SP-GiST Indexes
   
    index
    SP-GiST
   
 Introduction
 
  SP-GiST is an abbreviation for space-partitioned
  GiST.  SP-GiST supports partitioned
  search trees, which facilitate development of a wide range of different
  non-balanced data structures, such as quad-trees, k-d trees, and radix
  trees (tries).  The common feature of these structures is that they
  repeatedly divide the search space into partitions that need not be
  of equal size.  Searches that are well matched to the partitioning rule
  can be very fast.
 
 
  These popular data structures were originally developed for in-memory
  usage.  In main memory, they are usually designed as a set of dynamically
  allocated nodes linked by pointers.  This is not suitable for direct
  storing on disk, since these chains of pointers can be rather long which
  would require too many disk accesses.  In contrast, disk-based data
  structures should have a high fanout to minimize I/O.  The challenge
  addressed by SP-GiST is to map search tree nodes to
  disk pages in such a way that a search need access only a few disk pages,
  even if it traverses many nodes.
 
 
  Like GiST, SP-GiST is meant to allow
  the development of custom data types with the appropriate access methods,
  by an expert in the domain of the data type, rather than a database expert.
 
 
  Some of the information here is derived from Purdue University's
  SP-GiST Indexing Project
  web site.
  The SP-GiST implementation in
  PostgreSQL is primarily maintained by Teodor
  Sigaev and Oleg Bartunov, and there is more information on their
  
  web site.
 
 Built-in Operator Classes
 
  The core PostgreSQL> distribution
  includes the SP-GiST operator classes shown in
  .
 
  
   Built-in SP-GiST Operator Classes
   
    
     
      Name
      Indexed Data Type
      Indexable Operators
     
    
    
     
      kd_point_ops>
      point>
      
       <<>
       <@>
       <^>
       >>>
       >^>
       ~=>
      
     
     
      quad_point_ops>
      point>
      
       <<>
       <@>
       <^>
       >>>
       >^>
       ~=>
      
     
     
      range_ops>
      any range type
      
       &&>
       &<>
       &>>
       -|->
       <<>
       <@>
       =>
       >>>
       @>>
      
     
     
      box_ops>
      box>
      
       <<>
       &<>
       &&>
       &>>
       >>>
       ~=>
       @>>
       <@>
       &<|>
       <<|>
       |>>
       |&>>
      
     
     
      text_ops>
      text>
      
       <>
       <=>
       =>
       >>
       >=>
       ~<=~>
       ~<~>
       ~>=~>
       ~>~>
      
     
     
      inet_ops>
      inet>, cidr>
      
       &&>
       >>>
       >>=>
       >>
       >=>
       <>>
       <<>
       <<=>
       <>
       <=>
       =>
      
     
    
   
  
 
  Of the two operator classes for type point>,
  quad_point_ops> is the default.  kd_point_ops>
  supports the same operators but uses a different index data structure which
  may offer better performance in some applications.
 
 Extensibility
 
  SP-GiST offers an interface with a high level of
  abstraction, requiring the access method developer to implement only
  methods specific to a given data type. The SP-GiST core
  is responsible for efficient disk mapping and searching the tree structure.
  It also takes care of concurrency and logging considerations.
 
 
  Leaf tuples of an SP-GiST tree contain values of the
  same data type as the indexed column.  Leaf tuples at the root level will
  always contain the original indexed data value, but leaf tuples at lower
  levels might contain only a compressed representation, such as a suffix.
  In that case the operator class support functions must be able to
  reconstruct the original value using information accumulated from the
  inner tuples that are passed through to reach the leaf level.
 
