summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-12-17Change overly strict Assert in TransactionGroupUpdateXidStatus.Amit Kapila
This Assert thought that an overflowed transaction can never get registered for the group update.  But that is not true, because even when the number of children for a transaction got reduced, the overflow flag is not changed. And, for group update, we only care about the current number of children for a transaction that is being committed. Based on comments by Andres Freund, remove a redundant Assert in TransactionIdSetPageStatus as we already had a static Assert for the same condition a few lines earlier. Reported-by: Vignesh C Author: Dilip Kumar Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 11 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-s5=uJw-Z6JC9gcqtBSjXsrHnU63PXBrA=pnBjqnkm5UA@mail.gmail.com
2019-12-16On Windows, wait a little to see if ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED goes away.Tom Lane
Attempting to open a file fails with ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED if the file is flagged for deletion but not yet actually gone (another in a long list of reasons why Windows is broken, if you ask me). This seems likely to explain a lot of irreproducible failures we see in the buildfarm. This state generally persists for only a millisecond or so, so just wait a bit and retry. If it's a real permissions problem, we'll eventually give up and report it as such. If it's the pending deletion case, we'll see file-not-found and report that after the deletion completes, and the caller will treat that in an appropriate way. In passing, rejigger the existing retry logic for some other error cases so that we don't uselessly wait an extra time when we're not going to retry anymore. Alexander Lakhin (with cosmetic tweaks by me). Back-patch to all supported branches, since this seems like a pretty safe change and the problem is definitely real. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16161-7a985d2f1bbe8f71@postgresql.org
2019-12-16Fix yet another crash in page split during GiST index creation.Heikki Linnakangas
Commit a7ee7c8513 fixed a bug in GiST page split during index creation, where we failed to re-find the position of a downlink after the page containing it was split. However, that fix was incomplete; the other call to gistinserttuples() in the same function needs to also clear 'downlinkoffnum'. Fixes bug #16134 reported by Alexander Lakhin, for real this time. The previous fix was enough to fix the crash with the reproducer script for bug #16162, but the original script for #16134 was still crashing. Backpatch to v12, like the previous incomplete fix. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d869f537-abe4-d2ea-0510-38cd053f5152%40gmail.com
2019-12-16Clean up some misplaced comments in partition_join.sql regression test.Etsuro Fujita
Also, add a comment explaining a test case. Back-patch to 11 where the regression test was added. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK15adZPh2B%2BmGUjSOMH%2BH39ogDRWfCfm4G6jncZCAs9V_Q%40mail.gmail.com
2019-12-14Prevent overly-aggressive collapsing of joins to RTE_RESULT relations.Tom Lane
The RTE_RESULT simplification logic added by commit 4be058fe9 had a flaw: it would collapse out a RTE_RESULT that is due to compute a PlaceHolderVar, and reassign the PHV to the parent join level, even if another input relation of the join contained a lateral reference to the PHV. That can't work because the PHV would be computed too late. In practice it led to failures of internal sanity checks later in planning (either assertion failures or errors such as "failed to construct the join relation"). To fix, add code to check for the presence of such PHVs in relevant portions of the query tree. Notably, this required refactoring range_table_walker so that a caller could ask to walk individual RTEs not the whole list. (It might be a good idea to refactor range_table_mutator in the same way, if only to keep those functions looking similar; but I didn't do so here as it wasn't necessary for the bug fix.) This exercise also taught me that find_dependent_phvs(), as it stood, could only safely be used on the entire Query, not on subtrees. Adjust its API to reflect that; which in passing allows it to have a fast path for the common case of no PHVs anywhere. Per report from Will Leinweber. Back-patch to v12 where the bug was introduced. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALLb-4xJMd4GZt2YCecMC95H-PafuWNKcmps4HLRx2NHNBfB4g@mail.gmail.com
2019-12-14Fix mdsyncfiletag(), take II.Thomas Munro
The previous commit failed to consider that FileGetRawDesc() might not return a valid fd, as discovered on the build farm. Switch to using the File interface only. Back-patch to 12, like the previous commit.
