summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-08-05Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut
Source-Git-URL: https://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: 1b16f532c5e3688b4439a2769cef003b17946667
2024-07-31Revert "Allow parallel workers to cope with a newly-created session user ID."Tom Lane
This reverts commit 216201027d90e99a0a2b2d2efba85dc0aac94c62. Some buildfarm animals are failing with "cannot change "client_encoding" during a parallel operation". It looks like assign_client_encoding is unhappy at being asked to roll back a client_encoding setting after a parallel worker encounters a failure. There must be more to it though: why didn't I see this during local testing? In any case, it's clear that moving the RestoreGUCState() call is not as side-effect-free as I thought. Given that the bug f5f30c22e intended to fix has gone unreported for years, it's not something that's urgent to fix; I'm not willing to risk messing with it further with only days to our next release wrap.
2024-07-31Allow parallel workers to cope with a newly-created session user ID.Tom Lane
Parallel workers failed after a sequence like BEGIN; CREATE USER foo; SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION foo; because check_session_authorization could not see the uncommitted pg_authid row for "foo". This is because we ran RestoreGUCState() in a separate transaction using an ordinary just-created snapshot. The same disease afflicts any other GUC that requires catalog lookups and isn't forgiving about the lookups failing. To fix, postpone RestoreGUCState() into the worker's main transaction after we've set up a snapshot duplicating the leader's. This affects check_transaction_isolation and check_transaction_deferrable, which think they should only run during transaction start. Make them act like check_transaction_read_only, which already knows it should silently accept the value when InitializingParallelWorker. Per bug #18545 from Andrey Rachitskiy. Back-patch to all supported branches, because this has been wrong for awhile. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18545-feba138862f19aaa@postgresql.org
2024-07-28libpq: Use strerror_r instead of strerrorPeter Eisentraut
Commit 453c4687377 introduced a use of strerror() into libpq, but that is not thread-safe. Fix by using strerror_r() instead. In passing, update some of the code comments added by 453c4687377, as we have learned more about the reason for the change in OpenSSL that started this. Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> Discussion: Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b6fb018b-f05c-4afd-abd3-318c649faf18@highgo.ca
2024-07-26Disable all TLS session ticketsDaniel Gustafsson
OpenSSL supports two types of session tickets for TLSv1.3, stateless and stateful. The option we've used only turns off stateless tickets leaving stateful tickets active. Use the new API introduced in 1.1.1 to disable all types of tickets. Backpatch to all supported versions. Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240617173803.6alnafnxpiqvlh3g@awork3.anarazel.de Backpatch-through: v12
2024-07-24Reset relhassubclass upon attaching table as a partitionAlvaro Herrera
We don't allow inheritance parents as partitions, and have checks to prevent this; but if a table _was_ in the past an inheritance parents and all their children are removed, the pg_class.relhassubclass flag may remain set, which confuses the partition pruning code (most obviously, it results in an assertion failure; in production builds it may be worse.) Fix by resetting relhassubclass on attach. Backpatch to all supported versions. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18550-d5e047e9a897a889@postgresql.org
2024-07-23Detect integer overflow in array_set_slice().Nathan Bossart
When provided an empty initial array, array_set_slice() fails to check for overflow when computing the new array's dimensions. While such overflows are ordinarily caught by ArrayGetNItems(), commands with the following form are accepted: INSERT INTO t (i[-2147483648:2147483647]) VALUES ('{}'); To fix, perform the hazardous computations using overflow-detecting arithmetic routines. As with commit 18b585155a, the added test cases generate errors that include a platform-dependent value, so we again use psql's VERBOSITY parameter to suppress printing the message text. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin Author: Joseph Koshakow Reviewed-by: Jian He Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31ad2cd1-db94-bdb3-f91a-65ffdb4bef95%40gmail.com Backpatch-through: 12
2024-07-20Correctly check updatability of columns targeted by INSERT...DEFAULT.Tom Lane
If a view has some updatable and some non-updatable columns, we failed to verify updatability of any columns for which an INSERT or UPDATE on the view explicitly specifies a DEFAULT item (unless the view has a declared default for that column, which is rare anyway, and one would almost certainly not write one for a non-updatable column). This would lead to an unexpected "attribute number N not found in view targetlist" error rather than the intended error. Per bug #18546 from Alexander Lakhin. This bug is old, so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18546-84a292e759a9361d@postgresql.org
2024-07-19Add overflow checks to money type.Nathan Bossart
None of the arithmetic functions for the the money type handle overflow. This commit introduces several helper functions with overflow checking and makes use of them in the money type's arithmetic functions. Fixes bug #18240. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin Author: Joseph Koshakow Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18240-c5da758d7dc1ecf0%40postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHdBPOyEGS7s%2Bxf4iaW0-cgiq25jpYdWBqQqvLtLe_t6tw%40mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 12
2024-07-15Fix bad indentation introduced in 43cd30bcd1cAndres Freund
Oops. Reported-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZpVZB9rH5tHllO75@nathan Backpatch: 12-, like 43cd30bcd1c
2024-07-15Fix type confusion in guc_var_compare()Andres Freund
