summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-11-08Fix sign-compare warnings in pg_iovec.h.Nathan Bossart
The code in question (pg_preadv() and pg_pwritev()) has been around for a while, but commit 15c9ac3629 moved it to a header file. If third-party code that includes this header file is built with -Wsign-compare on a system without preadv() or pwritev(), warnings ensue. This commit fixes said warnings by casting the result of pg_pread()/pg_pwrite() to size_t, which should be safe because we will have already checked for a negative value. Author: Wolfgang Walther Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16989737-1aa8-48fd-8dfe-b7ada06509ab%40technowledgy.de Backpatch-through: 17
2024-11-08Improve fix for not entering parallel mode when holding interrupts.Tom Lane
Commit ac04aa84a put the shutoff for this into the planner, which is not ideal because it doesn't prevent us from re-using a previously made parallel plan. Revert the planner change and instead put the shutoff into InitializeParallelDSM, modeling it on the existing code there for recovering from failure to allocate a DSM segment. However, that code path is mostly untested, and testing a bit harder showed there's at least one bug: ExecHashJoinReInitializeDSM is not prepared for us to have skipped doing parallel DSM setup. I also thought the Assert in ReinitializeParallelWorkers is pretty ill-advised, and replaced it with a silent Min() operation. The existing test case added by ac04aa84a serves fine to test this version of the fix, so no change needed there. Patch by me, but thanks to Noah Misch for the core idea that we could shut off worker creation when !INTERRUPTS_CAN_BE_PROCESSED. Back-patch to v12, as ac04aa84a was. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAC-SaSzHUKT=vZJ8MPxYdC_URPfax+yoA1hKTcF4ROz_Q6z0_Q@mail.gmail.com
2024-11-08Disallow partitionwise join when collations don't matchAmit Langote
If the collation of any join key column doesn’t match the collation of the corresponding partition key, partitionwise joins can yield incorrect results. For example, rows that would match under the join key collation might be located in different partitions due to the partitioning collation. In such cases, a partitionwise join would yield different results from a non-partitionwise join, so disallow it in such cases. Reported-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNno_HKiQ6PqyLYfuqDtwp7KKHZiH1J7Pqyz0nr+PS2Dwg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 12
2024-11-08Disallow partitionwise grouping when collations don't matchAmit Langote
If the collation of any grouping column doesn’t match the collation of the corresponding partition key, partitionwise grouping can yield incorrect results. For example, rows that would be grouped under the grouping collation may end up in different partitions under the partitioning collation. In such cases, full partitionwise grouping would produce results that differ from those without partitionwise grouping, so disallowed that. Partial partitionwise aggregation is still allowed, as the Finalize step reconciles partition-level aggregates with grouping requirements across all partitions, ensuring that the final output remains consistent. This commit also fixes group_by_has_partkey() by ensuring the RelabelType node is stripped from grouping expressions when matching them to partition key expressions to avoid false mismatches. Bug: #18568 Reported-by: Webbo Han <1105066510@qq.com> Author: Webbo Han <1105066510@qq.com> Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com> Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18568-2a9afb6b9f7e6ed3@postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/tencent_9D9103CDA420C07768349CC1DFF88465F90A@qq.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNno_HKiQ6PqyLYfuqDtwp7KKHZiH1J7Pqyz0nr+PS2Dwg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 12
2024-11-08Fix inconsistent RestrictInfo serial numbersRichard Guo
When we generate multiple clones of the same qual condition to cope with outer join identity 3, we need to ensure that all the clones get the same serial number. To achieve this, we reset the root->last_rinfo_serial counter each time we produce RestrictInfo(s) from the qual list (see deconstruct_distribute_oj_quals). This approach works only if we ensure that we are not changing the qual list in any way that'd affect the number of RestrictInfos built from it. However, with b262ad440, an IS NULL qual on a NOT NULL column might result in an additional constant-FALSE RestrictInfo. And different versions of the same qual clause can lead to different conclusions about whether it can be reduced to constant-FALSE. This would affect the number of RestrictInfos built from the qual list for different versions, causing inconsistent RestrictInfo serial numbers across multiple clones of the same qual. This inconsistency can confuse users of these serial numbers, such as rebuild_joinclause_attr_needed, and lead to planner errors such as "ERROR: variable not found in subplan target lists". To fix, reset the root->last_rinfo_serial counter after generating the additional constant-FALSE RestrictInfo. Back-patch to v17 where the issue crept in. In v17, I failed to make a test case that would expose this bug, so no test case for v17. Author: Richard Guo Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4-B6kafn+LmPuh-TYFwFyEm-vVj3Qqv7Yo-69CEv14rRg@mail.gmail.com
