| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Make a common replication origin name formatting function to replace
multiple snprintf() expressions. This also includes logic previously done
by ReplicationOriginNameForTablesync().
This makes the code to generate the origin name consistent among apply
worker and tablesync worker.
Author: Peter Smith
Reviewed-By: Aleksander Alekseev
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut%2BPsa8hhfSE6ozUK-ih7GkQziAVAf4f3bqiXEj2nQiu-43g%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
This is useful as a way for extensions to process COPY TO rows in the
way they see fit (say auditing, analytics, backend, etc.) without the
need to invoke an external process running as the OS user running the
backend through PROGRAM that requires superuser rights. COPY FROM
already provides a similar callback for logical replication. For COPY
TO, the callback is triggered when we are ready to send a row in
CopySendEndOfRow(), which is the same code path as when sending a row
to a frontend or a pipe/file.
A small test module, test_copy_callbacks, is added to provide some
coverage for this facility.
Author: Bilva Sanaba, Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/253C21D1-FCEB-41D9-A2AF-E6517015B7D7@amazon.com
|
|
There are a number of bugs in this area. Two of them are fixed here,
namely:
1. get_relation_idx_constraint_oid does not restrict the type of
constraint that's returned, so with sufficient bad luck it can
return the OID of a foreign key constraint. This has the effect that
a primary key in a partition can end up as a child of a foreign key,
which makes no sense (it needs to be the child of the equivalent
primary key.)
Change the API contract so that only index-backed constraints are
returned, mimicking get_constraint_index().
2. Both CloneFkReferenced and CloneFkReferencing clone a
self-referencing foreign key, so the partition ends up with
a duplicate foreign key. Change the former function to ignore such
constraints.
Add some tests to verify that things are better now. (However, these
new tests show some additional misbehavior that will be fixed later --
namely that there's a constraint marked NOT VALID.)
Backpatch to 12, where these constraints are possible at all.
Author: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220603154232.1715b14c@karst
|
|
In a similar effort to f01592f91, here we mostly rename shadowed local
variables to remove the warnings produced when compiling with
-Wshadow=compatible-local.
This fixes 63 warnings and leaves just 5.
Author: Justin Pryzby, David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby
Discussion https://postgr.es/m/20220817145434.GC26426%40telsasoft.com
|
|
This cleans up a couple of areas:
- Remove XLogSegNo calculation for the last WAL segment in backup in
xlog.c (7d70809 has moved this logic entirely to xlogbackup.c when
building the contents of the backup history file).
- Remove check on log_min_duration in analyze.c, as it is already true
where this code path is reached.
- Simplify call to find_option() in guc.c.
Author: Ranier Vilela
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQArCDQQiPiFR16=yu9k5s2tp4tgEe1U1ZbkW4ofx81AWWQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Both check_application_name() and check_cluster_name() use
pg_clean_ascii() but didn't release the memory. Depending on when the
GUC is set, this might be cleaned up at some later time or it would
leak postmaster memory once. In any case, it seems better not to have
to rely on such analysis and make the code locally robust. Also, this
makes Valgrind happier.
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoBmFNy9MPfA0UUbMubQqH3AaK5U3mrv6pSeWrwCk3LJ8g@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This prevents marking the argument string for translation for gettext,
and it also prevents the given string (which is already translated) from
being translated at runtime.
Also, mark the strings used as arguments to check_rolespec_name for
translation.
Backpatch all the way back as appropriate. None of this is caught by
any tests (necessarily so), so I verified it manually.
|
|
There are still some alignment-related failures in the buildfarm,
which might or might not be able to be fixed quickly, but I've also
just realized that it increased the size of many WAL records by 4 bytes
because a block reference contains a RelFileLocator. The effect of that
hasn't been studied or discussed, so revert for now.
|
|
Its API is quite strange, and since there's only one caller, there's no
reason for it to be a separate function in the first place. Inline it
instead.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220927124249.4zdzzlz6had7k3x2@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
RelFileNumbers are now assigned using a separate counter, instead of
being assigned from the OID counter. This counter never wraps around:
if all 2^56 possible RelFileNumbers are used, an internal error
occurs. As the cluster is limited to 2^64 total bytes of WAL, this
limitation should not cause a problem in practice.