 
  Inner tuples are more complex, since they are branching points in the
  search tree.  Each inner tuple contains a set of one or more
  nodes>, which represent groups of similar leaf values.
  A node contains a downlink that leads either to another, lower-level inner
  tuple, or to a short list of leaf tuples that all lie on the same index page.
  Each node normally has a label> that describes it; for example,
  in a radix tree the node label could be the next character of the string
  value.  (Alternatively, an operator class can omit the node labels, if it
  works with a fixed set of nodes for all inner tuples;
  see .)
  Optionally, an inner tuple can have a prefix> value
  that describes all its members.  In a radix tree this could be the common
  prefix of the represented strings.  The prefix value is not necessarily
  really a prefix, but can be any data needed by the operator class;
  for example, in a quad-tree it can store the central point that the four
  quadrants are measured with respect to.  A quad-tree inner tuple would
  then also contain four nodes corresponding to the quadrants around this
  central point.
 
 
  Some tree algorithms require knowledge of level (or depth) of the current
  tuple, so the SP-GiST core provides the possibility for
  operator classes to manage level counting while descending the tree.
  There is also support for incrementally reconstructing the represented
  value when that is needed, and for passing down additional data (called
  traverse values>) during a tree descent.
 
 
  
   The SP-GiST core code takes care of null entries.
   Although SP-GiST indexes do store entries for nulls
   in indexed columns, this is hidden from the index operator class code:
   no null index entries or search conditions will ever be passed to the
   operator class methods.  (It is assumed that SP-GiST
   operators are strict and so cannot succeed for null values.)  Null values
   are therefore not discussed further here.
  
 
 
  There are five user-defined methods that an index operator class for
  SP-GiST must provide.  All five follow the convention
  of accepting two internal> arguments, the first of which is a
  pointer to a C struct containing input values for the support method,
  while the second argument is a pointer to a C struct where output values
  must be placed.  Four of the methods just return void>, since
  all their results appear in the output struct; but
  leaf_consistent> additionally returns a boolean> result.
  The methods must not modify any fields of their input structs.  In all
  cases, the output struct is initialized to zeroes before calling the
  user-defined method.
 
 
  The five user-defined methods are:
 
 
    
     config>
     
      
       Returns static information about the index implementation, including
       the data type OIDs of the prefix and node label data types.
      
     
      The SQL> declaration of the function must look like this:
CREATE FUNCTION my_config(internal, internal) RETURNS void ...
      The first argument is a pointer to a spgConfigIn>
      C struct, containing input data for the function.
      The second argument is a pointer to a spgConfigOut>
      C struct, which the function must fill with result data.
typedef struct spgConfigIn
{
    Oid         attType;        /* Data type to be indexed */
} spgConfigIn;
typedef struct spgConfigOut
{
    Oid         prefixType;     /* Data type of inner-tuple prefixes */
    Oid         labelType;      /* Data type of inner-tuple node labels */
    bool        canReturnData;  /* Opclass can reconstruct original data */
    bool        longValuesOK;   /* Opclass can cope with values > 1 page */
} spgConfigOut;
      attType> is passed in order to support polymorphic
      index operator classes; for ordinary fixed-data-type operator classes, it
      will always have the same value and so can be ignored.
     
     
      For operator classes that do not use prefixes,
      prefixType> can be set to VOIDOID>.
      Likewise, for operator classes that do not use node labels,
      labelType> can be set to VOIDOID>.
      canReturnData> should be set true if the operator class
      is capable of reconstructing the originally-supplied index value.
      longValuesOK> should be set true only when the
      attType> is of variable length and the operator
      class is capable of segmenting long values by repeated suffixing
      (see ).
     
     
    
    
     choose>
     
      
        Chooses a method for inserting a new value into an inner tuple.
      