2024-11-06Fix lc_collate_is_c() when LC_COLLATE != LC_CTYPE.Jeff Davis
An unfortunate typo in commit 2d819a08a1 can cause wrong results when the default collation provider is libc, LC_CTYPE=C, and LC_COLLATE is a real locale. Users with this combination of settings must REINDEX all affected indexes. The same typo can also cause performance degradation when LC_COLLATE=C and LC_CTYPE is a real locale. Problem does not exist in master (due to refactoring), so fix only in version 17. Reported-by: Drew Callahan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d5081a7f4f6d425c28dd69d1e09b2e78f149e726.camel@j-davis.com
2024-11-06Monkey-patch LLVM code to fix ARM relocation bug.Thomas Munro
Supply a new memory manager for RuntimeDyld, to avoid crashes in generated code caused by memory placement that can overflow a 32 bit data type. This is a drop-in replacement for the llvm::SectionMemoryManager class in the LLVM library, with Michael Smith's proposed fix from https://www.github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71968. We hereby slurp it into our own source tree, after moving into a new namespace llvm::backport and making some minor adjustments so that it can be compiled with older LLVM versions as far back as 12. It's harder to make it work on even older LLVM versions, but it doesn't seem likely that people are really using them so that is not investigated for now. The problem could also be addressed by switching to JITLink instead of RuntimeDyld, and that is the LLVM project's recommended solution as the latter is about to be deprecated. We'll have to do that soon enough anyway, and then when the LLVM version support window advances far enough in a few years we'll be able to delete this code. Unfortunately that wouldn't be enough for PostgreSQL today: in most relevant versions of LLVM, JITLink is missing or incomplete. Several other projects have already back-ported this fix into their fork of LLVM, which is a vote of confidence despite the lack of commit into LLVM as of today. We don't have our own copy of LLVM so we can't do exactly what they've done; instead we have a copy of the whole patched class so we can pass an instance of it to RuntimeDyld. The LLVM project hasn't chosen to commit the fix yet, and even if it did, it wouldn't be back-ported into the releases of LLVM that most of our users care about, so there is not much point in waiting any longer for that. If they make further changes and commit it to LLVM 19 or 20, we'll still need this for older versions, but we may want to resynchronize our copy and update some comments. The changes that we've had to make to our copy can be seen by diffing our SectionMemoryManager.{h,cpp} files against the ones in the tree of the pull request. Per the LLVM project's license requirements, a copy is in SectionMemoryManager.LICENSE. This should fix the spate of crash reports we've been receiving lately from users on large memory ARM systems. Back-patch to all supported releases. Co-authored-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com> Reviewed-by: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> (license aspects) Reported-by: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAO6_Xqr63qj%3DSx7HY6ZiiQ6R_JbX%2B-p6sTPwDYwTWZjUmjsYBg%40mail.gmail.com
2024-11-05Clear padding of PgStat_HashKey when handling pgstats entriesMichael Paquier
PgStat_HashKey is currently initialized in a way that could result in random data if the structure has any padding bytes. The structure has no padding bytes currently, fortunately, but it could become a problem should the structure change at some point in the future. The code is changed to use some memset(0) so as any padding would be handled properly, as it would be surprising to see random failures in the pgstats entry lookups. PgStat_HashKey is a structure internal to pgstats, and an ABI change could be possible in the scope of a bug fix, so backpatch down to 15 where this has been introduced. Author: Bertrand Drouvot Reviewed-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zyb7RW1y9dVfO0UH@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal Backpatch-through: 15
2024-11-04Use portable diff options in pg_bsd_indent's regression test.Tom Lane
We had been using "diff -upd", which evidently works for most people, but Solaris's diff doesn't like it. (We'd not noticed because the Solaris buildfarm animals weren't running this test until they were upgraded to the latest buildfarm client script.) Change to "diff -U3" which is what pg_regress has used for ages. Per buildfarm (and off-list discussion with Noah Misch). Back-patch to v16 where this test was added. In v16, also back-patch the relevant part of 628c1d1f2 so that the test script looks about the same in all branches.