Before this change guc_var_compare() cast the input arguments to const struct config_generic *. That's not quite right however, as the input on one side is often just a char * on one side. Instead just use char *, the first field in config_generic. This fixes a -Warray-bounds warning with some versions of gcc. While the warning is only known to be triggered for <= 15, the issue the warning points out seems real, so apply the fix everywhere. Author: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> Reported-by: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> Suggested-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a74a1a0d-0fd2-3649-5224-4f754e8f91aa%40xs4all.nl
2024-07-14Avoid unhelpful internal error for incorrect recursive-WITH queries.Tom Lane
checkWellFormedRecursion would issue "missing recursive reference" if a WITH RECURSIVE query contained a single self-reference but that self-reference was inside a top-level WITH, ORDER BY, LIMIT, etc, rather than inside the second arm of the UNION as expected. We already intended to throw more-on-point errors for such cases, but those error checks must be done before examining the UNION arm in order to have the desired results. So this patch need only move some code (and improve the comments). Per bug #18536 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18536-0a342ec07901203e@postgresql.org
2024-07-13Fix lost Windows socket EOF events.Thomas Munro
Winsock only signals an FD_CLOSE event once if the other end of the socket shuts down gracefully. Because each WaitLatchOrSocket() call constructs and destroys a new event handle every time, with unlucky timing we can lose it and hang. We get away with this only if the other end disconnects non-gracefully, because FD_CLOSE is repeatedly signaled in that case. To fix this design flaw in our Windows socket support fundamentally, we'd probably need to rearchitect it so that a single event handle exists for the lifetime of a socket, or switch to completely different multiplexing or async I/O APIs. That's going to be a bigger job and probably wouldn't be back-patchable. This brute force kludge closes the race by explicitly polling with MSG_PEEK before sleeping. Back-patch to all supported releases. This should hopefully clear up some random build farm and CI hang failures reported over the years. It might also allow us to try using graceful shutdown in more places again (reverted in commit 29992a6) to fix instability in the transmission of FATAL error messages, but that isn't done by this commit. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Tested-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/176008.1715492071%40sss.pgh.pa.us
2024-07-12Fix ALTER TABLE DETACH for inconsistent indexesAlvaro Herrera
When a partitioned table has an index that doesn't support a constraint, but a partition has an equivalent index that does, then a DETACH operation would misbehave: a crash in assertion-enabled systems (because we fail to find the constraint in the parent that we expect to), or a broken coninhcount value (-1) in production systems (because we blindly believe that we've successfully detached the parent). While we should reject an ATTACH of a partition with such an index, we have failed to do so in existing releases, so adding an error in stable releases might break the (unlikely) existing applications that rely on this behavior. At this point I don't even want to reject them in master, because it'd break pg_upgrade if such databases exist, and there would be no easy way to fix existing databases without expensive index rebuilds. (Later on we could add ALTER TABLE ... ADD CONSTRAINT USING INDEX to partitioned tables, which would allow the user to fix such patterns. At that point we could add more restrictions to prevent the problem from its root.) Also, add a test case that leaves one table in this condition, so that we can verify that pg_upgrade continues to work if we later decide to change the policy on the master branch. Backpatch to all supported branches. Co-authored-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18500-62948b6fe5522f56@postgresql.org
2024-07-11Fix possibility of logical decoding partial transaction changes.Masahiko Sawada
When creating and initializing a logical slot, the restart_lsn is set to the latest WAL insertion point (or the latest replay point on standbys). Subsequently, WAL records are decoded from that point to find the start point for extracting changes in the DecodingContextFindStartpoint() function. Since the initial restart_lsn could be in the middle of a transaction, the start point must be a consistent point where we won't see the data for partial transactions. Previously, when not building a full snapshot, serialized snapshots were restored, and the SnapBuild jumps to the consistent state even while finding the start point. Consequently, the slot's restart_lsn and confirmed_flush could be set to the middle of a transaction. This could lead to various unexpected consequences. Specifically, there were reports of logical decoding decoding partial transactions, and assertion failures occurred because only subtransactions were decoded without decoding their top-level transaction until decoding the commit record. To resolve this issue, the changes prevent restoring the serialized snapshot and jumping to the consistent state while finding the start point. On v17 and HEAD, a flag indicating whether snapshot restores should be skipped has been added to the SnapBuild struct, and SNAPBUILD_VERSION has been bumpded. On backbranches, the flag is stored in the LogicalDecodingContext instead, preserving on-disk compatibility. Backpatch to all supported versions. Reported-by: Drew Callahan Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Hayato Kuroda Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2444AA15-D21B-4CCE-8052-52C7C2DAFE5C%40amazon.com Backpatch-through: 12
2024-07-10Make our back branches compatible with libxml2 2.13.x.Tom Lane
This back-patches HEAD commits 066e8ac6e, 6082b3d5d, e7192486d, and 896cd266f into supported branches. Changes: * Use xmlAddChildList not xmlAddChild in XMLSERIALIZE (affects v16 and up only). This was a flat-out coding mistake that we got away with due to lax checking in previous versions of xmlAddChild. * Use xmlParseInNodeContext not xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory. This is to dodge a bug in xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory in libxm2 releases 2.13.0-2.13.2. While that bug is now fixed upstream and will probably never be seen in any production-oriented distro, it is currently a problem on some more-bleeding-edge-friendly platforms. * Suppress "chunk is not well balanced" errors from libxml2, unless it is the only error. This eliminates an error-reporting discrepancy between 2.13 and older releases. This error is almost always redundant with previous errors, if not flat-out inappropriate, which is why 2.13 changed the behavior and why nobody's likely to miss it. Erik Wienhold and Tom Lane, per report from Frank Streitzig. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/trinity-b0161630-d230-4598-9ebc-7a23acdb37cb-1720186432160@3c-app-gmx-bap25 Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/trinity-361ba18b-541a-4fe7-bc63-655ae3a7d599-1720259822452@3c-app-gmx-bs01
2024-07-08Fix scale clamping in numeric round() and trunc().Dean Rasheed
The numeric round() and trunc() functions clamp the scale argument to the range between +/- NUMERIC_MAX_RESULT_SCALE (2000), which is much smaller than the actual allowed range of type numeric. As a result, they return incorrect results when asked to round/truncate more than 2000 digits before or after the decimal point. Fix by using the correct upper and lower scale limits based on the actual allowed (and documented) range of type numeric. While at it, use the new NUMERIC_WEIGHT_MAX constant instead of SHRT_MAX in all other overflow checks, and fix a comment thinko in power_var() introduced by e54a758d24 -- the minimum value of ln_dweight is -NUMERIC_DSCALE_MAX (-16383), not -SHRT_MAX, though this doesn't affect the point being made in the comment, that the resulting local_rscale value may exceed NUMERIC_MAX_DISPLAY_SCALE (1000). Back-patch to all supported branches. Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Joel Jacobson. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCXB%2BrDTuMjhK5ZxcouufigSc-X4tGJCBTMpZ3n%3DxxQuhg%40mail.gmail.com
2024-07-01Preserve CurrentMemoryContext across notify and sinval interrupts.Tom Lane
ProcessIncomingNotify is called from the main processing loop that normally runs in MessageContext. That outer-loop code assumes that whatever it allocates will be cleaned up when we're done processing the current client message --- but if we service a notify interrupt, then whatever gets allocated before the next switch into MessageContext will be permanently leaked in TopMemoryContext, because CommitTransactionCommand sets CurrentMemoryContext to TopMemoryContext. There are observable leaks associated with (at least) encoding conversion of incoming queries and parameters attached to Bind messages. sinval catchup interrupts have a similar problem. There might be others, but I've not identified any other clear cases. To fix, take care to save and restore CurrentMemoryContext across the Start/CommitTransactionCommand calls in these functions. Per bug #18512 from wizardbrony. Commit to back branches only; in HEAD, this was dealt with by the riskier but more thoroughgoing approach in commit 1afe31f03. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3478884.1718656625@sss.pgh.pa.us
2024-06-27Cope with inplace update making catcache stale during TOAST fetch.Noah Misch
This extends ad98fb14226ae6456fbaed7990ee7591cbe5efd2 to invals of inplace updates. Trouble requires an inplace update of a catalog having a TOAST table, so only pg_database was at risk. (The other catalog on which core code performs inplace updates, pg_class, has no TOAST table.) Trouble would require something like the inplace-inval.spec test. Consider GRANT ... ON DATABASE fetching a stale row from cache and discarding a datfrozenxid update that vac_truncate_clog() has already relied upon. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions). Reviewed (in an earlier version) by Robert Haas. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240114201411.d0@rfd.leadboat.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240512232923.aa.nmisch@google.com
2024-06-27AccessExclusiveLock new relations just after assigning the OID.Noah Misch
This has no user-visible, important consequences, since other sessions' catalog scans can't find the relation until we commit. However, this unblocks introducing a rule about locks required to heap_update() a pg_class row. CREATE TABLE has been acquiring this lock eventually, but it can heap_update() pg_class.relchecks earlier. create_toast_table() has been acquiring only ShareLock. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions), the plan for the commit relying on the new rule. Reviewed (in an earlier version) by Robert Haas. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240611024525.9f.nmisch@google.com
2024-06-27Lock before setting relhassubclass on RELKIND_PARTITIONED_INDEX.Noah Misch
Commit 5b562644fec696977df4a82790064e8287927891 added a comment that SetRelationHasSubclass() callers must hold this lock. When commit 17f206fbc824d2b4b14480199ca9ff7dea417eda extended use of this column to partitioned indexes, it didn't take the lock. As the latter commit message mentioned, we currently never reset a partitioned index to relhassubclass=f. That largely avoids harm from the lock omission. The cause for fixing this now is to unblock introducing a rule about locks required to heap_update() a pg_class row. This might cause more deadlocks. It gives minor user-visible benefits: - If an ALTER INDEX SET TABLESPACE runs concurrently with ALTER TABLE ATTACH PARTITION or CREATE PARTITION OF, one transaction blocks instead of failing with "tuple concurrently updated". (Many cases of DDL concurrency still fail that way.) - Match ALTER INDEX ATTACH PARTITION in choosing to lock the index. While not user-visible today, we'll need this if we ever make something set the flag to false for a partitioned index, like ANALYZE does today for tables. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions), the plan for the commit relying on the new rule. In back branches, add LockOrStrongerHeldByMe() instead of adding a LockHeldByMe() parameter. Reviewed (in an earlier version) by Robert Haas. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240611024525.9f.nmisch@google.com
2024-06-27Expand comments and add an assertion in nodeModifyTable.c.Noah Misch
Most comments concern RELKIND_VIEW. One addresses the ExecUpdate() "tupleid" parameter. A later commit will rely on these facts, but they hold already. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions), the plan for that commit. Reviewed (in an earlier version) by Robert Haas. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240512232923.aa.nmisch@google.com
2024-06-27Avoid crashing when a JIT-inlined backend function throws an error.Tom Lane
errfinish() assumes that the __FUNC__ and __FILE__ arguments it's passed are compile-time constant strings that can just be pointed to rather than physically copied. However, it's possible for LLVM to generate code in which those pointers point into a dynamically loaded code segment. If that segment gets unloaded before we're done with the ErrorData struct, we have dangling pointers that will lead to SIGSEGV. In simple cases that won't happen, because we won't unload LLVM code before end of transaction. But it's possible to happen if the error is thrown within end-of-transaction code run by _SPI_commit or _SPI_rollback, because since commit 2e517818f those functions clean up by ending the transaction and starting a new one. Rather than fixing this by adding pstrdup() overhead to every elog/ereport sequence, let's fix it by copying the risky pointers in CopyErrorData(). That solves it for _SPI_commit/_SPI_rollback because they use that function to preserve the error data across the transaction end/restart sequence; and it seems likely that any other code doing something similar would need to do that too. I'm suspicious that this behavior amounts to an LLVM bug (or a bug in our use of it?), because it implies that string constant references that should be pointer-equal according to a naive understanding of C semantics will sometimes not be equal. However, even if it is a bug and someday gets fixed, we'll have to cope with the current behavior for a long time to come. Report and patch by me. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1565654.1719425368@sss.pgh.pa.us
2024-06-27Fix MVCC bug with prepared xact with subxacts on standbyHeikki Linnakangas
We did not recover the subtransaction IDs of prepared transactions when starting a hot standby from a shutdown checkpoint. As a result, such subtransactions were considered as aborted, rather than in-progress. That would lead to hint bits being set incorrectly, and the subtransactions suddenly becoming visible to old snapshots when the prepared transaction was committed. To fix, update pg_subtrans with prepared transactions's subxids when starting hot standby from a shutdown checkpoint. The snapshots taken from that state need to be marked as "suboverflowed", so that we also check the pg_subtrans. Backport to all supported versions. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6b852e98-2d49-4ca1-9e95-db419a2696e0@iki.fi
2024-06-20Don't throw an error if a queued AFTER trigger no longer exists.Tom Lane
afterTriggerInvokeEvents and AfterTriggerExecute have always treated it as an error if the trigger OID mentioned in a queued after-trigger event can't be found. However, that fails to account for the edge case where the trigger's been dropped in the current transaction since queueing the event. There seems no very good reason to disallow that case, so instead silently do nothing if the trigger OID can't be found. This does give up a little bit of bug-detection ability, but I don't recall that these error messages have ever actually revealed a bug, so it seems mostly theoretical. Alternatives such as marking pending events DONE at the time of dropping a trigger would be complicated and perhaps introduce bugs of their own. Per bug #18517 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18517-af2d19882240902c@postgresql.org
2024-06-17Fix insertion of SP-GiST REDIRECT tuples during REINDEX CONCURRENTLY.Tom Lane
Reconstruction of an SP-GiST index by REINDEX CONCURRENTLY may insert some REDIRECT tuples. This will typically happen in a transaction that lacks an XID, which leads either to assertion failure in spgFormDeadTuple or to insertion of a REDIRECT tuple with zero xid. The latter's not good either, since eventually VACUUM will apply GlobalVisTestIsRemovableXid() to the zero xid, resulting in either an assertion failure or a garbage answer. In practice, since REINDEX CONCURRENTLY locks out index scans till it's done, it doesn't matter whether it inserts REDIRECTs or PLACEHOLDERs; and likewise it doesn't matter how soon VACUUM reduces such a REDIRECT to a PLACEHOLDER. So in non-assert builds there's no observable problem here, other than perhaps a little index bloat. But it's not behaving as intended. To fix, remove the failing Assert in spgFormDeadTuple, acknowledging that we might sometimes insert a zero XID; and guard VACUUM's GlobalVisTestIsRemovableXid() call with a test for valid XID, ensuring that we'll reduce such a REDIRECT the first time VACUUM sees it. (Versions before v14 use TransactionIdPrecedes here, which won't fail on zero xid, so they really have no bug at all in non-assert builds.) Another solution could be to not create REDIRECTs at all during REINDEX CONCURRENTLY, making the relevant code paths treat that case like index build (which likewise knows that no concurrent index scans can be happening). That would allow restoring the Assert in spgFormDeadTuple, but we'd still need the VACUUM change because redirection tuples with zero xid may be out there already. But there doesn't seem to be a nice way for spginsert() to tell that it's being called in REINDEX CONCURRENTLY without some API changes, so we'll leave that as a possible future improvement. In HEAD, also rename the SpGistState.myXid field to redirectXid, which seems less misleading (since it might not in fact be our transaction's XID) and is certainly less uninformatively generic. Per bug #18499 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18499-8a519c280f956480@postgresql.org
2024-06-14Clean out column-level pg_init_privs entries when dropping tables.Tom Lane
DeleteInitPrivs did not get the memo about how, when dropping a whole object (with subid == 0), you should drop entries relating to its sub-objects too. This is visible in the test_pg_dump test case if one drops the extension at the end: the entry for GRANT SELECT(col1) ON regress_pg_dump_table TO public; was still present in pg_init_privs afterwards, although it was pointing to a dangling table OID. Noted while fooling with a fix for REASSIGN OWNED for pg_init_privs entries. This bug is aboriginal in the pg_init_privs feature though, and there seems no reason not to back-patch the fix.