     
      The SQL> declaration of the function must look like this:
CREATE FUNCTION my_choose(internal, internal) RETURNS void ...
      The first argument is a pointer to a spgChooseIn>
      C struct, containing input data for the function.
      The second argument is a pointer to a spgChooseOut>
      C struct, which the function must fill with result data.
typedef struct spgChooseIn
{
    Datum       datum;          /* original datum to be indexed */
    Datum       leafDatum;      /* current datum to be stored at leaf */
    int         level;          /* current level (counting from zero) */
    /* Data from current inner tuple */
    bool        allTheSame;     /* tuple is marked all-the-same? */
    bool        hasPrefix;      /* tuple has a prefix? */
    Datum       prefixDatum;    /* if so, the prefix value */
    int         nNodes;         /* number of nodes in the inner tuple */
    Datum      *nodeLabels;     /* node label values (NULL if none) */
} spgChooseIn;
typedef enum spgChooseResultType
{
    spgMatchNode = 1,           /* descend into existing node */
    spgAddNode,                 /* add a node to the inner tuple */
    spgSplitTuple               /* split inner tuple (change its prefix) */
} spgChooseResultType;
typedef struct spgChooseOut
{
    spgChooseResultType resultType;     /* action code, see above */
    union
    {
        struct                  /* results for spgMatchNode */
        {
            int         nodeN;      /* descend to this node (index from 0) */
            int         levelAdd;   /* increment level by this much */
            Datum       restDatum;  /* new leaf datum */
        }           matchNode;
        struct                  /* results for spgAddNode */
        {
            Datum       nodeLabel;  /* new node's label */
            int         nodeN;      /* where to insert it (index from 0) */
        }           addNode;
        struct                  /* results for spgSplitTuple */
        {
            /* Info to form new upper-level inner tuple with one child tuple */
            bool        prefixHasPrefix;    /* tuple should have a prefix? */
            Datum       prefixPrefixDatum;  /* if so, its value */
            int         prefixNNodes;       /* number of nodes */
            Datum      *prefixNodeLabels;   /* their labels (or NULL for
                                             * no labels) */
            int         childNodeN;         /* which node gets child tuple */
            /* Info to form new lower-level inner tuple with all old nodes */
            bool        postfixHasPrefix;   /* tuple should have a prefix? */
            Datum       postfixPrefixDatum; /* if so, its value */
        }           splitTuple;
    }           result;
} spgChooseOut;
       datum> is the original datum that was to be inserted
       into the index.
       leafDatum> is initially the same as
       datum>, but can change at lower levels of the tree
       if the choose or picksplit
       methods change it.  When the insertion search reaches a leaf page,
       the current value of leafDatum> is what will be stored
       in the newly created leaf tuple.
       level> is the current inner tuple's level, starting at
       zero for the root level.
       allTheSame> is true if the current inner tuple is
       marked as containing multiple equivalent nodes
       (see ).
       hasPrefix> is true if the current inner tuple contains
       a prefix; if so,
       prefixDatum> is its value.
       nNodes> is the number of child nodes contained in the
       inner tuple, and
       nodeLabels> is an array of their label values, or
       NULL if there are no labels.
      
      
       The choose function can determine either that
       the new value matches one of the existing child nodes, or that a new
       child node must be added, or that the new value is inconsistent with
       the tuple prefix and so the inner tuple must be split to create a
       less restrictive prefix.
      
      
       If the new value matches one of the existing child nodes,
       set resultType> to spgMatchNode>.
       Set nodeN> to the index (from zero) of that node in
       the node array.
       Set levelAdd> to the increment in
       level> caused by descending through that node,
       or leave it as zero if the operator class does not use levels.
       Set restDatum> to equal datum>
       if the operator class does not modify datums from one level to the
       next, or otherwise set it to the modified value to be used as
       leafDatum> at the next level.
      
      
       If a new child node must be added,
       set resultType> to spgAddNode>.
       Set nodeLabel> to the label to be used for the new
       node, and set nodeN> to the index (from zero) at which
       to insert the node in the node array.
       After the node has been added, the choose
       function will be called again with the modified inner tuple;
       that call should result in an spgMatchNode> result.
      
