d41b9bcf6f29edda@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 13
2025-06-08pg_restore: fix incompatibility with old directory-format dumps.Tom Lane
pg_restore failed to restore large objects (blobs) out of directory-format dumps made by versions before PG v12. That's because, due to a bug fixed in commit 548e50976, those old versions put the wrong filename into the BLOBS TOC entry. Said bug was harmless before v17, because we ignored the incorrect filename field --- but commit a45c78e32 assumed it would be correct. Reported-by: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> Author: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRCrZ=_e1Rv1N+6vDaH+6gf=9A2mE2J4RvnvKA1bLiXvXA@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 17
2025-06-06Fixed signed/unsigned mismatch in test_dsm_registry.Nathan Bossart
Oversight in commit 8b2bcf3f28. Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aECi_gSD9JnVWQ8T%40nathan Backpatch-through: 17
2025-06-02Disallow "=" in names of reloptions and foreign-data options.Tom Lane
We store values for these options as array elements with the syntax "name=value", hence a name containing "=" confuses matters when it's time to read the array back in. Since validation of the options is often done (long) after this conversion to array format, that leads to confusing and off-point error messages. We can improve matters by rejecting names containing "=" up-front. (Probably a better design would have involved pairs of array elements, but it's too late now --- and anyway, there's no evident use-case for option names like this. We already reject such names in some other contexts such as GUCs.) Reported-by: Chapman Flack <jcflack@acm.org> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Chapman Flack <jcflack@acm.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6830EB30.8090904@acm.org Backpatch-through: 13
2025-06-02Use replay LSN as target for cascading logical WAL sendersMichael Paquier
A cascading WAL sender doing logical decoding (as known as doing its work on a standby) has been using as flush LSN the value returned by GetStandbyFlushRecPtr() (last position safely flushed to disk). This is incorrect as such processes are only able to decode changes up to the LSN that has been replayed by the startup process. This commit changes cascading logical WAL senders to use the replay LSN, as returned by GetXLogReplayRecPtr(). This distinction is important particularly during shutdown, when WAL senders need to send any remaining available data to their clients, switching WAL senders to a caught-up state. Using the latest flush LSN rather than the replay LSN could cause the WAL senders to be stuck in an infinite loop preventing them to shut down, as the startup process does not run when WAL senders attempt to catch up, so they could keep waiting for work that would never happen. Backpatch down to v16, where logical decoding on standbys has been introduced. Author: Alexey Makhmutov <a.makhmutov@postgrespro.ru> Reviewed-by: Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/52138028-7246-421c-9161-4fa108b88070@postgrespro.ru Backpatch-through: 16
2025-06-01Run pgindent on the previous commit.Tom Lane
Clean up after rearranging PG_TRY blocks. Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2954090.1748723636@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch-through: 13
2025-06-01Fix edge-case resource leaks in PL/Python error reporting.Tom Lane
PLy_elog_impl and its subroutine PLy_traceback intended to avoid leaking any PyObject reference counts, but their coverage of the matter was sadly incomplete. In particular, out-of-memory errors in most of the string-construction subroutines could lead to reference count leaks, because those calls were outside the PG_TRY blocks responsible for dropping reference counts. Fix by (a) adjusting the scopes of the PG_TRY blocks, and (b) moving the responsibility for releasing the reference counts of the traceback-stack objects to PLy_elog_impl. This requires some additional "volatile" markers, but not too many. In passing, fix an ancient thinko: use of the "e_module_o" PyObject was guarded by "if (e_type_s)", where surely "if (e_module_o)" was meant. This would only have visible consequences if the "__name__" attribute were present but the "__module__" attribute wasn't, which apparently never happens; but someday it might. Rearranging the PG_TRY blocks requires indenting a fair amount of code one more tab stop, which I'll do separately for clarity. Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2954090.1748723636@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch-through: 13
2025-05-31Fix MERGE into a plain inheritance parent table.Dean Rasheed
When a MERGE's target table is the parent of an inheritance tree, any INSERT actions insert into the parent table using ModifyTableState's rootResultRelInfo. However, there are two bugs in the way this is initialized: 1. ExecInitMerge() incorrectly uses a different ResultRelInfo entry from ModifyTableState's resultRelInfo array to build the insert projection, which may not be compatible with rootResultRelInfo. 2. ExecInitModifyTable() does not fully initialize rootResultRelInfo. Specifically, ri_WithCheckOptions, ri_WithCheckOptionExprs, ri_returningList, and ri_projectReturning are not initialized. This can lead to crashes, or incorrect query results due to failing to check WCO's or process the RETURNING list for INSERT actions. Fix both these bugs in ExecInitMerge(), noting that it is only necessary to fully initialize rootResultRelInfo if the MERGE has INSERT actions and the target table is a plain inheritance parent. Backpatch to v15, where MERGE was introduced. Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4rlmjfniiyffp6b3kv4pfy4jw3pciy6mq72rdgnedsnbsx7qe5@j5hlpiwdguvc Backpatch-through: 15
2025-05-30Ensure we have a snapshot when updating various system catalogs.Nathan Bossart
A few places that access system catalogs don't set up an active snapshot before potentially accessing their TOAST tables. To fix, push an active snapshot just before each section of code that might require accessing one of these TOAST tables, and pop it shortly afterwards. While at it, this commit adds some rather strict assertions in an attempt to prevent such issues in the future. Commit 16bf24e0e4 recently removed pg_replication_origin's TOAST table in order to fix the same problem for that catalog. On the back-branches, those bugs are left in place. We cannot easily remove a catalog's TOAST table on released major versions, and only replication origins with extremely long names are affected. Given the low severity of the issue, fixing older versions doesn't seem worth the trouble of significantly modifying the patch. Also, on v13 and v14, the aforementioned strict assertions have been omitted because commit 2776922201, which added HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot(), was not back-patched. While we could probably back-patch it now, I've opted against it because it seems unlikely that new TOAST snapshot issues will be introduced in the oldest supported versions. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18127-fe54b6a667f29658%40postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18309-c0bf914950c46692%40postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZvMSUPOqUU-VNADN%40nathan Backpatch-through: 13
