summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/utils/adt/int8.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/utils/adt/int8.c')
-rw-r--r--src/backend/utils/adt/int8.c380
1 files changed, 275 insertions, 105 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/int8.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/int8.c
index e58c94268ad..96964c82b9e 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/int8.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/int8.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
* IDENTIFICATION
- * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/int8.c,v 1.55 2004/08/29 05:06:49 momjian Exp $
+ * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/int8.c,v 1.56 2004/10/04 14:42:46 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
#define MAXINT8LEN 25
+#define SAMESIGN(a,b) (((a) < 0) == ((b) < 0))
+
typedef struct
{
int64 current;
@@ -31,6 +33,7 @@ typedef struct
int64 step;
} generate_series_fctx;
+
/***********************************************************************
**
** Routines for 64-bit integers.
@@ -67,7 +70,6 @@ scanint8(const char *str, bool errorOK, int64 *result)
if (*ptr == '-')
{
ptr++;
- sign = -1;
/*
* Do an explicit check for INT64_MIN. Ugly though this is, it's
@@ -75,12 +77,15 @@ scanint8(const char *str, bool errorOK, int64 *result)
* portably.
*/
#ifndef INT64_IS_BUSTED
- if (strcmp(ptr, "9223372036854775808") == 0)
+ if (strncmp(ptr, "9223372036854775808", 19) == 0)
{
- *result = -INT64CONST(0x7fffffffffffffff) - 1;
- return true;
+ tmp = -INT64CONST(0x7fffffffffffffff) - 1;
+ ptr += 19;
+ goto gotdigits;
}
#endif
+
+ sign = -1;
}
else if (*ptr == '+')
ptr++;
@@ -93,7 +98,8 @@ scanint8(const char *str, bool errorOK, int64 *result)
else
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
- errmsg("invalid input syntax for type bigint: \"%s\"", str)));
+ errmsg("invalid input syntax for integer: \"%s\"",
+ str)));
}
/* process digits */
@@ -108,11 +114,14 @@ scanint8(const char *str, bool errorOK, int64 *result)
else
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
- errmsg("integer out of range")));
+ errmsg("value \"%s\" is out of range for type bigint",
+ str)));
}
tmp = newtmp;
}
+gotdigits:
+
/* allow trailing whitespace, but not other trailing chars */
while (*ptr != '\0' && isspace((unsigned char) *ptr))
ptr++;
@@ -124,7 +133,8 @@ scanint8(const char *str, bool errorOK, int64 *result)
else
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TEXT_REPRESENTATION),
- errmsg("invalid input syntax for type bigint: \"%s\"", str)));
+ errmsg("invalid input syntax for integer: \"%s\"",
+ str)));
}
*result = (sign < 0) ? -tmp : tmp;
@@ -485,58 +495,118 @@ int28ge(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
int8um(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 arg = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 result;
- PG_RETURN_INT64(-val);
+ result = -arg;
+ /* overflow check (needed for INT64_MIN) */
+ if (arg != 0 && SAMESIGN(result, arg))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
Datum
int8up(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 arg = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
- PG_RETURN_INT64(val);
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(arg);
}
Datum
int8pl(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
- int64 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int64 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int64 result;
- PG_RETURN_INT64(val1 + val2);
+ result = arg1 + arg2;
+ /*
+ * Overflow check. If the inputs are of different signs then their sum
+ * cannot overflow. If the inputs are of the same sign, their sum
+ * had better be that sign too.
+ */
+ if (SAMESIGN(arg1, arg2) && !SAMESIGN(result, arg1))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
Datum
int8mi(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
- int64 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int64 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int64 result;
- PG_RETURN_INT64(val1 - val2);
+ result = arg1 - arg2;
+ /*
+ * Overflow check. If the inputs are of the same sign then their
+ * difference cannot overflow. If they are of different signs then
+ * the result should be of the same sign as the first input.
