| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Dropping twice a pgstats entry should not happen, and the error report
generated was missing the "generation" counter (tracking when an entry
is reused) that has been added in 818119afccd3.
Like d92573adcb02, backpatch down to v15 where this information is
useful to have, to gather more information from instances where the
problem shows up. A report has shown that this error path has been
reached on a standby based on 17.3, for a relation stats entry and an
OID close to wraparound.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAN4RuQvYth942J2+FcLmJKgdpq6fE5eqyFvb_PuskxF2eL=Wzg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
This adds a few more functions to int128.h, allowing more of numeric.c
to use 128-bit integers on all platforms.
Specifically, int64_div_fast_to_numeric() and the following aggregate
functions can now use 128-bit integers for improved performance on all
platforms, rather than just platforms with native support for int128:
- SUM(int8)
- AVG(int8)
- STDDEV_POP(int2 or int4)
- STDDEV_SAMP(int2 or int4)
- VAR_POP(int2 or int4)
- VAR_SAMP(int2 or int4)
In addition to improved performance on platforms lacking native
128-bit integer support, this significantly simplifies this numeric
code by allowing a lot of conditionally compiled code to be deleted.
A couple of numeric functions (div_var_int64() and sqrt_var()) still
contain conditionally compiled 128-bit integer code that only works on
platforms with native 128-bit integer support. Making those work more
generally would require rolling our own higher precision 128-bit
division, which isn't supported for now.
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWgBMc9ZwKMYqQpaQz2X6gaamYRB+RnMsUNcdMcL2Mj_w@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Use Min(NBuffers, MAX_CHECKPOINT_REQUESTS) instead of NBuffers in
CheckpointerShmemSize() to match the actual array size limit set in
CheckpointerShmemInit(). This prevents wasting shared memory when
NBuffers > MAX_CHECKPOINT_REQUESTS. Also, fix the comment.
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1439188.1754506714%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Author: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
|
|
The code used a PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMPTZ() where the return type is
TimestampTz and not a Datum.
On 64-bit systems, there is no effect since this just ends up casting
64-bit integers back and forth. On 32-bit systems, timestamptz is
pass-by-reference. PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMPTZ() allocates new memory and
returns the address, meaning that the caller could interpret this as a
timestamp value.
The effect is using "date_trunc(..., 'infinity'::timestamptz) will
return random values (instead of the correct return value 'infinity').
Bug introduced in commit d85ce012f99f.
Author: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2d320b6f-b4af-4fbc-9eec-5d0fa15d187b@eisentraut.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4bf60a84-2862-4a53-acd5-8eddf134a60e@eisentraut.org
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
This commit makes use of the existing PqMsg_* macros in more places
and adds new PqReplMsg_* and PqBackupMsg_* macros for use in
special replication and backup messages, respectively.
Author: Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aIECfYfevCUpenBT@nathan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFcNs%2Br73NOUb7%2BqKrV4HHEki02CS96Z%2Bx19WaFgE087BWwEng%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
The name "namspace" looks like a typo, but it was presumably meant
to avoid using the "namespace" C++ keyword. This commit renames
the parameter to "nameSpace" to prevent future confusion while
still avoiding the keyword.
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aJJxpfsDfiQ1VbJ5%40nathan
|
|
These were introduced (commit efdc7d74753) at the same time as we were
moving to using the standard inttypes.h format macros (commit
a0ed19e0a9e). It doesn't seem useful to keep a new already-deprecated
interface like this with only a few users, so remove the new symbols
again and have the callers use PRIx64.
(Also, INT64_HEX_FORMAT was kind of a misnomer, since hex formats all
use unsigned types.)
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0ac47b5d-e5ab-4cac-98a7-bdee0e2831e4%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Following commit e035863c9a0, building with -O0 began triggering
warnings about potentially uninitialized 'workbuf' usage. While
theoretically the initialization isn't necessary since VARDATA()
doesn't access the contents of the pointed-to object, this commit
explicitly initializes the workbuf variable to suppress the warning.
Buildfarm members adder and flaviventris have shown the warning.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoCOZxfqnNgfM5yVKJZYnOq5m2Q96fBGy1fovEqQ9V4OZA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The result of "DirectFunctionCall1(numeric_float8, d)" is already in
Datum form, but the code was incorrectly applying PG_RETURN_FLOAT8()
to it. On machines where float8 is pass-by-reference, this would
result in complete garbage, since an unpredictable pointer value
would be treated as an integer and then converted to float. It's not
entirely clear how much of a problem would ensue on 64-bit hardware,
but certainly interpreting a float8 bitpattern as uint64 and then
converting that to float isn't the intended behavior.