      
       If the new value is inconsistent with the tuple prefix,
       set resultType> to spgSplitTuple>.
       This action moves all the existing nodes into a new lower-level
       inner tuple, and replaces the existing inner tuple with a tuple
       having a single downlink pointing to the new lower-level inner tuple.
       Set prefixHasPrefix> to indicate whether the new
       upper tuple should have a prefix, and if so set
       prefixPrefixDatum> to the prefix value.  This new
       prefix value must be sufficiently less restrictive than the original
       to accept the new value to be indexed.
       Set prefixNNodes> to the number of nodes needed in the
       new tuple, and set prefixNodeLabels> to a palloc'd array
       holding their labels, or to NULL if node labels are not required.
       Note that the total size of the new upper tuple must be no more
       than the total size of the tuple it is replacing; this constrains
       the lengths of the new prefix and new labels.
       Set childNodeN> to the index (from zero) of the node
       that will downlink to the new lower-level inner tuple.
       Set postfixHasPrefix> to indicate whether the new
       lower-level inner tuple should have a prefix, and if so set
       postfixPrefixDatum> to the prefix value.  The
       combination of these two prefixes and the downlink node's label
       (if any) must have the same meaning as the original prefix, because
       there is no opportunity to alter the node labels that are moved to
       the new lower-level tuple, nor to change any child index entries.
       After the node has been split, the choose
       function will be called again with the replacement inner tuple.
       That call may return an spgAddNode> result, if no suitable
       node was created by the spgSplitTuple> action.  Eventually
       choose must return spgMatchNode> to
       allow the insertion to descend to the next level.
      
     
    
    
     picksplit>
     
      
       Decides how to create a new inner tuple over a set of leaf tuples.
      
      
        The SQL> declaration of the function must look like this:
CREATE FUNCTION my_picksplit(internal, internal) RETURNS void ...
      The first argument is a pointer to a spgPickSplitIn>
      C struct, containing input data for the function.
      The second argument is a pointer to a spgPickSplitOut>
      C struct, which the function must fill with result data.
typedef struct spgPickSplitIn
{
    int         nTuples;        /* number of leaf tuples */
    Datum      *datums;         /* their datums (array of length nTuples) */
    int         level;          /* current level (counting from zero) */
} spgPickSplitIn;
typedef struct spgPickSplitOut
{
    bool        hasPrefix;      /* new inner tuple should have a prefix? */
    Datum       prefixDatum;    /* if so, its value */
    int         nNodes;         /* number of nodes for new inner tuple */
    Datum      *nodeLabels;     /* their labels (or NULL for no labels) */
    int        *mapTuplesToNodes;   /* node index for each leaf tuple */
    Datum      *leafTupleDatums;    /* datum to store in each new leaf tuple */
} spgPickSplitOut;
       nTuples> is the number of leaf tuples provided.
       datums> is an array of their datum values.
       level> is the current level that all the leaf tuples
       share, which will become the level of the new inner tuple.
      
      
       Set hasPrefix> to indicate whether the new inner
       tuple should have a prefix, and if so set
       prefixDatum> to the prefix value.
       Set nNodes> to indicate the number of nodes that
       the new inner tuple will contain, and
       set nodeLabels> to an array of their label values,
       or to NULL if node labels are not required.
       Set mapTuplesToNodes> to an array that gives the index
       (from zero) of the node that each leaf tuple should be assigned to.
       Set leafTupleDatums> to an array of the values to
       be stored in the new leaf tuples (these will be the same as the
       input datums> if the operator class does not modify
       datums from one level to the next).
       Note that the picksplit> function is
       responsible for palloc'ing the
       nodeLabels>, mapTuplesToNodes> and
       leafTupleDatums> arrays.
      
      
       If more than one leaf tuple is supplied, it is expected that the
       picksplit> function will classify them into more than
       one node; otherwise it is not possible to split the leaf tuples
       across multiple pages, which is the ultimate purpose of this
       operation.  Therefore, if the picksplit> function
       ends up placing all the leaf tuples in the same node, the core
       SP-GiST code will override that decision and generate an inner
       tuple in which the leaf tuples are assigned at random to several
       identically-labeled nodes.  Such a tuple is marked
       allTheSame> to signify that this has happened.  The
       choose> and inner_consistent> functions
       must take suitable care with such inner tuples.
       See  for more information.
      
      
       picksplit> can be applied to a single leaf tuple only
       in the case that the config> function set
       longValuesOK> to true and a larger-than-a-page input
       value has been supplied.  In this case the point of the operation is
       to strip off a prefix and produce a new, shorter leaf datum value.
       The call will be repeated until a leaf datum short enough to fit on
       a page has been produced.  See  for
       more information.
      