+ */
+ if (!SAMESIGN(arg1, arg2) && !SAMESIGN(result, arg1))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
Datum
int8mul(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
- int64 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int64 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int64 result;
- PG_RETURN_INT64(val1 * val2);
+ result = arg1 * arg2;
+ /*
+ * Overflow check. We basically check to see if result / arg2 gives
+ * arg1 again. There are two cases where this fails: arg2 = 0 (which
+ * cannot overflow) and arg1 = INT64_MIN, arg2 = -1 (where the division
+ * itself will overflow and thus incorrectly match).
+ *
+ * Since the division is likely much more expensive than the actual
+ * multiplication, we'd like to skip it where possible. The best
+ * bang for the buck seems to be to check whether both inputs are in
+ * the int32 range; if so, no overflow is possible.
+ */
+ if (!(arg1 == (int64) ((int32) arg1) &&
+ arg2 == (int64) ((int32) arg2)) &&
+ arg2 != 0 &&
+ (result/arg2 != arg1 || (arg2 == -1 && arg1 < 0 && result < 0)))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
Datum
int8div(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
- int64 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int64 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int64 result;
- if (val2 == 0)
+ if (arg2 == 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DIVISION_BY_ZERO),
errmsg("division by zero")));
- PG_RETURN_INT64(val1 / val2);
+ result = arg1 / arg2;
+ /*
+ * Overflow check. The only possible overflow case is for
+ * arg1 = INT64_MIN, arg2 = -1, where the correct result is -INT64_MIN,
+ * which can't be represented on a two's-complement machine.
+ */
+ if (arg2 == -1 && arg1 < 0 && result < 0)
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
/* int8abs()
@@ -546,8 +616,15 @@ Datum
int8abs(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
int64 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 result;
- PG_RETURN_INT64((arg1 < 0) ? -arg1 : arg1);
+ result = (arg1 < 0) ? -arg1 : arg1;
+ /* overflow check (needed for INT64_MIN) */
+ if (result < 0)
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
/* int8mod()
@@ -556,20 +633,16 @@ int8abs(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
int8mod(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
- int64 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
- int64 result;
+ int64 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
- if (val2 == 0)
+ if (arg2 == 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DIVISION_BY_ZERO),
errmsg("division by zero")));
+ /* No overflow is possible */
- result = val1 / val2;
- result *= val2;
- result = val1 - result;
-
- PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(arg1 % arg2);
}
@@ -577,18 +650,26 @@ Datum
int8inc(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
int64 arg = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 result;
- PG_RETURN_INT64(arg + 1);
+ result = arg + 1;
+ /* Overflow check */
+ if (arg > 0 && result < 0)
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
+
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
Datum
int8larger(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
- int64 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int64 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
int64 result;
- result = ((val1 > val2) ? val1 : val2);
+ result = ((arg1 > arg2) ? arg1 : arg2);
PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
@@ -596,11 +677,11 @@ int8larger(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
int8smaller(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
- int64 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int64 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
int64 result;
- result = ((val1 < val2) ? val1 : val2);
+ result = ((arg1 < arg2) ? arg1 : arg2);
PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
@@ -608,83 +689,172 @@ int8smaller(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
int84pl(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
- int32 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT32(1);
+ int64 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int32 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT32(1);
+ int64 result;
- PG_RETURN_INT64(val1 + val2);
+ result = arg1 + arg2;
+ /*
+ * Overflow check. If the inputs are of different signs then their sum
+ * cannot overflow. If the inputs are of the same sign, their sum
+ * had better be that sign too.
+ */
+ if (SAMESIGN(arg1, arg2) && !SAMESIGN(result, arg1))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
Datum
int84mi(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
- int32 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT32(1);
+ int64 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int32 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT32(1);
+ int64 result;
- PG_RETURN_INT64(val1 - val2);
+ result = arg1 - arg2;
+ /*
+ * Overflow check. If the inputs are of the same sign then their
+ * difference cannot overflow. If they are of different signs then
+ * the result should be of the same sign as the first input.
