diff options
| author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2021-07-09 11:02:26 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2021-07-09 11:02:26 -0400 |
| commit | 51df19a0546220614b1ea53a584fe5c6717ccc56 (patch) | |
| tree | 6825f650fdd9e3be5865c9679ce802a773c0c0e4 /src/backend/utils/adt/network.c | |
| parent | a692a2a183e184cc8cd7e6958f8110bbc25e1e22 (diff) | |
Reject cases where a query in WITH rewrites to just NOTIFY.
Since the executor can't cope with a utility statement appearing
as a node of a plan tree, we can't support cases where a rewrite
rule inserts a NOTIFY into an INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE command appearing
in a WITH clause of a larger query. (One can imagine ways around
that, but it'd be a new feature not a bug fix, and so far there's
been no demand for it.) RewriteQuery checked for this, but it
missed the case where the DML command rewrites to *only* a NOTIFY.
That'd lead to crashes later on in planning. Add the missed check,
and improve the level of testing of this area.
Per bug #17094 from Yaoguang Chen. It's been busted since WITH
was introduced, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17094-bf15dff55eaf2e28@postgresql.org
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/utils/adt/network.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions