summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2003-12-28 21:57:37 +0000
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2003-12-28 21:57:37 +0000
commitc607bd693ffcf225b7ef696ca44b537076038854 (patch)
tree5284d0d0f9b8d671dedd379199bdbba114f8a352 /src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c
parentd167fb10153a2f00c9a8b46df537a202f7755cb9 (diff)
Clean up the usage of canonicalize_qual(): in particular, be consistent
about whether it is applied before or after eval_const_expressions(). I believe there were some corner cases where the system would fail to recognize that a partial index is applicable because of the previous inconsistency. Store normal rather than 'implicit AND' representations of constraints and index predicates in the catalogs. initdb forced due to representation change of constraints/predicates.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c186
1 files changed, 74 insertions, 112 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c b/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c
index 1bff3509e26..186de4c40ac 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
- * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c,v 1.39 2003/11/29 19:51:51 pgsql Exp $
+ * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepqual.c,v 1.40 2003/12/28 21:57:37 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
#include "optimizer/prep.h"
#include "utils/lsyscache.h"
-static Expr *flatten_andors(Expr *qual);
+static Node *flatten_andors_mutator(Node *node, void *context);
static void flatten_andors_and_walker(FastList *out_list, List *andlist);
static void flatten_andors_or_walker(FastList *out_list, List *orlist);
static List *pull_ands(List *andlist);
@@ -61,8 +61,7 @@ static void count_bool_nodes(Expr *qual, double *nodes,
*
* canonicalize_qual() does "smart" conversion to either CNF or DNF, per
* the above considerations, while cnfify() and dnfify() simply perform
- * the demanded transformation. The latter two may become dead code
- * eventually.
+ * the demanded transformation. The latter two are presently dead code.
*****************************************************************************/
@@ -72,11 +71,6 @@ static void count_bool_nodes(Expr *qual, double *nodes,
*
* Returns the modified qualification.
*
- * If 'removeAndFlag' is true then it removes explicit AND at the top level,
- * producing a list of implicitly-ANDed conditions. Otherwise, a regular
- * boolean expression is returned. Since most callers pass 'true', we
- * prefer to declare the result as List *, not Expr *.
- *
* XXX This code could be much smarter, at the cost of also being slower,
* if we tried to compute selectivities and/or see whether there are
* actually indexes to support an indexscan implementation of a DNF qual.
@@ -85,8 +79,8 @@ static void count_bool_nodes(Expr *qual, double *nodes,
* implement. For now, though, we just try to avoid doing anything
* quite as stupid as unconditionally converting to CNF was...
*/
-List *
-canonicalize_qual(Expr *qual, bool removeAndFlag)
+Expr *
+canonicalize_qual(Expr *qual)
{
Expr *newqual;
double nodes,
@@ -95,23 +89,23 @@ canonicalize_qual(Expr *qual, bool removeAndFlag)
bool cnfok,
dnfok;
+ /* Quick exit for empty qual */
if (qual == NULL)
- return NIL;
+ return NULL;
/*
* Flatten AND and OR groups throughout the tree. This improvement is
* always worthwhile, so do it unconditionally.
*/
- qual = flatten_andors(qual);
+ newqual = (Expr *) flatten_andors((Node *) qual);
/*
* Push down NOTs. We do this only in the top-level boolean
* expression, without examining arguments of operators/functions.
- * Even so, it might not be a win if we are unable to find negators
- * for all the operators involved; perhaps we should compare before-
- * and-after tree sizes?
+ * The main reason for doing this is to expose as much top-level AND/OR
+ * structure as we can, so there's no point in descending further.