If the counter were 64 bits wide rather than 56 bits wide, we would
need to increase the width of the BufferTag, which might adversely
impact buffer lookup performance. Also, this lets us use bigint for
pg_class.relfilenode and other places where these values are exposed
at the SQL level without worrying about overflow.
This should remove the need to keep "tombstone" files around until
the next checkpoint when relations are removed. We do that to keep
RelFileNumbers from being recycled, but now that won't happen
anyway. However, this patch doesn't actually change anything in
this area; it just makes it possible for a future patch to do so.
Dilip Kumar, based on an idea from Andres Freund, who also reviewed
some earlier versions of the patch. Further review and some
wordsmithing by me. Also reviewed at various points by Ashutosh
Sharma, Vignesh C, Amul Sul, Álvaro Herrera, and Tom Lane.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobp7+7kmi4gkq7Y+4AM9fTvL+O1oQ4-5gFTT+6Ng-dQ=g@mail.gmail.com
|
|
While at it, remove an unused queryString parameter from
CheckPubRelationColumnList() and make other minor stylistic changes.
Backpatch to 15.
Reported by Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hou zj <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220926.160426.454497059203258582.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
|
Commit 25936fd46 adjusted things so that the "storeslot" we use
for remapping trigger tuples would have adequate lifespan, but it
neglected to consider the lifespan of the tuple descriptor that
the slot depends on. It turns out that in at least some cases, the
tupdesc we are passing is a refcounted tupdesc, and the refcount for
the slot's reference can get assigned to a resource owner having
different lifespan than the slot does. That leads to an error like
"tupdesc reference 0x7fdef236a1b8 is not owned by resource owner
SubTransaction". Worse, because of a second oversight in the same
commit, we'd try to free the same tupdesc refcount again while
cleaning up after that error, leading to recursive errors and an
"ERRORDATA_STACK_SIZE exceeded" PANIC.
To fix the initial problem, let's just make a non-refcounted copy
of the tupdesc we're supposed to use. That seems likely to guard
against additional problems, since there's no strong reason for
this code to assume that what it's given is a refcounted tupdesc;
in which case there's an independent hazard of the tupdesc having
shorter lifespan than the slot does. (I didn't bother trying to
free said copy, since it should go away anyway when the (sub)
transaction context is cleaned up.)
The other issue can be fixed by making the code added to
AfterTriggerFreeQuery work like the rest of that function, ie be
sure that it doesn't try to free the same slot twice in the event
of recursive error cleanup.
While here, also clean up minor stylistic issues in the test case
added by 25936fd46: don't use "create or replace function", as any
name collision within the tests is likely to have ill effects
that that won't mask; and don't use function names as generic as
trigger_function1, especially if you're not going to drop them
at the end of the test stanza.
Per bug #17607 from Thomas Mc Kay. Back-patch to v12, as the
previous fix was.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17607-bd8ccc81226f7f80@postgresql.org
|
|
|
|
We previously thought that allowing such cases can confuse users when they
specify DROP TABLES IN SCHEMA but that doesn't seem to be the case based
on discussion. This helps to uplift the restriction during
ALTER TABLE ... SET SCHEMA which used to ensure that we couldn't end up
with a publication having both a schema and the same schema's table.
To allow this, we need to forbid having any schema on a publication if
column lists on a table are specified (and vice versa). This is because
otherwise we still need a restriction during ALTER TABLE ... SET SCHEMA to
forbid cases where it could lead to a publication having both a schema and
the same schema's table with column list.
Based on suggestions by Peter Eisentraut.
