diff options
author | Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> | 2014-05-06 11:26:28 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> | 2014-05-06 11:26:28 -0400 |
commit | 04e15c69d2176849aad40dc8df55761ba0ad0491 (patch) | |
tree | b35274c9d4f7beaa41f6850977cd41024ce36dfa /src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c | |
parent | 41fdcf71d2b424104e08ce229104b8e8e2840d1b (diff) |
Remove tabs after spaces in C comments
This was not changed in HEAD, but will be done later as part of a
pgindent run. Future pgindent runs will also do this.
Report by Tom Lane
Backpatch through all supported branches, but not HEAD
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c index 2f30c55c54a..f533a78ac84 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeIndexonlyscan.c @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ IndexOnlyNext(IndexOnlyScanState *node) * Note on Memory Ordering Effects: visibilitymap_test does not lock * the visibility map buffer, and therefore the result we read here * could be slightly stale. However, it can't be stale enough to - * matter. It suffices to show that (1) there is a read barrier + * matter. It suffices to show that (1) there is a read barrier * between the time we read the index TID and the time we test the * visibility map; and (2) there is a write barrier between the time * some other concurrent process clears the visibility map bit and the @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ IndexOnlyNext(IndexOnlyScanState *node) /* * Only MVCC snapshots are supported here, so there should be no * need to keep following the HOT chain once a visible entry has - * been found. If we did want to allow that, we'd need to keep + * been found. If we did want to allow that, we'd need to keep * more state to remember not to call index_getnext_tid next time. */ if (scandesc->xs_continue_hot) @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ IndexOnlyNext(IndexOnlyScanState *node) /* * Note: at this point we are holding a pin on the heap page, as * recorded in scandesc->xs_cbuf. We could release that pin now, - * but it's not clear whether it's a win to do so. The next index + * but it's not clear whether it's a win to do so. The next index * entry might require a visit to the same heap page. */ } |