In postgres_fdw, don't try to ship MULTIEXPR updates to remote server.

In a statement like "UPDATE remote_tab SET (x,y) = (SELECT ...)",
we'd conclude that the statement could be directly executed remotely,
because the sub-SELECT is in a resjunk tlist item that's not examined
for shippability.  Currently that ends up crashing if the sub-SELECT
contains any remote Vars.  Prevent the crash by deeming MULTIEXEC
Params to be unshippable.

This is a bit of a brute-force solution, since if the sub-SELECT
*doesn't* contain any remote Vars, the current execution technology
would work; but that's not a terribly common use-case for this syntax,
I think.  In any case, we generally don't try to ship sub-SELECTs, so
it won't surprise anybody that this doesn't end up as a remote direct
update.  I'd be inclined to see if that general limitation can be fixed
before worrying about this case further.

Per report from Lukáš Sobotka.

Back-patch to 9.6.  9.5 had MULTIEXPR, but we didn't try to perform
remote direct updates then, so the case didn't arise anyway.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJif3k+iA_ekBB5Zw2hDBaE1wtiQa4LH4_JUXrrMGwTrH0J01Q@mail.gmail.com

1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out b/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
index 65bdcbb7a67..1335adcf2e9 100644
--- a/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
+++ b/contrib/postgres_fdw/expected/postgres_fdw.out
@@ -5535,6 +5535,37 @@ DELETE FROM ft2 WHERE c1 = 9999 RETURNING tableoid::regclass;
  ft2
 (1 row)
 
+-- Test UPDATE with a MULTIEXPR sub-select
+-- (maybe someday this'll be remotely executable, but not today)
+EXPLAIN (verbose, costs off)
+UPDATE ft2 AS target SET (c2, c7) = (
+    SELECT c2 * 10, c7
+        FROM ft2 AS src
+        WHERE target.c1 = src.c1
+) WHERE c1 > 1100;
+                                                                    QUERY PLAN                                                                     
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Update on public.ft2 target
+   Remote SQL: UPDATE "S 1"."T 1" SET c2 = $2, c7 = $3 WHERE ctid = $1
+   ->  Foreign Scan on public.ft2 target
+         Output: target.c1, $1, NULL::integer, target.c3, target.c4, target.c5, target.c6, $2, target.c8, (SubPlan 1 (returns $1,$2)), target.ctid
+         Remote SQL: SELECT "C 1", c3, c4, c5, c6, c8, ctid FROM "S 1"."T 1" WHERE (("C 1" > 1100)) FOR UPDATE
+         SubPlan 1 (returns $1,$2)
+           ->  Foreign Scan on public.ft2 src
+                 Output: (src.c2 * 10), src.c7
+                 Remote SQL: SELECT c2, c7 FROM "S 1"."T 1" WHERE (($1::integer = "C 1"))
+(9 rows)
+
+UPDATE ft2 AS target SET (c2, c7) = (
+    SELECT c2 * 10, c7
+        FROM ft2 AS src
+        WHERE target.c1 = src.c1
+) WHERE c1 > 1100;
+UPDATE ft2 AS target SET (c2) = (
+    SELECT c2 / 10
+        FROM ft2 AS src
+        WHERE target.c1 = src.c1
+) WHERE c1 > 1100;
 -- Test that trigger on remote table works as expected
 CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "S 1".F_BRTRIG() RETURNS trigger AS $$
 BEGIN