2024-11-04pg_basebackup, pg_receivewal: fix failure to find password in ~/.pgpass.Tom Lane
Sloppy refactoring in commit cca97ce6a caused these programs to pass dbname = NULL to libpq if there was no "--dbname" switch on the command line, where before "replication" would be passed. This didn't break things completely, because the source server doesn't care about the dbname specified for a physical replication connection. However, it did cause libpq to fail to match a ~/.pgpass entry that has "replication" in the dbname field. Restore the previous behavior of passing "replication". Also, closer inspection shows that if you do specify a dbname in the connection string, that is what will be matched to ~/.pgpass, not "replication". This was the pre-existing behavior so we should not change it, but the SGML docs were pretty misleading about it. Improve that. Per bug #18685 from Toshi Harada. Back-patch to v17 where the error crept in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18685-fee2dd142b9688f1@postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2702546.1730740456@sss.pgh.pa.us
2024-11-04pg_combinebackup: Error if incremental file exists in full backup.Robert Haas
Suppose that you run a command like "pg_combinebackup b1 b2 -o output", but both b1 and b2 contain an INCREMENTAL.$something file in a directory that is expected to contain relation files. This is an error, but the previous code would not detect the problem and instead write a garbage full file named $something to the output directory. This commit adds code to detect the error and a test case to verify the behavior. It's difficult to imagine that this will ever happen unless someone is intentionally trying to break incremental backup, but per discussion, let's consider that the lack of adequate sanity checking in this area is a bug and back-patch to v17, where incremental backup was introduced. Patch by me, reviewed by Bertrand Drouvot and Amul Sul. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaD7dBYPqe7kMtO0dyto7rd0rUh7joh=JPUSaFszKY6Pg@mail.gmail.com
2024-11-04pg_combinebackup: When reconstructing, avoid double slash in filename.Robert Haas
This function is always called with a relative_path that ends in a slash, so there's no need to insert a second one. So, don't. Instead, add an assertion to verify that nothing gets broken in the future, and adjust the comments. While this is not a critical bug, the duplicate slash is visible in error messages, which could create confusion, so back-patch to v17. This is also better in that it keeps the code consistent across branches. Patch by me, reviewed by Bertrand Drouvot and Amul Sul. Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaD7dBYPqe7kMtO0dyto7rd0rUh7joh=JPUSaFszKY6Pg@mail.gmail.com
2024-11-02Suppress new "may be used uninitialized" warning.Noah Misch
Buildfarm member mamba fails to deduce that the function never uses this variable without initializing it. Back-patch to v12, like commit b412f402d1e020c5dac94f3bf4a005db69519b99.
2024-11-02Move I/O before the index_update_stats() buffer lock region.Noah Misch
Commit a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257 enlarged the work done here under the pg_class heap buffer lock. Two preexisting actions are best done before holding that lock. Both RelationGetNumberOfBlocks() and visibilitymap_count() do I/O, and the latter might exclusive-lock a visibility map buffer. Moving these reduces contention and risk of undetected LWLock deadlock. Back-patch to v12, like that commit. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20241031200139.b4@rfd.leadboat.com
2024-11-02Revert "For inplace update, send nontransactional invalidations."Noah Misch
This reverts commit 95c5acb3fc261067ab65ddc0b2dca8e162f09442 (v17) and counterparts in each other non-master branch. If released, that commit would have caused a worst-in-years minor release regression, via undetected LWLock self-deadlock. This commit and its self-deadlock fix warrant more bake time in the master branch. Reported by Alexander Lakhin. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10ec0bc3-5933-1189-6bb8-5dec4114558e@gmail.com
2024-11-02Revert "WAL-log inplace update before revealing it to other sessions."Noah Misch
This reverts commit bfd5c6e279c8e1702eea882439dc7ebdf4d4b3a5 (v17) and counterparts in each other non-master branch. This unblocks reverting a commit on which it depends. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10ec0bc3-5933-1189-6bb8-5dec4114558e@gmail.com
2024-10-30Stabilize jsonb_path_query test case.Tom Lane
An operation like '12:34:56'::time_tz takes the UTC offset from the prevailing time zone, which means that the results change across DST transitions. One of the test cases added in ed055d249 failed to consider this. Per report from Bernhard Wiedemann. Back-patch to v17, as the test case was. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ba8e1bc0-8a99-45b7-8397-3f2e94415e03@suse.de
2024-10-30Fix bug in nbtree array primitive scan scheduling.Peter Geoghegan
A bug in nbtree's handling of primitive index scan scheduling could lead to wrong answers when a scrollable cursor was used with an index scan that had a SAOP index qual. Wrong answers were only possible when the scan direction changed after a primitive scan was scheduled, but before _bt_next was asked to fetch the next tuple in line (i.e. for things to break, _bt_next had to be denied the opportunity to step off the page in the same direction as the one used when the primscan was scheduled). Furthermore, the issue only occurred when the page in question happened to be the first page to be visited by the entire top-level scan; the issue hinged upon the cursor backing up to the absolute beginning of the key space that it returns tuples from (fetching in the opposite scan direction across a "primitive scan boundary" always worked correctly). To fix, make _bt_next unset the "needs primitive index scan" flag when it detects that the current scan direction is not the one that was used by _bt_readpage back when the primitive scan in question was scheduled. This fixes the cases that are known to be faulty, and also seems like a good idea on general robustness grounds. Affected scrollable cursor cases now avoid a spurious primitive index scan when they fetch backwards to the absolute start of the key space to be visited by their cursor. Fetching backwards now only returns those tuples at the start of the scan, as expected. It'll also be okay to once again fetch forwards from the start at that point, since the scan will be left in a state that's exactly consistent with the state it was in before any tuples were ever fetched, as expected. Oversight in commit 5bf748b8, which enhanced nbtree ScalarArrayOp execution. Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wznv49bFsE2jkt4GuZ0tU2C91dEST=50egzjY2FeOcHL4Q@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 17-, where commit 5bf748b8 first appears.