2024-06-13Fix parsing of ignored operators in websearch_to_tsquery().Tom Lane
The manual says clearly that punctuation in the input of websearch_to_tsquery() is ignored, except for the special cases of dashes and quotes. However, this failed for cases like "(foo bar) or something", or in general an ISOPERATOR character in front of the "or". We'd switch back to WAITOPERAND state, then ignore the operator character while remaining in that state, and then reach the "or" in WAITOPERAND state which (intentionally) makes us treat it as data. The fix is simple enough: if we see an ISOPERATOR character while in WAITOPERATOR state, we have to skip it while staying in that state. (We don't need to worry about other punctuation characters: those will be consumed as though they were words, but then rejected by lexizing.) In v14 and up (since commit eb086056f) we can simplify the code a bit more too, because there is no longer a reason for the WAITOPERAND state to distinguish between quoted and unquoted operands. Per bug #18479 from Manos Emmanouilidis. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18479-d9b46e2fc242c33e@postgresql.org
2024-06-13Clamp result of MultiXactMemberFreezeThresholdHeikki Linnakangas
The purpose of the function is to reduce the effective autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age if the multixact members SLRU is approaching wraparound, to make multixid freezing more aggressive. The returned value should therefore never be greater than plain autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age. Reviewed-by: Robert Haas Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/85fb354c-f89f-4d47-b3a2-3cbd461c90a3@iki.fi Backpatch-through: 12, all supported versions
2024-06-11Fix infer_arbiter_indexes() to not assume resultRelation is 1.Tom Lane
infer_arbiter_indexes failed to renumber varnos in index expressions or predicates that it got from the catalogs. This escaped detection up to now because the stored varnos in such trees will be 1, and an INSERT's result relation is usually the first rangetable entry, so that that was fine. However, in cases such as inserting through an updatable view, it's not fine, leading to failure to match the expressions to the query with ensuing "there is no unique or exclusion constraint matching the ON CONFLICT specification" errors. Fix by copy-and-paste from get_relation_info(). Per bug #18502 from Michael Wang. Back-patch to all supported versions. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18502-545b53f5b81e54e0@postgresql.org
2024-06-07Reject modifying a temp table of another session with ALTER TABLE.Tom Lane
Normally this case isn't even reachable by non-superusers, since permissions checks prevent naming such a table. However, it is possible to make it happen by altering a parent table whose child is another session's temp table. We definitely can't support any such ALTER that requires modifying the contents of such a table, since we lack access to the other session's temporary-buffer pool. But there seems no good reason to allow it even if it'd only require changing catalog contents. One reason not to allow it is that we'd rather not expose the implementation-dependent behavior of whether a specific ALTER requires touching the table contents. Another is that there may be (in future, even if not today) optimizations that assume that a session's own temp tables won't be modified by other sessions. Hence, add a RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP() check to all the places where ALTER TABLE currently does CheckTableNotInUse(). (I looked through all other callers of CheckTableNotInUse(), and they seem OK already.) Per bug #18492 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18492-c7a2634bf4968763@postgresql.org
2024-06-07Fix behavior of stable functions called from a CALL's argument list.Tom Lane
If the CALL is within an atomic context (e.g. there's an outer transaction block), _SPI_execute_plan should acquire a fresh snapshot to execute any such functions with. We failed to do that and instead passed them the Portal snapshot, which had been acquired at the start of the current SQL command. This'd lead to seeing stale values of rows modified since the start of the command. This is arguably a bug in 84f5c2908: I failed to see that "are we in non-atomic mode" needs to be defined the same way as it is further down in _SPI_execute_plan, i.e. check !_SPI_current->atomic not just options->allow_nonatomic. Alternatively the blame could be laid on plpgsql, which is unconditionally passing allow_nonatomic = true for CALL/DO even when it knows it's in an atomic context. However, fixing it in spi.c seems like a better idea since that will also fix the problem for any extensions that may have copied plpgsql's coding pattern. While here, update an obsolete comment about _SPI_execute_plan's snapshot management. Per report from Victor Yegorov. Back-patch to all supported versions. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGnEboiRe+fG2QxuBO2390F7P8e2MQ6UyBjZSL_w1Cej+E4=Vw@mail.gmail.com
2024-05-18Account for optimized MinMax aggregates during SS_finalize_plan.Tom Lane
We are capable of optimizing MIN() and MAX() aggregates on indexed columns into subqueries that exploit the index, rather than the normal thing of scanning the whole table. When we do this, we replace the Aggref node(s) with Params referencing subquery outputs. Such Params really ought to be included in the per-plan-node extParam/allParam sets computed by SS_finalize_plan. However, we've never done so up to now because of an ancient implementation choice to perform that substitution during set_plan_references, which runs after SS_finalize_plan, so that SS_finalize_plan never sees these Params. The cleanest fix would be to perform a separate tree walk to do these substitutions before SS_finalize_plan runs. That seems unattractive, first because a whole-tree mutation pass is expensive, and second because we lack infrastructure for visiting expression subtrees in a Plan tree, so that we'd need a new function knowing as much as SS_finalize_plan knows about that. I also considered swapping the order of SS_finalize_plan and set_plan_references, but that fell foul of various assumptions that seem tricky to fix. So the approach adopted here is to teach SS_finalize_plan itself to check for such Aggrefs. I refactored things a bit in setrefs.c to avoid having three copies of the code that does that. Back-patch of v17 commits d0d44049d and 779ac2c74. When d0d44049d went in, there was no evidence that it was fixing a reachable bug, so I refrained from back-patching. Now we have such evidence. Per bug #18465 from Hal Takahara. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18465-2fae927718976b22@postgresql.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2391880.1689025003@sss.pgh.pa.us