As luck would have it, even the complete-garbage case doesn't break
BRIN indexes, since the results are only used to make choices about
how to merge values into ranges: at worst, we'd make poor choices
resulting in an inefficient index. Doubtless that explains the lack
of field complaints. However, users with BRIN indexes that use the
numeric_minmax_multi_ops opclass may wish to reindex in hopes of
making their indexes more efficient.
Author: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Co-authored-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2093712.1753983215@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 14
|
|
This commit introduces a new column backup_type that indicates the
type of backup being performed: either 'full' or 'incremental'.
Bump catalog version.
Author: Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOzEurQuzbHwTj1ehk1a+eeQDidJPyrE5s6mYumkjwjZnurhkQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
During CREATE DATABASE, if changing the locale provider, require that
a new locale is specified rather than trying to reinterpret the
template's locale using the new provider.
This only affects the behavior when the template uses the builtin
provider and CREATE DATABASE specifies the ICU provider without
specifying the locale. Previously, that may have succeeded due to
loose validation by ICU, whereas now that will cause an error. Because
it can cause an error, backport only to unreleased versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5038b33a6dc639009f4b3d43fa6ae0c5ba9e04f7.camel@j-davis.com
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
Neither Peter nor I had tried this with USE_VALGRIND ...
Per buildfarm member skink.
|
|
Macros like VARDATA() and VARSIZE() should be thought of as taking
values of type pointer to struct varlena or some other related struct.
The way they are implemented, you can pass anything to it and it will
cast it right. But this is in principle incorrect. To fix, add the
required DatumGetPointer() calls. Or in a couple of cases, remove
superfluous PointerGetDatum() calls.
It is planned in a subsequent patch to change macros like VARDATA()
and VARSIZE() to inline functions, which will enforce stricter typing.
This is in preparation for that.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/928ea48f-77c6-417b-897c-621ef16685a6%40eisentraut.org
|
|
These instances were using Datum-returning functions where a
lower-level function returning uint32 would be more appropriate.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8246d7ff-f4b7-4363-913e-827dadfeb145%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Previously, specifying the publication option 'publish_generated_columns'
without an explicit value would incorrectly default to 'stored', which is
not the intended behavior.
This patch fixes the issue by raising an ERROR when no value is provided
for 'publish_generated_columns', ensuring that users must explicitly
specify a valid option.
Author: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 18, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PsCUCWiEKmB10DxhoPfXbF6jw5RD9ib2LuaQeA_XraW7w@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Some of these were accidentally reversed, but there was no ill effect.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8246d7ff-f4b7-4363-913e-827dadfeb145%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Previously, enabling sync_replication_slots while wal_level was not set
to logical could cause the server to shut down. This was because
the postmaster performed a configuration check before launching
the slot synchronization worker and raised an ERROR if the settings
were incompatible. Since ERROR is treated as FATAL in the postmaster,
this resulted in the entire server shutting down unexpectedly.
This commit changes the postmaster to log that message with a LOG-level
instead of raising an ERROR, allowing the server to continue running
even with the misconfiguration.
Back-patch to v17, where slot synchronization was introduced.
Reported-by: Hugo DUBOIS <hdubois@scaleway.com>
Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo DUBOIS <hdubois@scaleway.com>
Reviewed-by: Shveta Malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH0PTU_pc3oHi__XESF9ZigCyzai1Mo3LsOdFyQA4aUDkm01RA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
|
|
Author: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20250804140120.280c2d6a9d2ea687cd167743@sraoss.co.jp
|
|
This enhancement builds upon the infrastructure introduced in commit
228c370868, which enables the preservation of deleted tuples and their
origin information on the subscriber. This capability is crucial for
handling concurrent transactions replicated from remote nodes.
The update introduces support for detecting update_deleted conflicts
during the application of update operations on the subscriber. When an
update operation fails to locate the target row-typically because it has
been concurrently deleted-we perform an additional table scan. This scan
uses the SnapshotAny mechanism and we do this additional scan only when
the retain_dead_tuples option is enabled for the relevant subscription.
