diff options
author | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2016-03-12 16:05:10 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> | 2016-03-12 16:05:29 -0500 |
commit | 23a27b039d94ba359286694831eafe03cd970eef (patch) | |
tree | 4b1d6acb2fe4ae5c1275292adb3f027f2e052ea8 /src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c | |
parent | e01157500f26342bf4f067a4eb1e45ab9a3cd410 (diff) |
Widen query numbers-of-tuples-processed counters to uint64.
This patch widens SPI_processed, EState's es_processed field, PortalData's
portalPos field, FuncCallContext's call_cntr and max_calls fields,
ExecutorRun's count argument, PortalRunFetch's result, and the max number
of rows in a SPITupleTable to uint64, and deals with (I hope) all the
ensuing fallout. Some of these values were declared uint32 before, and
others "long".
I also removed PortalData's posOverflow field, since that logic seems
pretty useless given that portalPos is now always 64 bits.
The user-visible results are that command tags for SELECT etc will
correctly report tuple counts larger than 4G, as will plpgsql's GET
GET DIAGNOSTICS ... ROW_COUNT command. Queries processing more tuples
than that are still not exactly the norm, but they're becoming more
common.
Most values associated with FETCH/MOVE distances, such as PortalRun's count
argument and the count argument of most SPI functions that have one, remain
declared as "long". It's not clear whether it would be worth promoting
those to int64; but it would definitely be a large dollop of additional
API churn on top of this, and it would only help 32-bit platforms which
seem relatively less likely to see any benefit.
Andreas Scherbaum, reviewed by Christian Ullrich, additional hacking by me
Diffstat (limited to 'src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c b/src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c index 105b6186f64..5b27c731b6e 100644 --- a/src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c +++ b/src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int pltcl_process_SPI_result(Tcl_Interp *interp, Tcl_Obj *loop_body, int spi_rc, SPITupleTable *tuptable, - int ntuples); + uint64 ntuples); static int pltcl_SPI_prepare(ClientData cdata, Tcl_Interp *interp, int objc, Tcl_Obj *const objv[]); static int pltcl_SPI_execute_plan(ClientData cdata, Tcl_Interp *interp, @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int pltcl_SPI_lastoid(ClientData cdata, Tcl_Interp *interp, int objc, Tcl_Obj *const objv[]); static void pltcl_set_tuple_values(Tcl_Interp *interp, const char *arrayname, - int tupno, HeapTuple tuple, TupleDesc tupdesc); + uint64 tupno, HeapTuple tuple, TupleDesc tupdesc); static Tcl_Obj *pltcl_build_tuple_argument(HeapTuple tuple, TupleDesc tupdesc); @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ pltcl_init_load_unknown(Tcl_Interp *interp) int tcl_rc; Tcl_DString unknown_src; char *part; - int i; + uint64 i; int fno; /************************************************************ @@ -2007,10 +2007,9 @@ pltcl_process_SPI_result(Tcl_Interp *interp, Tcl_Obj *loop_body, int spi_rc, SPITupleTable *tuptable, - int ntuples) + uint64 ntuples) { int my_rc = TCL_OK; - int i; int loop_rc; HeapTuple *tuples; TupleDesc tupdesc; @@ -2021,7 +2020,7 @@ pltcl_process_SPI_result(Tcl_Interp *interp, case SPI_OK_INSERT: case SPI_OK_DELETE: case SPI_OK_UPDATE: - Tcl_SetObjResult(interp, Tcl_NewIntObj(ntuples)); + Tcl_SetObjResult(interp, Tcl_NewWideIntObj(ntuples)); break; case SPI_OK_UTILITY: @@ -2060,6 +2059,8 @@ pltcl_process_SPI_result(Tcl_Interp *interp, * There is a loop body - process all tuples and evaluate the * body on each */ + uint64 i; + for (i = 0; i < ntuples; i++) { pltcl_set_tuple_values(interp, arrayname, i, @@ -2085,7 +2086,7 @@ pltcl_process_SPI_result(Tcl_Interp *interp, if (my_rc == TCL_OK) { - Tcl_SetObjResult(interp, Tcl_NewIntObj(ntuples)); + Tcl_SetObjResult(interp, Tcl_NewWideIntObj(ntuples)); } break; @@ -2472,7 +2473,7 @@ pltcl_SPI_lastoid(ClientData cdata, Tcl_Interp *interp, **********************************************************************/ static void pltcl_set_tuple_values(Tcl_Interp *interp, const char *arrayname, - int tupno, HeapTuple tuple, TupleDesc tupdesc) + uint64 tupno, HeapTuple tuple, TupleDesc tupdesc) { int i; char *outputstr; @@ -2498,7 +2499,7 @@ pltcl_set_tuple_values(Tcl_Interp *interp, const char *arrayname, { arrptr = &arrayname; nameptr = &attname; - Tcl_SetVar2Ex(interp, arrayname, ".tupno", Tcl_NewIntObj(tupno), 0); + Tcl_SetVar2Ex(interp, arrayname, ".tupno", Tcl_NewWideIntObj(tupno), 0); } for (i = 0; i < tupdesc->natts; i++) |