summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFujii Masao <fujii@postgresql.org>2025-09-25 00:51:59 +0900
committerFujii Masao <fujii@postgresql.org>2025-09-25 00:51:59 +0900
commit7fcb32ad023a434e07b7214c1c762ecd410b6969 (patch)
treeb24cf8f7d87c5171a7874b897822e96e3d48f176 /src
parenta5b35fcedb542587e7d8b8fcd21a2e0995b82d2f (diff)
Fix incorrect and inconsistent comments in tableam.h and heapam.c.
This commit corrects several issues in function comments: * The parameter "rel" was incorrectly referred to as "relation" in the comments for table_tuple_delete(), table_tuple_update(), and table_tuple_lock(). * In table_tuple_delete(), "changingPart" was listed as an output parameter in the comments but is actually input. * In table_tuple_update(), "slot" was listed as an input parameter in the comments but is actually output. * The comment for "update_indexes" in table_tuple_update() was mis-indented. * The comments for heap_lock_tuple() incorrectly referenced a non-existent "tid" parameter. Author: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com> Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEoWx2nB6Ay8g=KEn7L3qbYX_4+sLk9XOMkV0XZqHR4cTY8ZvQ@mail.gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'src')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c1
-rw-r--r--src/include/access/tableam.h16
2 files changed, 9 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c
index 4c5ae205a7a..ed0c0c2dc9f 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c
@@ -4552,7 +4552,6 @@ get_mxact_status_for_lock(LockTupleMode mode, bool is_update)
*
* Input parameters:
* relation: relation containing tuple (caller must hold suitable lock)
- * tid: TID of tuple to lock
* cid: current command ID (used for visibility test, and stored into
* tuple's cmax if lock is successful)
* mode: indicates if shared or exclusive tuple lock is desired
diff --git a/src/include/access/tableam.h b/src/include/access/tableam.h
index b2ce35e2a34..77eb41eb6dc 100644
--- a/src/include/access/tableam.h
+++ b/src/include/access/tableam.h
@@ -1433,17 +1433,18 @@ table_multi_insert(Relation rel, TupleTableSlot **slots, int nslots,
* concurrent-update conditions. Use simple_table_tuple_delete instead.
*
* Input parameters:
- * relation - table to be modified (caller must hold suitable lock)
+ * rel - table to be modified (caller must hold suitable lock)
* tid - TID of tuple to be deleted
* cid - delete command ID (used for visibility test, and stored into
* cmax if successful)
* crosscheck - if not InvalidSnapshot, also check tuple against this
* wait - true if should wait for any conflicting update to commit/abort
- * Output parameters:
- * tmfd - filled in failure cases (see below)
* changingPart - true iff the tuple is being moved to another partition
* table due to an update of the partition key. Otherwise, false.
*
+ * Output parameters:
+ * tmfd - filled in failure cases (see below)
+ *
* Normal, successful return value is TM_Ok, which means we did actually
* delete it. Failure return codes are TM_SelfModified, TM_Updated, and
* TM_BeingModified (the last only possible if wait == false).
@@ -1469,17 +1470,18 @@ table_tuple_delete(Relation rel, ItemPointer tid, CommandId cid,
* concurrent-update conditions. Use simple_table_tuple_update instead.
*
* Input parameters:
- * relation - table to be modified (caller must hold suitable lock)
+ * rel - table to be modified (caller must hold suitable lock)
* otid - TID of old tuple to be replaced
- * slot - newly constructed tuple data to store
* cid - update command ID (used for visibility test, and stored into
* cmax/cmin if successful)
* crosscheck - if not InvalidSnapshot, also check old tuple against this
* wait - true if should wait for any conflicting update to commit/abort
+ *
* Output parameters:
+ * slot - newly constructed tuple data to store
* tmfd - filled in failure cases (see below)
* lockmode - filled with lock mode acquired on tuple
- * update_indexes - in success cases this is set to true if new index entries
+ * update_indexes - in success cases this is set to true if new index entries
* are required for this tuple
*
* Normal, successful return value is TM_Ok, which means we did actually
@@ -1512,7 +1514,7 @@ table_tuple_update(Relation rel, ItemPointer otid, TupleTableSlot *slot,
* Lock a tuple in the specified mode.
*
* Input parameters:
- * relation: relation containing tuple (caller must hold suitable lock)
+ * rel: relation containing tuple (caller must hold suitable lock)
* tid: TID of tuple to lock (updated if an update chain was followed)
* snapshot: snapshot to use for visibility determinations
* cid: current command ID (used for visibility test, and stored into