     
    
    
     inner_consistent>
     
      
       Returns set of nodes (branches) to follow during tree search.
      
      
       The SQL> declaration of the function must look like this:
CREATE FUNCTION my_inner_consistent(internal, internal) RETURNS void ...
      The first argument is a pointer to a spgInnerConsistentIn>
      C struct, containing input data for the function.
      The second argument is a pointer to a spgInnerConsistentOut>
      C struct, which the function must fill with result data.
typedef struct spgInnerConsistentIn
{
    ScanKey     scankeys;       /* array of operators and comparison values */
    int         nkeys;          /* length of array */
    Datum       reconstructedValue;     /* value reconstructed at parent */
    void       *traversalValue; /* opclass-specific traverse value */
    MemoryContext traversalMemoryContext;   /* put new traverse values here */
    int         level;          /* current level (counting from zero) */
    bool        returnData;     /* original data must be returned? */
    /* Data from current inner tuple */
    bool        allTheSame;     /* tuple is marked all-the-same? */
    bool        hasPrefix;      /* tuple has a prefix? */
    Datum       prefixDatum;    /* if so, the prefix value */
    int         nNodes;         /* number of nodes in the inner tuple */
    Datum      *nodeLabels;     /* node label values (NULL if none) */
} spgInnerConsistentIn;
typedef struct spgInnerConsistentOut
{
    int         nNodes;         /* number of child nodes to be visited */
    int        *nodeNumbers;    /* their indexes in the node array */
    int        *levelAdds;      /* increment level by this much for each */
    Datum      *reconstructedValues;    /* associated reconstructed values */
    void      **traversalValues;        /* opclass-specific traverse values */
} spgInnerConsistentOut;
       The array scankeys>, of length nkeys>,
       describes the index search condition(s).  These conditions are
       combined with AND — only index entries that satisfy all of
       them are interesting.  (Note that nkeys> = 0 implies
       that all index entries satisfy the query.)  Usually the consistent
       function only cares about the sk_strategy> and
       sk_argument> fields of each array entry, which
       respectively give the indexable operator and comparison value.
       In particular it is not necessary to check sk_flags> to
       see if the comparison value is NULL, because the SP-GiST core code
       will filter out such conditions.
       reconstructedValue> is the value reconstructed for the
       parent tuple; it is (Datum) 0> at the root level or if the
       inner_consistent> function did not provide a value at the
       parent level.
       traversalValue> is a pointer to any traverse data
       passed down from the previous call of inner_consistent>
       on the parent index tuple, or NULL at the root level.
       traversalMemoryContext> is the memory context in which
       to store output traverse values (see below).
       level> is the current inner tuple's level, starting at
       zero for the root level.
       returnData> is true> if reconstructed data is
       required for this query; this will only be so if the
       config> function asserted canReturnData>.
       allTheSame> is true if the current inner tuple is
       marked all-the-same>; in this case all the nodes have the
       same label (if any) and so either all or none of them match the query
       (see ).
       hasPrefix> is true if the current inner tuple contains
       a prefix; if so,
       prefixDatum> is its value.
       nNodes> is the number of child nodes contained in the
       inner tuple, and
       nodeLabels> is an array of their label values, or
       NULL if the nodes do not have labels.
      
