| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
CheckForSerializableConflictOut(), because it can set hint bits.
YAMAMOTO Takashi
|
|
Mostly text supplied by Jan Urbański.
|
|
Instead of manually maintaining the "implementation of XXX operator"
comments in pg_proc.h, delete all those entries and let initdb create
them via a join. To let initdb figure out which name to use when there
is a conflict, change the comments for deprecated operators to say they
are deprecated --- which seems like a good thing to do anyway.
|
|
This works around the problem noted by Yamamoto Takashi in bug #5906,
that there were code paths whereby we could reach AtCleanup_Portals
with a portal's cleanup hook still unexecuted. The changes I made
a few days ago were intended to prevent that from happening, and
I think that on balance it's still a good thing to avoid, so I don't
want to remove the Assert in AtCleanup_Portals. Hence do this instead.
|
|
Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>.
|
|
Andrey Popp
|
|
Historically, we've not had separate comments for built-in pg_operator
entries, but relied on the comments for the underlying functions. The
trouble with this approach is that there isn't much of anything to suggest
to users that they'd be better off using the operators instead. So, move
all the relevant comments into pg_operator, and give each underlying
function a comment that just says "implementation of XXX operator".
There are only about half a dozen cases where it seems reasonable to use
the underlying function interchangeably with the operator; in these cases
I left the same comment in place on the function as on the operator.
While at it, establish a policy that every built-in function and operator
entry should have a comment: there are now queries in the opr_sanity
regression test that will complain if one doesn't. This only required
adding a dozen or two more entries than would have been there anyway.
I also spent some time trying to eliminate gratuitous inconsistencies in
the style of the comments, though it's hopeless to suppose that more won't
creep in soon enough.
Per my proposal of 2010-10-15.
|
|
This is faked information like for domains.
|
|
Patch from Jan Urbański.
|
|
plpython_subtransaction test needs a separate expected file
specifically for Python 2.5.
|
|
it a lot more useful for determining which standby is most up-to-date,
for example. There was long discussions on whether overwriting existing
existing WAL makes sense to begin with, and whether we should do some more
extensive variable renaming, but this change nevertheless seems quite
uncontroversial.
Fujii Masao, reviewed by Jeff Janes, Robert Haas, Stephen Frost.
|
|
Change the way UPDATEs are handled. Instead of maintaining a chain of
tuple-level locks in shared memory, copy any existing locks on the old
tuple to the new tuple at UPDATE. Any existing page-level lock needs to
be duplicated too, as a lock on the new tuple. That was neglected
previously.
Store xmin on tuple-level predicate locks, to distinguish a lock on an old
already-recycled tuple from a new tuple at the same physical location.
Failure to distinguish them caused loops in the tuple-lock chains, as
reported by YAMAMOTO Takashi. Although we don't use the chain representation
of UPDATEs anymore, it seems like a good idea to store the xmin to avoid
some false positives if no other reason.
CheckSingleTargetForConflictsIn now correctly handles the case where a lock
that's being held is not reflected in the local lock table. That happens
if another backend acquires a lock on our behalf due to an UPDATE or a page
split.
PredicateLockPageCombine now retains locks for the page that is being
removed, rather than removing them. This prevents a potentially dangerous
false-positive inconsistency where the local lock table believes that a lock
is held, but it is actually not.
Dan Ports and Kevin Grittner
|
|
This was previously omitted by accident.
|
|
Per discussion, this seems important for plans involving writable CTEs,
since there can now be more than one ModifyTable node in the plan.
To retain the same formatting as for target tables of scan nodes, we
show only one target table, which will be the parent table in case of
an UPDATE or DELETE on an inheritance tree. Individual child tables
can be determined by inspecting the child plan trees if needed.
|
|
Without this patch, when wal_receiver_status_interval=0, indicating that no
status messages should be sent, Hot Standby feedback messages are instead sent
extremely frequently.
Fujii Masao, with documentation changes by me.
|
|
With this patch, portals, SQL functions, and SPI all agree that there
should be only a CommandCounterIncrement between the queries that are
generated from a single SQL command by rule expansion. Fetching a whole
new snapshot now happens only between original queries. This is equivalent
to the existing behavior of EXPLAIN ANALYZE, and it was judged to be the
best choice since it eliminates one source of concurrency hazards for
rules. The patch should also make things marginally faster by reducing the
number of snapshot push/pop operations.
The patch removes pg_parse_and_rewrite(), which is no longer used anywhere.