*/
- newqual = find_nots(qual);
+ newqual = find_nots(newqual);
/*
* Choose whether to convert to CNF, or DNF, or leave well enough
@@ -175,13 +169,10 @@ canonicalize_qual(Expr *qual, bool removeAndFlag)
newqual = qual_cleanup(find_ands(newqual));
}
- /* Convert to implicit-AND list if requested */
- if (removeAndFlag)
- newqual = (Expr *) make_ands_implicit(newqual);
-
- return (List *) newqual;
+ return newqual;
}
+#ifdef NOT_USED
/*
* cnfify
* Convert a qualification to conjunctive normal form by applying
@@ -223,6 +214,7 @@ cnfify(Expr *qual, bool removeAndFlag)
return (List *) newqual;
}
+#endif
#ifdef NOT_USED
/*
@@ -281,50 +273,46 @@ dnfify(Expr *qual)
/*--------------------
* flatten_andors
- * Given a qualification, simplify nested AND/OR clauses into flat
- * AND/OR clauses with more arguments.
+ * Given an expression tree, simplify nested AND/OR clauses into flat
+ * AND/OR clauses with more arguments. The entire tree is processed.
*
- * Returns the rebuilt expr (note original list structure is not touched).
+ * Returns the rebuilt expr (note original structure is not touched).
*--------------------
*/
-static Expr *
-flatten_andors(Expr *qual)
+Node *
+flatten_andors(Node *node)
{
- if (qual == NULL)
- return NULL;
+ return flatten_andors_mutator(node, NULL);
+}
- if (and_clause((Node *) qual))
+static Node *
+flatten_andors_mutator(Node *node, void *context)
+{
+ if (node == NULL)
+ return NULL;
+ if (IsA(node, BoolExpr))
{
- FastList out_list;
+ BoolExpr *bexpr = (BoolExpr *) node;
- FastListInit(&out_list);
- flatten_andors_and_walker(&out_list, ((BoolExpr *) qual)->args);
- return make_andclause(FastListValue(&out_list));
- }
- else if (or_clause((Node *) qual))
- {
- FastList out_list;
+ if (bexpr->boolop == AND_EXPR)
+ {
+ FastList out_list;
- FastListInit(&out_list);
- flatten_andors_or_walker(&out_list, ((BoolExpr *) qual)->args);
- return make_orclause(FastListValue(&out_list));
- }
- else if (not_clause((Node *) qual))
- return make_notclause(flatten_andors(get_notclausearg(qual)));
- else if (is_opclause(qual))
- {
- OpExpr *opexpr = (OpExpr *) qual;
- Expr *left = (Expr *) get_leftop(qual);
- Expr *right = (Expr *) get_rightop(qual);
-
- return make_opclause(opexpr->opno,
- opexpr->opresulttype,
- opexpr->opretset,
- flatten_andors(left),
- flatten_andors(right));
+ FastListInit(&out_list);
+ flatten_andors_and_walker(&out_list, bexpr->args);
+ return (Node *) make_andclause(FastListValue(&out_list));
+ }
+ if (bexpr->boolop == OR_EXPR)
+ {
+ FastList out_list;
+
+ FastListInit(&out_list);
+ flatten_andors_or_walker(&out_list, bexpr->args);
+ return (Node *) make_orclause(FastListValue(&out_list));
+ }
+ /* else it's a NOT clause, fall through */
}
- else
- return qual;
+ return expression_tree_mutator(node, flatten_andors_mutator, context);
}
static void
@@ -334,9 +322,9 @@ flatten_andors_and_walker(FastList *out_list, List *andlist)
foreach(arg, andlist)
{
- Expr *subexpr = (Expr *) lfirst(arg);
+ Node *subexpr = (Node *) lfirst(arg);
- if (and_clause((Node *) subexpr))
+ if (and_clause(subexpr))
flatten_andors_and_walker(out_list, ((BoolExpr *) subexpr)->args);
else
FastAppend(out_list, flatten_andors(subexpr));
@@ -350,9 +338,9 @@ flatten_andors_or_walker(FastList *out_list, List *orlist)