      
       nNodes> must be set to the number of child nodes that
       need to be visited by the search, and
       nodeNumbers> must be set to an array of their indexes.
       If the operator class keeps track of levels, set
       levelAdds> to an array of the level increments
       required when descending to each node to be visited.  (Often these
       increments will be the same for all the nodes, but that's not
       necessarily so, so an array is used.)
       If value reconstruction is needed, set
       reconstructedValues> to an array of the values
       reconstructed for each child node to be visited; otherwise, leave
       reconstructedValues> as NULL.
       If it is desired to pass down additional out-of-band information
       (traverse values>) to lower levels of the tree search,
       set traversalValues> to an array of the appropriate
       traverse values, one for each child node to be visited; otherwise,
       leave traversalValues> as NULL.
       Note that the inner_consistent> function is
       responsible for palloc'ing the
       nodeNumbers>, levelAdds>,
       reconstructedValues>, and
       traversalValues> arrays in the current memory context.
       However, any output traverse values pointed to by
       the traversalValues> array should be allocated
       in traversalMemoryContext>.
       Each traverse value must be a single palloc'd chunk.
      
     
    
    
     leaf_consistent>
     
      
       Returns true if a leaf tuple satisfies a query.
      
      
       The SQL> declaration of the function must look like this:
CREATE FUNCTION my_leaf_consistent(internal, internal) RETURNS bool ...
      The first argument is a pointer to a spgLeafConsistentIn>
      C struct, containing input data for the function.
      The second argument is a pointer to a spgLeafConsistentOut>
      C struct, which the function must fill with result data.
typedef struct spgLeafConsistentIn
{
    ScanKey     scankeys;       /* array of operators and comparison values */
    int         nkeys;          /* length of array */
    Datum       reconstructedValue;     /* value reconstructed at parent */
    void       *traversalValue; /* opclass-specific traverse value */
    int         level;          /* current level (counting from zero) */
    bool        returnData;     /* original data must be returned? */
    Datum       leafDatum;      /* datum in leaf tuple */
} spgLeafConsistentIn;
typedef struct spgLeafConsistentOut
{
    Datum       leafValue;      /* reconstructed original data, if any */
    bool        recheck;        /* set true if operator must be rechecked */
} spgLeafConsistentOut;
       The array scankeys>, of length nkeys>,
       describes the index search condition(s).  These conditions are
       combined with AND — only index entries that satisfy all of
       them satisfy the query.  (Note that nkeys> = 0 implies
       that all index entries satisfy the query.)  Usually the consistent
       function only cares about the sk_strategy> and
       sk_argument> fields of each array entry, which
       respectively give the indexable operator and comparison value.
       In particular it is not necessary to check sk_flags> to
       see if the comparison value is NULL, because the SP-GiST core code
       will filter out such conditions.
       reconstructedValue> is the value reconstructed for the
       parent tuple; it is (Datum) 0> at the root level or if the
       inner_consistent> function did not provide a value at the
       parent level.
       traversalValue> is a pointer to any traverse data
       passed down from the previous call of inner_consistent>
       on the parent index tuple, or NULL at the root level.
       level> is the current leaf tuple's level, starting at
       zero for the root level.
       returnData> is true> if reconstructed data is
       required for this query; this will only be so if the
       config> function asserted canReturnData>.
       leafDatum> is the key value stored in the current
       leaf tuple.
      
      
       The function must return true> if the leaf tuple matches the
       query, or false> if not.  In the true> case,
       if returnData> is true> then
       leafValue> must be set to the value originally supplied
       to be indexed for this leaf tuple.  Also,
       recheck> may be set to true> if the match
       is uncertain and so the operator(s) must be re-applied to the actual
       heap tuple to verify the match.
      
     
    
   
  
   All the SP-GiST support methods are normally called in a short-lived
   memory context; that is, CurrentMemoryContext> will be reset
   after processing of each tuple.  It is therefore not very important to
   worry about pfree'ing everything you palloc.  (The config>
   method is an exception: it should try to avoid leaking memory.  But
   usually the config> method need do nothing but assign
   constants into the passed parameter struct.)
  
  
   If the indexed column is of a collatable data type, the index collation
   will be passed to all the support methods, using the standard
   PG_GET_COLLATION()> mechanism.
  