2025-05-30Allow larger packets during GSSAPI authentication exchange.Tom Lane
Our GSSAPI code only allows packet sizes up to 16kB. However it emerges that during authentication, larger packets might be needed; various authorities suggest 48kB or 64kB as the maximum packet size. This limitation caused login failure for AD users who belong to many AD groups. To add insult to injury, we gave an unintelligible error message, typically "GSSAPI context establishment error: The routine must be called again to complete its function: Unknown error". As noted in code comments, the 16kB packet limit is effectively a protocol constant once we are doing normal data transmission: the GSSAPI code splits the data stream at those points, and if we change the limit then we will have cross-version compatibility problems due to the receiver's buffer being too small in some combinations. However, during the authentication exchange the packet sizes are not determined by us, but by the underlying GSSAPI library. So we might as well just try to send what the library tells us to. An unpatched recipient will fail on a packet larger than 16kB, but that's not worse than the sender failing without even trying. So this doesn't introduce any meaningful compatibility problem. We still need a buffer size limit, but we can easily make it be 64kB rather than 16kB until transport negotiation is complete. (Larger values were discussed, but don't seem likely to add anything.) Reported-by: Chris Gooch <cgooch@bamfunds.com> Fix-suggested-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DS0PR22MB5971A9C8A3F44BCC6293C4DABE99A@DS0PR22MB5971.namprd22.prod.outlook.com Backpatch-through: 13
2025-05-31Make XactLockTableWait() and ConditionalXactLockTableWait() interruptable more.Fujii Masao
Previously, XactLockTableWait() and ConditionalXactLockTableWait() could enter a non-interruptible loop when they successfully acquired a lock on a transaction but the transaction still appeared to be running. Since this loop continued until the transaction completed, it could result in long, uninterruptible waits. Although this scenario is generally unlikely since XactLockTableWait() and ConditionalXactLockTableWait() can basically acquire a transaction lock only when the transaction is not running, it can occur in a hot standby. In such cases, the transaction may still appear active due to the KnownAssignedXids list, even while no lock on the transaction exists. For example, this situation can happen when creating a logical replication slot on a standby. The cause of the non-interruptible loop was the absence of CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() within it. This commit adds CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() to the loop in both functions, ensuring they can be interrupted safely. Back-patch to all supported branches. Author: Kevin K Biju <kevinkbiju@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAM45KeELdjhS-rGuvN=ZLJ_asvZACucZ9LZWVzH7bGcD12DDwg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
2025-05-28Adjust regex for test with opening parenthesis in character classesMichael Paquier
As written, the test was throwing an error because of an unbalanced parenthesis. The regex used in the test is adjusted to not fail and to test the case of an opening parenthesis in a character class after some nested square brackets. Oversight in d46911e584d4. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16ab039d1af455652bdf4173402ddda145f2c73b.camel@cybertec.at
2025-05-28Fix conversion of SIMILAR TO regexes for character classesMichael Paquier
The code that translates SIMILAR TO pattern matching expressions to POSIX-style regular expressions did not consider that square brackets can be nested. For example, in an expression like [[:alpha:]%_], the logic replaced the placeholders '_' and '%' but it should not. This commit fixes the conversion logic by tracking the nesting level of square brackets marking character class areas, while considering that in expressions like []] or [^]] the first closing square bracket is a regular character. Multiple tests are added to show how the conversions should or should not apply applied while in a character class area, with specific cases added for all the characters converted outside character classes like an opening parenthesis '(', dollar sign '$', etc. Author: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16ab039d1af455652bdf4173402ddda145f2c73b.camel@cybertec.at Backpatch-through: 13
2025-05-26Fix race condition in subscription TAP test 021_twophaseMichael Paquier
The test did not wait for all the subscriptions to have caught up when dropping the subscription "tab_copy". In a slow environment, it could be possible for the replay of the COMMIT PREPARED transaction "mygid" to not be confirmed yet, causing one prepared transaction to be left around before moving to the next steps of the test. One failure noticed is a transaction found in pg_prepared_xacts for the cases where copy_data = false and two_phase = true, but there should be none after dropping the subscription. As an extra safety measure, a check is added before dropping the subscription, scanning pg_prepared_xacts to make sure that no prepared transactions are left once both subscriptions have caught up. Issue introduced by a8fd13cab0ba, fixing a problem similar to eaf5321c3524. Per buildfarm member kestrel. Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm329QaZ+bwU--bW6GjbNSZ8-38cDE8QWofafub7NV67oA@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 15
2025-05-23Fix per-relation memory leakage in autovacuum.Tom Lane
PgStat_StatTabEntry and AutoVacOpts structs were leaked until the end of the autovacuum worker's run, which is bad news if there are a lot of relations in the database. Note: pfree'ing the PgStat_StatTabEntry structs here seems a bit risky, because pgstat_fetch_stat_tabentry_ext does not guarantee anything about whether its result is long-lived. It appears okay so long as autovacuum forces PGSTAT_FETCH_CONSISTENCY_NONE, but I think that API could use a re-think. Also ensure that the VacuumRelation structure passed to vacuum() is in recoverable storage. Back-patch to v15 where we started to manage table statistics this way. (The AutoVacOpts leakage is probably older, but I'm not excited enough to worry about just that part.) Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756246@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch-through: 15