Author: Hou Zhijie and Vignesh C
Reviewed-By: Peter Smith, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 15, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2729c9e2-9aac-8cda-f2f4-34f2bcc18f4e@enterprisedb.com
|
|
This may be a bit too subtle, but removing that word from there makes
this clause no longer a perfect parallel of the GRANT variant "ALL
TABLES IN SCHEMA": indeed, for publications what we record is the schema
itself, not the tables therein, which means that any tables added to the
schema in the future are also published. This is completely different
to what GRANT does, which is affect only the tables that exist when the
command is executed.
There isn't resounding support for this change, but there are a few
positive votes and no opposition. Because the time to 15 RC1 is very
short, let's get this out now.
Backpatch to 15.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2729c9e2-9aac-8cda-f2f4-34f2bcc18f4e
|
|
This comment has been wrong since its introduction in commit 0d5f05cde;
backpatch to v12 where that came in.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK14VGf-xQjGQN4o1QyAbXAaxugU5%3DqfcmTDh1iufUDnV_w%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Autoconf is showing its age, fewer and fewer contributors know how to wrangle
it. Recursive make has a lot of hard to resolve dependency issues and slow
incremental rebuilds. Our home-grown MSVC build system is hard to maintain for
developers not using Windows and runs tests serially. While these and other
issues could individually be addressed with incremental improvements, together
they seem best addressed by moving to a more modern build system.
After evaluating different build system choices, we chose to use meson, to a
good degree based on the adoption by other open source projects.
We decided that it's more realistic to commit a relatively early version of
the new build system and mature it in tree.
This commit adds an initial version of a meson based build system. It supports
building postgres on at least AIX, FreeBSD, Linux, macOS, NetBSD, OpenBSD,
Solaris and Windows (however only gcc is supported on aix, solaris). For
Windows/MSVC postgres can now be built with ninja (faster, particularly for
incremental builds) and msbuild (supporting the visual studio GUI, but
building slower).
Several aspects (e.g. Windows rc file generation, PGXS compatibility, LLVM
bitcode generation, documentation adjustments) are done in subsequent commits
requiring further review. Other aspects (e.g. not installing test-only
extensions) are not yet addressed.
When building on Windows with msbuild, builds are slower when using a visual
studio version older than 2019, because those versions do not support
MultiToolTask, required by meson for intra-target parallelism.
The plan is to remove the MSVC specific build system in src/tools/msvc soon
after reaching feature parity. However, we're not planning to remove the
autoconf/make build system in the near future. Likely we're going to keep at
least the parts required for PGXS to keep working around until all supported
versions build with meson.
Some initial help for postgres developers is at
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Meson
With contributions from Thomas Munro, John Naylor, Stone Tickle and others.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Author: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-By: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211012083721.hvixq4pnh2pixr3j@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
We check that the ICU locale is only specified if the ICU locale
provider is selected. But we did that too early. We need to wait
until we load the settings of the template database, since that could
also set what the locale provider is.
Reported-by: Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9ba4cd1ea6ed6b7b15c0ff15e6f540cd@postgrespro.ru
|
|
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in optimizer, parser,
utility, libpq, and "commands" code, as well as in remaining library
code. Do the same for all code related to frontend programs (with the
exception of pg_dump/pg_dumpall related code).
Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will handle
ecpg and pg_dump/pg_dumpall.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in storage, catalog,
access method, executor, and logical replication code, as well as in
miscellaneous utility/library code.
Like other recent commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this
commit was written with help from clang-tidy. Later commits will do the
same for other parts of the codebase.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
Check in CREATE DATABASE and initdb that the selected encoding is
supported by ICU. Before, they would pass but users would later get
an error from the server when they tried to use the database.
Also document that initdb sets the encoding to UTF8 by default if the
ICU locale provider is chosen.
Author: Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6dd6db0984d86a51b7255ba79f111971@postgrespro.ru
|
|
While at it, make ellipses formatting consistent when describing SQL statements.