 Implementation
  
   This section covers implementation details and other tricks that are
   useful for implementers of SP-GiST operator classes to
   know.
  
 
  SP-GiST Limits
  
   Individual leaf tuples and inner tuples must fit on a single index page
   (8kB by default).  Therefore, when indexing values of variable-length
   data types, long values can only be supported by methods such as radix
   trees, in which each level of the tree includes a prefix that is short
   enough to fit on a page, and the final leaf level includes a suffix also
   short enough to fit on a page.  The operator class should set
   longValuesOK> to TRUE only if it is prepared to arrange for
   this to happen.  Otherwise, the SP-GiST core will
   reject any request to index a value that is too large to fit
   on an index page.
  
  
   Likewise, it is the operator class's responsibility that inner tuples
   do not grow too large to fit on an index page; this limits the number
   of child nodes that can be used in one inner tuple, as well as the
   maximum size of a prefix value.
  
  
   Another limitation is that when an inner tuple's node points to a set
   of leaf tuples, those tuples must all be in the same index page.
   (This is a design decision to reduce seeking and save space in the
   links that chain such tuples together.)  If the set of leaf tuples
   grows too large for a page, a split is performed and an intermediate
   inner tuple is inserted.  For this to fix the problem, the new inner
   tuple must> divide the set of leaf values into more than one
   node group.  If the operator class's picksplit> function
   fails to do that, the SP-GiST core resorts to
   extraordinary measures described in .
  
 
 
  SP-GiST Without Node Labels
  
   Some tree algorithms use a fixed set of nodes for each inner tuple;
   for example, in a quad-tree there are always exactly four nodes
   corresponding to the four quadrants around the inner tuple's centroid
   point.  In such a case the code typically works with the nodes by
   number, and there is no need for explicit node labels.  To suppress
   node labels (and thereby save some space), the picksplit>
   function can return NULL for the nodeLabels> array,
   and likewise the choose> function can return NULL for
   the prefixNodeLabels> array during
   a spgSplitTuple> action.
   This will in turn result in nodeLabels> being NULL during
   subsequent calls to choose> and inner_consistent>.
   In principle, node labels could be used for some inner tuples and omitted
   for others in the same index.
  
  
   When working with an inner tuple having unlabeled nodes, it is an error
   for choose> to return spgAddNode>, since the set
   of nodes is supposed to be fixed in such cases.
  
 
 
  All-the-same> Inner Tuples
  
   The SP-GiST core can override the results of the
   operator class's picksplit> function when
   picksplit> fails to divide the supplied leaf values into
   at least two node categories.  When this happens, the new inner tuple
   is created with multiple nodes that each have the same label (if any)
   that picksplit> gave to the one node it did use, and the
   leaf values are divided at random among these equivalent nodes.
   The allTheSame> flag is set on the inner tuple to warn the
   choose> and inner_consistent> functions that the
   tuple does not have the node set that they might otherwise expect.
  
  
   When dealing with an allTheSame> tuple, a choose>
   result of spgMatchNode> is interpreted to mean that the new
   value can be assigned to any of the equivalent nodes; the core code will
   ignore the supplied  nodeN> value and descend into one
   of the nodes at random (so as to keep the tree balanced).  It is an
   error for choose> to return spgAddNode>, since
   that would make the nodes not all equivalent; the
   spgSplitTuple> action must be used if the value to be inserted
   doesn't match the existing nodes.
  
  
   When dealing with an allTheSame> tuple, the
   inner_consistent> function should return either all or none
   of the nodes as targets for continuing the index search, since they are
   all equivalent.  This may or may not require any special-case code,
   depending on how much the inner_consistent> function normally
   assumes about the meaning of the nodes.
  
 
 Examples
 
  The PostgreSQL source distribution includes
  several examples of index operator classes for SP-GiST,
  as described in .  Look
  into src/backend/access/spgist/>
  and src/backend/utils/adt/> to see the code.