2024-10-30Fix some more bugs in foreign keys connecting partitioned tablesÁlvaro Herrera
* In DetachPartitionFinalize() we were applying a tuple conversion map to tuples that didn't need one, which can lead to erratic behavior if a partitioned table has a partition with a different column order, as reported by Alexander Lakhin. This was introduced by 53af9491a043. Don't do that. Also, modify a recently added test case to exercise this. * The same function as well as CloneFkReferenced() were acquiring AccessShareLock on a partition, only to have CreateTrigger() later acquire ShareRowExclusiveLock on it. This can lead to deadlock by lock escalation, unnecessarily. Avoid that by acquiring the stronger lock to begin with. This probably dates back to branch 12, but I have never seen a report of this being a problem in the field. * Innocuous but wasteful: also introduced by 53af9491a043, we were reading a pg_constraint tuple from syscache that we don't need, as reported by Tender Wang. Don't. Backpatch to 15. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/461e9c26-2076-8224-e119-84998b6a784e@gmail.com
2024-10-29Unpin buffer before inplace update waits for an XID to end.Noah Misch
Commit a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257 changed inplace updates to wait for heap_update() commands like GRANT TABLE and GRANT DATABASE. By keeping the pin during that wait, a sequence of autovacuum workers and an uncommitted GRANT starved one foreground LockBufferForCleanup() for six minutes, on buildfarm member sarus. Prevent, at the cost of a bit of complexity. Back-patch to v12, like the earlier commit. That commit and heap_inplace_lock() have not yet appeared in any release. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20241026184936.ae.nmisch@google.com
2024-10-29Update time zone data files to tzdata release 2024b.Tom Lane
Historical corrections for Mexico, Mongolia, and Portugal. Notably, Asia/Choibalsan is now an alias for Asia/Ulaanbaatar rather than being a separate zone, mainly because the differences between those zones were found to be based on untrustworthy data.
2024-10-29doc: Add better description for rewrite functions in event triggersMichael Paquier
There are two functions that can be used in event triggers to get more details about a rewrite happening on a relation. Both had a limited documentation: - pg_event_trigger_table_rewrite_reason() and pg_event_trigger_table_rewrite_oid() were not mentioned in the main event trigger section in the paragraph dedicated to the event table_rewrite. - pg_event_trigger_table_rewrite_reason() returns an integer which is a bitmap of the reasons why a rewrite happens. There was no explanation about the meaning of these values, forcing the reader to look at the code to find out that these are defined in event_trigger.h. While on it, let's add a comment in event_trigger.h where the AT_REWRITE_* are defined, telling to update the documentation when these values are changed. Backpatch down to 13 as a consequence of 1ad23335f36b, where this area of the documentation has been heavily reworked. Author: Greg Sabino Mullane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKAnmmL+Z6j-C8dAx1tVrnBmZJu+BSoc68WSg3sR+CVNjBCqbw@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 13
2024-10-29Fix dependency of partitioned table and table AM with CREATE TABLE .. USINGMichael Paquier
A pg_depend entry between a partitioned table and its table access method was missing when using CREATE TABLE .. USING with an unpinned access method. DROP ACCESS METHOD could be used, while it should be blocked if CASCADE is not specified, even if there was a partitioned table that depends on the table access method. pg_class.relam would then hold an orphaned OID value still pointing to the AM dropped. The problem is fixed by adding a dependency between the partitioned table and its table access method if set when the relation is created. A test checking the contents of pg_depend in this case is added. Issue introduced in 374c7a229042, that has added support for CREATE TABLE .. USING for partitioned tables. Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18674-1ef01eceec278fab@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 17
2024-10-28Guard against enormously long input in pg_saslprep().Tom Lane
Coverity complained that pg_saslprep() could suffer integer overflow, leading to under-allocation of the output buffer, if the input string exceeds SIZE_MAX/4. This hazard seems largely hypothetical, but it's easy enough to defend against, so let's do so. This patch creates a third place in src/common/ where we are locally defining MaxAllocSize so that we can test against that in the same way in backend and frontend compiles. That seems like about two places too many, so the next patch will move that into common/fe_memutils.h. I'm hesitant to do that in back branches however. Back-patch to v14. The code looks similar in older branches, but before commit 67a472d71 there was a separate test on the input string length that prevented this hazard. Per Coverity report.