2019-12-14Don't use _mdfd_getseg() in mdsyncfiletag().Thomas Munro
_mdfd_getseg() opens all segments up to the requested one. That causes problems for mdsyncfiletag(), if mdunlinkfork() has already unlinked other segment files. Open the file we want directly by name instead, if it's not already open. The consequence of this bug was a rare panic in the checkpointer, made more likely if you saturated the sync request queue so that the SYNC_FORGET_REQUEST messages for a given relation were more likely to be absorbed in separate cycles by the checkpointer. Back-patch to 12. Defect in commit 3eb77eba. Author: Thomas Munro Reported-by: Justin Pryzby Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191119115759.GI30362%40telsasoft.com
2019-12-13Fix crash when a page was split during GiST index creation.Heikki Linnakangas
The bug was similar to the one that was fixed in commit 22251686f0. When we split page X and insert the downlink for the new page, the parent page might also need to be split. When that happens, the downlink offset number we remembered for X is no longer valid. We correctly called gistFindCorrectParent() to re-find it, but gistFindCorrectParent() doesn't do anything if the LSN of the page hasn't changed, and we stopped updating LSNs during index build in commit 9155580fd5. The buggy codepath was taken if the page was split into three or more pages, and inserting the downlink caused the parent page to split. To fix, explicitly mark the downlink offset number as invalid, to force gistFindCorrectParent() to re-find it. Fixes bug #16134 reported by Alexander Lakhin, reported again as #16162 by Andreas Kunert. Thanks to Jeff Janes, Tom Lane and Tomas Vondra for debugging. Backpatch to v12, where we stopped WAL-logging during index build. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/16134-0423f729671dec64%40postgresql.org Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/16162-45d21b7b6c1a3105%40postgresql.org
2019-12-12Fix EXTRACT(ISOYEAR FROM timestamp) for years BC.Tom Lane
The test cases added by commit 26ae3aa80 exposed an old oversight in timestamp[tz]_part: they didn't correct the result of date2isoyear() for BC years, so that we produced an off-by-one answer for such years. Fix that, and back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/SG2PR06MB37762CAE45DB0F6CA7001EA9B6550@SG2PR06MB3776.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com
2019-12-12Remove redundant function calls in timestamp[tz]_part().Tom Lane
The DTK_DOW/DTK_ISODOW and DTK_DOY switch cases in timestamp_part() and timestamptz_part() contained calls of timestamp2tm() that were fully redundant with the ones done just above the switch. This evidently crept in during commit 258ee1b63, which relocated that code from another place where the calls were indeed needed. Just delete the redundant calls. I (tgl) noted that our test coverage of these functions left quite a bit to be desired, so extend timestamp.sql and timestamptz.sql to cover all the branches. Back-patch to all supported branches, as the previous commit was. There's no real issue here other than some wasted cycles in some not-too-heavily-used code paths, but the test coverage seems valuable. Report and patch by Li Japin; test case adjustments by me. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/SG2PR06MB37762CAE45DB0F6CA7001EA9B6550@SG2PR06MB3776.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com
2019-12-12Remove extra parenthesis from comment.Etsuro Fujita
2019-12-10In pg_ctl, work around ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION on the postmaster log file.Tom Lane
On Windows, we use CMD.EXE to redirect the postmaster's stdout/stderr into a log file. CMD.EXE will open that file with non-sharing-friendly parameters, and the file will remain open for a short time after the postmaster has removed postmaster.pid. This can result in an ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION failure if we attempt to start a new postmaster immediately with the same log file (e.g. during "pg_ctl restart"). This seems to explain intermittent buildfarm failures we've been seeing on Windows machines. To fix, just open and close the log file using our own pgwin32_open(), which will wait if necessary to avoid the failure. (Perhaps someday we should stop using CMD.EXE, but that would be a far more complex patch, and it doesn't seem worth the trouble ... yet.) Back-patch to v12. This only solves the problem when frontend fopen() is redirected to pgwin32_fopen(), which has only been true since commit 0ba06e0bf. Hence, no point in back-patching further, unless we care to back-patch that change too. Diagnosis and patch by Alexander Lakhin (bug #16154). Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16154-1ccf0b537b24d5e0@postgresql.org
2019-12-10Fix handling of multiple AFTER ROW triggers on a foreign table.Etsuro Fujita
AfterTriggerExecute() retrieves a fresh tuple or pair of tuples from a tuplestore and then stores the tuple(s) in the passed-in slot(s) if AFTER_TRIGGER_FDW_FETCH, while it uses the most-recently-retrieved tuple(s) stored in the slot(s) if AFTER_TRIGGER_FDW_REUSE. This was done correctly before 12, but commit ff11e7f4b broke it by mistakenly clearing the tuple(s) stored in the slot(s) in that function, leading to an assertion failure as reported in bug #16139 from Alexander Lakhin. Also, fix some other issues with the aforementioned commit in passing: * For tg_newslot, which is a slot added to the TriggerData struct by the commit to store new updated tuples, it didn't ensure the slot was NULL if there was no such tuple. * The commit failed to update the documentation about the trigger interface. Author: Etsuro Fujita Backpatch-through: 12 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16139-94f9ccf0db6119ec%40postgresql.org
