summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2005-07-02 23:00:42 +0000
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2005-07-02 23:00:42 +0000
commitcc5e80b8d1c4bf86aa99b54c938e9048e10bf93a (patch)
tree6288e2b3bf66c8b1d30ee6db9b7846251d5ad95a /src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c
parentea1e2b948d2dcbd40fb9053e74ae2da27cfd425e (diff)
Teach planner about some cases where a restriction clause can be
propagated inside an outer join. In particular, given LEFT JOIN ON (A = B) WHERE A = constant, we cannot conclude that B = constant at the top level (B might be null instead), but we can nonetheless put a restriction B = constant into the quals for B's relation, since no inner-side rows not meeting that condition can contribute to the final result. Similarly, given FULL JOIN USING (J) WHERE J = constant, we can't directly conclude that either input J variable = constant, but it's OK to push such quals into each input rel. Per recent gripe from Kim Bisgaard. Along the way, remove 'valid_everywhere' flag from RestrictInfo, as on closer analysis it was not being used for anything, and was defined backwards anyway.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c46
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 32 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c
index a76f1bb7a2e..ba3d82dd307 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
- * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c,v 1.37 2005/06/09 04:19:00 tgl Exp $
+ * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c,v 1.38 2005/07/02 23:00:41 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@@ -24,11 +24,9 @@
static RestrictInfo *make_restrictinfo_internal(Expr *clause,
Expr *orclause,
bool is_pushed_down,
- bool valid_everywhere,
Relids required_relids);
static Expr *make_sub_restrictinfos(Expr *clause,
- bool is_pushed_down,
- bool valid_everywhere);
+ bool is_pushed_down);
static RestrictInfo *join_clause_is_redundant(PlannerInfo *root,
RestrictInfo *rinfo,
List *reference_list,
@@ -40,8 +38,8 @@ static RestrictInfo *join_clause_is_redundant(PlannerInfo *root,
*
* Build a RestrictInfo node containing the given subexpression.
*
- * The is_pushed_down and valid_everywhere flags must be supplied by the
- * caller. required_relids can be NULL, in which case it defaults to the
+ * The is_pushed_down flag must be supplied by the caller.
+ * required_relids can be NULL, in which case it defaults to the
* actual clause contents (i.e., clause_relids).
*
* We initialize fields that depend only on the given subexpression, leaving
@@ -49,23 +47,19 @@ static RestrictInfo *join_clause_is_redundant(PlannerInfo *root,
* later.
*/
RestrictInfo *
-make_restrictinfo(Expr *clause, bool is_pushed_down, bool valid_everywhere,
- Relids required_relids)
+make_restrictinfo(Expr *clause, bool is_pushed_down, Relids required_relids)
{
/*
* If it's an OR clause, build a modified copy with RestrictInfos
* inserted above each subclause of the top-level AND/OR structure.
*/
if (or_clause((Node *) clause))
- return (RestrictInfo *) make_sub_restrictinfos(clause,
- is_pushed_down,
- valid_everywhere);
+ return (RestrictInfo *) make_sub_restrictinfos(clause, is_pushed_down);
/* Shouldn't be an AND clause, else AND/OR flattening messed up */
Assert(!and_clause((Node *) clause));
- return make_restrictinfo_internal(clause, NULL,
- is_pushed_down, valid_everywhere,
+ return make_restrictinfo_internal(clause, NULL, is_pushed_down,
required_relids);
}
@@ -84,9 +78,7 @@ make_restrictinfo(Expr *clause, bool is_pushed_down, bool valid_everywhere,
* a specialized routine to allow sharing of RestrictInfos.
*/
List *
-make_restrictinfo_from_bitmapqual(Path *bitmapqual,
- bool is_pushed_down,
- bool valid_everywhere)
+make_restrictinfo_from_bitmapqual(Path *bitmapqual, bool is_pushed_down)
{
List *result;
@@ -101,8 +93,7 @@ make_restrictinfo_from_bitmapqual(Path *bitmapqual,
List *sublist;
sublist = make_restrictinfo_from_bitmapqual((Path *) lfirst(l),
- is_pushed_down,
- valid_everywhere);
+ is_pushed_down);
result = list_concat(result, sublist);
}
}
@@ -118,8 +109,7 @@ make_restrictinfo_from_bitmapqual(Path *bitmapqual,
List *sublist;
sublist = make_restrictinfo_from_bitmapqual((Path *) lfirst(l),
- is_pushed_down,
- valid_everywhere);
+ is_pushed_down);
if (sublist == NIL)
{
/* constant TRUE input yields constant TRUE OR result */
@@ -137,7 +127,6 @@ make_restrictinfo_from_bitmapqual(Path *bitmapqual,
list_make1(make_restrictinfo_internal(make_orclause(withoutris),
make_orclause(withris),
is_pushed_down,
- valid_everywhere,
NULL));
}
else if (IsA(bitmapqual, IndexPath))
@@ -162,15 +151,13 @@ make_restrictinfo_from_bitmapqual(Path *bitmapqual,
*/
static RestrictInfo *
make_restrictinfo_internal(Expr *clause, Expr *orclause,
- bool is_pushed_down, bool valid_everywhere,
- Relids required_relids)
+ bool is_pushed_down, Relids required_relids)
{
RestrictInfo *restrictinfo = makeNode(RestrictInfo);
restrictinfo->clause = clause;
restrictinfo->orclause = orclause;
restrictinfo->is_pushed_down = is_pushed_down;
- restrictinfo->valid_everywhere = valid_everywhere;
restrictinfo->can_join = false; /* may get set below */
/*
@@ -250,8 +237,7 @@ make_restrictinfo_internal(Expr *clause, Expr *orclause,
* simple clauses are valid RestrictInfos.
*/
static Expr *
-make_sub_restrictinfos(Expr *clause, bool is_pushed_down,
- bool valid_everywhere)
+make_sub_restrictinfos(Expr *clause, bool is_pushed_down)
{
if (or_clause((Node *) clause))
{
@@ -261,12 +247,10 @@ make_sub_restrictinfos(Expr *clause, bool is_pushed_down,
foreach(temp, ((BoolExpr *) clause)->args)
orlist = lappend(orlist,
make_sub_restrictinfos(lfirst(temp),
- is_pushed_down,
- valid_everywhere));
+ is_pushed_down));
return (Expr *) make_restrictinfo_internal(clause,
make_orclause(orlist),
is_pushed_down,
- valid_everywhere,
NULL);
}
else if (and_clause((Node *) clause))
@@ -277,15 +261,13 @@ make_sub_restrictinfos(Expr *clause, bool is_pushed_down,
foreach(temp, ((BoolExpr *) clause)->args)
andlist = lappend(andlist,
make_sub_restrictinfos(lfirst(temp),
- is_pushed_down,
- valid_everywhere));
+ is_pushed_down));
return make_andclause(andlist);
}
else
return (Expr *) make_restrictinfo_internal(clause,
NULL,
is_pushed_down,
- valid_everywhere,
NULL);
}