Ekaterina Kiryanova and Alexander Lakhin
Reviewed by myself and Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/eed5cec0-a542-53da-6a5e-7789c6ed9817%40postgrespro.ru
Backpatch only the grammar fix to v15
|
|
guc.c has grown to be one of our largest .c files, making it
a bottleneck for compilation. It's also acquired a bunch of
knowledge that'd be better kept elsewhere, because of our not
very good habit of putting variable-specific check hooks here.
Hence, split it up along these lines:
* guc.c itself retains just the core GUC housekeeping mechanisms.
* New file guc_funcs.c contains the SET/SHOW interfaces and some
SQL-accessible functions for GUC manipulation.
* New file guc_tables.c contains the data arrays that define the
built-in GUC variables, along with some already-exported constant
tables.
* GUC check/assign/show hook functions are moved to the variable's
home module, whenever that's clearly identifiable. A few hard-
to-classify hooks ended up in commands/variable.c, which was
already a home for miscellaneous GUC hook functions.
To avoid cluttering a lot more header files with #include "guc.h",
I also invented a new header file utils/guc_hooks.h and put all
the GUC hook functions' declarations there, regardless of their
originating module. That allowed removal of #include "guc.h"
from some existing headers. The fallout from that (hopefully
all caught here) demonstrates clearly why such inclusions are
best minimized: there are a lot of files that, for example,
were getting array.h at two or more levels of remove, despite
not having any connection at all to GUCs in themselves.
There is some very minor code beautification here, such as
renaming a couple of inconsistently-named hook functions
and improving some comments. But mostly this just moves
code from point A to point B and deals with the ensuing
needs for #include adjustments and exporting a few functions
that previously weren't exported.
Patch by me, per a suggestion from Andres Freund; thanks also
to Michael Paquier for the idea to invent guc_funcs.c.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/587607.1662836699@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
In commit f6c5edb8ab, we started to drop the replication origin slots
before tablesync worker exits to avoid consuming more slots than required.
We were dropping the replication origin in the same transaction where we
were marking the tablesync state as SYNCDONE. Now, if there is any error
after we have dropped the origin but before we commit the containing
transaction, the in-memory state of replication progress won't be rolled
back. Due to this, after the restart, tablesync worker can start streaming
from the wrong location and can apply the already processed transaction.
To fix this, we need to opportunistically drop the origin after marking
the tablesync state as SYNCDONE. Even, if the tablesync worker fails to
remove the replication origin before exit, the apply worker ensures to
clean it up afterward.
Reported by Tom Lane as per buildfarm.
Diagnosed-by: Masahiko Sawada
Author: Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-By: Masahiko Sawada, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220714115155.GA5439@depesz.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoAw0Oofi4kiDpJBOwpYyBBBkJj=sLUOn4Gd2GjUAKG-fw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This adds some uses of the new palloc/pg_malloc variants here and
there as a demonstration and test. This is kept separate from the
actual API patch, since the latter might be backpatched at some point.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/bb755632-2a43-d523-36f8-a1e7a389a907@enterprisedb.com
|
|
Because of inadequate filtering, the check triggers were confusing the
search for action triggers in GetForeignKeyActionTriggers and vice-versa
in GetForeignKeyCheckTriggers; this confusion results in seemingly
random assertion failures, and can have real impact in non-asserting
builds depending on catalog order. Change these functions so that they
correctly ignore triggers that are not relevant to each side.
To reduce the odds of further problems, do not break out of the
searching loop in assertion builds. This break is likely to hide bugs;
without it, we would have detected this bug immediately.
This problem was introduced by f4566345cf40, so backpatch to 15 where
that commit first appeared.
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220908172029.sejft2ppckbo6oh5@awork3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4104619.1662663056@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
During ALTER TABLE ATTACH PARTITION, if the name of a parent's foreign
key constraint is already used on the partition, the code tries to
choose another one before the FK attributes list has been populated,
so the resulting constraint name was "<relname>__fkey" instead of
"<relname>_<attrs>_fkey". Repair, and add a test case.