2019-12-09Fix race condition in our Windows signal emulation.Tom Lane
pg_signal_dispatch_thread() responded to the client (signal sender) and disconnected the pipe before actually setting the shared variables that make the signal visible to the backend process's main thread. In the worst case, it seems, effective delivery of the signal could be postponed for as long as the machine has any other work to do. To fix, just move the pg_queue_signal() call so that we do it before responding to the client. This essentially makes pgkill() synchronous, which is a stronger guarantee than we have on Unix. That may be overkill, but on the other hand we have not seen comparable timing bugs on any Unix platform. While at it, add some comments to this sadly underdocumented code. Problem diagnosis and fix by Amit Kapila; I just added the comments. Back-patch to all supported versions, as it appears that this can cause visible NOTIFY timing oddities on all of them, and there might be other misbehavior due to slow delivery of other signals. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/32745.1575303812@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-12-09Improve isolationtester's timeout management.Tom Lane
isolationtester.c had a hard-wired limit of 3 minutes per test step. It now emerges that this isn't quite enough for some of the slowest buildfarm animals. This isn't the first time we've had to raise this limit (cf. 1db439ad4), so let's make it configurable. This patch raises the default to 5 minutes, and introduces an environment variable PGISOLATIONTIMEOUT that can be set if more time is needed, following the precedent of PGCTLTIMEOUT. Also, modify isolationtester so that when the timeout is hit, it explicitly reports having sent a cancel. This makes the regression failure log considerably more intelligible. (In the worst case, a timed-out test might actually be reported as "passing" without this extra output, so arguably this is a bug fix in itself.) In passing, update the README file, which had apparently not gotten touched when we added "make check" support here. Back-patch to 9.6; older versions don't have comparable timeout logic. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22964.1575842935@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-12-09Fix typos in miscinit.c.Amit Kapila
Commit f13ea95f9e moved the description of postmaster.pid file contents from miscadmin.h to pidfile.h, but missed to update the comments in miscinit.c. Author: Hadi Moshayedi Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila Backpatch-through: 10 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAK=1=WpYEM9x3LGkaxgXaxeYQjnkdW8XLsxrYRTE2Gq-H83FMw@mail.gmail.com
2019-12-04Fix whitespace.Etsuro Fujita
2019-12-03Fix failures with TAP tests of pg_ctl on WindowsMichael Paquier
On Windows, all the hosts spawned by the TAP tests bind to 127.0.0.1. Hence, if there is a port conflict, starting a cluster would immediately fail. One of the test scripts of pg_ctl initializes a node without PostgresNode.pm, using the default port 5432. This could cause unexpected startup failures in the tests if an independent server was up and running on the same host (the reverse is also possible, though more unlikely). Fix this issue by assigning properly a free port to the node configured, in the same range used as for the other nodes part of the tests. Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191202031444.GC1696@paquier.xyz Backpatch-through: 11
2019-12-01Fix misbehavior with expression indexes on ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS tables.Tom Lane
We implement ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS by truncating tables marked that way, which requires also truncating/rebuilding their indexes. But RelationTruncateIndexes asks the relcache for up-to-date copies of any index expressions, which may cause execution of eval_const_expressions on them, which can result in actual execution of subexpressions. This is a bad thing to have happening during ON COMMIT. Manuel Rigger reported that use of a SQL function resulted in crashes due to expectations that ActiveSnapshot would be set, which it isn't. The most obvious fix perhaps would be to push a snapshot during PreCommit_on_commit_actions, but I think that would just open the door to more problems: CommitTransaction explicitly expects that no user-defined code can be running at this point. Fortunately, since we know that no tuples exist to be indexed, there seems no need to use the real index expressions or predicates during RelationTruncateIndexes. We can set up dummy index expressions instead (we do need something that will expose the right data type, as there are places that build index tupdescs based on this), and just ignore predicates and exclusion constraints. In a green field it'd likely be better to reimplement ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS using the same "init fork" infrastructure used for unlogged relations. That seems impractical without catalog changes though, and even without that it'd be too big a change to back-patch. So for now do it like this. Per private report from Manuel Rigger. This has been broken forever, so back-patch to all supported branches.
