diff options
| author | Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> | 2004-04-20 17:41:53 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org> | 2004-04-20 17:41:53 -0700 |
| commit | b7fbe52c11d0c7b535ba75487d7e0913ede3671b (patch) | |
| tree | d6cd35e6eb11b7912cc19faabb4534063a1ebfe4 /include/linux/security.h | |
| parent | ce0cbde11f79c665ccc0d4ed01a4dd6976808b6b (diff) | |
[PATCH] compute_creds race
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@myrealbox.com>
Fixes from me, Olaf Dietsche <olaf+list.linux-kernel@olafdietsche.de>
In fs/exec.c, compute_creds does:
task_lock(current);
if (bprm->e_uid != current->uid || bprm->e_gid != current->gid) {
current->mm->dumpable = 0;
if (must_not_trace_exec(current)
|| atomic_read(¤t->fs->count) > 1
|| atomic_read(¤t->files->count) > 1
|| atomic_read(¤t->sighand->count) > 1) {
if(!capable(CAP_SETUID)) {
bprm->e_uid = current->uid;
bprm->e_gid = current->gid;
}
}
}
current->suid = current->euid = current->fsuid = bprm->e_uid;
current->sgid = current->egid = current->fsgid = bprm->e_gid;
task_unlock(current);
security_bprm_compute_creds(bprm);
I assume the task_lock is to prevent another process (on SMP or preempt)
from ptracing the execing process between the check and the assignment. If
that's the concern then the fact that the lock is dropped before the call
to security_brpm_compute_creds means that, if security_bprm_compute_creds
does anything interesting, there's a race.
For my (nearly complete) caps patch, I obviously need to fix this. But I
think it may be exploitable now. Suppose there are two processes, A (the
malicious code) and B (which uses exec). B starts out unprivileged (A and
B have, e.g., uid and euid = 500).
1. A ptraces B.
2. B calls exec on some setuid-root program.
3. in cap_bprm_set_security, B sets bprm->cap_permitted to the full
set.
4. B gets to compute_creds in exec.c, calls task_lock, and does not
change its uid.
5. B calls task_unlock.
6. A detaches from B (on preempt or SMP).
7. B gets to task_lock in cap_bprm_compute_creds, changes its
capabilities, and returns from compute_creds into load_elf_binary.
8. load_elf_binary calls create_elf_tables (line 852 in 2.6.5-mm1),
which calls cap_bprm_secureexec (through LSM), which returns false (!).
9. exec finishes.
The setuid program is now running with uid=euid=500 but full permitted
capabilities. There are two (or three) ways to effectively get local root
now:
1. IIRC, linux 2.4 doesn't check capabilities in ptrace, so A could
just ptrace B again.
2. LD_PRELOAD.
3. There are probably programs that will misbehave on their own under
these circumstances.
Is there some reason why this is not doable?
The patch renames bprm_compute_creds to bprm_apply_creds and moves all uid
logic into the hook, where the test and the resulting modification can both
happen under task_lock().
This way, out-of-tree LSMs will fail to compile instead of malfunctioning.
It should also make life easier for LSMs and will certainly make it easier
for me to finish the cap patch.
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/security.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/security.h | 18 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h index 9baa2ed4ac96..2d16f6577669 100644 --- a/include/linux/security.h +++ b/include/linux/security.h @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ extern int cap_capget (struct task_struct *target, kernel_cap_t *effective, kern extern int cap_capset_check (struct task_struct *target, kernel_cap_t *effective, kernel_cap_t *inheritable, kernel_cap_t *permitted); extern void cap_capset_set (struct task_struct *target, kernel_cap_t *effective, kernel_cap_t *inheritable, kernel_cap_t *permitted); extern int cap_bprm_set_security (struct linux_binprm *bprm); -extern void cap_bprm_compute_creds (struct linux_binprm *bprm); +extern void cap_bprm_apply_creds (struct linux_binprm *bprm); extern int cap_bprm_secureexec(struct linux_binprm *bprm); extern int cap_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, char *name, void *value, size_t size, int flags); extern int cap_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, char *name); @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct swap_info_struct; * @bprm_free_security: * @bprm contains the linux_binprm structure to be modified. * Deallocate and clear the @bprm->security field. - * @bprm_compute_creds: + * @bprm_apply_creds: * Compute and set the security attributes of a process being transformed * by an execve operation based on the old attributes (current->security) * and the information saved in @bprm->security by the set_security hook. @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ struct swap_info_struct; * @bprm contains the linux_binprm structure. * @bprm_set_security: * Save security information in the bprm->security field, typically based - * on information about the bprm->file, for later use by the compute_creds + * on information about the bprm->file, for later use by the apply_creds * hook. This hook may also optionally check permissions (e.g. for * transitions between security domains). * This hook may be called multiple times during a single execve, e.g. for @@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ struct swap_info_struct; * Check permission before allowing the @parent process to trace the * @child process. * Security modules may also want to perform a process tracing check - * during an execve in the set_security or compute_creds hooks of + * during an execve in the set_security or apply_creds hooks of * binprm_security_ops if the process is being traced and its security * attributes would be changed by the execve. * @parent contains the task_struct structure for parent process. @@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ struct security_operations { int (*bprm_alloc_security) (struct linux_binprm * bprm); void (*bprm_free_security) (struct linux_binprm * bprm); - void (*bprm_compute_creds) (struct linux_binprm * bprm); + void (*bprm_apply_creds) (struct linux_binprm * bprm); int (*bprm_set_security) (struct linux_binprm * bprm); int (*bprm_check_security) (struct linux_binprm * bprm); int (*bprm_secureexec) (struct linux_binprm * bprm); @@ -1290,9 +1290,9 @@ static inline void security_bprm_free (struct linux_binprm *bprm) { security_ops->bprm_free_security (bprm); } -static inline void security_bprm_compute_creds (struct linux_binprm *bprm) +static inline void security_bprm_apply_creds (struct linux_binprm *bprm) { - security_ops->bprm_compute_creds (bprm); + security_ops->bprm_apply_creds (bprm); } static inline int security_bprm_set (struct linux_binprm *bprm) { @@ -1962,9 +1962,9 @@ static inline int security_bprm_alloc (struct linux_binprm *bprm) static inline void security_bprm_free (struct linux_binprm *bprm) { } -static inline void security_bprm_compute_creds (struct linux_binprm *bprm) +static inline void security_bprm_apply_creds (struct linux_binprm *bprm) { - cap_bprm_compute_creds (bprm); + cap_bprm_apply_creds (bprm); } static inline int security_bprm_set (struct linux_binprm *bprm) |
