summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/git-range-diff.txt
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-01-21doc: use .adoc extension for AsciiDoc filesbrian m. carlson
We presently use the ".txt" extension for our AsciiDoc files. While not wrong, most editors do not associate this extension with AsciiDoc, meaning that contributors don't get automatic editor functionality that could be useful, such as syntax highlighting and prose linting. It is much more common to use the ".adoc" extension for AsciiDoc files, since this helps editors automatically detect files and also allows various forges to provide rich (HTML-like) rendering. Let's do that here, renaming all of the files and updating the includes where relevant. Adjust the various build scripts and makefiles to use the new extension as well. Note that this should not result in any user-visible changes to the documentation. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-12-16range-diff: introduce the convenience option `--remerge-diff`Johannes Schindelin
Just like `git log`, now also `git range-diff` has that option as a shortcut for the common operation that would otherwise require the quite unwieldy (if theoretically "more correct") `--diff-mode=remerge` option. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2024-12-16range-diff: optionally include merge commits' diffs in the analysisJohannes Schindelin
The `git log` command already offers support for including diffs for merges, via the `--diff-merges=<format>` option. Let's add corresponding support for `git range-diff`, too. This makes it more convenient to spot differences between commit ranges that contain merges. This is especially true in scenarios with non-trivial merges, i.e. merges introducing changes other than, or in addition to, what merge ORT would have produced. Merging a topic branch that changes a function signature into a branch that added a caller of that function, for example, would require the merge commit itself to adjust that caller to the modified signature. In my code reviews, I found the `--diff-merges=remerge` option particularly useful. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-10-30Merge branch 'sn/typo-grammo-phraso-fixes'Junio C Hamano
Many typos, ungrammatical sentences and wrong phrasing have been fixed. * sn/typo-grammo-phraso-fixes: t/README: fix multi-prerequisite example doc/gitk: s/sticked/stuck/ git-jump: admit to passing merge mode args to ls-files doc/diff-options: improve wording of the log.diffMerges mention doc: fix some typos, grammar and wording issues
2023-10-09documentation: wording improvementsElijah Newren
Diff best viewed with --color-diff. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2023-10-05doc: fix some typos, grammar and wording issuesŠtěpán Němec
Signed-off-by: Štěpán Němec <stepnem@smrk.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-08-26range-diff: optionally accept pathspecsJohannes Schindelin
The `git range-diff` command can be quite expensive, which is not a surprise given that the underlying algorithm to match up pairs of commits between the provided two commit ranges has a cubic runtime. Therefore it makes sense to restrict the commit ranges as much as possible, to reduce the amount of input to that O(N^3) algorithm. In chatty repositories with wide trees, this is not necessarily possible merely by choosing commit ranges wisely. Let's give users another option to restrict the commit ranges: by providing a pathspec. That helps in repositories with wide trees because it is likely that the user has a good idea which subset of the tree they are actually interested in. Example: git range-diff upstream/main upstream/seen HEAD -- range-diff.c This shows commits that are either in the local branch or in `seen`, but not in `main`, skipping all commits that do not touch `range-diff.c`. Note: Since we piggy-back the pathspecs onto the `other_arg` mechanism that was introduced to be able to pass through the `--notes` option to the revision machinery, we must now ensure that the `other_arg` array is appended at the end (the revision range must come before the pathspecs, if any). Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-17Merge branch 'js/range-diff-one-side-only'Junio C Hamano
The "git range-diff" command learned "--(left|right)-only" option to show only one side of the compared range. * js/range-diff-one-side-only: range-diff: offer --left-only/--right-only options range-diff: move the diffopt initialization down one layer range-diff: combine all options in a single data structure range-diff: simplify code spawning `git log` range-diff: libify the read_patches() function again range-diff: avoid leaking memory in two error code paths
2021-02-06range-diff(docs): explain how to specify commit rangesJohannes Schindelin
There are three forms, depending whether the user specifies one, two or three non-option arguments. We've never actually explained how this works in the manual, so let's explain it. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-06range-diff: offer --left-only/--right-only optionsJohannes Schindelin