+ */
+ if (!SAMESIGN(arg1, arg2) && !SAMESIGN(result, arg1))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
Datum
int84mul(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
- int32 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT32(1);
+ int64 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int32 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT32(1);
+ int64 result;
- PG_RETURN_INT64(val1 * val2);
+ result = arg1 * arg2;
+ /*
+ * Overflow check. We basically check to see if result / arg1 gives
+ * arg2 again. There is one case where this fails: arg1 = 0 (which
+ * cannot overflow).
+ *
+ * Since the division is likely much more expensive than the actual
+ * multiplication, we'd like to skip it where possible. The best
+ * bang for the buck seems to be to check whether both inputs are in
+ * the int32 range; if so, no overflow is possible.
+ */
+ if (arg1 != (int64) ((int32) arg1) &&
+ result/arg1 != arg2)
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
Datum
int84div(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
- int32 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT32(1);
+ int64 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int32 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT32(1);
+ int64 result;
- if (val2 == 0)
+ if (arg2 == 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DIVISION_BY_ZERO),
errmsg("division by zero")));
- PG_RETURN_INT64(val1 / val2);
+ result = arg1 / arg2;
+ /*
+ * Overflow check. The only possible overflow case is for
+ * arg1 = INT64_MIN, arg2 = -1, where the correct result is -INT64_MIN,
+ * which can't be represented on a two's-complement machine.
+ */
+ if (arg2 == -1 && arg1 < 0 && result < 0)
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
Datum
int48pl(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int32 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT32(0);
- int64 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int32 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT32(0);
+ int64 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int64 result;
- PG_RETURN_INT64(val1 + val2);
+ result = arg1 + arg2;
+ /*
+ * Overflow check. If the inputs are of different signs then their sum
+ * cannot overflow. If the inputs are of the same sign, their sum
+ * had better be that sign too.
+ */
+ if (SAMESIGN(arg1, arg2) && !SAMESIGN(result, arg1))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
Datum
int48mi(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int32 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT32(0);
- int64 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int32 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT32(0);
+ int64 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int64 result;
- PG_RETURN_INT64(val1 - val2);
+ result = arg1 - arg2;
+ /*
+ * Overflow check. If the inputs are of the same sign then their
+ * difference cannot overflow. If they are of different signs then
+ * the result should be of the same sign as the first input.
+ */
+ if (!SAMESIGN(arg1, arg2) && !SAMESIGN(result, arg1))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
Datum
int48mul(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int32 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT32(0);
- int64 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int32 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT32(0);
+ int64 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int64 result;
- PG_RETURN_INT64(val1 * val2);
+ result = arg1 * arg2;
+ /*
+ * Overflow check. We basically check to see if result / arg2 gives
+ * arg1 again. There is one case where this fails: arg2 = 0 (which
+ * cannot overflow).
+ *
+ * Since the division is likely much more expensive than the actual
+ * multiplication, we'd like to skip it where possible. The best
+ * bang for the buck seems to be to check whether both inputs are in
+ * the int32 range; if so, no overflow is possible.
