summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/builtin/commit-graph.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>2022-09-01 00:29:45 +0000
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2022-09-01 10:07:40 -0700
commit35ebb1e37b25b9d799d1064d36a2ce668ad20264 (patch)
treeeba4a0a320c6973fe50f8505c9380e453d517630 /builtin/commit-graph.c
parent29fb2ec384a867ca577335a12f4b45c184e7b642 (diff)
chainlint.pl: don't require `return|exit|continue` to end with `&&`
In order to check for &&-chain breakage, each time TestParser encounters a new command, it checks whether the previous command ends with `&&`, and -- with a couple exceptions -- signals breakage if it does not. The first exception is that a command may validly end with `||`, which is commonly employed as `command || return 1` at the very end of a loop body to terminate the loop early. The second is that piping one command's output with `|` to another command does not constitute a &&-chain break (the exit status of the pipe is the exit status of the final command in the pipe). However, it turns out that there are a few additional cases found in the wild in which it is likely safe for `&&` to be missing even when other commands follow. For instance: while {condition-1} do test {condition-2} || return 1 # or `exit 1` within a subshell more-commands done while {condition-1} do test {condition-2} || continue more-commands done Such cases indicate deliberate thought about failure modes by the test author, thus flagging them as breaking the &&-chain is not helpful. Therefore, take these special cases into consideration when checking for &&-chain breakage. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'builtin/commit-graph.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions