diff options
author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2014-06-16 15:55:05 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2014-06-16 15:55:30 -0400 |
commit | 2146f13408cdb85c738364fe8f7965209e08c6be (patch) | |
tree | 9c5989a33d072788a51411dd7ee1bedb14f2280d /src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c | |
parent | ac608fe758455804f26179ea7c556e7752e453e8 (diff) |
Avoid recursion when processing simple lists of AND'ed or OR'ed clauses.
Since most of the system thinks AND and OR are N-argument expressions
anyway, let's have the grammar generate a representation of that form when
dealing with input like "x AND y AND z AND ...", rather than generating
a deeply-nested binary tree that just has to be flattened later by the
planner. This avoids stack overflow in parse analysis when dealing with
queries having more than a few thousand such clauses; and in any case it
removes some rather unsightly inconsistencies, since some parts of parse
analysis were generating N-argument ANDs/ORs already.
It's still possible to get a stack overflow with weirdly parenthesized
input, such as "x AND (y AND (z AND ( ... )))", but such cases are not
mainstream usage. The maximum depth of parenthesization is already
limited by Bison's stack in such cases, anyway, so that the limit is
probably fairly platform-independent.
Patch originally by Gurjeet Singh, heavily revised by me
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c b/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c index 2a24938d843..244e5dbc150 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c @@ -4,13 +4,12 @@ * Routines for preprocessing qualification expressions * * - * The parser regards AND and OR as purely binary operators, so a qual like - * (A = 1) OR (A = 2) OR (A = 3) ... - * will produce a nested parsetree - * (OR (A = 1) (OR (A = 2) (OR (A = 3) ...))) - * In reality, the optimizer and executor regard AND and OR as N-argument - * operators, so this tree can be flattened to - * (OR (A = 1) (A = 2) (A = 3) ...) + * While the parser will produce flattened (N-argument) AND/OR trees from + * simple sequences of AND'ed or OR'ed clauses, there might be an AND clause + * directly underneath another AND, or OR underneath OR, if the input was + * oddly parenthesized. Also, rule expansion and subquery flattening could + * produce such parsetrees. The planner wants to flatten all such cases + * to ensure consistent optimization behavior. * * Formerly, this module was responsible for doing the initial flattening, * but now we leave it to eval_const_expressions to do that since it has to |