summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/commands/vacuum.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>2014-05-06 11:26:27 -0400
committerBruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>2014-05-06 11:26:27 -0400
commit0b44914c21a008bb2f0764672eb6b15310431b3e (patch)
tree0dccfe5e855aebe7160470bcfcb37597611d981c /src/backend/commands/vacuum.c
parent17b04a15806d8e8b4cc3013244f4837c02d6baf4 (diff)
Remove tabs after spaces in C comments
This was not changed in HEAD, but will be done later as part of a pgindent run. Future pgindent runs will also do this. Report by Tom Lane Backpatch through all supported branches, but not HEAD
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/commands/vacuum.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/commands/vacuum.c24
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/vacuum.c b/src/backend/commands/vacuum.c
index 656b90eed36..3eb8ecb4d8a 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/vacuum.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/vacuum.c
@@ -385,9 +385,9 @@ vacuum_set_xid_limits(int freeze_min_age,
TransactionId safeLimit;
/*
- * We can always ignore processes running lazy vacuum. This is because we
+ * We can always ignore processes running lazy vacuum. This is because we
* use these values only for deciding which tuples we must keep in the
- * tables. Since lazy vacuum doesn't write its XID anywhere, it's safe to
+ * tables. Since lazy vacuum doesn't write its XID anywhere, it's safe to
* ignore it. In theory it could be problematic to ignore lazy vacuums in
* a full vacuum, but keep in mind that only one vacuum process can be
* working on a particular table at any time, and that each vacuum is
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ vacuum_set_xid_limits(int freeze_min_age,
* If we scanned the whole relation then we should just use the count of
* live tuples seen; but if we did not, we should not trust the count
* unreservedly, especially not in VACUUM, which may have scanned a quite
- * nonrandom subset of the table. When we have only partial information,
+ * nonrandom subset of the table. When we have only partial information,
* we take the old value of pg_class.reltuples as a measurement of the
* tuple density in the unscanned pages.
*
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ vac_update_relstats(Relation relation,
/*
* If we have discovered that there are no indexes, then there's no
- * primary key either. This could be done more thoroughly...
+ * primary key either. This could be done more thoroughly...
*/
if (pgcform->relhaspkey && !hasindex)
{
@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ vac_update_relstats(Relation relation,
* advance pg_database.datfrozenxid, also try to truncate pg_clog.
*
* We violate transaction semantics here by overwriting the database's
- * existing pg_database tuple with the new value. This is reasonably
+ * existing pg_database tuple with the new value. This is reasonably
* safe since the new value is correct whether or not this transaction
* commits. As with vac_update_relstats, this avoids leaving dead tuples
* behind after a VACUUM.
@@ -763,7 +763,7 @@ vac_update_datfrozenxid(void)
* Also update the XID wrap limit info maintained by varsup.c.
*
* The passed XID is simply the one I just wrote into my pg_database
- * entry. It's used to initialize the "min" calculation.
+ * entry. It's used to initialize the "min" calculation.
*
* This routine is only invoked when we've managed to change our
* DB's datfrozenxid entry, or we found that the shared XID-wrap-limit
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ vac_truncate_clog(TransactionId frozenXID)
* vacuum_rel() -- vacuum one heap relation
*
* Doing one heap at a time incurs extra overhead, since we need to
- * check that the heap exists again just before we vacuum it. The
+ * check that the heap exists again just before we vacuum it. The
* reason that we do this is so that vacuuming can be spread across
* many small transactions. Otherwise, two-phase locking would require
* us to lock the entire database during one pass of the vacuum cleaner.
@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ vacuum_rel(Oid relid, VacuumStmt *vacstmt, bool do_toast, bool for_wraparound)
}
/*
- * Check for user-requested abort. Note we want this to be inside a
+ * Check for user-requested abort. Note we want this to be inside a
* transaction, so xact.c doesn't issue useless WARNING.
*/
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
@@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ vacuum_rel(Oid relid, VacuumStmt *vacstmt, bool do_toast, bool for_wraparound)
*
* We allow the user to vacuum a table if he is superuser, the table
* owner, or the database owner (but in the latter case, only if it's not
- * a shared relation). pg_class_ownercheck includes the superuser case.
+ * a shared relation). pg_class_ownercheck includes the superuser case.
*
* Note we choose to treat permissions failure as a WARNING and keep
* trying to vacuum the rest of the DB --- is this appropriate?
@@ -1078,7 +1078,7 @@ vacuum_rel(Oid relid, VacuumStmt *vacstmt, bool do_toast, bool for_wraparound)
/*
* If the relation has a secondary toast rel, vacuum that too while we
* still hold the session lock on the master table. Note however that
- * "analyze" will not get done on the toast table. This is good, because
+ * "analyze" will not get done on the toast table. This is good, because
* the toaster always uses hardcoded index access and statistics are
* totally unimportant for toast relations.
*/
@@ -1097,7 +1097,7 @@ vacuum_rel(Oid relid, VacuumStmt *vacstmt, bool do_toast, bool for_wraparound)
/*
* Open all the vacuumable indexes of the given relation, obtaining the
- * specified kind of lock on each. Return an array of Relation pointers for
+ * specified kind of lock on each. Return an array of Relation pointers for
* the indexes into *Irel, and the number of indexes into *nindexes.
*
* We consider an index vacuumable if it is marked insertable (IndexIsReady).
@@ -1147,7 +1147,7 @@ vac_open_indexes(Relation relation, LOCKMODE lockmode,
}
/*
- * Release the resources acquired by vac_open_indexes. Optionally release
+ * Release the resources acquired by vac_open_indexes. Optionally release
* the locks (say NoLock to keep 'em).
*/
void