From 1c49dae165bcee69bf3327d6ae20271d82cdf6bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Haas Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:35:55 -0400 Subject: "Pin", rather than "keep", dynamic shared memory mappings and segments. Nobody seemed concerned about this naming when it originally went in, but there's a pending patch that implements the opposite of dsm_keep_mapping, and the term "unkeep" was judged unpalatable. "unpin" has existing precedent in the PostgreSQL code base, and the English language, so use this terminology instead. Per discussion, back-patch to 9.4. --- src/backend/storage/ipc/dsm_impl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/backend/storage/ipc/dsm_impl.c') diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/dsm_impl.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/dsm_impl.c index af637dc999d..befe207f460 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/dsm_impl.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/dsm_impl.c @@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ dsm_impl_mmap(dsm_op op, dsm_handle handle, Size request_size, * do anything to receive the handle; Windows transfers it automatically. */ void -dsm_impl_keep_segment(dsm_handle handle, void *impl_private) +dsm_impl_pin_segment(dsm_handle handle, void *impl_private) { switch (dynamic_shared_memory_type) { -- cgit v1.2.3