From 65b71dec2d577e9ef7423773a88fdd075f3eb97f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Rowley Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 13:41:47 +1200 Subject: Use TupleDescAttr macro consistently A few places were directly accessing the attrs[] array. This goes against the standards set by 2cd708452. Fix that. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrBztXP3yx=NKNmo3xwFAFhEdyPnvrDg3=M0RhDs+4vYw@mail.gmail.com --- src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c') diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c index b49194c0167..612c6738950 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c @@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ ExecInitIndexOnlyScan(IndexOnlyScan *node, EState *estate, int eflags) /* First, count the number of such index keys */ for (int attnum = 0; attnum < indnkeyatts; attnum++) { - if (indexRelation->rd_att->attrs[attnum].atttypid == CSTRINGOID && + if (TupleDescAttr(indexRelation->rd_att, attnum)->atttypid == CSTRINGOID && indexRelation->rd_opcintype[attnum] == NAMEOID) namecount++; } @@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ ExecInitIndexOnlyScan(IndexOnlyScan *node, EState *estate, int eflags) for (int attnum = 0; attnum < indnkeyatts; attnum++) { - if (indexRelation->rd_att->attrs[attnum].atttypid == CSTRINGOID && + if (TupleDescAttr(indexRelation->rd_att, attnum)->atttypid == CSTRINGOID && indexRelation->rd_opcintype[attnum] == NAMEOID) indexstate->ioss_NameCStringAttNums[idx++] = (AttrNumber) attnum; } -- cgit v1.2.3