diff options
| author | Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> | 2020-05-21 20:28:38 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> | 2020-05-21 20:28:38 -0400 |
| commit | 22fc8d1cfc8ced0722ac0dfe417ce4602a272ebc (patch) | |
| tree | fae461548408a1dc23ef8e9d32504fcef3367f69 | |
| parent | c7c0db90c29c8cad31dc0aeb9131acac3d048dee (diff) | |
doc: suggest 1.1 as a random_page_cost value for SSDs
Reported-by: yigong hu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOxFffcourucFqSk+tZA13ErS3XRYkDy6EeaPff4AvHGiEEuug@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.5
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/src/sgml/config.sgml | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml index 943cbe656ef..0aa3c97a0ec 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml @@ -3360,7 +3360,8 @@ include_dir 'conf.d' the database is smaller than the total server memory, decreasing random_page_cost can be appropriate. Storage that has a low random read cost relative to sequential, e.g. solid-state drives, might - also be better modeled with a lower value for random_page_cost. + also be better modeled with a lower value for random_page_cost, + e.g., <literal>1.1</literal>. </para> <tip> |