2024-10-28Fix overflow in bsearch_arg() with more than INT_MAX elementsHeikki Linnakangas
This was introduced in commit bfa2cee784, which replaced the old bsearch_cmp() function we had in extended_stats.c with the current implementation. The original discussion or commit message of bfa2cee784 didn't mention where the new implementation came from, but based on some googling, I'm guessing *BSD or libiberty, all of which share this same code, with or without this fix. Author: Ranier Vilela Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart Backpatch-through: 14 Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEudQAp34o_8u6sGSVraLwuMv9F7T9hyHpePXHmRaxR2Aboi%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com
2024-10-25WAL-log inplace update before revealing it to other sessions.Noah Misch
A buffer lock won't stop a reader having already checked tuple visibility. If a vac_update_datfrozenid() and then a crash happened during inplace update of a relfrozenxid value, datfrozenxid could overtake relfrozenxid. That could lead to "could not access status of transaction" errors. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions). In v14 and earlier, this also back-patches the assertion removal from commit 7fcf2faf9c7dd473208fd6d5565f88d7f733782b. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240620012908.92.nmisch@google.com
2024-10-25For inplace update, send nontransactional invalidations.Noah Misch
The inplace update survives ROLLBACK. The inval didn't, so another backend's DDL could then update the row without incorporating the inplace update. In the test this fixes, a mix of CREATE INDEX and ALTER TABLE resulted in a table with an index, yet relhasindex=f. That is a source of index corruption. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions). The back branch versions don't change WAL, because those branches just added end-of-recovery SIResetAll(). All branches change the ABI of extern function PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple(). No PGXN extension calls that, and there's no apparent use case in extensions. Reviewed by Nitin Motiani and (in earlier versions) Andres Freund. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240523000548.58.nmisch@google.com
2024-10-25At end of recovery, reset all sinval-managed caches.Noah Misch
An inplace update's invalidation messages are part of its transaction's commit record. However, the update survives even if its transaction aborts or we stop recovery before replaying its transaction commit. After recovery, a backend that started in recovery could update the row without incorporating the inplace update. That could result in a table with an index, yet relhasindex=f. That is a source of index corruption. This bulk invalidation avoids the functional consequences. A future change can fix the !RecoveryInProgress() scenario without changing the WAL format. Back-patch to v17 - v12 (all supported versions). v18 will instead add invalidations to WAL. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240618152349.7f.nmisch@google.com
2024-10-24Stop reading uninitialized memory in heap_inplace_lock().Noah Misch
Stop computing a never-used value. This removes the read; the read had no functional implications. Back-patch to v12, like commit a07e03fd8fa7daf4d1356f7cb501ffe784ea6257. Reported by Alexander Lakhin. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6c92f59b-f5bc-e58c-9bdd-d1f21c17c786@gmail.com
2024-10-23Remove unnecessary word in a commentAmit Langote
Relations opened by the executor are only closed once in ExecCloseRangeTableRelations(), so the word "again" in the comment for ExecGetRangeTableRelation() is misleading and unnecessary. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqHnw-zR+u060i3jp4ky5UR0CjByRFQz50oZ05de7wUg=Q@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 12
2024-10-23ecpg: Fix out-of-bound read in DecodeDateTime()Michael Paquier
It was possible for the code to read out-of-bound data from the "day_tab" table with some crafted input data. Let's treat these as invalid input as the month number is incorrect. A test is added to test this case with a check on the errno returned by the decoding routine. A test close to the new one added in this commit was testing for a failure, but did not look at the errno generated, so let's use this commit to also change it, adding a check on the errno returned by DecodeDateTime(). Like the other test scripts, dt_test should likely be expanded to include more checks based on the errnos generated in these code paths. This is left as future work. This issue exists since 2e6f97560a83, so backpatch all the way down. Reported-by: Pavel Nekrasov Author: Bruce Momjian, Pavel Nekrasov Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18614-6bbe00117352309e@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 12
2024-10-22Restructure foreign key handling code for ATTACH/DETACHÁlvaro Herrera
... to fix bugs when the referenced table is partitioned. The catalog representation we chose for foreign keys connecting partitioned tables (in commit f56f8f8da6af) is inconvenient, in the sense that a standalone table has a different way to represent the constraint when referencing a partitioned table, than when the same table becomes a partition (and vice versa). Because of this, we need to create additional catalog rows on detach (pg_constraint and pg_trigger), and remove them on attach. We were doing some of those things, but not all of them, leading to missing catalog rows in certain cases. The worst problem seems to be that we are missing action triggers after detaching a partition, which means that you could update/delete rows from the referenced partitioned table that still had referencing rows on that table, the server failing to throw the required errors. !!! Note that this means existing databases with FKs that reference