summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c17
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c
index d92d43a17ea..0f423e96847 100644
--- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c
+++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c
@@ -1047,10 +1047,10 @@ subquery_planner(PlannerGlobal *glob, Query *parse, PlannerInfo *parent_root,
* cannot do so if the HAVING clause contains aggregates (obviously) or
* volatile functions (since a HAVING clause is supposed to be executed
* only once per group). We also can't do this if there are any nonempty
- * grouping sets; moving such a clause into WHERE would potentially change
- * the results, if any referenced column isn't present in all the grouping
- * sets. (If there are only empty grouping sets, then the HAVING clause
- * must be degenerate as discussed below.)
+ * grouping sets and the clause references any columns that are nullable
+ * by the grouping sets; moving such a clause into WHERE would potentially
+ * change the results. (If there are only empty grouping sets, then the
+ * HAVING clause must be degenerate as discussed below.)
*
* Also, it may be that the clause is so expensive to execute that we're
* better off doing it only once per group, despite the loss of
@@ -1088,15 +1088,16 @@ subquery_planner(PlannerGlobal *glob, Query *parse, PlannerInfo *parent_root,
{
Node *havingclause = (Node *) lfirst(l);
- if ((parse->groupClause && parse->groupingSets) ||
- contain_agg_clause(havingclause) ||
+ if (contain_agg_clause(havingclause) ||
contain_volatile_functions(havingclause) ||
- contain_subplans(havingclause))
+ contain_subplans(havingclause) ||
+ (parse->groupClause && parse->groupingSets &&
+ bms_is_member(root->group_rtindex, pull_varnos(root, havingclause))))
{
/* keep it in HAVING */
newHaving = lappend(newHaving, havingclause);
}
- else if (parse->groupClause && !parse->groupingSets)
+ else if (parse->groupClause)
{
Node *whereclause;