Backpatch to 12. In 11, the code to attach a partition was not smart
enough to cope with conflicting constraint names, so the problem doesn't
exist there.
Author: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220901184156.738ebee5@karst
|
|
This commit raises a warning message for a combination of options
('copy_data = true' and 'origin = none') during CREATE/ALTER subscription
operations if the publication tables were also replicated from other
publishers.
During replication, we can skip the data from other origins as we have that
information in WAL but that is not possible during initial sync so we raise
a warning if there is such a possibility.
Author: Vignesh C
Reviewed-By: Peter Smith, Amit Kapila, Jonathan Katz, Shi yu, Wang wei
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm0gwjY_4HFxvvty01BOT01q_fJLKQ3pWP9=9orqubhjcQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
As noted by Justin Pryzby, just I forgot to commit locally before creating
a patch file.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220901053146.GI31833@telsasoft.com
|
|
Here we remove some dead code from CreateTriggerFiringOn() which was
attempting to find the relevant child partition index corresponding to the
given indexOid. As it turned out, thanks to -Wshadow=compatible-local,
this code was buggy as the code which was finding the child indexes
assigned those to a shadowed variable that directly went out of scope.
The code which thought it was looking at the List of child indexes was
always referencing an empty List.
On further investigation, this code is dead. We never call
CreateTriggerFiringOn() passing a valid indexOid in a way that the
function would actually ever execute the code in question. So, for lack
of a way to test if a fix actually works, let's just remove the dead code
instead.
As a reminder, if there is ever a need to resurrect this code, an Assert()
has been added to remind future feature developers that they might need to
write some code to find the corresponding child index.
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220819211824.GX26426@telsasoft.com
|
|
The reverts the following and makes some associated cleanups:
commit f79b803dc: Common SQL/JSON clauses
commit f4fb45d15: SQL/JSON constructors
commit 5f0adec25: Make STRING an unreserved_keyword.
commit 33a377608: IS JSON predicate
commit 1a36bc9db: SQL/JSON query functions
commit 606948b05: SQL JSON functions
commit 49082c2cc: RETURNING clause for JSON() and JSON_SCALAR()
commit 4e34747c8: JSON_TABLE
commit fadb48b00: PLAN clauses for JSON_TABLE
commit 2ef6f11b0: Reduce running time of jsonb_sqljson test
commit 14d3f24fa: Further improve jsonb_sqljson parallel test
commit a6baa4bad: Documentation for SQL/JSON features
commit b46bcf7a4: Improve readability of SQL/JSON documentation.
commit 112fdb352: Fix finalization for json_objectagg and friends
commit fcdb35c32: Fix transformJsonBehavior
commit 4cd8717af: Improve a couple of sql/json error messages
commit f7a605f63: Small cleanups in SQL/JSON code
commit 9c3d25e17: Fix JSON_OBJECTAGG uniquefying bug
commit a79153b7a: Claim SQL standard compliance for SQL/JSON features
commit a1e7616d6: Rework SQL/JSON documentation
commit 8d9f9634e: Fix errors in copyfuncs/equalfuncs support for JSON node types.
commit 3c633f32b: Only allow returning string types or bytea from json_serialize
commit 67b26703b: expression eval: Fix EEOP_JSON_CONSTRUCTOR and EEOP_JSONEXPR size.
The release notes are also adjusted.
Backpatch to release 15.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/40d2c882-bcac-19a9-754d-4299e1d87ac7@postgresql.org
|
|
Before now, the cutoffs that VACUUM used to determine which XIDs/MXIDs
to freeze were determined at the start of each VACUUM by taking related
cutoffs that represent which XIDs/MXIDs VACUUM should treat as still
running, and subtracting an XID/MXID age based value controlled by GUCs
like vacuum_freeze_min_age. The FreezeLimit cutoff (XID freeze cutoff)
was derived by subtracting an XID age value from OldestXmin, while the
MultiXactCutoff cutoff (MXID freeze cutoff) was derived by subtracting
an MXID age value from OldestMxact. This approach didn't match the
approach used nearby to determine whether this VACUUM operation should
be an aggressive VACUUM or not.