partitioned tables might have rows that break relational integrity, on tables that were once partitions on the referencing side of the FK. Another possible problem is that trying to reattach a table that had been detached would fail indicating that internal triggers cannot be found, which from the user's point of view is nonsensical. In branches 15 and above, we fix this by creating a new helper function addFkConstraint() which is in charge of creating a standalone pg_constraint row, and repurposing addFkRecurseReferencing() and addFkRecurseReferenced() so that they're only the recursive routine for each side of the FK, and they call addFkConstraint() to create pg_constraint at each partitioning level and add the necessary triggers. These new routines can be used during partition creation, partition attach and detach, and foreign key creation. This reduces redundant code and simplifies the flow. In branches 14 and 13, we have a much simpler fix that consists on simply removing the constraint on detach. The reason is that those branches are missing commit f4566345cf40, which reworked the way this works in a way that we didn't consider back-patchable at the time. We opted to leave branch 12 alone, because it's different from branch 13 enough that the fix doesn't apply; and because it is going in EOL mode very soon, patching it now might be worse since there's no way to undo the damage if it goes wrong. Existing databases might need to be repaired. In the future we might want to rethink the catalog representation to avoid this problem, but for now the code seems to do what's required to make the constraints operate correctly. Co-authored-by: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com> Co-authored-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Reported-by: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> Reported-by: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com> Reported-by: Thomas Baehler (SBB CFF FFS) <thomas.baehler2@sbb.ch> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230420144344.40744130@karst Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230705233028.2f554f73@karst Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/GVAP278MB02787E7134FD691861635A8BC9032@GVAP278MB0278.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18541-628a61bc267cd2d3@postgresql.org
2024-10-21Fix wrong assertion and poor error messages in "COPY (query) TO".Tom Lane
If the query is rewritten into a NOTIFY command by a DO INSTEAD rule, we'd get an assertion failure, or in non-assert builds issue a rather confusing error message. Improve that. Also fix a longstanding grammar mistake in a nearby error message. Per bug #18664 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Tender Wang and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18664-ffd0ebc2386598df@postgresql.org
2024-10-21Fix race condition in committing a serializable transactionHeikki Linnakangas
The finished transaction list can contain XIDs that are older than the serializable global xmin. It's a short-lived state; ClearOldPredicateLocks() removes any such transactions from the list, and it's called whenever the global xmin advances. But if another backend calls SummarizeOldestCommittedSxact() in that window, it will call SerialAdd() on an XID that's older than the global xmin, or if there are no more transactions running, when global xmin is invalid. That trips the assertion in SerialAdd(). Fixes bug #18658 reported by Andrew Bille. Thanks to Alexander Lakhin for analysis. Backpatch to all versions. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18658-7dab125ec688c70b%40postgresql.org
2024-10-20SQL/JSON: Fix some oversights in commit b6e1157e7Amit Langote
The decision in b6e1157e7 to ignore raw_expr when evaluating a JsonValueExpr was incorrect. While its value is not ultimately used (since formatted_expr's value is), failing to initialize it can lead to problems, for instance, when the expression tree in raw_expr contains Aggref nodes, which must be initialized to ensure the parent Agg node works correctly. Also, optimize eval_const_expressions_mutator()'s handling of JsonValueExpr a bit. Currently, when formatted_expr cannot be folded into a constant, we end up processing it twice -- once directly in eval_const_expressions_mutator() and again recursively via ece_generic_processing(). This recursive processing is required to handle raw_expr. To avoid the redundant processing of formatted_expr, we now process raw_expr directly in eval_const_expressions_mutator(). Finally, update the comment of JsonValueExpr to describe the roles of raw_expr and formatted_expr more clearly. Bug: #18657 Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Diagnosed-by: Fabio R. Sluzala <fabio3rs@gmail.com> Diagnosed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18657-1b90ccce2b16bdb8@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 16
2024-10-18Fix description of PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster::wait_for_event()Michael Paquier
The arguments of the function were listed in an incorrect order in the description of the routine. This information can be seen with perldoc. Issue spotted while working on this area of the code. Backpatch-through: 17
2024-10-17Fix extreme skew detection in Parallel Hash Join.Thomas Munro
