Merge tag 'v5.0-rc6' into for-5.1/block

Pull in 5.0-rc6 to avoid a dumb merge conflict with fs/iomap.c.
This is needed since io_uring is now based on the block branch,
to avoid a conflict between the multi-page bvecs and the bits
of io_uring that touch the core block parts.

* tag 'v5.0-rc6': (525 commits)
  Linux 5.0-rc6
  x86/mm: Make set_pmd_at() paravirt aware
  MAINTAINERS: Update the ocores i2c bus driver maintainer, etc
  blk-mq: remove duplicated definition of blk_mq_freeze_queue
  Blk-iolatency: warn on negative inflight IO counter
  blk-iolatency: fix IO hang due to negative inflight counter
  MAINTAINERS: unify reference to xen-devel list
  x86/mm/cpa: Fix set_mce_nospec()
  futex: Handle early deadlock return correctly
  futex: Fix barrier comment
  net: dsa: b53: Fix for failure when irq is not defined in dt
  blktrace: Show requests without sector
  mips: cm: reprime error cause
  mips: loongson64: remove unreachable(), fix loongson_poweroff().
  sit: check if IPv6 enabled before calling ip6_err_gen_icmpv6_unreach()
  geneve: should not call rt6_lookup() when ipv6 was disabled
  KVM: nVMX: unconditionally cancel preemption timer in free_nested (CVE-2019-7221)
  KVM: x86: work around leak of uninitialized stack contents (CVE-2019-7222)
  kvm: fix kvm_ioctl_create_device() reference counting (CVE-2019-6974)
  signal: Better detection of synchronous signals
  ...

1 files changed, 20 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index fdd312da0992..a0514e01c3eb 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -2221,11 +2221,11 @@ static inline struct futex_hash_bucket *queue_lock(struct futex_q *q)
 	 * decrement the counter at queue_unlock() when some error has
 	 * occurred and we don't end up adding the task to the list.
 	 */
-	hb_waiters_inc(hb);
+	hb_waiters_inc(hb); /* implies smp_mb(); (A) */
 
 	q->lock_ptr = &hb->lock;
 
-	spin_lock(&hb->lock); /* implies smp_mb(); (A) */
+	spin_lock(&hb->lock);
 	return hb;
 }
 
@@ -2861,35 +2861,39 @@ retry_private:
 	 * and BUG when futex_unlock_pi() interleaves with this.
 	 *
 	 * Therefore acquire wait_lock while holding hb->lock, but drop the
-	 * latter before calling rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). This still fully
-	 * serializes against futex_unlock_pi() as that does the exact same
-	 * lock handoff sequence.
+	 * latter before calling __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). This
+	 * interleaves with futex_unlock_pi() -- which does a similar lock
+	 * handoff -- such that the latter can observe the futex_q::pi_state
+	 * before __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() is done.
 	 */
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
 	spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
+	/*
+	 * __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() unconditionally enqueues the @rt_waiter
+	 * such that futex_unlock_pi() is guaranteed to observe the waiter when
+	 * it sees the futex_q::pi_state.
+	 */
 	ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter, current);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
 
 	if (ret) {
 		if (ret == 1)
 			ret = 0;
-
-		spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
-		goto no_block;
+		goto cleanup;
 	}
 
-
 	if (unlikely(to))
 		hrtimer_start_expires(&to->timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
 
 	ret = rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter);
 
+cleanup:
 	spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
 	/*
-	 * If we failed to acquire the lock (signal/timeout), we must
+	 * If we failed to acquire the lock (deadlock/signal/timeout), we must
 	 * first acquire the hb->lock before removing the lock from the
-	 * rt_mutex waitqueue, such that we can keep the hb and rt_mutex
-	 * wait lists consistent.
+	 * rt_mutex waitqueue, such that we can keep the hb and rt_mutex wait
+	 * lists consistent.
 	 *
 	 * In particular; it is important that futex_unlock_pi() can not
 	 * observe this inconsistency.
@@ -3013,6 +3017,10 @@ retry:
 		 * there is no point where we hold neither; and therefore
 		 * wake_futex_pi() must observe a state consistent with what we
 		 * observed.
+		 *
+		 * In particular; this forces __rt_mutex_start_proxy() to
+		 * complete such that we're guaranteed to observe the
+		 * rt_waiter. Also see the WARN in wake_futex_pi().
 		 */
 		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
 		spin_unlock(&hb->lock);