summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2022-02-17 22:45:34 -0500
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2022-02-17 22:45:34 -0500
commite0d4123bbcfe6d85eb3130ded4478f2135d116f2 (patch)
treed0112c70a0cba5496dd005089d6bd13417aca9d2 /src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
parentaf2d484e0e4676db1d90207402c16e5530f80a9c (diff)
Suppress warning about stack_base_ptr with late-model GCC.
GCC 12 complains that set_stack_base is storing the address of a local variable in a long-lived pointer. This is an entirely reasonable warning (indeed, it just helped us find a bug); but that behavior is intentional here. We can work around it by using __builtin_frame_address(0) instead of a specific local variable; that produces an address a dozen or so bytes different, in my testing, but we don't care about such a small difference. Maybe someday a compiler lacking that function will start to issue a similar warning, but we'll worry about that when it happens. Patch by me, per a suggestion from Andres Freund. Back-patch to v12, which is as far back as the patch will go without some pain. (Recently-established project policy would permit a back-patch as far as 9.2, but I'm disinclined to expend the work until GCC 12 is much more widespread.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3773792.1645141467@sss.pgh.pa.us
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c8
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
index de554e28cfe..c30fb986962 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/init/miscinit.c
@@ -274,6 +274,14 @@ InitPostmasterChild(void)
{
IsUnderPostmaster = true; /* we are a postmaster subprocess now */
+ /*
+ * Set reference point for stack-depth checking. This might seem
+ * redundant in !EXEC_BACKEND builds; but it's not because the postmaster
+ * launches its children from signal handlers, so we might be running on
+ * an alternative stack.
+ */
+ (void) set_stack_base();
+
InitProcessGlobals();
/*