From 6974924347c908335607a4a2f252213d58e21b7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Naylor Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 15:22:25 +0700 Subject: Specialize tuplesort routines for different kinds of abbreviated keys Previously, the specialized tuplesort routine inlined handling for reverse-sort and NULLs-ordering but called the datum comparator via a pointer in the SortSupport struct parameter. Testing has showed that we can get a useful performance gain by specializing datum comparison for the different representations of abbreviated keys -- signed and unsigned 64-bit integers and signed 32-bit integers. Almost all abbreviatable data types will benefit -- the only exception for now is numeric, since the datum comparison is more complex. The performance gain depends on data type and input distribution, but often falls in the range of 10-20% faster. Thomas Munro Reviewed by Peter Geoghegan, review and performance testing by me Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BhUKGKKYttZZk-JMRQSVak%3DCXSJ5fiwtirFf%3Dn%3DPAbumvn1Ww%40mail.gmail.com --- src/backend/utils/adt/date.c | 15 +-------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/backend/utils/adt/date.c') diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/date.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/date.c index fee610916f7..081dfa2450f 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/date.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/date.c @@ -439,25 +439,12 @@ date_cmp(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) PG_RETURN_INT32(0); } -static int -date_fastcmp(Datum x, Datum y, SortSupport ssup) -{ - DateADT a = DatumGetDateADT(x); - DateADT b = DatumGetDateADT(y); - - if (a < b) - return -1; - else if (a > b) - return 1; - return 0; -} - Datum date_sortsupport(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { SortSupport ssup = (SortSupport) PG_GETARG_POINTER(0); - ssup->comparator = date_fastcmp; + ssup->comparator = ssup_datum_int32_cmp; PG_RETURN_VOID(); } -- cgit v1.2.3