Merge branch 'relax-tracing-prog-recursive-attach-rules'

Dmitrii Dolgov says:

====================
Relax tracing prog recursive attach rules

Currently, it's not allowed to attach an fentry/fexit prog to another
fentry/fexit. At the same time it's not uncommon to see a tracing
program with lots of logic in use, and the attachment limitation
prevents usage of fentry/fexit for performance analysis (e.g. with
"bpftool prog profile" command) in this case. An example could be
falcosecurity libs project that uses tp_btf tracing programs for
offloading certain part of logic into tail-called programs, but the
use-case is still generic enough -- a tracing program could be
complicated and heavy enough to warrant its profiling, yet frustratingly
it's not possible to do so use best tooling for that.

Following the corresponding discussion [1], the reason for that is to
avoid tracing progs call cycles without introducing more complex
solutions. But currently it seems impossible to load and attach tracing
programs in a way that will form such a cycle. Replace "no same type"
requirement with verification that no more than one level of attachment
nesting is allowed. In this way only one fentry/fexit program could be
attached to another fentry/fexit to cover profiling use case, and still
no cycle could be formed.

The series contains a test for recursive attachment, as well as a fix +
test for an issue in re-attachment branch of bpf_tracing_prog_attach.
When preparing the test for the main change set, I've stumbled upon the
possibility to construct a sequence of events when attach_btf would be
NULL while computing a trampoline key. It doesn't look like this issue
is triggered by the main change, because the reproduces doesn't actually
need to have an fentry attachment chain.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191108064039.2041889-16-ast@kernel.org/
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240103190559.14750-1-9erthalion6@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

2 files changed, 56 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 1bf9805ee185..a1f18681721c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -2738,6 +2738,22 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, u32 uattr_size)
 			goto free_prog_sec;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Bookkeeping for managing the program attachment chain.
+	 *
+	 * It might be tempting to set attach_tracing_prog flag at the attachment
+	 * time, but this will not prevent from loading bunch of tracing prog
+	 * first, then attach them one to another.
+	 *
+	 * The flag attach_tracing_prog is set for the whole program lifecycle, and
+	 * doesn't have to be cleared in bpf_tracing_link_release, since tracing
+	 * programs cannot change attachment target.
+	 */
+	if (type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING && dst_prog &&
+	    dst_prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING) {
+		prog->aux->attach_tracing_prog = true;
+	}
+
 	/* find program type: socket_filter vs tracing_filter */
 	err = find_prog_type(type, prog);
 	if (err < 0)
@@ -3171,7 +3187,12 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	}
 
 	if (tgt_prog_fd) {
-		/* For now we only allow new targets for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT */
+		/*
+		 * For now we only allow new targets for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT. If this
+		 * part would be changed to implement the same for
+		 * BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, do not forget to update the way how
+		 * attach_tracing_prog flag is set.
+		 */
 		if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) {
 			err = -EINVAL;
 			goto out_put_prog;
@@ -3216,6 +3237,10 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	 *
 	 * - if prog->aux->dst_trampoline and tgt_prog is NULL, the program
 	 *   was detached and is going for re-attachment.
+	 *
+	 * - if prog->aux->dst_trampoline is NULL and tgt_prog and prog->aux->attach_btf
+	 *   are NULL, then program was already attached and user did not provide
+	 *   tgt_prog_fd so we have no way to find out or create trampoline
 	 */
 	if (!prog->aux->dst_trampoline && !tgt_prog) {
 		/*
@@ -3229,6 +3254,11 @@ static int bpf_tracing_prog_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 			err = -EINVAL;
 			goto out_unlock;
 		}
+		/* We can allow re-attach only if we have valid attach_btf. */
+		if (!prog->aux->attach_btf) {
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto out_unlock;
+		}
 		btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
 		key = bpf_trampoline_compute_key(NULL, prog->aux->attach_btf, btf_id);
 	}
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index d5f4ff1eb235..adbf330d364b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -20317,6 +20317,7 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 			    struct bpf_attach_target_info *tgt_info)
 {
 	bool prog_extension = prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT;
+	bool prog_tracing = prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING;
 	const char prefix[] = "btf_trace_";
 	int ret = 0, subprog = -1, i;
 	const struct btf_type *t;
@@ -20387,10 +20388,21 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 			bpf_log(log, "Can attach to only JITed progs\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
-		if (tgt_prog->type == prog->type) {
-			/* Cannot fentry/fexit another fentry/fexit program.
-			 * Cannot attach program extension to another extension.
-			 * It's ok to attach fentry/fexit to extension program.
+		if (prog_tracing) {
+			if (aux->attach_tracing_prog) {
+				/*
+				 * Target program is an fentry/fexit which is already attached
+				 * to another tracing program. More levels of nesting
+				 * attachment are not allowed.
+				 */
+				bpf_log(log, "Cannot nest tracing program attach more than once\n");
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+		} else if (tgt_prog->type == prog->type) {
+			/*
+			 * To avoid potential call chain cycles, prevent attaching of a
+			 * program extension to another extension. It's ok to attach
+			 * fentry/fexit to extension program.
 			 */
 			bpf_log(log, "Cannot recursively attach\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
@@ -20403,16 +20415,15 @@ int bpf_check_attach_target(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 			 * except fentry/fexit. The reason is the following.
 			 * The fentry/fexit programs are used for performance
 			 * analysis, stats and can be attached to any program
-			 * type except themselves. When extension program is
-			 * replacing XDP function it is necessary to allow
-			 * performance analysis of all functions. Both original
-			 * XDP program and its program extension. Hence
-			 * attaching fentry/fexit to BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT is
-			 * allowed. If extending of fentry/fexit was allowed it
-			 * would be possible to create long call chain
-			 * fentry->extension->fentry->extension beyond
-			 * reasonable stack size. Hence extending fentry is not
-			 * allowed.
+			 * type. When extension program is replacing XDP function
+			 * it is necessary to allow performance analysis of all
+			 * functions. Both original XDP program and its program
+			 * extension. Hence attaching fentry/fexit to
+			 * BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT is allowed. If extending of
+			 * fentry/fexit was allowed it would be possible to create
+			 * long call chain fentry->extension->fentry->extension
+			 * beyond reasonable stack size. Hence extending fentry
+			 * is not allowed.
 			 */
 			bpf_log(log, "Cannot extend fentry/fexit\n");
 			return -EINVAL;