summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>2026-01-23 11:28:58 +0100
committerPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>2026-01-23 11:53:20 +0100
commit15257cc2f905dbf5813c0bfdd3c15885f28093c4 (patch)
tree4313c6614389d883c6a8125a760dba81db359cbf /kernel
parent4f70f106bca1a56bd66d00830ac91680bd754974 (diff)
sched/fair: Revert force wakeup preemption
This agressively bypasses run_to_parity and slice protection with the assumpiton that this is what waker wants but there is no garantee that the wakee will be the next to run. It is a better choice to use yield_to_task or WF_SYNC in such case. This increases the number of resched and preemption because a task becomes quickly "ineligible" when it runs; We update the task vruntime periodically and before the task exhausted its slice or at least quantum. Example: 2 tasks A and B wake up simultaneously with lag = 0. Both are eligible. Task A runs 1st and wakes up task C. Scheduler updates task A's vruntime which becomes greater than average runtime as all others have a lag == 0 and didn't run yet. Now task A is ineligible because it received more runtime than the other task but it has not yet exhausted its slice nor a min quantum. We force preemption, disable protection but Task B will run 1st not task C. Sidenote, DELAY_ZERO increases this effect by clearing positive lag at wake up. Fixes: e837456fdca8 ("sched/fair: Reimplement NEXT_BUDDY to align with EEVDF goals") Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260123102858.52428-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched/fair.c10
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a148c61a8085..3eaeceda71b0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8828,16 +8828,6 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
if ((wake_flags & WF_FORK) || pse->sched_delayed)
return;
- /*
- * If @p potentially is completing work required by current then
- * consider preemption.
- *
- * Reschedule if waker is no longer eligible. */
- if (in_task() && !entity_eligible(cfs_rq, se)) {
- preempt_action = PREEMPT_WAKEUP_RESCHED;
- goto preempt;
- }
-
/* Prefer picking wakee soon if appropriate. */
if (sched_feat(NEXT_BUDDY) &&
set_preempt_buddy(cfs_rq, wake_flags, pse, se)) {