When comparing commit ranges, one is frequently interested only in one side, such as asking the question "Has this patch that I submitted to the Git mailing list been applied?": one would only care about the part of the output that corresponds to the commits in a local branch. To make that possible, imitate the `git rev-list` options `--left-only` and `--right-only`. This addresses https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/issues/206 Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-12-05Merge branch 'dl/range-diff-with-notes'Junio C Hamano
"git range-diff" learned to take the "--notes=<ref>" and the "--no-notes" options to control the commit notes included in the log message that gets compared. * dl/range-diff-with-notes: format-patch: pass notes configuration to range-diff range-diff: pass through --notes to `git log` range-diff: output `## Notes ##` header t3206: range-diff compares logs with commit notes t3206: s/expected/expect/ t3206: disable parameter substitution in heredoc t3206: remove spaces after redirect operators pretty-options.txt: --notes accepts a ref instead of treeish rev-list-options.txt: remove reference to --show-notes argv-array: add space after `while`
2019-11-21range-diff: pass through --notes to `git log`Denton Liu
When a commit being range-diff'd has a note attached to it, the note will be compared as well. However, if a user has multiple notes refs or if they want to suppress notes from being printed, there is currently no way to do this. Pass through `--[no-]notes[=<ref>]` to the `git log` call so that this option is customizable. Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-07Documentation: fix a bunch of typos, both old and newElijah Newren
Reported-by: Jens Schleusener <Jens.Schleusener@fossies.org> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-11-12range-diff doc: add a section about output stabilityÆvar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
The range-diff command is already advertised as porcelain, but let's make it really clear that the output is completely subject to change, particularly when it comes to diff options such as --stat. Right now that option doesn't work, but fixing that is the subject of a later change. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-13range-diff: use dim/bold cues to improve dual color modeJohannes Schindelin
It *is* a confusing thing to look at a diff of diffs. All too easy is it to mix up whether the -/+ markers refer to the "inner" or the "outer" diff, i.e. whether a `+` indicates that a line was added by either the old or the new diff (or both), or whether the new diff does something different than the old diff. To make things easier to process for normal developers, we introduced the dual color mode which colors the lines according to the commit diff, i.e. lines that are added by a commit (whether old, new, or both) are colored in green. In non-dual color mode, the lines would be colored according to the outer diff: if the old commit added a line, it would be colored red (because that line addition is only present in the first commit range that was specified on the command-line, i.e. the "old" commit, but not in the second commit range, i.e. the "new" commit). However, this dual color mode is still not making things clear enough, as we are looking at two levels of diffs, and we still only pick a color according to *one* of them (the outer diff marker is colored differently, of course, but in particular with deep indentation, it is easy to lose track of that outer diff marker's background color). Therefore, let's add another dimension to the mix. Still use green/red/normal according to the commit diffs, but now also dim the lines that were only in the old commit, and use bold face for the lines that are only in the new commit. That way, it is much easier not to lose track of, say, when we are looking at a line that was added in the previous iteration of a patch series but the new iteration adds a slightly different version: the obsolete change will be dimmed, the current version of the patch will be bold. At least this developer has a much easier time reading the range-diffs that way. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-13range-diff: make --dual-color the default modeJohannes Schindelin
After using this command extensively for the last two months, this developer came to the conclusion that even if the dual color mode still leaves a lot of room for confusion about what was actually changed, the non-dual color mode is substantially worse in that regard. Therefore, we really want to make the dual color mode the default. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-13range-diff: populate the man pageJohannes Schindelin
The bulk of this patch consists of a heavily butchered version of tbdiff's README written by Thomas Rast and Thomas Gummerer, lifted from https://github.com/trast/tbdiff. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-13Introduce `range-diff` to compare iterations of a topic branchJohannes Schindelin
This command does not do a whole lot so far, apart from showing a usage that is oddly similar to that of `git tbdiff`. And for a good reason: the next commits will turn `range-branch` into a full-blown replacement for `tbdiff`. At this point, we ignore tbdiff's color options, as they will all be implemented later using diff_options. Since f318d739159 (generate-cmds.sh: export all commands to command-list.h, 2018-05-10), every new command *requires* a man page to build right away, so let's also add a blank man page, too. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>