VACUUM now uses the standard approach instead: it subtracts the same
age-based values from next XID/next MXID (rather than subtracting from
OldestXmin/OldestMxact). This approach is simpler and more uniform.
Most of the time it will have only a negligible impact on how and when
VACUUM freezes. It will occasionally make VACUUM more robust in the
event of problems caused by long running transaction. These are cases
where OldestXmin and OldestMxact are held back by so much that they
attain an age that is a significant fraction of the value of age-based
settings like vacuum_freeze_min_age.
There is no principled reason why freezing should be affected in any way
by the presence of a long-running transaction -- at least not before the
point that the OldestXmin and OldestMxact limits used by each VACUUM
operation attain an age that makes it unsafe to freeze some of the
XIDs/MXIDs whose age exceeds the value of the relevant age-based
settings. The new approach should at least make freezing degrade more
gracefully than before, even in the most extreme cases.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkOv5CEeyOO=c91XnT5WBR_0gii0Wn5UbZhJ=4TTykDYg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Currently, the replication origin tracking of the tablesync worker is
dropped by the apply worker. So, there will be a small lag between the
tablesync worker exit and its origin tracking got removed. In the
meantime, new tablesync workers can be launched and will try to set up
a new origin tracking. This can lead the system to reach max configured
limit (max_replication_slots) even if the user has configured the max
limit considering the number of tablesync workers required in the system.
We decided not to back-patch as this can occur in very narrow
circumstances and users have to option to increase the configured limit by
increasing max_replication_slots.
Reported-by: Hubert Depesz Lubaczewski
Author: Ajin Cherian
Reviwed-by: Masahiko Sawada, Peter Smith, Hou Zhijie, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220714115155.GA5439@depesz.com
|
|
Oversights in commits 0b018fab and f3c15cbe.
|
|
|
|
In a similar effort to f01592f91, here we're targetting fixing the
warnings where we've deemed the shadowing variable to serve a close enough
purpose to the shadowed variable just to reuse the shadowed version and
not declare the shadowing variable at all.
By my count, this takes the warning count from 106 down to 71.
Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220825020839.GT2342@telsasoft.com
|
|
The GRANT statement can now specify WITH INHERIT TRUE or WITH
INHERIT FALSE to control whether the member inherits the granted
role's permissions. For symmetry, you can now likewise write
WITH ADMIN TRUE or WITH ADMIN FALSE to turn ADMIN OPTION on or off.
If a GRANT does not specify WITH INHERIT, the behavior based on
whether the member role is marked INHERIT or NOINHERIT. This means
that if all roles are marked INHERIT or NOINHERIT before any role
grants are performed, the behavior is identical to what we had before;
otherwise, it's different, because ALTER ROLE [NO]INHERIT now only
changes the default behavior of future grants, and has no effect on
existing ones.
Patch by me. Reviewed and testing by Nathan Bossart and Tushar Ahuja,
with design-level comments from various others.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmoa5Sf4PiWrfxA=sGzDKg0Ojo3dADw=wAHOhR9dggV=RmQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The code took the LOCALE option as the default/fallback for
ICU_LOCALE, but this was neither documented nor intended, so remove
it. (It was probably left in from an earlier patch version.)
Reported-by: Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/f385ba25e7f8be427b8c582e5cca7d79%40postgrespro.ru#515a31c5429d6d37ad1d5c9d66962a1e
|
|
These should have been included in 421892a19 as these shadowed variable
warnings can also be fixed by adjusting the scope of the shadowed variable
to put the declaration for it in an inner scope.
This is part of the same effort as f01592f91.
By my count, this takes the warning count from 114 down to 106.