foreach(arg, orlist)
{
- Expr *subexpr = (Expr *) lfirst(arg);
+ Node *subexpr = (Node *) lfirst(arg);
- if (or_clause((Node *) subexpr))
+ if (or_clause(subexpr))
flatten_andors_or_walker(out_list, ((BoolExpr *) subexpr)->args);
else
FastAppend(out_list, flatten_andors(subexpr));
@@ -383,9 +371,9 @@ pull_ands_walker(FastList *out_list, List *andlist)
foreach(arg, andlist)
{
- Expr *subexpr = (Expr *) lfirst(arg);
+ Node *subexpr = (Node *) lfirst(arg);
- if (and_clause((Node *) subexpr))
+ if (and_clause(subexpr))
pull_ands_walker(out_list, ((BoolExpr *) subexpr)->args);
else
FastAppend(out_list, subexpr);
@@ -416,9 +404,9 @@ pull_ors_walker(FastList *out_list, List *orlist)
foreach(arg, orlist)
{
- Expr *subexpr = (Expr *) lfirst(arg);
+ Node *subexpr = (Node *) lfirst(arg);
- if (or_clause((Node *) subexpr))
+ if (or_clause(subexpr))
pull_ors_walker(out_list, ((BoolExpr *) subexpr)->args);
else
FastAppend(out_list, subexpr);
@@ -427,9 +415,10 @@ pull_ors_walker(FastList *out_list, List *orlist)
/*
* find_nots
- * Traverse the qualification, looking for 'NOT's to take care of.
- * For 'NOT' clauses, apply push_not() to try to push down the 'NOT'.
- * For all other clause types, simply recurse.
+ * Traverse the qualification, looking for NOTs to take care of.
+ * For NOT clauses, apply push_nots() to try to push down the NOT.
+ * For AND and OR clause types, simply recurse. Otherwise stop
+ * recursing (we do not worry about structure below the top AND/OR tree).
*
* Returns the modified qualification. AND/OR flatness is preserved.
*/
@@ -439,21 +428,6 @@ find_nots(Expr *qual)
if (qual == NULL)
return NULL;
-#ifdef NOT_USED
- /* recursing into operator expressions is probably not worth it. */
- if (is_opclause(qual))
- {
- OpExpr *opexpr = (OpExpr *) qual;
- Expr *left = (Expr *) get_leftop(qual);
- Expr *right = (Expr *) get_rightop(qual);
-
- return make_opclause(opexpr->opno,
- opexpr->opresulttype,
- opexpr->opretset,
- find_nots(left),
- find_nots(right));
- }
-#endif
if (and_clause((Node *) qual))
{
FastList t_list;
@@ -482,7 +456,7 @@ find_nots(Expr *qual)
/*
* push_nots
- * Push down a 'NOT' as far as possible.
+ * Push down a NOT as far as possible.
*
* Input is an expression to be negated (e.g., the argument of a NOT clause).
* Returns a new qual equivalent to the negation of the given qual.
@@ -496,7 +470,7 @@ push_nots(Expr *qual)
/*
* Negate an operator clause if possible: ("NOT" (< A B)) => (> A B)
- * Otherwise, retain the clause as it is (the 'not' can't be pushed
+ * Otherwise, retain the clause as it is (the NOT can't be pushed
* down any farther).
*/
if (is_opclause(qual))
@@ -543,16 +517,15 @@ push_nots(Expr *qual)
else if (not_clause((Node *) qual))
{
/*
- * Another 'not' cancels this 'not', so eliminate the 'not' and
- * stop negating this branch. But search the subexpression for
- * more 'not's to simplify.
+ * Another NOT cancels this NOT, so eliminate the NOT and
+ * stop negating this branch.
*/
- return find_nots(get_notclausearg(qual));
+ return get_notclausearg(qual);
}
else
{
/*
- * We don't know how to negate anything else, place a 'not' at
+ * We don't know how to negate anything else, place a NOT at
* this level.