2024-05-16Fix documentation about DROP DATABASE FORCE process termination rights.Noah Misch
Specifically, it terminates a background worker even if the caller couldn't terminate the background worker with pg_terminate_backend(). Commit 3a9b18b3095366cd0c4305441d426d04572d88c1 neglected to update this. Back-patch to v13, which introduced DROP DATABASE FORCE. Reviewed by Amit Kapila. Reported by Kirill Reshke. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240429212756.60.nmisch@google.com
2024-05-14Fix handling of polymorphic output arguments for procedures.Tom Lane
Most of the infrastructure for procedure arguments was already okay with polymorphic output arguments, but it turns out that CallStmtResultDesc() was a few bricks shy of a load here. It thought all it needed to do was call build_function_result_tupdesc_t, but that function specifically disclaims responsibility for resolving polymorphic arguments. Failing to handle that doesn't seem to be a problem for CALL in plpgsql, but CALL from plain SQL would get errors like "cannot display a value of type anyelement", or even crash outright. In v14 and later we can simply examine the exposed types of the CallStmt.outargs nodes to get the right type OIDs. But it's a lot more complicated to fix in v12/v13, because those versions don't have CallStmt.outargs, nor do they do expand_function_arguments until ExecuteCallStmt runs. We have to duplicatively run expand_function_arguments, and then re-determine which elements of the args list are output arguments. Per bug #18463 from Drew Kimball. Back-patch to all supported versions, since it's busted in all of them. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18463-f8cd77e12564d8a2@postgresql.org
2024-05-13Fix pg_sequence_last_value() for unlogged sequences on standbys.Nathan Bossart
Presently, when this function is called for an unlogged sequence on a standby server, it will error out with a message like ERROR: could not open file "base/5/16388": No such file or directory Since the pg_sequences system view uses pg_sequence_last_value(), it can error similarly. To fix, modify the function to return NULL for unlogged sequences on standby servers. Since this bug is present on all versions since v15, this approach is preferable to making the ERROR nicer because we need to repair the pg_sequences view without modifying its definition on released versions. For consistency, this commit also modifies the function to return NULL for other sessions' temporary sequences. The pg_sequences view already appropriately filters out such sequences, so there's no bug there, but we might as well offer some defense in case someone invokes this function directly. Unlogged sequences were first introduced in v15, but temporary sequences are much older, so while the fix for unlogged sequences is only back-patched to v15, the temporary sequence portion is back-patched to all supported versions. We could also remove the privilege check in the pg_sequences view definition in v18 if we modify this function to return NULL for sequences for which the current user lacks privileges, but that is left as a future exercise for when v18 development begins. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240501005730.GA594666%40nathanxps13 Backpatch-through: 12
2024-05-06Translation updatesPeter Eisentraut
Source-Git-URL: https://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git Source-Git-Hash: ffc021363d88b4368b4046d42d2ed4d1a9b90384
2024-05-01Ensure we allocate NAMEDATALEN bytes for names in Index Only ScansDavid Rowley
As an optimization, we store "name" columns as cstrings in btree indexes. Here we modify it so that Index Only Scans convert these cstrings back to names with NAMEDATALEN bytes rather than storing the cstring in the tuple slot, as was happening previously. Bug: #17855 Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin, Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17855-5f523e0f9769a566@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 12, all supported versions
2024-04-30Disallow converting a table to a view within an outer SQL command.Tom Lane
We have long disallowed all forms of ALTER TABLE if the table is already opened by some outer SQL command in the same session. This has the same purpose as obtaining AccessExclusiveLock, but since a session's own locks don't conflict the lock only blocks use of the table by other sessions, not our own. Without this check, the ALTER might confuse the outer SQL command since any previous inspection of the table would potentially become invalid. However, the RelisBecomingView code path in DefineQueryRewrite never got that memo, and assumed that AccessExclusiveLock is sufficient for performing something morally equivalent to a rather invasive ALTER TABLE. Unsurprisingly, this can confuse an outer command that is trying to do something with the table. This was submitted as a security issue, but the security team has been unable to identify any consequence worse than a null pointer dereference (from trying to access rd_tableam methods that the relation no longer has). Therefore, in accordance with our usual policy, it's not security material and should just be fixed as a routine bug. Fix by disallowing the operation if the table is open locally, exactly as ALTER TABLE does it. Per an anonymous security researcher, via Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik. Patch v12-v15 only. In v16 and later, we removed this code altogether (cf. commit b23cd185f), so that there's no issue.