There was considerable discussion about more aggressive refactoring of the
query-processing functions exported by postgres.c, but for the moment
nothing more has been done there.
I also took the opportunity to refactor snapmgr.c's API slightly: the
former PushUpdatedSnapshot() has been split into two functions.
Marko Tiikkaja, reviewed by Steve Singer and Tom Lane
|
|
|
|
For consistency with pg_last_xlog_replay_location. Per discussion.
|
|
|
|
This provides a separate exception class for each error code that the
backend defines, as well as the ability to get the SQLSTATE from the
exception object.
Jan Urbański, reviewed by Steve Singer
|
|
Adds a context manager, obtainable by plpy.subtransaction(), to run a
group of statements in a subtransaction.
Jan Urbański, reviewed by Steve Singer, additional scribbling by me
|
|
We don't have complete expected coverage for Python 2.2 anyway, so it
doesn't seem worth keeping this one around that no one appears to be
updating anyway. Visual inspection of the differences ought to be
good enough for those few who care about this obsolete Python version.
|
|
The originally committed patch for modifying CTEs didn't interact well
with EXPLAIN, as noted by myself, and also had corner-case problems with
triggers, as noted by Dean Rasheed. Those problems show it is really not
practical for ExecutorEnd to call any user-defined code; so split the
cleanup duties out into a new function ExecutorFinish, which must be called
between the last ExecutorRun call and ExecutorEnd. Some Asserts have been
added to these functions to help verify correct usage.
It is no longer necessary for callers of the executor to call
AfterTriggerBeginQuery/AfterTriggerEndQuery for themselves, as this is now
done by ExecutorStart/ExecutorFinish respectively. If you really need to
suppress that and do it for yourself, pass EXEC_FLAG_SKIP_TRIGGERS to
ExecutorStart.
Also, refactor portal commit processing to allow for the possibility that
PortalDrop will invoke user-defined code. I think this is not actually
necessary just yet, since the portal-execution-strategy logic forces any
non-pure-SELECT query to be run to completion before we will consider
committing. But it seems like good future-proofing.
|
|
output of actual Postgres parameter _values_ related to shared memory,
and suggesting that these are only possible parameters to reduce.
|
|
Josh Kupershmidt
|
|
sender is immediately woken up by transaction commit, there's no need to
wake up so aggressively.
|
|
This allows functions with multiple OUT parameters returning both one
or multiple records (RECORD or SETOF RECORD).
Jan Urbański, reviewed by Hitoshi Harada
|
|
We need ExecutorEnd to run the ModifyTable nodes to completion in
reverse order of initialization, not forward order. Easily done
by constructing the list back-to-front.
|
|
This patch implements data-modifying WITH queries according to the
semantics that the updates all happen with the same command counter value,
and in an unspecified order. Therefore one WITH clause can't see the
effects of another, nor can the outer query see the effects other than
through the RETURNING values. And attempts to do conflicting updates will
have unpredictable results. We'll need to document all that.
This commit just fixes the code; documentation updates are waiting on
author.
Marko Tiikkaja and Hitoshi Harada
|
|
Emit a log message when creating a named restore point, and improve
documentation for pg_create_restore_point().
Euler Taveira de Oliveira, per suggestions from Thom Brown, with some
additional wordsmithing by me.
|
|
- ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER with HANDLER
- ALTER TABLE VALIDATE CONSTRAINT
- ALTER TYPE ADD VALUE
- COPY with ENCODING and FORCE NOT NULL
- CREATE FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER with HANDLER
- CREATE TRIGGER ... INSTEAD OF
|
|
and fix unexpected completion for DROP TEMP and UNIQUE.
|
|
|
|
The recent additions for FDW support required checking foreign-table-ness
in several places in the parse/plan chain. While it's not clear whether
that would really result in a noticeable slowdown, it seems best to avoid
any performance risk by keeping a copy of the relation's relkind in
RangeTblEntry. That might have some other uses later, anyway.
Per discussion.
|
|
Add functions plpy.quote_ident, plpy.quote_literal,
plpy.quote_nullable, which wrap the equivalent SQL functions.
To be able to propagate char * constness properly, make the argument
of quote_literal_cstr() const char *. This also makes it more
consistent with quote_identifier().
