| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Since SSL compression is no longer recommended, turn the default in
libpq from on to off.
OpenSSL 1.1.0 and many distribution packages already turn compression
off by default, so such a server won't accept compression anyway. So
this will mainly affect users of older OpenSSL installations.
Also update the documentation to make clear that this setting is no
longer recommended.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/595cf3b1-4ffe-7f05-6f72-f72b7afa7993%402ndquadrant.com
|
|
This allows specifying an external command for prompting for or
otherwise obtaining passphrases for SSL key files. This is useful
because in many cases there is no TTY easily available during service
startup.
Also add a setting ssl_passphrase_command_supports_reload, which allows
supporting SSL configuration reload even if SSL files need passphrases.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
|
|
This was not stated in so many words anywhere. Document it to make
clear that it's a design limitation and not just an oversight or
documentation omission.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/152089733343.1222.6927268289645380498@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
It is not used for anything internally, and it cannot be relied on for
external uses, so it can just be removed. To correct recommended way to
check for a primary key is in pg_index.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/b1a24c6c-6913-f89c-674e-0704f0ed69db@2ndquadrant.com
|
|
In a top-level CALL, the values of INOUT arguments will be returned as a
result row. In PL/pgSQL, the values are assigned back to the input
arguments. In other languages, the same convention as for return a
record from a function is used. That does not require any code changes
in the PL implementations.
Reviewed-by: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
|
|
Autovacuum's 'workitem' request queue is of limited size, so requests
can fail if they arrive more quickly than autovacuum can process them.
Emit a log message when this happens, to provide better visibility of
this.
Backpatch to 10. While this represents an API change for
AutoVacuumRequestWork, that function is not yet prepared to deal with
external modules calling it, so there doesn't seem to be any risk (other
than log spam, that is.)
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Fabrízio Mello, Ildar Musin, Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoB1HrQhp6_4rTyHN5kWEJCEsG8YzsjZNt-ctoXSn5Uisw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
New wording from David G. Johnston, who noticed the unreadable original
also. Include his suggested test case as well.
Fix a typo I noticed elsewhere while doing this.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwY4Ld7ecxL_KAmaxwt0FUu5VcPPN2L4dh+3BeYbrdBa5g@mail.gmail.com
|
|
David Rowley
|
|
Amit Langote
|
|
We were independently checking ReservedBackends < MaxConnections and
max_wal_senders < MaxConnections, but because walsenders aren't allowed
to use superuser-reserved connections, that's really the wrong thing.
Correct behavior is to insist on ReservedBackends + max_wal_senders being
less than MaxConnections. Fix the code and associated documentation.
This has been wrong for a long time, but since the situation probably
hardly ever arises in the field (especially pre-v10, when the default
for max_wal_senders was zero), no back-patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28271.1520195491@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
The SSL documentation text has gotten a bit long, so add some
subsections and reorder for better flow.
|
|
The previous method worked off the full virtual address space, not just
the shared memory usage.
Author: Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Vasundhar Boddapati <bvasundhar@gmail.com>
|
|
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reported-by: Şahap Aşçı <sahapasci@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com>
|
|
Like the LDAP and SSL tests, these are not run by default but can be
selected via PG_TEST_EXTRA.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
|
|
This is analogous to the syntax allowed for VACUUM. This allows us to
avoid making new options reserved keywords and makes it easier to
allow arbitrary argument order. Oh, and it's consistent with the other
commands, too.
Author: Nathan Bossart
Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier, Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/D3FC73E2-9B1A-4DB4-8180-55F57D116B4E@amazon.com
|
|
The LIKE INCLUDING ALL clause to CREATE TABLE intuitively indicates
cloning of extended statistics on the source table, but it failed to do
so. Patch it up so that it does. Also include an INCLUDING STATISTICS
option to the LIKE clause, so that the behavior can be requested
individually, or excluded individually.
While at it, reorder the INCLUDING options, both in code and in docs, in
alphabetical order which makes more sense than feature-implementation
order that was previously used.
Backpatch this to Postgres 10, where extended statistics were
introduced, because this is seen as an oversight in a fresh feature
which is better to get consistent from the get-go instead of changing
only in pg11.
