From a1dc4ea02044af557e4464029016507ea0940d8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heikki Linnakangas Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:08:09 +0300 Subject: Rephrase a few comments for clarity. I was confused by what "intended to be parallel serially" meant, until Robert Haas and David G. Johnston explained it. Rephrase the comment to make it more clear, using David's suggested wording. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1fec9022-41e8-e484-70ce-2179b08c2092%40iki.fi --- src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c') diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c index b912f4b7a5c..f452e0fd5ff 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c @@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ IndexOnlyNext(IndexOnlyScanState *node) { /* * We reach here if the index only scan is not parallel, or if we're - * executing a index only scan that was intended to be parallel - * serially. + * serially executing an index only scan that was planned to be + * parallel. */ scandesc = index_beginscan(node->ss.ss_currentRelation, node->ioss_RelationDesc, -- cgit v1.2.3