The goal of this scan is to locate the most recently deleted tuple-matching
the old column values from the remote update-that has not yet been removed
by VACUUM and is still visible according to our slot (i.e., its deletion
is not older than conflict-detection-slot's xmin). If such a tuple is
found, the system reports an update_deleted conflict, including the origin
and transaction details responsible for the deletion.
This provides a groundwork for more robust and accurate conflict
resolution process, preventing unexpected behavior by correctly
identifying cases where a remote update clashes with a deletion from
another origin.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716BE80DAEB0EE2A6A5D1F5949D2@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
Coverity complained that the "errtrace" string is leaked if we return
early because backtrace_symbols fails. Another criticism that could
be leveled at this is that not providing any hint of what happened is
user-unfriendly. Fix that.
The odds of a leak here are small, and typically it wouldn't matter
anyway since the leak will be in ErrorContext which will soon get
reset. So I'm not feeling a need to back-patch.
|
|
If ndatums is zero, the code would allocate zero-length boundKinds
and boundDatums chunks, which would have nothing pointing to them,
leading to Valgrind complaints. Rearrange the code to avoid the
useless pallocs, and also to not bother computing byval/typlen when
they aren't used.
I'm unsure why I didn't see this in my Valgrind testing back in May.
This code hasn't changed since then, but maybe we added a regression
test that reaches this edge case. Or possibly I just failed to
notice the reports, which do say "0 bytes lost".
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756246@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
CompleteCachedPlan intentionally doesn't worry about small
leaks from PlanCacheComputeResultDesc. However, Valgrind
knows nothing of engineering tradeoffs and complains anyway.
Silence it by doing things the hard way if USE_VALGRIND.
I don't really love this patch, because it makes the handling
of plansource->resultDesc different from the handling of query
dependencies and search_path just above, which likewise are willing
to accept small leaks into the cached plan's context. However,
those cases aren't provoking Valgrind complaints. (Perhaps in a
CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS build, they would?) For the moment, this
makes the src/pl/plpgsql tests leak-free according to Valgrind.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756246@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Like the situation with function cache loading, text search
dictionary loading functions tend to leak some cruft into the
dictionary's long-lived cache context. To judge by the examples in
the core regression tests, not very many bytes are at stake.
Moreover, I don't see a way to prevent such leaks without changing the
API for TS template initialization functions: right now they do not
have to worry about making sure that their results are long-lived.
Hence, I think we should install a suppression rule rather than trying
to fix this completely. However, I did grab some low-hanging fruit:
several places were leaking the result of get_tsearch_config_filename.
This seems worth doing mostly because they are inconsistent with other
dictionaries that were freeing it already.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756246@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
These changes don't actually fix any leaks. They just make sure that
Valgrind will find pointers to data structures that remain allocated
at process exit, and thus not falsely complain about leaks. In
particular, we are trying to avoid situations where there is no
pointer to the beginning of an allocated block (except possibly
within the block itself, which Valgrind won't count).
* Because dynahash.c never frees hashtable storage except by deleting
the whole hashtable context, it doesn't bother to track the individual
blocks of elements allocated by element_alloc(). This results in
"possibly lost" complaints from Valgrind except when the first element
of each block is actively in use. (Otherwise it'll be on a freelist,
but very likely only reachable via "interior pointers" within element
blocks, which doesn't satisfy Valgrind.)
To fix, if we're building with USE_VALGRIND, expend an extra pointer's
worth of space in each element block so that we can chain them all
together from the HTAB header. Skip this in shared hashtables though:
Valgrind doesn't track those, and we'd need additional locking to make
it safe to manipulate a shared chain.
While here, update a comment obsoleted by 9c911ec06.
* Put the dlist_node fields of catctup and catclist structs first.
This ensures that the dlist pointers point to the starts of these
palloc blocks, and thus that Valgrind won't consider them
"possibly lost".
* The postmaster's PMChild structs and the autovac launcher's
avl_dbase structs also have the dlist_node-is-not-first problem,
but putting it first still wouldn't silence the warning because we
bulk-allocate those structs in an array, so that Valgrind sees a
single allocation. Commonly the first array element will be pointed
to only from some later element, so that the reference would be an
interior pointer even if it pointed to the array start. (This is the
same issue as for dynahash elements.) Since these are pretty simple
data structures, I don't feel too bad about faking out Valgrind by
just keeping a static pointer to the array start.
