From a0ed19e0a9efe93b3b83d6e3fe8f77656be253a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Eisentraut Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 10:30:08 +0100 Subject: Use PRI?64 instead of "ll?" in format strings (continued). Continuation of work started in commit 15a79c73, after initial trial. Author: Thomas Munro Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b936d2fb-590d-49c3-a615-92c3a88c6c19%40eisentraut.org --- src/backend/backup/walsummaryfuncs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/backend/backup/walsummaryfuncs.c') diff --git a/src/backend/backup/walsummaryfuncs.c b/src/backend/backup/walsummaryfuncs.c index 9811b79d62a..d6dd131da14 100644 --- a/src/backend/backup/walsummaryfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/backup/walsummaryfuncs.c @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ pg_wal_summary_contents(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) if (raw_tli < 1 || raw_tli > PG_INT32_MAX) ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE), - errmsg("invalid timeline %lld", (long long) raw_tli)); + errmsg("invalid timeline %" PRId64, raw_tli)); /* Prepare to read the specified WAL summary file. */ ws.tli = (TimeLineID) raw_tli; -- cgit v1.2.3