2019-11-30Fix off-by-one error in PGTYPEStimestamp_fmt_ascTomas Vondra
When using %b or %B patterns to format a date, the code was simply using tm_mon as an index into array of month names. But that is wrong, because tm_mon is 1-based, while array indexes are 0-based. The result is we either use name of the next month, or a segfault (for December). Fix by subtracting 1 from tm_mon for both patterns, and add a regression test triggering the issue. Backpatch to all supported versions (the bug is there far longer, since at least 2003). Reported-by: Paul Spencer Backpatch-through: 9.4 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16143-0d861eb8688d3fef%40postgresql.org
2019-11-28Remove unnecessary clauses_attnums variableTomas Vondra
Commit c676e659b2 reworked how choose_best_statistics() picks the best extended statistics, but failed to remove clauses_attnums which is now unnecessary. So get rid of it and backpatch to 12, same as c676e659b2. Author: Tomas Vondra Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+u7OA7H5rcE2=8f263w4NZD6ipO_XOrYB816nuLXbmSTH9pQQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 12
2019-11-28Fix choose_best_statistics to check clauses individuallyTomas Vondra
When picking the best extended statistics object for a list of clauses, it's not enough to look at attnums extracted from the clause list as a whole. Consider for example this query with OR clauses: SELECT * FROM t WHERE (t.a = 1) OR (t.b = 1) OR (t.c = 1) with a statistics defined on columns (a,b). Relying on attnums extracted from the whole OR clause, we'd consider the statistics usable. That does not work, as we see the conditions as a single OR-clause, referencing an attribute not covered by the statistic, leading to empty list of clauses to be estimated using the statistics and an assert failure. This changes choose_best_statistics to check which clauses are actually covered, and only using attributes from the fully covered ones. For the previous example this means the statistics object will not be considered as compatible with the OR-clause. Backpatch to 12, where MCVs were introduced. The issue does not affect older versions because functional dependencies don't handle OR clauses. Author: Tomas Vondra Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed Reported-By: Manuel Rigger Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+u7OA7H5rcE2=8f263w4NZD6ipO_XOrYB816nuLXbmSTH9pQQ@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 12
2019-11-27Fix typo in comment.Etsuro Fujita
2019-11-26Allow access to child table statistics if user can read parent table.Tom Lane
The fix for CVE-2017-7484 disallowed use of pg_statistic data for planning purposes if the user would not be able to select the associated column and a non-leakproof function is to be applied to the statistics values. That turns out to disable use of pg_statistic data in some common cases involving inheritance/partitioning, where the user does have permission to select from the parent table that was actually named in the query, but not from a child table whose stats are needed. Since, in non-corner cases, the user *can* select the child table's data via the parent, this restriction is not actually useful from a security standpoint. Improve the logic so that we also check the permissions of the originally-named table, and allow access if select permission exists for that. When checking access to stats for a simple child column, we can map the child column number back to the parent, and perform this test exactly (including not allowing access if the child column isn't exposed by the parent). For expression indexes, the current logic just insists on whole-table select access, and this patch allows access if the user can select the whole parent table. In principle, if the child table has extra columns, this might allow access to stats on columns the user can't read. In practice, it's unlikely that the planner is going to do any stats calculations involving expressions that are not visible to the query, so we'll ignore that fine point for now. Perhaps someday we'll improve that logic to detect exactly which columns are used by an expression index ... but today is not that day. Back-patch to v11. The issue was created in 9.2 and up by the CVE-2017-7484 fix, but this patch depends on the append_rel_array[] planner data structure which only exists in v11 and up. In practice the issue is most urgent with partitioned tables, so fixing v11 and later should satisfy much of the practical need. Dilip Kumar and Amit Langote, with some kibitzing by me Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3876.1531261875@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-11-26Don't shut down Gather[Merge] early under Limit.Amit Kapila
Revert part of commit 19df1702f5. Early shutdown was added by that commit so that we could collect statistics from workers, but unfortunately, it interacted badly with rescans. The problem is that we ended up destroying the parallel context which is required for rescans. This leads to rescans of a Limit node over a Gather node to produce unpredictable results as it tries to access destroyed parallel context. By reverting the early shutdown code, we might lose statistics in some cases of Limit over Gather [Merge], but that will require further study to fix. Reported-by: Jerry Sievers Diagnosed-by: Thomas Munro Author: Amit Kapila, testcase by Vignesh C Backpatch-through: 9.6 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87ims2amh6.fsf@jsievers.enova.com
2019-11-24Avoid assertion failure with LISTEN in a serializable transaction.Tom Lane
