diff options
author | Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> | 2014-05-06 11:26:28 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> | 2014-05-06 11:26:28 -0400 |
commit | 04e15c69d2176849aad40dc8df55761ba0ad0491 (patch) | |
tree | b35274c9d4f7beaa41f6850977cd41024ce36dfa /src/backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c | |
parent | 41fdcf71d2b424104e08ce229104b8e8e2840d1b (diff) |
Remove tabs after spaces in C comments
This was not changed in HEAD, but will be done later as part of a
pgindent run. Future pgindent runs will also do this.
Report by Tom Lane
Backpatch through all supported branches, but not HEAD
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c index 94b2a3608a6..1dc4e4d7f46 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ AdjustTimestampForTypmod(Timestamp *time, int32 typmod) * Note: this round-to-nearest code is not completely consistent about * rounding values that are exactly halfway between integral values. * On most platforms, rint() will implement round-to-nearest-even, but - * the integer code always rounds up (away from zero). Is it worth + * the integer code always rounds up (away from zero). Is it worth * trying to be consistent? */ #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP @@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ interval_send(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) /* * The interval typmod stores a "range" in its high 16 bits and a "precision" - * in its low 16 bits. Both contribute to defining the resolution of the + * in its low 16 bits. Both contribute to defining the resolution of the * type. Range addresses resolution granules larger than one second, and * precision specifies resolution below one second. This representation can * express all SQL standard resolutions, but we implement them all in terms of @@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ interval_transform(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) /* * Temporally-smaller fields occupy higher positions in the range - * bitmap. Since only the temporally-smallest bit matters for length + * bitmap. Since only the temporally-smallest bit matters for length * coercion purposes, we compare the last-set bits in the ranges. * Precision, which is to say, sub-second precision, only affects * ranges that include SECOND. @@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ AdjustIntervalForTypmod(Interval *interval, int32 typmod) * that fields to the right of the last one specified are zeroed out, * but those to the left of it remain valid. Thus for example there * is no operational difference between INTERVAL YEAR TO MONTH and - * INTERVAL MONTH. In some cases we could meaningfully enforce that + * INTERVAL MONTH. In some cases we could meaningfully enforce that * higher-order fields are zero; for example INTERVAL DAY could reject * nonzero "month" field. However that seems a bit pointless when we * can't do it consistently. (We cannot enforce a range limit on the @@ -1064,9 +1064,9 @@ AdjustIntervalForTypmod(Interval *interval, int32 typmod) * * Note: before PG 8.4 we interpreted a limited set of fields as * actually causing a "modulo" operation on a given value, potentially - * losing high-order as well as low-order information. But there is + * losing high-order as well as low-order information. But there is * no support for such behavior in the standard, and it seems fairly - * undesirable on data consistency grounds anyway. Now we only + * undesirable on data consistency grounds anyway. Now we only * perform truncation or rounding of low-order fields. */ if (range == INTERVAL_FULL_RANGE) @@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ AdjustIntervalForTypmod(Interval *interval, int32 typmod) /* * Note: this round-to-nearest code is not completely consistent * about rounding values that are exactly halfway between integral - * values. On most platforms, rint() will implement + * values. On most platforms, rint() will implement * round-to-nearest-even, but the integer code always rounds up * (away from zero). Is it worth trying to be consistent? */ @@ -1440,7 +1440,7 @@ timestamptz_to_time_t(TimestampTz t) * Produce a C-string representation of a TimestampTz. * * This is mostly for use in emitting messages. The primary difference - * from timestamptz_out is that we force the output format to ISO. Note + * from timestamptz_out is that we force the output format to ISO. Note * also that the result is in a static buffer, not pstrdup'd. */ const char * @@ -1610,7 +1610,7 @@ recalc_t: * * First, convert to an integral timestamp, avoiding possibly * platform-specific roundoff-in-wrong-direction errors, and adjust to - * Unix epoch. Then see if we can convert to pg_time_t without loss. This + * Unix epoch. Then see if we can convert to pg_time_t without loss. This * coding avoids hardwiring any assumptions about the width of pg_time_t, * so it should behave sanely on machines without int64. */ @@ -4540,7 +4540,7 @@ timestamp_zone(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMPTZ(timestamp); /* - * Look up the requested timezone. First we look in the date token table + * Look up the requested timezone. First we look in the date token table * (to handle cases like "EST"), and if that fails, we look in the * timezone database (to handle cases like "America/New_York"). (This * matches the order in which timestamp input checks the cases; it's @@ -4713,7 +4713,7 @@ timestamptz_zone(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMP(timestamp); /* - * Look up the requested timezone. First we look in the date token table + * Look up the requested timezone. First we look in the date token table * (to handle cases like "EST"), and if that fails, we look in the * timezone database (to handle cases like "America/New_York"). (This * matches the order in which timestamp input checks the cases; it's |