2024-04-29Close race condition between datfrozen and relfrozen updates.Noah Misch
vac_update_datfrozenxid() did multiple loads of relfrozenxid and relminmxid from buffer memory, and it assumed each would get the same value. Not so if a concurrent vac_update_relstats() did an inplace update. Commit 2d2e40e3befd8b9e0d2757554537345b15fa6ea2 fixed the same kind of bug in vac_truncate_clog(). Today's bug could cause the rel-level field and XIDs in the rel's rows to precede the db-level field. A cluster having such values should VACUUM affected tables. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions). Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240423003956.e7.nmisch@google.com
2024-04-28Detect more overflows in timestamp[tz]_pl_interval.Tom Lane
In commit 25cd2d640 I (tgl) opined that "The additions of the months and microseconds fields could also overflow, of course. However, I believe we need no additional checks there; the existing range checks should catch such cases". This is demonstrably wrong however for the microseconds field, and given that discovery it seems prudent to be paranoid about the months addition as well. Report and patch by Joseph Koshakow. As before, back-patch to all supported branches. (However, the test case doesn't work before v15 because we didn't allow wider-than-int32 numbers in interval literals. A variant test could probably be built that fits within that restriction, but it didn't seem worth the trouble.) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAvxfHf77sRHKoEzUw9_cMYSpbpNS2C+J_+8Dq4+0oi8iKopeA@mail.gmail.com
2024-04-16Fix generation of EC join conditions at the wrong plan level.Tom Lane
get_baserel_parampathinfo previously assumed without checking that the results of generate_join_implied_equalities "necessarily satisfy join_clause_is_movable_into". This turns out to be wrong in the presence of outer joins, because the generated clauses could include Vars that mustn't be evaluated below a relevant outer join. That led to applying clauses at the wrong plan level and possibly getting incorrect query results. We must check each clause's nullable_relids, and really the right thing to do is test join_clause_is_movable_into. However, trying to fix it that way exposes an oversight in equivclass.c: it wasn't careful about marking join clauses for appendrel children with the correct clause_relids. That caused the modified get_baserel_parampathinfo code to reject some clauses it still needs to accept. (See parallel commit for HEAD/v16 for more commentary about that.) Per bug #18429 from Benoît Ryder. This misbehavior existed for a long time before commit 2489d76c4, so patch v12-v15 this way. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18429-8982d4a348cc86c6@postgresql.org
2024-04-15Fix type-checking of RECORD-returning functions in FROM, redux.Tom Lane
Commit 2ed8f9a01 intended to institute a policy that if a RangeTblFunction has a coldeflist, then the function return type is certainly RECORD, and we should use the coldeflist as the source of truth about what the columns of the record type are. When the original function has been folded to a constant, inspection of the constant might give a different answer. This situation will lead to a tuple-type-mismatch error at execution, but up until that point we need to consistently believe the coldeflist, or we'll have problems from different bits of code reaching different conclusions. expandRTE didn't get that memo though, and would try to produce a tupdesc based on the constant in this situation, leading to an assertion failure. (Desultory testing suggests that non-assert builds often manage to give the expected error, although I also saw a "cache lookup failed for type 0" error, and it seems at least possible that a crash could happen.) Some other callers of get_expr_result_type and get_expr_result_tupdesc were also being incautious about this. While none of them seem to have actual bugs, they're working harder than necessary in this case, besides which it seems safest to have an explicit policy of not using those functions on an RTE with a coldeflist. Adjust the code accordingly, and add commentary to funcapi.c about this policy. Also fix an obsolete comment that claimed "get_expr_result_type() doesn't know how to extract type info from a RECORD constant". That hasn't been true since commit d57534740. Per bug #18422 from Alexander Lakhin. As with the previous commit, back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18422-89ca86c8eac5246d@postgresql.org
2024-04-11Fix WaitEventSet resource leak in WaitLatchOrSocket().Etsuro Fujita
This function would have the same issue we solved in commit 501cfd07d: If an error is thrown after calling CreateWaitEventSet(), the file descriptor (on epoll- or kqueue-based systems) or handles (on Windows) that the WaitEventSet contains are leaked. Like that commit, use PG_TRY-PG_FINALLY (PG_TRY-PG_CATCH in v12) to make sure the WaitEventSet is freed properly. Back-patch to all supported versions, but as we do not have this issue in HEAD (cf. commit 50c67c201), no need to apply this patch to it. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK16MqdDoD8oatp8SQWaEa4vS3nfQqDN_Sj9YRuu5J3Lj9g%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-10Fix illegal attribute propagation in LLVM JIT.Thomas Munro
