summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMichael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>2024-09-27 09:40:21 +0900
committerMichael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>2024-09-27 09:40:21 +0900
commit911eda9f3cc3d4d87fc060519947f35aa92f0d07 (patch)
treeb89fd477ee47e37517519ad0f5c72a6b9ce3a649
parentf232d7c6827c30e8f464dfa31cbe243ff6002ba9 (diff)
Fix incorrect memory access in VACUUM FULL with invalid toast indexes
An invalid toast index is skipped in reindex_relation(). These would be remnants of a failed REINDEX CONCURRENTLY and they should never been rebuilt as there can only be one valid toast index at a time. REINDEX_REL_SUPPRESS_INDEX_USE, used by CLUSTER and VACUUM FULL, needs to maintain a list of the indexes being processed. The list of indexes is retrieved from the relation cache, and includes invalid indexes. The code has missed that invalid toast indexes are ignored in reindex_relation() as this leads to a hard failure in reindex_index(), and they were left in the reindex pending list, making the list inconsistent when rechecked. The incorrect memory access was happening when scanning pg_class for the refresh of pg_database.datfrozenxid, when doing a scan of pg_class. This issue exists since REINDEX CONCURRENTLY exists, where invalid toast indexes can exist, so backpatch all the way down. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin Author: Tender Wang Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18630-9aed99c38830657d@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 12
-rw-r--r--src/backend/catalog/index.c8
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/index.c b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
index 5969e680248..4ca86d955fe 100644
--- a/src/backend/catalog/index.c
+++ b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
@@ -3859,6 +3859,14 @@ reindex_relation(Oid relid, int flags, int options)
errmsg("cannot reindex invalid index \"%s.%s\" on TOAST table, skipping",
get_namespace_name(indexNamespaceId),
get_rel_name(indexOid))));
+
+ /*
+ * Remove this invalid toast index from the reindex pending list,
+ * as it is skipped here due to the hard failure that would happen
+ * in reindex_index(), should we try to process it.
+ */
+ if (flags & REINDEX_REL_SUPPRESS_INDEX_USE)
+ RemoveReindexPending(indexOid);
continue;
}