If LISTEN is the only action in a serializable-mode transaction, and the session was not previously listening, and the notify queue is not empty, predicate.c reported an assertion failure. That happened because we'd acquire the transaction's initial snapshot during PreCommit_Notify, which was called *after* predicate.c expects any such snapshot to have been established. To fix, just swap the order of the PreCommit_Notify and PreCommit_CheckForSerializationFailure calls during CommitTransaction. This will imply holding the notify-insertion lock slightly longer, but the difference could only be meaningful in serializable mode, which is an expensive option anyway. It appears that this is just an assertion failure, with no consequences in non-assert builds. A snapshot used only to scan the notify queue could not have been involved in any serialization conflicts, so there would be nothing for PreCommit_CheckForSerializationFailure to do except assign it a prepareSeqNo and set the SXACT_FLAG_PREPARED flag. And given no conflicts, neither of those omissions affect the behavior of ReleasePredicateLocks. This admittedly once-over-lightly analysis is backed up by the lack of field reports of trouble. Per report from Mark Dilger. The bug is old, so back-patch to all supported branches; but the new test case only goes back to 9.6, for lack of adequate isolationtester infrastructure before that. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3ac7f397-4d5f-be8e-f354-440020675694@gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/13881.1574557302@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-11-24Stabilize NOTIFY behavior by transmitting notifies before ReadyForQuery.Tom Lane
This patch ensures that, if any notify messages were received during a just-finished transaction, they get sent to the frontend just before not just after the ReadyForQuery message. With libpq and other client libraries that act similarly, this guarantees that the client will see the notify messages as available as soon as it thinks the transaction is done. This probably makes no difference in practice, since in realistic use-cases the application would have to cope with asynchronous arrival of notify events anyhow. However, it makes it a lot easier to build cross-session-notify test cases with stable behavior. I'm a bit surprised now that we've not seen any buildfarm instability with the test cases added by commit b10f40bf0. Tests that I intend to add in an upcoming bug fix are definitely unstable without this. Back-patch to 9.6, which is as far back as we can do NOTIFY testing with the isolationtester infrastructure. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/13881.1574557302@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-11-23Improve test coverage for LISTEN/NOTIFY.Tom Lane
Back-patch commit b10f40bf0 into older branches. This adds reporting of NOTIFY messages to isolationtester.c, and extends the async-notify test to include direct tests of basic NOTIFY functionality. This provides useful infrastructure for testing a bug fix I'm about to back-patch, and there seems no good reason not to have better tests of LISTEN/NOTIFY in the back branches. The commit's survived long enough in HEAD to make it unlikely that it will cause problems. Back-patch as far as 9.6. isolationtester.c changed too much in 9.6 to make it sane to try to fix older branches this way, and I don't really want to back-patch those changes too. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31304.1564246011@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-11-22Add test coverage for "unchanged toast column" replication code path.Tom Lane
It seems pretty unacceptable to have no regression test coverage for this aspect of the logical replication protocol, especially given the bugs we've found in related code. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16129-a0c0f48e71741e5f@postgresql.org
2019-11-22Fix bogus tuple-slot management in logical replication UPDATE handling.Tom Lane
slot_modify_cstrings seriously abused the TupleTableSlot API by relying on a slot's underlying data to stay valid across ExecClearTuple. Since this abuse was also quite undocumented, it's little surprise that the case got broken during the v12 slot rewrites. As reported in bug #16129 from Ondřej Jirman, this could lead to crashes or data corruption when a logical replication subscriber processes a row update. Problems would only arise if the subscriber's table contained columns of pass-by-ref types that were not being copied from the publisher. Fix by explicitly copying the datum/isnull arrays from the source slot that the old row was in already. This ends up being about the same thing that happened pre-v12, but hopefully in a less opaque and fragile way. We might've caught the problem sooner if there were any test cases dealing with updates involving non-replicated or dropped columns. Now there are. Back-patch to v10 where this code came in. Even though the failure does not manifest before v12, IMO this code is too fragile to leave as-is. In any case we certainly want the additional test coverage. Patch by me; thanks to Tomas Vondra for initial investigation. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16129-a0c0f48e71741e5f@postgresql.org
2019-11-21Defend against self-referential views in relation_is_updatable().Tom Lane
While a self-referential view doesn't actually work, it's possible to create one, and it turns out that this breaks some of the information_schema views. Those views call relation_is_updatable(), which neglected to consider the hazards of being recursive. In older PG versions you get a "stack depth limit exceeded" error, but since v10 it'd recurse to the point of stack overrun and crash, because commit a4c35ea1c took out the expression_returns_set() call that was incidentally checking the stack depth. Since this function is only used by information_schema views, it seems like it'd be better to return "not updatable" than suffer an error. Hence, add tracking of what views we're examining, in just the same way that the nearby fireRIRrules() code detects self-referential views. I added a check_stack_depth() call too, just to be defensive. Per private report from Manuel Rigger. Back-patch to all supported versions.