Commit 72559438 started copying more attributes from AttributeTemplate to the functions we generate on the fly. In the case of deform functions, which return void, this meant that "noundef", from AttributeTemplate's return value (a Datum) was copied to a void type. Older LLVM releases were OK with that, but LLVM 18 crashes. Update our llvm_copy_attributes() function to skip copying the attribute for the return value, if the target function returns void. Thanks to Dmitry Dolgov for help chasing this down. Back-patch to all supported releases, like 72559438. Reported-by: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRACpVFr7LMdVYENUkScG5FCYMZDDdSGNU-tch%2Bw98OxYg%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-02Avoid deadlock during orphan temp table removal.Tom Lane
If temp tables have dependencies (such as sequences) then it's possible for autovacuum's cleanup of orphan temp tables to deadlock against an incoming backend that's trying to clean out the temp namespace for its own use. That can happen because RemoveTempRelations' performDeletion call can visit objects within the namespace in an order different from the order in which a per-table deletion will visit them. To fix, observe that performDeletion will begin by taking an exclusive lock on the temp namespace (even though it won't actually delete it). So, if we can get a shared lock on the namespace, we can be sure we're not running concurrently with RemoveTempRelations, while also not conflicting with ordinary use of the namespace. This requires introducing a conditional version of LockDatabaseObject, but that's no big deal. (It's surprising we've got along without that this long.) Report and patch by Mikhail Zhilin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c43ce028-2bc2-4865-9b89-3f706246eed5@postgrespro.ru
2024-03-27Fix unnecessary use of moving-aggregate mode with non-moving frame.Tom Lane
When a plain aggregate is used as a window function, and the window frame start is specified as UNBOUNDED PRECEDING, the frame's head cannot move so we do not need to use moving-aggregate mode. The check for that was put into initialize_peragg(), failing to notice that ExecInitWindowAgg() calls that function before it's filled in winstate->frameOptions. Since makeNode() would have zeroed the field, this didn't provoke uninitialized-value complaints, nor would the erroneous decision have resulted in more than a little inefficiency. Still, it's wrong, so move the initialization of winstate->frameOptions earlier to make it work properly. While here, also fix a thinko in a comment. Both errors crept in in commit a9d9acbf2 which introduced the moving-aggregate mode. Spotted by Vallimaharajan G. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18e7f2a5167.fe36253866818.977923893562469143@zohocorp.com
2024-03-26Fix failure of ALTER FOREIGN TABLE SET SCHEMA to move sequences.Tom Lane
Ordinary ALTER TABLE SET SCHEMA will also move any owned sequences into the new schema. We failed to do likewise for foreign tables, because AlterTableNamespaceInternal believed that only certain relkinds could have indexes, owned sequences, or constraints. We could simply add foreign tables to that relkind list, but it seems likely that the same oversight could be made again in future. Instead let's remove the relkind filter altogether. These functions shouldn't cost much when there are no objects that they need to process, and surely this isn't an especially performance-critical case anyway. Per bug #18407 from Vidushi Gupta. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18407-4fd07373d252c6a0@postgresql.org
2024-03-26Allow "make check"-style testing to work with musl C library.Tom Lane
The musl dynamic linker saves a pointer to the process' environment value of LD_LIBRARY_PATH very early in startup. When we move/clobber the environment to make more room for ps status strings, we clobber that value and thereby prevent libraries from being found via LD_LIBRARY_PATH, which breaks the use of a temporary installation for testing purposes. To fix, stop collecting usable space for ps status if we notice that the variable we are about to clobber is LD_LIBRARY_PATH. This will result in some reduction in how long the ps status can be, but it's only likely to occur in temporary test contexts, so it doesn't seem like a big problem. In any case, we don't have to do it if we see we are on glibc, which surely is where the majority of our Linux testing is done. Thomas Munro, Bruce Momjian, and Tom Lane, per report from Wolfgang Walther. Back-patch to all supported branches, with the hope that we'll set up a buildfarm animal to test on this platform. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fddd1cd6-dc16-40a2-9eb5-d7fef2101488@technowledgy.de
2024-03-25Clarify comment for LogicalTapeSetBlocks().Jeff Davis
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1229327.1711160246@sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch-through: 13