+ */
+ if (arg2 != (int64) ((int32) arg2) &&
+ result/arg2 != arg1)
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
+ PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
Datum
int48div(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int32 val1 = PG_GETARG_INT32(0);
- int64 val2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
+ int32 arg1 = PG_GETARG_INT32(0);
+ int64 arg2 = PG_GETARG_INT64(1);
- if (val2 == 0)
+ if (arg2 == 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_DIVISION_BY_ZERO),
errmsg("division by zero")));
-
- PG_RETURN_INT64(val1 / val2);
+ /* No overflow is possible */
+ PG_RETURN_INT64((int64) arg1 / arg2);
}
/* Binary arithmetics
@@ -757,21 +927,21 @@ int8shr(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
int48(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int32 val = PG_GETARG_INT32(0);
+ int32 arg = PG_GETARG_INT32(0);
- PG_RETURN_INT64((int64) val);
+ PG_RETURN_INT64((int64) arg);
}
Datum
int84(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 arg = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
int32 result;
- result = (int32) val;
+ result = (int32) arg;
/* Test for overflow by reverse-conversion. */
- if ((int64) result != val)
+ if ((int64) result != arg)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
errmsg("integer out of range")));
@@ -782,24 +952,24 @@ int84(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
int28(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int16 val = PG_GETARG_INT16(0);
+ int16 arg = PG_GETARG_INT16(0);
- PG_RETURN_INT64((int64) val);
+ PG_RETURN_INT64((int64) arg);
}
Datum
int82(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 arg = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
int16 result;
- result = (int16) val;
+ result = (int16) arg;
/* Test for overflow by reverse-conversion. */
- if ((int64) result != val)
+ if ((int64) result != arg)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
- errmsg("integer out of range")));
+ errmsg("smallint out of range")));
PG_RETURN_INT16(result);
}
@@ -807,10 +977,10 @@ int82(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
i8tod(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 arg = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
float8 result;
- result = val;
+ result = arg;
PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(result);
}
@@ -821,23 +991,23 @@ i8tod(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
dtoi8(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- float8 val = PG_GETARG_FLOAT8(0);
+ float8 arg = PG_GETARG_FLOAT8(0);
int64 result;
- /* Round val to nearest integer (but it's still in float form) */
- val = rint(val);
+ /* Round arg to nearest integer (but it's still in float form) */
+ arg = rint(arg);
/*
* Does it fit in an int64? Avoid assuming that we have handy
* constants defined for the range boundaries, instead test for
* overflow by reverse-conversion.
*/
- result = (int64) val;
+ result = (int64) arg;
- if ((float8) result != val)
+ if ((float8) result != arg)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
- errmsg("integer out of range")));
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
@@ -845,10 +1015,10 @@ dtoi8(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
i8tof(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 arg = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
float4 result;
- result = val;
+ result = arg;
PG_RETURN_FLOAT4(result);
}
@@ -859,24 +1029,24 @@ i8tof(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
ftoi8(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- float4 val = PG_GETARG_FLOAT4(0);
+ float4 arg = PG_GETARG_FLOAT4(0);
int64 result;
- float8 dval;
+ float8 darg;
- /* Round val to nearest integer (but it's still in float form) */
- dval = rint(val);
+ /* Round arg to nearest integer (but it's still in float form) */
+ darg = rint(arg);
/*
* Does it fit in an int64? Avoid assuming that we have handy
* constants defined for the range boundaries, instead test for
* overflow by reverse-conversion.
*/
- result = (int64) dval;
+ result = (int64) darg;
- if ((float8) result != dval)
+ if ((float8) result != darg)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
- errmsg("integer out of range")));
+ errmsg("bigint out of range")));
PG_RETURN_INT64(result);
}
@@ -884,13 +1054,13 @@ ftoi8(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
i8tooid(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- int64 val = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
+ int64 arg = PG_GETARG_INT64(0);
Oid result;
- result = (Oid) val;
+ result = (Oid) arg;
/* Test for overflow by reverse-conversion. */
- if ((int64) result != val)
+ if ((int64) result != arg)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_NUMERIC_VALUE_OUT_OF_RANGE),
errmsg("OID out of range")));
@@ -901,9 +1071,9 @@ i8tooid(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
oidtoi8(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- Oid val = PG_GETARG_OID(0);
+ Oid arg = PG_GETARG_OID(0);
- PG_RETURN_INT64((int64) val);
+ PG_RETURN_INT64((int64) arg);
}
Datum
@@ -929,13 +1099,13 @@ text_int8(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Datum
int8_text(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
{
- /* val is int64, but easier to leave it as Datum */
- Datum val = PG_GETARG_DATUM(0);
+ /* arg is int64, but easier to leave it as Datum */
+ Datum arg = PG_GETARG_DATUM(0);
char *s;
int len;
text *result;
- s = DatumGetCString(DirectFunctionCall1(int8out, val));
+ s = DatumGetCString(DirectFunctionCall1(int8out, arg));
len = strlen(s);
result = (text *) palloc(VARHDRSZ + len);
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.46.0) at 2025-08-10 20:55:48 +0000