summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2018-04-19 15:49:12 -0400
committerTom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>2018-04-19 15:49:12 -0400
commit0c141fcaa7dd806752986401b25de8f665ceb3fe (patch)
tree481f6044deba3a2e2a6920676eb8846bad5af064 /src
parentb3f4742aab82463166b327dbf26b3d4a5039e1c6 (diff)
Fix incorrect handling of join clauses pushed into parameterized paths.
In some cases a clause attached to an outer join can be pushed down into the outer join's RHS even though the clause is not degenerate --- this can happen if we choose to make a parameterized path for the RHS. If the clause ends up attached to a lower outer join, we'd misclassify it as being a "join filter" not a plain "filter" condition at that node, leading to wrong query results. To fix, teach extract_actual_join_clauses to examine each join clause's required_relids, not just its is_pushed_down flag. (The latter now seems vestigial, or at least in need of rethinking, but we won't do anything so invasive as redefining it in a bug-fix patch.) This has been wrong since we introduced parameterized paths in 9.2, though it's evidently hard to hit given the lack of previous reports. The test case used here involves a lateral function call, and I think that a lateral reference may be required to get the planner to select a broken plan; though I wouldn't swear to that. In any case, even if LATERAL is needed to trigger the bug, it still affects all supported branches, so back-patch to all. Per report from Andreas Karlsson. Thanks to Andrew Gierth for preliminary investigation. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f8128b11-c5bf-3539-48cd-234178b2314d@proxel.se
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c3
-rw-r--r--src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c11
-rw-r--r--src/include/optimizer/restrictinfo.h1
-rw-r--r--src/test/regress/expected/join.out27
-rw-r--r--src/test/regress/sql/join.sql11
5 files changed, 52 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c
index 1d30e9315a1..fcc13235964 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c
@@ -3447,6 +3447,7 @@ create_nestloop_plan(PlannerInfo *root,
if (IS_OUTER_JOIN(best_path->jointype))
{
extract_actual_join_clauses(joinrestrictclauses,
+ best_path->path.parent->relids,
&joinclauses, &otherclauses);
}
else
@@ -3559,6 +3560,7 @@ create_mergejoin_plan(PlannerInfo *root,
if (IS_OUTER_JOIN(best_path->jpath.jointype))
{
extract_actual_join_clauses(joinclauses,
+ best_path->jpath.path.parent->relids,
&joinclauses, &otherclauses);
}
else
@@ -3852,6 +3854,7 @@ create_hashjoin_plan(PlannerInfo *root,
if (IS_OUTER_JOIN(best_path->jpath.jointype))
{
extract_actual_join_clauses(joinclauses,
+ best_path->jpath.path.parent->relids,
&joinclauses, &otherclauses);
}
else
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c
index 87dc3431eb8..cc0b747008e 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c
@@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ extract_actual_clauses(List *restrictinfo_list,
*/
void
extract_actual_join_clauses(List *restrictinfo_list,
+ Relids joinrelids,
List **joinquals,
List **otherquals)
{
@@ -432,7 +433,15 @@ extract_actual_join_clauses(List *restrictinfo_list,
Assert(IsA(rinfo, RestrictInfo));
- if (rinfo->is_pushed_down)
+ /*
+ * We must check both is_pushed_down and required_relids, since an
+ * outer-join clause that's been pushed down to some lower join level
+ * via path parameterization will not be marked is_pushed_down;
+ * nonetheless, it must be treated as a filter clause not a join
+ * clause so far as the lower join level is concerned.
+ */
+ if (rinfo->is_pushed_down ||
+ !bms_is_subset(rinfo->required_relids, joinrelids))
{
if (!rinfo->pseudoconstant)
*otherquals = lappend(*otherquals, rinfo->clause);
diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/restrictinfo.h b/src/include/optimizer/restrictinfo.h
index fa8a5b145b2..964c047a49f 100644
--- a/src/include/optimizer/restrictinfo.h
+++ b/src/include/optimizer/restrictinfo.h
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ extern List *get_all_actual_clauses(List *restrictinfo_list);
extern List *extract_actual_clauses(List *restrictinfo_list,
bool pseudoconstant);
extern void extract_actual_join_clauses(List *restrictinfo_list,
+ Relids joinrelids,
List **joinquals,
List **otherquals);
extern bool join_clause_is_movable_to(RestrictInfo *rinfo, RelOptInfo *baserel);
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/join.out
index 55bb55fce3c..ae760e61425 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/join.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/join.out
@@ -3349,6 +3349,33 @@ order by fault;
| 123 | 122
(1 row)
+explain (costs off)
+select * from
+(values (1, array[10,20]), (2, array[20,30])) as v1(v1x,v1ys)
+left join (values (1, 10), (2, 20)) as v2(v2x,v2y) on v2x = v1x
+left join unnest(v1ys) as u1(u1y) on u1y = v2y;
+ QUERY PLAN
+-------------------------------------------------------------
+ Nested Loop Left Join
+ -> Values Scan on "*VALUES*"
+ -> Hash Right Join
+ Hash Cond: (u1.u1y = "*VALUES*_1".column2)
+ Filter: ("*VALUES*_1".column1 = "*VALUES*".column1)
+ -> Function Scan on unnest u1
+ -> Hash
+ -> Values Scan on "*VALUES*_1"
+(8 rows)
+
+select * from
+(values (1, array[10,20]), (2, array[20,30])) as v1(v1x,v1ys)
+left join (values (1, 10), (2, 20)) as v2(v2x,v2y) on v2x = v1x
+left join unnest(v1ys) as u1(u1y) on u1y = v2y;
+ v1x | v1ys | v2x | v2y | u1y
+-----+---------+-----+-----+-----
+ 1 | {10,20} | 1 | 10 | 10
+ 2 | {20,30} | 2 | 20 | 20
+(2 rows)
+
--
-- test handling of potential equivalence clauses above outer joins
--
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql
index 5448be8e709..174eec0ba4c 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql
@@ -1019,6 +1019,17 @@ select * from
where fault = 122
order by fault;
+explain (costs off)
+select * from
+(values (1, array[10,20]), (2, array[20,30])) as v1(v1x,v1ys)
+left join (values (1, 10), (2, 20)) as v2(v2x,v2y) on v2x = v1x
+left join unnest(v1ys) as u1(u1y) on u1y = v2y;
+
+select * from
+(values (1, array[10,20]), (2, array[20,30])) as v1(v1x,v1ys)
+left join (values (1, 10), (2, 20)) as v2(v2x,v2y) on v2x = v1x
+left join unnest(v1ys) as u1(u1y) on u1y = v2y;
+
--
-- test handling of potential equivalence clauses above outer joins
--