(This is all quite hacky, and it's not hard to imagine usages where
we'd need some other idea in order to have reasonable leak tracking of
structures that are only accessible via dlist_node lists. But these
changes seem to be enough to silence this class of leakage complaints
for the moment.)
* Free a couple of data structures manually near the end of an
autovacuum worker's run when USE_VALGRIND, and ensure that the final
vac_update_datfrozenxid() call is done in a non-permanent context.
This doesn't have any real effect on the process's total memory
consumption, since we're going to exit as soon as that last
transaction is done. But it does pacify Valgrind.
* Valgrind complains about the postmaster's socket-files and
lock-files lists being leaked, which we can silence by just
not nulling out the static pointers to them.
* Valgrind seems not to consider the global "environ" variable as
a valid root pointer; so when we allocate a new environment array,
it claims that data is leaked. To fix that, keep our own
statically-allocated copy of the pointer, similarly to the previous
item.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756246@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
In the current system architecture, none of these are worth obsessing
over; most are once-per-process leaks. However, Valgrind complains
about all of them, and if we get to using threads rather than
processes for backend sessions, it will become more interesting to
avoid per-session leaks.
* Fix leaks in StartupXLOG() and ShutdownWalRecovery().
* Fix leakage of pq_mq_handle in a parallel worker.
While at it, move mq_putmessage's "Assert(pq_mq_handle != NULL)"
to someplace where it's not trivially useless.
* Fix leak in logicalrep_worker_detach().
* Don't leak the startup-packet buffer in ProcessStartupPacket().
* Fix leak in evtcache.c's DecodeTextArrayToBitmapset().
If the presented array is toasted, this neglected to free the
detoasted copy, which was then leaked into EventTriggerCacheContext.
* I'm distressed by the amount of code that BuildEventTriggerCache
is willing to run while switched into a long-lived cache context.
Although the detoasted array is the only leak that Valgrind reports,
let's tighten things up while we're here. (DecodeTextArrayToBitmapset
is still run in the cache context, so doing this doesn't remove the
need for the detoast fix. But it reduces the surface area for other
leaks.)
* load_domaintype_info() intentionally leaked some intermediate cruft
into the long-lived DomainConstraintCache's memory context, reasoning
that the amount of leakage will typically not be much so it's not
worth doing a copyObject() of the final tree to avoid that. But
Valgrind knows nothing of engineering tradeoffs and complains anyway.
On the whole, the copyObject doesn't cost that much and this is surely
not a performance-critical code path, so let's do it the clean way.
* MarkGUCPrefixReserved didn't bother to clean up removed placeholder
GUCs at all, which shows up as a leak in one regression test.
It seems appropriate for it to do as much cleanup as
define_custom_variable does when replacing placeholders, so factor
that code out into a helper function. define_custom_variable's logic
was one brick shy of a load too: it forgot to free the separate
allocation for the placeholder's name.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756246@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Arrange that only the "aligned chunk" part of the allocated space is
included in a Valgrind vchunk. This suppresses complaints about that
vchunk being possibly lost because PG is retaining only pointers to
the aligned chunk. Also make sure that trailing wasted space is
marked NOACCESS.
As a tiny performance improvement, arrange that MCXT_ALLOC_ZERO zeroes
only the returned "aligned chunk", not the wasted padding space.
In passing, fix GetLocalBufferStorage to use MemoryContextAllocAligned
instead of rolling its own implementation, which was equally broken
according to Valgrind.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756246@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
When determining whether an allocated chunk is still reachable,
Valgrind will consider only pointers within what it believes to be
allocated chunks. Normally, all of a block obtained from malloc()
would be considered "allocated" --- but it turns out that if we use
VALGRIND_MEMPOOL_ALLOC to designate sub-section(s) of a malloc'ed
block as allocated, all the rest of that malloc'ed block is ignored.
This leads to lots of false positives of course. In particular,
in any multi-malloc-block context, all but the primary block were
reported as leaked. We also had a problem with context "ident"
strings, which were reported as leaked unless there was some other
pointer to them besides the one in the context header.
To fix, we need to use VALGRIND_MEMPOOL_ALLOC to designate
a context's management structs (the context struct itself and
any per-block headers) as allocated chunks. That forces moving
the VALGRIND_CREATE_MEMPOOL/VALGRIND_DESTROY_MEMPOOL calls into
the per-context-type code, so that the pool identifier can be
made as soon as we've allocated the initial block, but otherwise
it's fairly straightforward. Note that in Valgrind's eyes there
is no distinction between these allocations and the allocations
that the mmgr modules hand out to user code. That's fine for
now, but perhaps someday we'll want to do better yet.
