Phase 2 of pgindent updates.

Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments
to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments
following #endif to not obey the general rule.

Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using
the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that
tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of
code.  The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be
moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's
code there.  BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops
in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working
in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs.  So the
net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed
one tab stop left of before.  This is better all around: it leaves
more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such
cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after
the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after.

Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same
as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else.
That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage
from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent.

This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/rewriteheap.c b/src/backend/access/heap/rewriteheap.c
index e702af901e2..bd560e47e19 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/heap/rewriteheap.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/heap/rewriteheap.c
@@ -146,22 +146,22 @@ typedef struct RewriteStateData
 	BlockNumber rs_blockno;		/* block where page will go */
 	bool		rs_buffer_valid;	/* T if any tuples in buffer */
 	bool		rs_use_wal;		/* must we WAL-log inserts? */
-	bool		rs_logical_rewrite;		/* do we need to do logical rewriting */
-	TransactionId rs_oldest_xmin;		/* oldest xmin used by caller to
-										 * determine tuple visibility */
+	bool		rs_logical_rewrite; /* do we need to do logical rewriting */
+	TransactionId rs_oldest_xmin;	/* oldest xmin used by caller to determine
+									 * tuple visibility */
 	TransactionId rs_freeze_xid;	/* Xid that will be used as freeze cutoff
 									 * point */
-	TransactionId rs_logical_xmin;		/* Xid that will be used as cutoff
-										 * point for logical rewrites */
+	TransactionId rs_logical_xmin;	/* Xid that will be used as cutoff point
+									 * for logical rewrites */
 	MultiXactId rs_cutoff_multi;	/* MultiXactId that will be used as cutoff
 									 * point for multixacts */
 	MemoryContext rs_cxt;		/* for hash tables and entries and tuples in
 								 * them */
 	XLogRecPtr	rs_begin_lsn;	/* XLogInsertLsn when starting the rewrite */
-	HTAB	   *rs_unresolved_tups;		/* unmatched A tuples */
-	HTAB	   *rs_old_new_tid_map;		/* unmatched B tuples */
+	HTAB	   *rs_unresolved_tups; /* unmatched A tuples */
+	HTAB	   *rs_old_new_tid_map; /* unmatched B tuples */
 	HTAB	   *rs_logical_mappings;	/* logical remapping files */
-	uint32		rs_num_rewrite_mappings;		/* # in memory mappings */
+	uint32		rs_num_rewrite_mappings;	/* # in memory mappings */
 }			RewriteStateData;
 
 /*
@@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ typedef struct RewriteMappingFile
  */
 typedef struct RewriteMappingDataEntry
 {
-	LogicalRewriteMappingData map;		/* map between old and new location of
-										 * the tuple */
+	LogicalRewriteMappingData map;	/* map between old and new location of the
+									 * tuple */
 	dlist_node	node;
 } RewriteMappingDataEntry;
 
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ raw_heap_insert(RewriteState state, HeapTuple tup)
 	else
 		heaptup = tup;
 
-	len = MAXALIGN(heaptup->t_len);		/* be conservative */
+	len = MAXALIGN(heaptup->t_len); /* be conservative */
 
 	/*
 	 * If we're gonna fail for oversize tuple, do it right away