summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/utils/adt/date.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/utils/adt/date.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/utils/adt/date.c57
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/date.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/date.c
index 544e1d32bfc..13745a0adc9 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/date.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/date.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include "access/xact.h"
#include "catalog/pg_type.h"
#include "common/hashfn.h"
+#include "common/int.h"
#include "libpq/pqformat.h"
#include "miscadmin.h"
#include "nodes/supportnodes.h"
@@ -2013,6 +2014,11 @@ interval_time(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Interval *span = PG_GETARG_INTERVAL_P(0);
TimeADT result;
+ if (INTERVAL_NOT_FINITE(span))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_DATETIME_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("cannot convert infinite interval to time")));
+
result = span->time % USECS_PER_DAY;
if (result < 0)
result += USECS_PER_DAY;
@@ -2049,6 +2055,11 @@ time_pl_interval(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Interval *span = PG_GETARG_INTERVAL_P(1);
TimeADT result;
+ if (INTERVAL_NOT_FINITE(span))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_DATETIME_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("cannot add infinite interval to time")));
+
result = time + span->time;
result -= result / USECS_PER_DAY * USECS_PER_DAY;
if (result < INT64CONST(0))
@@ -2067,6 +2078,11 @@ time_mi_interval(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Interval *span = PG_GETARG_INTERVAL_P(1);
TimeADT result;
+ if (INTERVAL_NOT_FINITE(span))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_DATETIME_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("cannot subtract infinite interval from time")));
+
result = time - span->time;
result -= result / USECS_PER_DAY * USECS_PER_DAY;
if (result < INT64CONST(0))
@@ -2090,7 +2106,8 @@ in_range_time_interval(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
/*
* Like time_pl_interval/time_mi_interval, we disregard the month and day
- * fields of the offset. So our test for negative should too.
+ * fields of the offset. So our test for negative should too. This also
+ * catches -infinity, so we only need worry about +infinity below.
*/
if (offset->time < 0)
ereport(ERROR,
@@ -2100,13 +2117,14 @@ in_range_time_interval(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
/*
* We can't use time_pl_interval/time_mi_interval here, because their
* wraparound behavior would give wrong (or at least undesirable) answers.
- * Fortunately the equivalent non-wrapping behavior is trivial, especially
- * since we don't worry about integer overflow.
+ * Fortunately the equivalent non-wrapping behavior is trivial, except
+ * that adding an infinite (or very large) interval might cause integer
+ * overflow. Subtraction cannot overflow here.
*/
if (sub)
sum = base - offset->time;
- else
- sum = base + offset->time;
+ else if (pg_add_s64_overflow(base, offset->time, &sum))
+ PG_RETURN_BOOL(less);
if (less)
PG_RETURN_BOOL(val <= sum);
@@ -2581,6 +2599,11 @@ timetz_pl_interval(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Interval *span = PG_GETARG_INTERVAL_P(1);
TimeTzADT *result;
+ if (INTERVAL_NOT_FINITE(span))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_DATETIME_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("cannot add infinite interval to time")));
+
result = (TimeTzADT *) palloc(sizeof(TimeTzADT));
result->time = time->time + span->time;
@@ -2603,6 +2626,11 @@ timetz_mi_interval(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Interval *span = PG_GETARG_INTERVAL_P(1);
TimeTzADT *result;
+ if (INTERVAL_NOT_FINITE(span))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_DATETIME_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("cannot subtract infinite interval from time")));
+
result = (TimeTzADT *) palloc(sizeof(TimeTzADT));
result->time = time->time - span->time;
@@ -2630,7 +2658,8 @@ in_range_timetz_interval(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
/*
* Like timetz_pl_interval/timetz_mi_interval, we disregard the month and
- * day fields of the offset. So our test for negative should too.
+ * day fields of the offset. So our test for negative should too. This
+ * also catches -infinity, so we only need worry about +infinity below.
*/
if (offset->time < 0)
ereport(ERROR,
@@ -2640,13 +2669,14 @@ in_range_timetz_interval(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
/*
* We can't use timetz_pl_interval/timetz_mi_interval here, because their
* wraparound behavior would give wrong (or at least undesirable) answers.
- * Fortunately the equivalent non-wrapping behavior is trivial, especially
- * since we don't worry about integer overflow.
+ * Fortunately the equivalent non-wrapping behavior is trivial, except
+ * that adding an infinite (or very large) interval might cause integer
+ * overflow. Subtraction cannot overflow here.
*/
if (sub)
sum.time = base->time - offset->time;
- else
- sum.time = base->time + offset->time;
+ else if (pg_add_s64_overflow(base->time, offset->time, &sum.time))
+ PG_RETURN_BOOL(less);
sum.zone = base->zone;
if (less)
@@ -3096,6 +3126,13 @@ timetz_izone(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
TimeTzADT *result;
int tz;
+ if (INTERVAL_NOT_FINITE(zone))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
+ errmsg("interval time zone \"%s\" must be finite",
+ DatumGetCString(DirectFunctionCall1(interval_out,
+ PointerGetDatum(zone))))));
+
if (zone->month != 0 || zone->day != 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),