After repartitioning the inner side of a hash join that would have exceeded the allowed size, we check if all the tuples from a parent partition moved to one child partition. That is evidence that it contains duplicate keys and later attempts to repartition will also fail, so we should give up trying to limit memory (for lack of a better fallback strategy). A thinko prevented the check from working correctly in partition 0 (the one that is partially loaded into memory already). After repartitioning, we should check for extreme skew if the *parent* partition's space_exhausted flag was set, not the child partition's. The consequence was repeated futile repartitioning until per-partition data exceeded various limits including "ERROR: invalid DSA memory alloc request size 1811939328", OS allocation failure, or temporary disk space errors. (We could also do something about some of those symptoms, but that's material for separate patches.) This problem only became likely when PostgreSQL 16 introduced support for Parallel Hash Right/Full Join, allowing NULL keys into the hash table. Repartitioning always leaves NULL in partition 0, no matter how many times you do it, because the hash value is all zero bits. That's unlikely for other hashed values, but they might still have caused wasted extra effort before giving up. Back-patch to all supported releases. Reported-by: Craig Milhiser <craig@milhiser.com> Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BwnhO1OfgXbmXgC4fv_uu%3DOxcDQuHvfoQ4k0DFeB0Qqd-X-rQ%40mail.gmail.com
2024-10-17Fix whitespacePeter Eisentraut
2024-10-17Fix validation of COPY FORCE_NOT_NULL/FORCE_NULL for the all-column casesMichael Paquier
This commit adds missing checks for COPY FORCE_NOT_NULL and FORCE_NULL when applied to all columns via "*". These options now correctly require CSV mode and are disallowed in COPY TO, making their behavior consistent with FORCE_QUOTE. Some regression tests are added to verify the correct behavior for the all-columns case, including FORCE_QUOTE, which was not tested. Backpatch down to 17, where support for the all-column grammar with FORCE_NOT_NULL and FORCE_NULL has been added. Author: Joel Jacobson Reviewed-by: Zhang Mingli Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/65030d1d-5f90-4fa4-92eb-f5f50389858e@app.fastmail.com Backpatch-through: 17
2024-10-17Rewrite some regression queries for option checks with COPYMichael Paquier
Some queries in copy2 are there to check various option combinations, and used "stdin" or "stdout" incompatible with the COPY TO or FROM clauses combined with them, which was confusing. This commit rewrites these queries to use a compatible grammar. The coverage of the tests is unchanged. Like the original commit 451d1164b9d0, backpatch down to 16 where these have been introduced. A follow-up commit will rely on this area of the tests for a bug fix. Author: Joel Jacobson Reviewed-by: Zhang Mingli Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/65030d1d-5f90-4fa4-92eb-f5f50389858e@app.fastmail.com Backpatch-through: 16
2024-10-16Further refine _SPI_execute_plan's rule for atomic execution.Tom Lane
Commit 2dc1deaea turns out to have been still a brick shy of a load, because CALL statements executing within a plpgsql exception block could still pass the wrong snapshot to stable functions within the CALL's argument list. That happened because standard_ProcessUtility forces isAtomicContext to true if IsTransactionBlock is true, which it always will be inside a subtransaction. Then ExecuteCallStmt would think it does not need to push a new snapshot --- but _SPI_execute_plan didn't do so either, since it thought it was in nonatomic mode. The best fix for this seems to be for _SPI_execute_plan to operate in atomic execution mode if IsSubTransaction() is true, even when the SPI context as a whole is non-atomic. This makes _SPI_execute_plan have the same rules about when non-atomic execution is allowed as _SPI_commit/_SPI_rollback have about when COMMIT/ROLLBACK are allowed, which seems appropriately symmetric. (If anyone ever tries to allow COMMIT/ROLLBACK inside a subtransaction, this would all need to be rethought ... but I'm unconvinced that such a thing could be logically consistent at all.) For further consistency, also check IsSubTransaction() in SPI_inside_nonatomic_context. That does not matter for its one present-day caller StartTransaction, which can't be reached inside a subtransaction. But if any other callers ever arise, they'd presumably want this definition. Per bug #18656 from Alexander Alehin. Back-patch to all supported branches, like previous fixes in this area. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18656-cade1780866ef66c@postgresql.org
2024-10-16Reduce memory block size for decoded tuple storage to 8kB.Masahiko Sawada
Commit a4ccc1cef introduced the Generation Context and modified the logical decoding process to use a Generation Context with a fixed block size of 8MB for storing tuple data decoded during logical decoding (i.e., rb->tup_context). Several reports have indicated that the logical decoding process can be terminated due to out-of-memory (OOM) situations caused by excessive memory usage in rb->tup_context. This issue can occur when decoding a workload involving several concurrent transactions, including a long-running transaction that modifies tuples. By design, the Generation Context does not free a memory block until all chunks within that block are released. Consequently, if tuples modified by the long-running transaction are stored across multiple memory blocks, these blocks remain allocated until the long-running transaction completes, leading to substantial memory fragmentation. The memory usage during logical decoding, tracked by rb->size, does not account for memory fragmentation, resulting in potentially much higher memory consumption than the value of the logical_decoding_work_mem parameter. Various improvement strategies were discussed in the relevant thread. This change reduces the block size of the Generation Context used in rb->tup_context from 8MB to 8kB. This modification significantly decreases the likelihood of substantial memory fragmentation occurring and is relatively straightforward to backport. Performance testing across multiple platforms has confirmed that this change will not introduce any performance degradation that would impact actual operation. Backport to all supported branches. Reported-by: Alex Richman, Michael Guissine, Avi Weinberg Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Fujii Masao, David Rowley Tested-by: Hayato Kuroda, Shlok Kyal Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBTY1LATZUmvSXEssvq07qDZufV4AF-OHh9VD2pC0VY2A%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 12