In pg11, comments on statistics objects are cloned too. In pg10 they
are not, because I (Álvaro) was too coward to change the parse node as
required to support it. Also, in pg10 I chose not to renumber the
parser symbols for the various INCLUDING options in LIKE, for the same
reason. Any corresponding user-visible changes (docs) are backpatched,
though.
Reported-by: Stephen Froehlich
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CY1PR0601MB1927315B45667A1B679D0FD5E5EF0@CY1PR0601MB1927.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
|
|
|
|
Replace "checkpoint segment" with "WAL segment".
Reported-by: Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma@gmail.com>
|
|
In PostgreSQL 9.5, the documentation for pg_stat_replication was moved,
so some of the links pointed to an appropriate location.
Author: Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
The SSL and LDAP test suites are not run by default, as they are not
secure for multi-user environments. This commit adds an extra make
variable to optionally enable them, for example:
make check-world PG_TEST_EXTRA='ldap ssl'
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
|
|
The new column distinguishes normal functions, procedures, aggregates,
and window functions. This replaces the existing columns proisagg and
proiswindow, and replaces the convention that procedures are indicated
by prorettype == 0. Also change prorettype to be VOIDOID for procedures.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
|
|
Author: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180217140305.GB31338@paquier.xyz
|
|
Commit 924bcf4f16d added WaitForBackgroundWorkerShutdown, but didn't
add it to the documentation. Fix that and two small spelling errors in
the WaitForBackgroundWorkerStartup paragraph.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/C8738949-0350-4999-A1DA-26E209FF248D@yesql.se
|
|
Author: Ildar Musin
Reviewed-By: Fabian Coelho
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6376ed81-3ce8-14f4-4758-099872f4ce7d@postgrespro.ru
|
|
Commit ff963b393 added two identical copies of this row.
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d8j8tdevb7x.fsf@dalvik.ping.uio.no
|
|
Thomas Munro
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=3g1hhbFzYkR_QT9RmBvsGX4UaeCtX-4Js8OOEMmFeaSQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Turn off man.endnotes.are.numbered parameter, which we don't need, but
which increases performance vastly if off. Also turn on
man.output.quietly, which also makes things a bit faster, but which is
also less useful now as a progress indicator because the build is so
fast now.
|
|
The changes in the CREATE POLICY man page from commit
87c2a17fee784c7e1004ba3d3c5d8147da676783 triggered a stylesheet bug that
created some warning messages and incorrect output. This installs a
workaround.
Also improve the whitespace a bit so it looks better.
|
|
Michael Paquier
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20180209135327.GC29003@paquier.xyz
|
|
Security: CVE-2018-1058
|
|
The ability to create like-named objects in different schemas opens up
the potential for users to change the behavior of other users' queries,
maliciously or accidentally. When you connect to a PostgreSQL server,
you should remove from your search_path any schema for which a user
other than yourself or superusers holds the CREATE privilege. If you do
not, other users holding CREATE privilege can redefine the behavior of
your commands, causing them to perform arbitrary SQL statements under
your identity. "SET search_path = ..." and "SELECT
pg_catalog.set_config(...)" are not vulnerable to such hijacking, so one
can use either as the first command of a session. As special
exceptions, the following client applications behave as documented
regardless of search_path settings and schema privileges: clusterdb
createdb createlang createuser dropdb droplang dropuser ecpg (not
programs it generates) initdb oid2name pg_archivecleanup pg_basebackup
pg_config pg_controldata pg_ctl pg_dump pg_dumpall pg_isready
pg_receivewal pg_recvlogical pg_resetwal pg_restore pg_rewind pg_standby
pg_test_fsync pg_test_timing pg_upgrade pg_waldump reindexdb vacuumdb
vacuumlo. Not included are core client programs that run user-specified
SQL commands, namely psql and pgbench. PostgreSQL encourages non-core
client applications to do likewise.
Document this in the context of libpq connections, psql connections,
dblink connections, ECPG connections, extension packaging, and schema
usage patterns. The principal defense for applications is "SELECT
pg_catalog.set_config('search_path', '', false)", and the principal
defense for databases is "REVOKE CREATE ON SCHEMA public FROM PUBLIC".
