summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/arm64/include/asm/rqspinlock.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-04-10bpf: Use architecture provided res_smp_cond_load_acquireKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
In v2 of rqspinlock [0], we fixed potential problems with WFE usage in arm64 to fallback to a version copied from Ankur's series [1]. This logic was moved into arch-specific headers in v3 [2]. However, we missed using the arch-provided res_smp_cond_load_acquire in commit ebababcd0372 ("rqspinlock: Hardcode cond_acquire loops for arm64") due to a rebasing mistake between v2 and v3 of the rqspinlock series. Fix the typo to fallback to the arm64 definition as we did in v2. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250206105435.2159977-18-memxor@gmail.com [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250203214911.898276-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250303152305.3195648-9-memxor@gmail.com Fixes: ebababcd0372 ("rqspinlock: Hardcode cond_acquire loops for arm64") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250410145512.1876745-1-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2025-03-19rqspinlock: Hardcode cond_acquire loops for arm64Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Currently, for rqspinlock usage, the implementation of smp_cond_load_acquire (and thus, atomic_cond_read_acquire) are susceptible to stalls on arm64, because they do not guarantee that the conditional expression will be repeatedly invoked if the address being loaded from is not written to by other CPUs. When support for event-streams is absent (which unblocks stuck WFE-based loops every ~100us), we may end up being stuck forever. This causes a problem for us, as we need to repeatedly invoke the RES_CHECK_TIMEOUT in the spin loop to break out when the timeout expires. Let us import the smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait implementation Ankur is proposing in [0], and then fallback to it once it is merged. While we rely on the implementation to amortize the cost of sampling check_timeout for us, it will not happen when event stream support is unavailable. This is not the common case, and it would be difficult to fit our logic in the time_expr_ns >= time_limit_ns comparison, hence just let it be. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250203214911.898276-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com Cc: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250316040541.108729-9-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>