diff options
| author | Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com> | 2026-01-29 06:45:16 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2026-02-01 06:49:52 -1000 |
| commit | 8b1f3c54f930c3aeda0b5bad97bc317fc80267fd (patch) | |
| tree | b006837b9e6e284effd907d5e69f1d4961fb8d31 /kernel | |
| parent | 5eab8c588bf37b7eb498f23a2ac3fb135c258e17 (diff) | |
cpuset: fix overlap of partition effective CPUs
A warning was detect:
WARNING: kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:825 at rebuild_sched_domains_locked
Modules linked in:
CPU: 12 UID: 0 PID: 681 Comm: rmdir 6.19.0-rc6-next-20260121+
RIP: 0010:rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x309/0x4b0
RSP: 0018:ffffc900019bbd28 EFLAGS: 00000202
RAX: ffff888104413508 RBX: 0000000000000008 RCX: ffff888104413510
RDX: ffff888109b5f400 RSI: 000000000000ffcf RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: ffff888104413508 R09: 0000000000000002
R10: ffff888104413508 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff888104413500
R13: 0000000000000002 R14: ffffc900019bbd78 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 00007fe274b8d740(0000) GS:ffff8881b6b3c000(0000) knlGS:
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fe274c98b50 CR3: 00000001047a9000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
update_prstate+0x1c7/0x580
cpuset_css_killed+0x2f/0x50
kill_css+0x32/0x180
cgroup_destroy_locked+0xa7/0x200
cgroup_rmdir+0x28/0x100
kernfs_iop_rmdir+0x4c/0x80
vfs_rmdir+0x12c/0x280
filename_rmdir+0x19e/0x200
__x64_sys_rmdir+0x23/0x40
do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x390
It can be reproduced by steps:
# cd /sys/fs/cgroup/
# mkdir A1
# mkdir B1
# mkdir C1
# echo 1-3 > A1/cpuset.cpus
# echo root > A1/cpuset.cpus.partition
# echo 3-5 > B1/cpuset.cpus
# echo root > B1/cpuset.cpus.partition
# echo 6 > C1/cpuset.cpus
# echo root > C1/cpuset.cpus.partition
# rmdir A1/
# rmdir C1/
Both A1 and B1 were initially configured with CPU 3, which was exclusively
assigned to A1's partition. When A1 was removed, CPU 3 was returned to the
root pool. However, B1 incorrectly regained access to CPU 3 when
update_cpumasks_hier was triggered during C1's removal, which also updated
sibling configurations.
The update_sibling_cpumasks function was called to synchronize siblings'
effective CPUs due to changes in their parent's effective CPUs. However,
parent effective CPU changes should not affect partition-effective CPUs.
To fix this issue, update_cpumasks_hier should only be invoked when the
sibling is not a valid partition in the update_sibling_cpumasks.
Fixes: 2a3602030d80 ("cgroup/cpuset: Don't invalidate sibling partitions on cpuset.cpus conflict")
Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c index 003232dc9d2e..92a51316225d 100644 --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c @@ -2222,27 +2222,20 @@ static void update_sibling_cpumasks(struct cpuset *parent, struct cpuset *cs, * It is possible a change in parent's effective_cpus * due to a change in a child partition's effective_xcpus will impact * its siblings even if they do not inherit parent's effective_cpus - * directly. + * directly. It should not impact valid partition. * * The update_cpumasks_hier() function may sleep. So we have to * release the RCU read lock before calling it. */ rcu_read_lock(); cpuset_for_each_child(sibling, pos_css, parent) { - if (sibling == cs) + if (sibling == cs || is_partition_valid(sibling)) continue; - if (!is_partition_valid(sibling)) { - compute_effective_cpumask(tmp->new_cpus, sibling, - parent); - if (cpumask_equal(tmp->new_cpus, sibling->effective_cpus)) - continue; - } else if (is_remote_partition(sibling)) { - /* - * Change in a sibling cpuset won't affect a remote - * partition root. - */ + + compute_effective_cpumask(tmp->new_cpus, sibling, + parent); + if (cpumask_equal(tmp->new_cpus, sibling->effective_cpus)) continue; - } if (!css_tryget_online(&sibling->css)) continue; |
