summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/t/t9133-git-svn-nested-git-repo.sh
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDerrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>2022-06-29 13:21:07 +0000
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2022-06-30 10:25:54 -0700
commit54e51e559ec1df2dd709debcf28e6d7b1e515356 (patch)
treeb0cb1a73f7ec3c39f164e9733915c95421885f77 /t/t9133-git-svn-nested-git-repo.sh
parente4a4b31577c7419497ac30cebe30d755b97752c5 (diff)
git-rebase.txt: use back-ticks consistently
While inspecting the 'git rebase' documentation, I noticed that it is inconsistent with how it uses back-ticks (or other punctuation) for identifying Git commands, command-line arguments, or values for those arguments. Sometimes, an argument (like '--interactive') would appear without any punctuation, causing the argument to not have any special formatting. Other times, arguments or 'git rebase' itself would have single-quotes giving a bold look (in the HTML documentation at least). By consistently using back-ticks, these types of strings appear in a monospace font with special highlighting to appear more clearly as text that exists in a command-line invocation of a Git command. This rather-large diff is the result of scanning git-rebase.txt and adding back-ticks as appropriate. Some are adding back-ticks where there was no punctuation. Others are replacing single quotes. There are also a few minor cleanups in the process, including those found by reviewers. Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 't/t9133-git-svn-nested-git-repo.sh')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions