summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c59
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c
index 70a73821641..69c0a3f65be 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
- * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c,v 1.82 2000/01/27 18:11:30 tgl Exp $
+ * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c,v 1.83 2000/02/03 06:12:18 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@@ -743,9 +743,9 @@ create_hashjoin_node(HashPath *best_path,
* * Var nodes representing index keys must have varattno equal to the
* index's attribute number, not the attribute number in the original rel.
* * indxpath.c may have selected an index that is binary-compatible with
- * the actual expression operator, but not the same; we must replace the
- * expression's operator with the binary-compatible equivalent operator
- * that the index will recognize.
+ * the actual expression operator, but not exactly the same datatype.
+ * We must replace the expression's operator with the binary-compatible
+ * equivalent operator that the index will recognize.
* * If the index key is on the right, commute the clause to put it on the
* left. (Someday the executor might not need this, but for now it does.)
*
@@ -1054,6 +1054,7 @@ copy_path_costsize(Plan *dest, Path *src)
* Copy cost and size info from a lower plan node to an inserted node.
* This is not critical, since the decisions have already been made,
* but it helps produce more reasonable-looking EXPLAIN output.
+ * (Some callers alter the info after copying it.)
*/
static void
copy_plan_costsize(Plan *dest, Plan *src)
@@ -1178,12 +1179,7 @@ make_nestloop(List *qptlist,
NestLoop *node = makeNode(NestLoop);
Plan *plan = &node->join;
- /*
- * this cost estimate is entirely bogus... hopefully it will be
- * overwritten by caller.
- */
- plan->cost = (lefttree ? lefttree->cost : 0) +
- (righttree ? righttree->cost : 0);
+ /* cost should be inserted by caller */
plan->state = (EState *) NULL;
plan->targetlist = qptlist;
plan->qual = qpqual;
@@ -1204,12 +1200,7 @@ make_hashjoin(List *tlist,
HashJoin *node = makeNode(HashJoin);
Plan *plan = &node->join;
- /*
- * this cost estimate is entirely bogus... hopefully it will be
- * overwritten by caller.
- */
- plan->cost = (lefttree ? lefttree->cost : 0) +
- (righttree ? righttree->cost : 0);
+ /* cost should be inserted by caller */
plan->state = (EState *) NULL;
plan->targetlist = tlist;
plan->qual = qpqual;
@@ -1248,12 +1239,7 @@ make_mergejoin(List *tlist,
MergeJoin *node = makeNode(MergeJoin);
Plan *plan = &node->join;
- /*
- * this cost estimate is entirely bogus... hopefully it will be
- * overwritten by caller.
- */
- plan->cost = (lefttree ? lefttree->cost : 0) +
- (righttree ? righttree->cost : 0);
+ /* cost should be inserted by caller */
plan->state = (EState *) NULL;
plan->targetlist = tlist;
plan->qual = qpqual;
@@ -1293,6 +1279,7 @@ make_material(List *tlist,
Plan *plan = &node->plan;
copy_plan_costsize(plan, lefttree);
+ /* XXX shouldn't we charge some additional cost for materialization? */
plan->state = (EState *) NULL;
plan->targetlist = tlist;
plan->qual = NIL;
@@ -1310,6 +1297,20 @@ make_agg(List *tlist, Plan *lefttree)
Agg *node = makeNode(Agg);
copy_plan_costsize(&node->plan, lefttree);
+ /*
+ * The tuple width from the input node is OK, as is the cost (we are
+ * ignoring the cost of computing the aggregate; is there any value
+ * in accounting for it?). But the tuple count is bogus. We will
+ * produce a single tuple if the input is not a Group, and a tuple
+ * per group otherwise. For now, estimate the number of groups as
+ * 10% of the number of tuples --- bogus, but how to do better?
+ * (Note we assume the input Group node is in "tuplePerGroup" mode,
+ * so it didn't reduce its row count already.)
+ */
+ if (IsA(lefttree, Group))
+ node->plan.plan_rows *= 0.1;
+ else
+ node->plan.plan_rows = 1;
node->plan.state = (EState *) NULL;
node->plan.qual = NULL;
node->plan.targetlist = tlist;
@@ -1329,6 +1330,15 @@ make_group(List *tlist,
Group *node = makeNode(Group);
copy_plan_costsize(&node->plan, lefttree);
+ /*
+ * If tuplePerGroup (which is named exactly backwards) is true,
+ * we will return all the input tuples, so the input node's row count
+ * is OK. Otherwise, we'll return only one tuple from each group.
+ * For now, estimate the number of groups as 10% of the number of
+ * tuples --- bogus, but how to do better?
+ */
+ if (! tuplePerGroup)
+ node->plan.plan_rows *= 0.1;
node->plan.state = (EState *) NULL;
node->plan.qual = NULL;
node->plan.targetlist = tlist;
@@ -1357,6 +1367,11 @@ make_unique(List *tlist, Plan *lefttree, List *distinctList)
List *slitem;
copy_plan_costsize(plan, lefttree);
+ /*
+ * As for Group, we make the unsupported assumption that there will be
+ * 10% as many tuples out as in.
+ */
+ plan->plan_rows *= 0.1;
plan->state = (EState *) NULL;
plan->targetlist = tlist;
plan->qual = NIL;