2019-11-21Provide statistics for hypothetical BRIN indexesMichael Paquier
Trying to use hypothetical indexes with BRIN currently fails when trying to access a relation that does not exist when looking for the statistics. With the current API, it is not possible to easily pass a value for pages_per_range down to the hypothetical index, so this makes use of the default value of BRIN_DEFAULT_PAGES_PER_RANGE, which should be fine enough in most cases. Being able to refine or enforce the hypothetical costs in more optimistic ways would require more refactoring by filling in the statistics when building IndexOptInfo in plancat.c. This would involve ABI breakages around the costing routines, something not fit for stable branches. This is broken since 7e534ad, so backpatch down to v10. Author: Julien Rouhaud, Heikki Linnakangas Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Tom Lane, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOBaU_ZH0LKEA8VFCocr6Lpte1ab0b6FpvgS0y4way+RPSXfYg@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 10
2019-11-20Handle ReadFile() EOF correctly on Windows.Thomas Munro
When ReadFile() encounters the end of a file while reading from a synchronous handle with an offset provided via OVERLAPPED, it reports an error instead of returning 0. By not handling that (undocumented) result correctly, we caused some noisy LOG messages about an unknown error code. Repair. Back-patch to 12, where we started using pread()/ReadFile() with an offset. Reported-by: ZhenHua Cai, Amit Kapila Diagnosed-by: Juan Jose Santamaria Flecha Tested-by: Amit Kapila Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LK3%2BWRtpz68TiRdpHwxxWm%3D%2Bt1BMf-G68hhQsAQ41PZg%40mail.gmail.com
2019-11-19Fix corner-case failure in match_pattern_prefix().Tom Lane
The planner's optimization code for LIKE and regex operators could error out with a complaint like "no = operator for opfamily NNN" if someone created a binary-compatible index (for example, a bpchar_ops index on a text column) on the LIKE's left argument. This is a consequence of careless refactoring in commit 74dfe58a5. The old code in match_special_index_operator only accepted specific combinations of the pattern operator and the index opclass, thereby indirectly guaranteeing that the opclass would have a comparison operator with the same LHS input type as the pattern operator. While moving the logic out to a planner support function, I simplified that test in a way that no longer guarantees that. Really though we'd like an altogether weaker dependency on the opclass, so rather than put back exactly the old code, just allow lookup failure. I have in mind now to rewrite this logic completely, but this is the minimum change needed to fix the bug in v12. Per report from Manuel Rigger. Back-patch to v12 where the mistake came in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+u7OA7nnGYy8rY0vdTe811NuA+Frr9nbcBO9u2Z+JxqNaud+g@mail.gmail.com
2019-11-20Fix page modification outside of critical section in GINAlexander Korotkov
By oversight 52ac6cd2d0 makes ginDeletePage() sets pd_prune_xid of page to be deleted before entering the critical section. It appears that only versions 11 and later were affected by this oversight. Backpatch-through: 11
2019-11-20Revise GIN READMEAlexander Korotkov
We find GIN concurrency bugs from time to time. One of the problems here is that concurrency of GIN isn't well-documented in README. So, it might be even hard to distinguish design bugs from implementation bugs. This commit revised concurrency section in GIN README providing more details. Some examples are illustrated in ASCII art. Also, this commit add the explanation of how is tuple layout in internal GIN B-tree page different in comparison with nbtree. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfduXR_ywyaVN4%2BOYEGaw%3DcPLzWX6RxYLBncKw8de9vOkqw%40mail.gmail.com Author: Alexander Korotkov Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan Backpatch-through: 9.4
2019-11-20Fix traversing to the deleted GIN page via downlinkAlexander Korotkov
Current GIN code appears to don't handle traversing to the deleted page via downlink. This commit fixes that by stepping right from the delete page like we do in nbtree. This commit also fixes setting 'deleted' flag to the GIN pages. Now other page flags are not erased once page is deleted. That helps to keep our assertions true if we arrive deleted page via downlink. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdvMvsw-NcE5bRS7R1BbvA4BxoDnVVjkXC5W0Czvy9LVrg%40mail.gmail.com Author: Alexander Korotkov Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan Backpatch-through: 9.4
