diff options
author | Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com> | 2022-06-29 13:21:07 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2022-06-30 10:25:54 -0700 |
commit | 54e51e559ec1df2dd709debcf28e6d7b1e515356 (patch) | |
tree | b0cb1a73f7ec3c39f164e9733915c95421885f77 /t/t9133-git-svn-nested-git-repo.sh | |
parent | e4a4b31577c7419497ac30cebe30d755b97752c5 (diff) |
git-rebase.txt: use back-ticks consistently
While inspecting the 'git rebase' documentation, I noticed that it is
inconsistent with how it uses back-ticks (or other punctuation) for
identifying Git commands, command-line arguments, or values for those
arguments.
Sometimes, an argument (like '--interactive') would appear without any
punctuation, causing the argument to not have any special formatting.
Other times, arguments or 'git rebase' itself would have single-quotes
giving a bold look (in the HTML documentation at least).
By consistently using back-ticks, these types of strings appear in a
monospace font with special highlighting to appear more clearly as text
that exists in a command-line invocation of a Git command.
This rather-large diff is the result of scanning git-rebase.txt and
adding back-ticks as appropriate. Some are adding back-ticks where there
was no punctuation. Others are replacing single quotes.
There are also a few minor cleanups in the process, including those
found by reviewers.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t9133-git-svn-nested-git-repo.sh')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions