Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next-queued

Sync drm-intel-gt-next here so we can have an unified fixes flow.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

1 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/scripts/sorttable.c b/scripts/sorttable.c
index ec6b5e81eba1..0ef3abfc4a51 100644
--- a/scripts/sorttable.c
+++ b/scripts/sorttable.c
@@ -255,6 +255,45 @@ static void x86_sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size)
 	}
 }
 
+static void s390_sort_relative_table(char *extab_image, int image_size)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < image_size; i += 16) {
+		char *loc = extab_image + i;
+		uint64_t handler;
+
+		w(r((uint32_t *)loc) + i, (uint32_t *)loc);
+		w(r((uint32_t *)(loc + 4)) + (i + 4), (uint32_t *)(loc + 4));
+		/*
+		 * 0 is a special self-relative handler value, which means that
+		 * handler should be ignored. It is safe, because it means that
+		 * handler field points to itself, which should never happen.
+		 * When creating extable-relative values, keep it as 0, since
+		 * this should never occur either: it would mean that handler
+		 * field points to the first extable entry.
+		 */
+		handler = r8((uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
+		if (handler)
+			handler += i + 8;
+		w8(handler, (uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
+	}
+
+	qsort(extab_image, image_size / 16, 16, compare_relative_table);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < image_size; i += 16) {
+		char *loc = extab_image + i;
+		uint64_t handler;
+
+		w(r((uint32_t *)loc) - i, (uint32_t *)loc);
+		w(r((uint32_t *)(loc + 4)) - (i + 4), (uint32_t *)(loc + 4));
+		handler = r8((uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
+		if (handler)
+			handler -= i + 8;
+		w8(handler, (uint64_t *)(loc + 8));
+	}
+}
+
 static int do_file(char const *const fname, void *addr)
 {
 	int rc = -1;
@@ -297,6 +336,8 @@ static int do_file(char const *const fname, void *addr)
 		custom_sort = x86_sort_relative_table;
 		break;
 	case EM_S390:
+		custom_sort = s390_sort_relative_table;
+		break;
 	case EM_AARCH64:
 	case EM_PARISC:
 	case EM_PPC: