From a1dc4ea02044af557e4464029016507ea0940d8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heikki Linnakangas Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:08:09 +0300 Subject: Rephrase a few comments for clarity. I was confused by what "intended to be parallel serially" meant, until Robert Haas and David G. Johnston explained it. Rephrase the comment to make it more clear, using David's suggested wording. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1fec9022-41e8-e484-70ce-2179b08c2092%40iki.fi --- src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c') diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c index d4ac939c9b0..18c246e49a0 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeSeqscan.c @@ -66,8 +66,8 @@ SeqNext(SeqScanState *node) if (scandesc == NULL) { /* - * We reach here if the scan is not parallel, or if we're executing a - * scan that was intended to be parallel serially. + * We reach here if the scan is not parallel, or if we're serially + * executing a scan that was planned to be parallel. */ scandesc = heap_beginscan(node->ss.ss_currentRelation, estate->es_snapshot, -- cgit v1.2.3