Either one is sufficient to prevent attack. After a REVOKE, consider
auditing the public schema for objects named like pg_catalog objects.
Authors of SECURITY DEFINER functions use some of the same defenses, and
the CREATE FUNCTION reference page already covered them thoroughly.
This is a good opportunity to audit SECURITY DEFINER functions for
robust security practice.
Back-patch to 9.3 (all supported versions).
Reviewed by Michael Paquier and Jonathan S. Katz. Reported by Arseniy
Sharoglazov.
Security: CVE-2018-1058
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is mostly cosmetic, but it might fix build failures, on some
platform, when copying from the documentation.
Back-patch to 9.3 (all supported versions).
|
|
It seems some people are bothered by the outdated MD5 appearing in
example code. So replace it with more modern alternatives or by
a different example function.
Reported-by: Jon Wolski <jonwolski@gmail.com>
|
|
Add the user-callable functions sha224, sha256, sha384, sha512. We
already had these in the C code to support SCRAM, but there was no test
coverage outside of the SCRAM tests. Adding these as user-callable
functions allows writing some tests. Also, we have a user-callable md5
function but no more modern alternative, which led to wide use of md5 as
a general-purpose hash function, which leads to occasional complaints
about using md5.
Also mark the existing md5 functions as leak-proof.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
|
|
Move the "additional restrictions" comment to ALTER TABLE ADD
CONSTRAINT instead of ADD CONSTRAINT USING INDEX; and in the latter
instead indicate that partitioned tables are unsupported
Noted by David G. Johnston
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwY4Ld7ecxL_KAmaxwt0FUu5VcPPN2L4dh+3BeYbrdBa5g@mail.gmail.com
|
|
If we restrict unique constraints on partitioned tables so that they
must always include the partition key, then our standard approach to
unique indexes already works --- each unique key is forced to exist
within a single partition, so enforcing the unique restriction in each
index individually is enough to have it enforced globally. Therefore we
can implement unique indexes on partitions by simply removing a few
restrictions (and adding others.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171222212921.hi6hg6pem2w2t36z@alvherre.pgsql
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171229230607.3iib6b62fn3uaf47@alvherre.pgsql
Reviewed-by: Simon Riggs, Jesper Pedersen, Peter Eisentraut, Jaime
Casanova, Amit Langote
|
|
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/ad24e4f4-6481-066e-e3fb-6ef4a3121882%402ndquadrant.com
|
|
One example in create_table.sgml claimed to be showing table constraint
syntax, but it was really column constraint syntax due to the omission
of a comma. This is both wrong and confusing, so fix it in all
supported branches.
Per report from neil@postgrescompare.com.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/151871659877.1393.2431103178451978795@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
Formerly, DTYPE_REC was used only for variables declared as "record";
variables of named composite types used DTYPE_ROW, which is faster for
some purposes but much less flexible. In particular, the ROW code paths
are entirely incapable of dealing with DDL-caused changes to the number
or data types of the columns of a row variable, once a particular plpgsql
function has been parsed for the first time in a session. And, since the
stored representation of a ROW isn't a tuple, there wasn't any easy way
to deal with variables of domain-over-composite types, since the domain
constraint checking code would expect the value to be checked to be a
tuple. A lesser, but still real, annoyance is that ROW format cannot
represent a true NULL composite value, only a row of per-field NULL
values, which is not exactly the same thing.
Hence, switch to using DTYPE_REC for all composite-typed variables,
whether "record", named composite type, or domain over named composite
type. DTYPE_ROW remains but is used only for its native purpose, to
represent a fixed-at-compile-time list of variables, for instance the
targets of an INTO clause.
To accomplish this without taking significant performance losses, introduce
infrastructure that allows storing composite-type variables as "expanded
objects", similar to the "expanded array" infrastructure introduced in
commit 1dc5ebc90. A composite variable's value is thereby kept (most of
the time) in the form of separate Datums, so that field accesses and
updates are not much more expensive than they were in the ROW format.