*/
return make_notclause(qual);
@@ -561,12 +534,13 @@ push_nots(Expr *qual)
/*
* find_ors
- * Given a qualification tree with the 'not's pushed down, convert it
+ * Given a qualification tree with the NOTs pushed down, convert it
* to a tree in CNF by repeatedly applying the rule:
* ("OR" A ("AND" B C)) => ("AND" ("OR" A B) ("OR" A C))
*
* Note that 'or' clauses will always be turned into 'and' clauses
- * if they contain any 'and' subclauses.
+ * if they contain any 'and' subclauses. Also, we do not descend
+ * below the top-level AND/OR structure.
*
* Returns the modified qualification. AND/OR flatness is preserved.
*/
@@ -576,7 +550,6 @@ find_ors(Expr *qual)
if (qual == NULL)
return NULL;
- /* We used to recurse into opclauses here, but I see no reason to... */
if (and_clause((Node *) qual))
{
List *andlist = NIL;
@@ -595,8 +568,6 @@ find_ors(Expr *qual)
orlist = lappend(orlist, find_ors(lfirst(temp)));
return or_normalize(pull_ors(orlist));
}
- else if (not_clause((Node *) qual))
- return make_notclause(find_ors(get_notclausearg(qual)));
else
return qual;
}
@@ -688,12 +659,13 @@ or_normalize(List *orlist)
/*
* find_ands
- * Given a qualification tree with the 'not's pushed down, convert it
+ * Given a qualification tree with the NOTs pushed down, convert it
* to a tree in DNF by repeatedly applying the rule:
* ("AND" A ("OR" B C)) => ("OR" ("AND" A B) ("AND" A C))
*
* Note that 'and' clauses will always be turned into 'or' clauses
- * if they contain any 'or' subclauses.
+ * if they contain any 'or' subclauses. Also, we do not descend
+ * below the top-level AND/OR structure.
*
* Returns the modified qualification. AND/OR flatness is preserved.
*/
@@ -703,7 +675,6 @@ find_ands(Expr *qual)
if (qual == NULL)
return NULL;
- /* We used to recurse into opclauses here, but I see no reason to... */
if (or_clause((Node *) qual))
{
List *orlist = NIL;
@@ -722,8 +693,6 @@ find_ands(Expr *qual)
andlist = lappend(andlist, find_ands(lfirst(temp)));
return and_normalize(pull_ands(andlist));
}
- else if (not_clause((Node *) qual))
- return make_notclause(find_ands(get_notclausearg(qual)));
else
return qual;
}
@@ -860,8 +829,6 @@ qual_cleanup(Expr *qual)
else
return lfirst(orlist);
}
- else if (not_clause((Node *) qual))
- return make_notclause(qual_cleanup(get_notclausearg(qual)));
else
return qual;
}
@@ -889,14 +856,14 @@ remove_duplicates(List *list)
/*
* count_bool_nodes
* Support for heuristics in canonicalize_qual(): count the
- * number of nodes that are inputs to the top level AND/OR/NOT
+ * number of nodes that are inputs to the top level AND/OR
* part of a qual tree, and estimate how many nodes will appear
* in the CNF'ified or DNF'ified equivalent of the expression.
*
- * This is just an approximate calculation; it doesn't deal with NOTs
- * very well, and of course it cannot detect possible simplifications
- * from eliminating duplicate subclauses. The idea is just to cheaply
- * determine whether CNF will be markedly worse than DNF or vice versa.
+ * This is just an approximate calculation; it cannot detect possible
+ * simplifications from eliminating duplicate subclauses. The idea is just to
+ * cheaply determine whether CNF will be markedly worse than DNF or vice
+ * versa.
*
* The counts/estimates are represented as doubles to avoid risk of overflow.
*/
@@ -953,11 +920,6 @@ count_bool_nodes(Expr *qual,
if (*cnfnodes < *dnfnodes)
*cnfnodes = *dnfnodes;
}
- else if (not_clause((Node *) qual))
- {
- count_bool_nodes(get_notclausearg(qual),
- nodes, cnfnodes, dnfnodes);
- }
else if (contain_subplans((Node *) qual))
{
/*