From ebcc7bf949bae614cccc6b86e3ef9b926a6e2f99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andres Freund Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:03:15 -0800 Subject: Rephrase references to "time qualification". Now that the relevant code has, for other reasons, moved out of tqual.[ch], it seems time to refer to visiblity rather than time qualification. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180703070645.wchpu5muyto5n647@alap3.anarazel.de --- doc/src/sgml/indexam.sgml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'doc/src') diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/indexam.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/indexam.sgml index d758a4987dc..05102724ead 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/indexam.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/indexam.sgml @@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ amparallelrescan (IndexScanDesc scan); the TIDs of all the tuples it has been told about that match the scan keys. The access method is not involved in actually fetching those tuples from the index's parent table, nor in - determining whether they pass the scan's time qualification test or other + determining whether they pass the scan's visibility test or other conditions. -- cgit v1.2.3