This holds the line, more or less, on performance of variables of named
composite types in field-access-intensive microbenchmarks, and makes
variables declared "record" perform much better than before in similar
tests. In addition, the logic involved with enforcing composite-domain
constraints against updates of individual fields is in the expanded
record infrastructure not plpgsql proper, so that it might be reusable
for other purposes.
In further support of this, introduce a typcache feature for assigning a
unique-within-process identifier to each distinct tuple descriptor of
interest; in particular, DDL alterations on composite types result in a new
identifier for that type. This allows very cheap detection of the need to
refresh tupdesc-dependent data. This improves on the "tupDescSeqNo" idea
I had in commit 687f096ea: that assigned identifying sequence numbers to
successive versions of individual composite types, but the numbers were not
unique across different types, nor was there support for assigning numbers
to registered record types.
In passing, allow plpgsql functions to accept as well as return type
"record". There was no good reason for the old restriction, and it
was out of step with most of the other PLs.
Tom Lane, reviewed by Pavel Stehule
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8962.1514399547@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
|
|
This also makes procedures work in psql's \ef and \sf commands.
Reported-by: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
|
|
Noticed while reviewing nearby text
|
|
We can now create indexes more easily than before, so update this
chapter to use the simpler instructions.
After an idea of Amit Langote. I (Álvaro) opted to do more invasive
surgery and remove the previous suggestion to create per-partition
indexes, which his patch left in place.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/eafaaeb1-f0fd-d010-dd45-07db0300f645@lab.ntt.co.jp
Author: Amit Langote, Álvaro Herrera
|
|
- table_constraints.enforced
- triggers.action_order
- triggers.action_reference_old_table
- triggers.action_reference_new_table
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
|
|
Since we now support the server side handler for git over https (so
we're no longer using the "dumb protocol"), make https the primary
choice for cloning the repository, and the git protocol the secondary
choice.
In passing, also change the links to git-scm.com from http to https.
Reviewed by Stefan Kaltenbrunner and David G. Johnston
|
|
This patch adds the ability to use "RANGE offset PRECEDING/FOLLOWING"
frame boundaries in window functions. We'd punted on that back in the
original patch to add window functions, because it was not clear how to
do it in a reasonably data-type-extensible fashion. That problem is
resolved here by adding the ability for btree operator classes to provide
an "in_range" support function that defines how to add or subtract the
RANGE offset value. Factoring it this way also allows the operator class
to avoid overflow problems near the ends of the datatype's range, if it
wishes to expend effort on that. (In the committed patch, the integer
opclasses handle that issue, but it did not seem worth the trouble to
avoid overflow failures for datetime types.)
The patch includes in_range support for the integer_ops opfamily
(int2/int4/int8) as well as the standard datetime types. Support for
other numeric types has been requested, but that seems like suitable
material for a follow-on patch.
In addition, the patch adds GROUPS mode which counts the offset in
ORDER-BY peer groups rather than rows, and it adds the frame_exclusion
options specified by SQL:2011. As far as I can see, we are now fully
up to spec on window framing options.
Existing behaviors remain unchanged, except that I changed the errcode
for a couple of existing error reports to meet the SQL spec's expectation
that negative "offset" values should be reported as SQLSTATE 22013.
Internally and in relevant parts of the documentation, we now consistently
use the terminology "offset PRECEDING/FOLLOWING" rather than "value
PRECEDING/FOLLOWING", since the term "value" is confusingly vague.
Oliver Ford, reviewed and whacked around some by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGMVOdu9sivPAxbNN0X+q19Sfv9edEPv=HibOJhB14TJv_RCQg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Up to now, useful info for writing a new btree opclass has been buried
in the backend's nbtree/README file. Let's move it into the SGML docs,
in preparation for extending it with info about "in_range" functions
in the upcoming window RANGE patch.
To do this, I chose to create a new chapter for btree indexes in Part VII
(Internals), parallel to the chapters that exist for the newer index AMs.
This is a pretty short chapter as-is. At some point somebody might care
to flesh it out with more detail about btree internals, but that is
beyond the scope of my ambition for today.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/23141.1517874668@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