Author: David Rowley and Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrwLGBP%2BYw9vriayyf%3DXR4uPWP5jr6cQhP9au_kaDUhbA%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
In a similar effort to f01592f91, here we're targetting fixing the
warnings that -Wshadow=compatible-local produces that we can fix by moving
a variable to an inner scope to stop that variable from being shadowed by
another variable declared somewhere later in the function.
All of the warnings being fixed here are changing the scope of variables
which are being used as an iterator for a "for" loop. In each instance,
the fix happens to be changing the for loop to use the C99 type
initialization. Much of this code likely pre-dates our use of C99.
Reducing the scope of the outer scoped variable seems like the safest way
to fix these. Renaming seems more likely to risk patches using the wrong
variable. Reducing the scope is more likely to result in a compilation
failure after applying some future patch rather than introducing bugs with
it.
By my count, this takes the warning count from 129 down to 114.
Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrwLGBP%2BYw9vriayyf%3DXR4uPWP5jr6cQhP9au_kaDUhbA%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Previously, membership of role A in role B could be recorded in the
catalog tables only once. This meant that a new grant of role A to
role B would overwrite the previous grant. For other object types, a
new grant of permission on an object - in this case role A - exists
along side the existing grant provided that the grantor is different.
Either grant can be revoked independently of the other, and
permissions remain so long as at least one grant remains. Make role
grants work similarly.
Previously, when granting membership in a role, the superuser could
specify any role whatsoever as the grantor, but for other object types,
the grantor of record must be either the owner of the object, or a
role that currently has privileges to perform a similar GRANT.
Implement the same scheme for role grants, treating the bootstrap
superuser as the role owner since roles do not have owners. This means
that attempting to revoke a grant, or admin option on a grant, can now
fail if there are dependent privileges, and that CASCADE can be used
to revoke these. It also means that you can't grant ADMIN OPTION on
a role back to a user who granted it directly or indirectly to you,
similar to how you can't give WITH GRANT OPTION on a privilege back
to a role which granted it directly or indirectly to you.
Previously, only the superuser could specify GRANTED BY with a user
other than the current user. Relax that rule to allow the grantor
to be any role whose privileges the current user posseses. This
doesn't improve compatibility with what we do for other object types,
where support for GRANTED BY is entirely vestigial, but it makes this
feature more usable and seems to make sense to change at the same time
we're changing related behaviors.
Along the way, fix "ALTER GROUP group_name ADD USER user_name" to
require the same privileges as "GRANT group_name TO user_name".
Previously, CREATEROLE privileges were sufficient for either, but
only the former form was permissible with ADMIN OPTION on the role.
Now, either CREATEROLE or ADMIN OPTION on the role suffices for
either spelling.
Patch by me, reviewed by Stephen Frost.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaFr-RZeQ+WoQ5nKPv97oT9+aDgK_a5+qWHSgbDsMp1Vg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
An assertion would fail when creating a database with libc locale
provider from a template database with icu locale provider.
Reported-by: Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/f385ba25e7f8be427b8c582e5cca7d79%40postgrespro.ru#515a31c5429d6d37ad1d5c9d66962a1e
|
|
As such the current usage of & won't produce incorrect results but it
would be better to use && to short-circuit the evaluation of second
condition when the same is not required.
Author: Ranier Vilela
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Bharath Rupireddy
Backpatch-through: 15, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQApL8QcoYwQuutkWKY_h7gBY8F0Xs34YKfc7-G0i83K_pw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Consistently avoid trusting a sample of only one page at the point that
VACUUM determines a new reltuples for the target table (though only when
the table is larger than a single page). This is follow-up work to
commit 74388a1a, which added a heuristic to prevent reltuples from
becoming distorted by successive VACUUM operations that each scan only a
single heap page (which was itself more or less a bugfix for an issue in
commit 44fa8488, which simplified VACUUM's handling of scanned pages).