2019-11-20Fix deadlock between ginDeletePage() and ginStepRight()Alexander Korotkov
When ginDeletePage() is about to delete page it locks its left sibling to revise the rightlink. So, it locks pages in right to left manner. Int he same time ginStepRight() locks pages in left to right manner, and that could cause a deadlock. This commit makes ginScanToDelete() keep exclusive lock on left siblings of currently investigated path. That elimites need to relock left sibling in ginDeletePage(). Thus, deadlock with ginStepRight() can't happen anymore. Reported-by: Chen Huajun Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5c332bd1.87b6.16d7c17aa98.Coremail.chjischj%40163.com Author: Alexander Korotkov Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan Backpatch-through: 10
2019-11-16Further fix dumping of views that contain just VALUES(...).Tom Lane
It turns out that commit e9f1c01b7 missed a case: we must print a VALUES clause in long format if get_query_def is given a resultDesc that would require the query's output column name(s) to be different from what the bare VALUES clause would produce. This applies in case an ALTER ... RENAME COLUMN has been done to a view that formerly could be printed in simple format, as shown in the added regression test case. It also explains bug #16119 from Dmitry Telpt, because it turns out that (unlike CREATE VIEW) CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW fails to apply any column aliases it's given to the stored ON SELECT rule. So to get them to be printed, we have to account for the resultDesc renaming. It might be worth changing the matview code so that it creates the ON SELECT rule with the correct aliases; but we'd still need these messy checks in get_simple_values_rte to handle the case of a subsequent column rename, so any such change would be just neatnik-ism not a bug fix. Like the previous patch, back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16119-e64823f30a45a754@postgresql.org
2019-11-16Improve stability of tests for VACUUM (SKIP_LOCKED)Michael Paquier
Concurrent autovacuums running with the main regression test suite could cause the tests with VACUUM (SKIP_LOCKED) to generate randomly WARNING messages. For these tests, set client_min_messages to ERROR to get rid of those random failures, as disabling autovacuum for the relations operated would not completely close the failure window. For isolation tests, disable autovacuum for the relations vacuumed with SKIP_LOCKED. The tests are designed so as LOCK commands are taken in a first session before running a concurrent VACUUM (SKIP_LOCKED) in a second to generate WARNING messages, but a concurrent autovacuum could cause the tests to be slower. Reported-by: Tom Lane Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/25294.1573077278@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch-through: 12
2019-11-16Skip system attributes when applying mvdistinct statsTomas Vondra
When estimating number of distinct groups, we failed to ignore system attributes when matching the group expressions to mvdistinct stats, causing failures like ERROR: negative bitmapset member not allowed Fix that by simply skipping anything that is not a regular attribute. Backpatch to PostgreSQL 10, where the extended stats were introduced. Bug: #16111 Reported-by: Tuomas Leikola Author: Tomas Vondra Backpatch-through: 10 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16111-687799584c3a7e73@postgresql.org
2019-11-16Always call ExecShutdownNode() if appropriate.Thomas Munro
Call ExecShutdownNode() after ExecutePlan()'s loop, rather than at each break. We had forgotten to do that in one case. The omission caused intermittent "temporary file leak" warnings from multi-batch parallel hash joins with a LIMIT clause. Back-patch to 11. Though the problem exists in theory in earlier parallel query releases, nothing really depended on it. Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro, Amit Kapila Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191111.212418.2222262873417235945.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com
2019-11-13Add missing check_collation_set call to bpcharne().Tom Lane
We should throw an error for indeterminate collation, but bpcharne() was missing that logic, resulting in a much less user-friendly error (either an assertion failure or "cache lookup failed for collation 0"). Per report from Manuel Rigger. Back-patch to v12 where the mistake came in, evidently in commit 5e1963fb7. (Before non-deterministic collations, this function wasn't collation sensitive.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+u7OA4HOjtymxAbuGNh4-X_2R0Lw5n01tzvP8E5-i-2gQXYWA@mail.gmail.com