Jan Urbański, reviewed by Hitoshi Harada, some refinements by Peter
Eisentraut
|
|
"SELECT ... INTO UNLOGGED tabname" works, but wasn't documented; CREATE
UNLOGGED SEQUENCE and CREATE UNLOGGED VIEW failed an assertion, instead
of throwing a sensible error.
Latter issue reported by Itagaki Takahiro; patch review by Tom Lane.
|
|
void_send is useful for the same reason that void_out doesn't throw error,
namely that someone might do "select void_returning_func(...)" from a
client that prefers to operate in binary mode. The void_recv function may
or may not have any practical use, but we provide it for symmetry.
Radosław Smogura
|
|
This was a leftover from the pre-8.1 design of junkfilters. It doesn't
seem to have any reason to live, since it's merely a combination of two
easy function calls, and not a well-designed combination at that (it
encourages callers to leak the result tuple).
|
|
ExecUpdate checked for whether ExecBRUpdateTriggers had returned a new
tuple value by seeing if the returned tuple was pointer-equal to the old
one. But the "old one" was in estate->es_junkFilter's result slot, which
would be scribbled on if we had done an EvalPlanQual update in response to
a concurrent update of the target tuple; therefore we were comparing a
dangling pointer to a live one. Given the right set of circumstances we
could get a false match, resulting in not forcing the tuple to be stored in
the slot we thought it was stored in. In the case reported by Maxim Boguk
in bug #5798, this led to "cannot extract system attribute from virtual
tuple" failures when trying to do "RETURNING ctid". I believe there is a
very-low-probability chance of more serious errors, such as generating
incorrect index entries based on the original rather than the
trigger-modified version of the row.
In HEAD, change all of ExecBRInsertTriggers, ExecIRInsertTriggers,
ExecBRUpdateTriggers, and ExecIRUpdateTriggers so that they continue to
have similar APIs. In the back branches I just changed
ExecBRUpdateTriggers, since there is no bug in the ExecBRInsertTriggers
case.
|
|
|
|
File encodings can be specified separately from client encoding.
If not specified, client encoding is used for backward compatibility.
Cases when the encoding doesn't match client encoding are slower
than matched cases because we don't have conversion procs for other
encodings. Performance improvement would be be a future work.
Original patch by Hitoshi Harada, and modified by me.
|
|
This is both very useful in its own right, and an important test case
for the core FDW support.
This commit includes a small refactoring of copy.c to expose its option
checking code as a separately callable function. The original patch
submission duplicated hundreds of lines of that code, which seemed pretty
unmaintainable.
Shigeru Hanada, reviewed by Itagaki Takahiro and Tom Lane
|
|
This commit provides the core code and documentation needed. A contrib
module test case will follow shortly.
Shigeru Hanada, Jan Urbanski, Heikki Linnakangas
|
|
type changes.
The invalidation will cause the type information to be refetched, and
everything will work.
Jan Urbański, reviewed by Alex Hunsaker
|
|
|
|
Add a new libpq connection option client_encoding (which includes the
existing PGCLIENTENCODING environment variable), which besides an
encoding name accepts a special value "auto" that tries to determine
the encoding from the locale in the client's environment, using the
mechanisms that have been in use in initdb.
psql sets this new connection option to "auto" when running from a
terminal and not overridden by setting PGCLIENTENCODING.
original code by Heikki Linnakangas, with subsequent contributions by
Jaime Casanova, Peter Eisentraut, Stephen Frost, Ibrar Ahmed
|
|
Add a fdwhandler column to pg_foreign_data_wrapper, plus HANDLER options
in the CREATE FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER and ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER commands,
plus pg_dump support for same. Also invent a new pseudotype fdw_handler
with properties similar to language_handler.
This is split out of the "FDW API" patch for ease of review; it's all stuff
we will certainly need, regardless of any other details of the FDW API.
FDW handler functions will not actually get called yet.
In passing, fix some omissions and infelicities in foreigncmds.c.
Shigeru Hanada, Jan Urbanski, Heikki Linnakangas
|
|
This has been broken for awhile, but not clear it's worth back-patching.
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
|
|
The previous coding would try to process all SECTION_NONE items in the
initial sequential-restore pass, which failed if they were dependencies of
not-yet-restored items. Fix by postponing such items into the parallel
processing pass once we have skipped any non-PRE_DATA item.
Back-patch into 9.0; the original parallel-restore coding in 8.4 did not
have this bug, so no need to change it.
Report and diagnosis by Arnd Hannemann.
|
|
Per discussion after my commit o yesterday.
|