The original bugfix commit did not account for certain remaining cases
that where not affected by its "2% of total relpages" heuristic. This
happened with relations that are small enough that just one of its pages
exceeded the 2% threshold, yet still big enough for VACUUM to deem
skipping most of its pages via the visibility map worthwhile. reltuples
could still become distorted over time with such a table, at least in
scenarios where the VACUUM command is run repeatedly and without the
table itself ever changing.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzk7d4m3oEbEWkWQKd+gz-eD_peBvdXVk1a_KBygXadFeg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 15-, where the rules for scanned pages changed.
|
|
Initialize shared memory allocated for index stats to avoid a hard
crash. This was possible when parallel VACUUM became confused about the
current phase of index processing.
Oversight in commit 8e1fae1938, which refactored parallel VACUUM.
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reported-By: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220818133406.GL26426@telsasoft.com
Backpatch: 15-, the first version with the refactoring commit.
|
|
Previously, "GRANT foo TO bar" or "GRANT foo TO bar GRANTED BY baz"
would record the OID of the grantor in pg_auth_members.grantor, but
that role could later be dropped without modifying or removing the
pg_auth_members record. That's not great, because we typically try
to avoid dangling references in catalog data.
Now, a role grant depends on the grantor, and the grantor can't be
dropped without removing the grant or changing the grantor. "DROP
OWNED BY" will remove the grant, just as it does for other kinds of
privileges. "REASSIGN OWNED BY" will not, again just like what we do
in other cases involving privileges.
pg_auth_members now has an OID column, because that is needed in order
for dependencies to work. It also now has an index on the grantor
column, because otherwise dropping a role would require a sequential
scan of the entire table to see whether the role's OID is in use as
a grantor. That probably wouldn't be too large a problem in practice,
but it seems better to have an index just in case.
A follow-on patch is planned with the goal of more thoroughly
rationalizing the behavior of role grants. This patch is just trying
to do enough to make sure that the data we store in the catalogs is at
some basic level valid.
Patch by me, reviewed by Stephen Frost
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaFr-RZeQ+WoQ5nKPv97oT9+aDgK_a5+qWHSgbDsMp1Vg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
When creating a partitioned index, DefineIndex tries to identify
any existing indexes on the partitions that match the partitioned
index, so that it can absorb those as child indexes instead of
building new ones. Part of the matching is to compare IndexInfo
structs --- but that wasn't done quite right. We're comparing
the IndexInfo built within DefineIndex itself to one made from
existing catalog contents by BuildIndexInfo. Notably, while
BuildIndexInfo will run index expressions and predicates through
expression preprocessing, that has not happened to DefineIndex's
struct. The result is failure to match and subsequent creation
of duplicate indexes.
The easiest and most bulletproof fix is to build a new IndexInfo
using BuildIndexInfo, thereby guaranteeing that the processing done
is identical.
While here, let's also extract the opfamily and collation data
from the new partitioned index, removing ad-hoc logic that
duplicated knowledge about how those are constructed.
Per report from Christophe Pettus. Back-patch to v11 where
we invented partitioned indexes.
Richard Guo and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8864BFAA-81FD-4BF9-8E06-7DEB8D4164ED@thebuild.com
|
|
|
|
The standard way to check for list emptiness is to compare the
List pointer to NIL; our list code goes out of its way to ensure
that that is the only representation of an empty list. (An
acceptable alternative is a plain boolean test for non-null
pointer, but explicit mention of NIL is usually preferable.)
Various places didn't get that memo and expressed the condition
with list_length(), which might not be so bad except that there
were such a variety of ways to check it exactly: equal to zero,
less than or equal to zero, less than one, yadda yadda. In the
name of code readability, let's standardize all those spellings
as "list == NIL" or "list != NIL". (There's probably some
microscopic efficiency gain too, though few of these look to be
at all performance-critical.)
A very small number of cases were left as-is because they seemed
more consistent with other adjacent list_length tests that way.
Peter Smith, with bikeshedding from a number of us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PtQYe+ENX5KrONMfugf0q6NHg4hR5dAhqEXEc2eefFeig@mail.gmail.com
|