2024-10-16Fix typo in comment of transformJsonAggConstructor()Amit Langote
An oversight of 3a8a1f3254b. Reported-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> Author: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> Backpatch-through: 16
2024-10-15Add type cast to foreach_internal's loop variable.Nathan Bossart
C++ requires explicitly casting void pointers to the appropriate pointer type, which means the foreach_ptr macro cannot be used in C++ code without this change. Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio Reviewed-by: Bruce Momjian Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQSYG3QfHrc-rOk2KbnB9iJOd7Qu-Xii1s-GTA%3D3JFt49Q%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 17
2024-10-14psql: Fix \watch when using interval values less than 1msMichael Paquier
Attempting to use an interval of time less than 1ms would cause \watch to hang. This was confusing, so let's change the logic so as an interval lower than 1ms behaves the same as 0. Comments are added to mention that the internals of do_watch() had better rely on "sleep_ms", the interval value in milliseconds. While on it, this commit adds a test to check the behavior of interval values less than 1ms. \watch hanging for interval values less than 1ms existed before 6f9ee74d45aa, that has changed the code to support an interval value of 0. Reported-by: Heikki Linnakangas Author: Andrey M. Borodin, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/88445e0e-3156-4b9d-afae-9a1a7b1631f6@iki.fi Backpatch-through: 16
2024-10-12Correctly identify which EC members are computable at a plan node.Tom Lane
find_computable_ec_member() had the wrong mental model of what its primary caller prepare_sort_from_pathkeys() would do with the selected EquivalenceClass member expression. We will not compute the EC expression in a plan node atop the one returning the passed-in targetlist; rather, the EC expression will be computed as an additional column of that targetlist. So any Var or quasi-Var used in the given tlist is also available to the EC expression. In simple cases this makes no difference because the given tlist is just a list of Vars or quasi-Vars --- but if we are considering an appendrel member produced by flattening a UNION ALL, the tlist may contain expressions, resulting in failure to match and a "could not find pathkey item to sort" error. To fix, we can flatten both the tlist and the EC members with pull_var_clause(), and then just check for subset-ness, so that the code is actually shorter than before. While this bug is quite old, the present patch only works back to v13. We could possibly make it work in v12 by back-patching parts of 375398244. On the whole though I don't like the risk/reward ratio of that idea. v12's final release is next month, meaning there would be no chance to correct matters if the patch causes a regression. Since this failure has escaped notice for 14 years, it's likely nobody will hit it in the field with v12. Per bug #18652 from Alexander Lakhin. Andrei Lepikhov and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18652-deaa782ebcca85d1@postgresql.org
2024-10-11Fix missed case for builtin collation provider.Jeff Davis
A missed check for the builtin collation provider could result in falling through to call isalpha(). This does not appear to have practical consequences because it only happens for characters in the ASCII range. Regardless, the builtin provider should not be calling libc functions, so backpatch. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1bd5a0a5192f82c22ee7527e825b18ab0028b2c7.camel@j-davis.com Backpatch-through: 17
2024-10-09Avoid crash in estimate_array_length with null root pointer.Tom Lane
Commit 9391f7152 added a "PlannerInfo *root" parameter to estimate_array_length, but failed to consider the possibility that NULL would be passed for that, leading to a null pointer dereference. We could rectify the particular case shown in the bug report by fixing simplify_function/inline_function to pass through the root pointer. However, as long as eval_const_expressions is documented to accept NULL for root, similar hazards would remain. For now, let's just do the narrow fix of hardening estimate_array_length to not crash. Its behavior with NULL root will be the same as it was before 9391f7152, so this is not too awful. Per report from Fredrik Widlert (via Paul Ramsey). Back-patch to v17 where 9391f7152 came in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/518339E7-173E-45EC-A0FF-9A4A62AA4F40@cleverelephant.ca
2024-10-09Remove incorrect function import from pgindentDaniel Gustafsson
Commit 149ac7d4559 which re-implemented pgindent in Perl explicitly imported the devnull function from File::Spec, but the module does not export anything. In recent versions of Perl calling a missing import function cause a warning, which combined with warnings being fatal cause pgindent to error out. Backpatch to all supported versions. Author: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name> Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> Discusson: https://postgr.es/m/2372cd74-11b0-46f9-b28e-8f9627215d19@ewie.name Backpatch-through: v12
2024-10-07Fix search_path cache initialization.Jeff Davis
The cache needs to be available very early, so don't rely on InitializeSearchPath() to initialize the it. Reported-by: Murat Efendioğlu Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACbCzujQ4zS8MM1bx-==+tr+D3Hk5G1cjN4XkUQ+Q=cEpwhzqg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 17