2019-11-13Fix silly initializations (cosmetic only).Tom Lane
Initializing a pointer to "false" isn't per project style, and reportedly some compilers warn about it (though I've not seen any such warnings in the buildfarm). Seems to have come in with commit ff11e7f4b, so back-patch to v12 where that was added. Didier Gautheron Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJRYxu+XQuM0qnSqt1Ujztu6fBPzMMAT3VEn6W32rgKG6A2Fsw@mail.gmail.com
2019-11-13Avoid downcasing/truncation of RADIUS authentication parameters.Tom Lane
Commit 6b76f1bb5 changed all the RADIUS auth parameters to be lists rather than single values. But its use of SplitIdentifierString to parse the list format was not very carefully thought through, because that function thinks it's parsing SQL identifiers, which means it will (a) downcase the strings and (b) truncate them to be shorter than NAMEDATALEN. While downcasing should be harmless for the server names and ports, it's just wrong for the shared secrets, and probably for the NAS Identifier strings as well. The truncation aspect is at least potentially a problem too, though typical values for these parameters would fit in 63 bytes. Fortunately, we now have a function SplitGUCList that is exactly the same except for not doing the two unwanted things, so fixing this is a trivial matter of calling that function instead. While here, improve the documentation to show how to double-quote the parameter values. I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing as well. Report and patch from Marcos David (bug #16106); doc changes by me. Back-patch to v10 where the aforesaid commit came in, since this is arguably a regression from our previous behavior with RADIUS auth. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16106-7d319e4295d08e70@postgresql.org
2019-11-13Include TableFunc references when computing expression dependencies.Tom Lane
The TableFunc node (i.e., XMLTABLE) includes type and collation OIDs that might not be referenced anywhere else in the expression tree, so they need to be accounted for when extracting dependencies. Fortunately, the practical effects of this are limited, since (a) it's somewhat unlikely that people would be extracting columns of non-builtin types from an XML document, and (b) in many scenarios, the query would contain other references to such types, or functions depending on them. However, it's not hard to construct examples wherein the existing code lets one drop a type used in XMLTABLE and thereby break a view. This is evidently an original oversight in the XMLTABLE patch, so back-patch to v10 where that came in. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18427.1573508501@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-11-13Handle arrays and ranges in pg_upgrade's test for non-upgradable types.Tom Lane
pg_upgrade needs to check whether certain non-upgradable data types appear anywhere on-disk in the source cluster. It knew that it has to check for these types being contained inside domains and composite types; but it somehow overlooked that they could be contained in arrays and ranges, too. Extend the existing recursive-containment query to handle those cases. We probably should have noticed this oversight while working on commit 0ccfc2822 and follow-ups, but we failed to :-(. The whole thing's possibly a bit overdesigned, since we don't really expect that any of these types will appear on disk; but if we're going to the effort of doing a recursive search then it's silly not to cover all the possibilities. While at it, refactor so that we have only one copy of the search logic, not three-and-counting. Also, to keep the branches looking more alike, back-patch the output wording change of commit 1634d3615. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31473.1573412838@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-11-11Stamp 12.1.REL_12_1Tom Lane
2019-11-11Further improve stability of partition_prune regression test.Tom Lane
Commits 4ea03f3f4 et al arranged to filter out row counts in parallel plans, because those are dependent on the number of workers actually obtained. Somehow I missed that the 'Rows Removed by Filter' counts can also vary, so fix that too. Per buildfarm. This seems worth a last-minute patch because unreliable regression tests are a serious pain in the rear for packagers. Like the previous patch, back-patch to v11 where this test was introduced.
2019-11-11Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut
Source-Git-URL: https://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: 99bbc57cce0a1024898ac8d38b35fc6df7294e9e