When reading this patch, it's helpful to start with the comments
added at the head of mcxt.c.
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Co-authored-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756246@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210317181531.7oggpqevzz6bka3g@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
In ReorderBufferProcessTXN(), used to send the data of a transaction to
an output plugin, INSERT ON CONFLICT changes (INTERNAL_SPEC_INSERT) are
delayed until a confirmation record arrives (INTERNAL_SPEC_CONFIRM),
updating the change being processed.
8c58624df462 has added an extra step after processing a change to update
the progress of the transaction, by calling the callback
update_progress_txn() based on the LSN stored in a change after a
threshold of CHANGES_THRESHOLD (100) is reached. This logic has missed
the fact that for an INSERT ON CONFLICT change the data is freed once
processed, hence update_progress_txn() could be called pointing to a LSN
value that's already been freed. This could result in random crashes,
depending on the workload.
Per discussion, this issue is fixed by reusing in update_progress_txn()
the LSN from the change processed found at the beginning of the loop,
meaning that for a INTERNAL_SPEC_CONFIRM change the progress is updated
using the LSN of the INTERNAL_SPEC_CONFIRM change, and not the LSN from
its INTERNAL_SPEC_INSERT change. This is actually more correct, as we
want to update the progress to point to the INTERNAL_SPEC_CONFIRM
change.
Masahiko Sawada has found a nice trick to reproduce the issue: hardcode
CHANGES_THRESHOLD at 1 and run test_decoding (test "ddl" being enough)
on an instance running valgrind. The bug has been analyzed by Ethan
Mertz, who also originally suggested the solution used in this patch.
Issue introduced by 8c58624df462, so backpatch down to v16.
Author: Ethan Mertz <ethan.mertz@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aIsQqDZ7x4LAQ6u1@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 16
|
|
Currently, ALTER DATABASE/ROLE/SYSTEM RESET [ALL] with an unknown
custom GUC with a prefix reserved by MarkGUCPrefixReserved() errors
(unless a superuser runs a RESET ALL variant). This is problematic
for cases such as an extension library upgrade that removes a GUC.
To fix, simply make sure the relevant code paths explicitly allow
it. Note that we require superuser or privileges on the parameter
to reset it. This is perhaps a bit more restrictive than is
necessary, but it's not clear whether further relaxing the
requirements is safe.
Oversight in commit 88103567cb. The ALTER SYSTEM fix is dependent
on commit 2d870b4aef, which first appeared in v17. Unfortunately,
back-patching that commit would introduce ABI breakage, and while
that breakage seems unlikely to bother anyone, it doesn't seem
worth the risk. Hence, the ALTER SYSTEM part of this commit is
omitted on v15 and v16.
Reported-by: Mert Alev <mert@futo.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18964-ba09dea8c98fccd6%40postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
Author: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20250802002027.cd35c481f6c6bae7ca2a3e26@sraoss.co.jp
|
|
A deadlock can occur when the DDL command and the apply worker acquire
catalog locks in different orders while dropping replication origins.
The issue is rare in PG16 and higher branches because, in most cases, the
tablesync worker performs the origin drop in those branches, and its
locking sequence does not conflict with DDL operations.
This patch ensures consistent lock acquisition to prevent such deadlocks.
As per buildfarm.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Author: Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 14, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/bab95e12-6cc5-4ebb-80a8-3e41956aa297@gmail.com
|
|
Commit 719dcf3c42 introduced a field called CachedPlanType in
PlannedStmt to allow extensions to determine whether a cached plan is
generic or custom.
After discussion, the concepts that we want to track are a bit wider
than initially anticipated, as it is closer to knowing from which
"source" or "origin" a PlannedStmt has been generated or retrieved.
Custom and generic cached plans are a subset of that.
Based on the state of HEAD, we have been able to define two more
origins:
- "standard", for the case where PlannedStmt is generated in
standard_planner(), the most common case.
- "internal", for the fake PlannedStmt generated internally by some
query patterns.
This could be tuned in the future depending on what is needed. This
looks like a good starting point, at least. The default value is called
"UNKNOWN", provided as fallback value. This value is not used in the
core code, the idea is to let extensions building their own PlannedStmts
know about this new field.
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aILaHupXbIGgF2wJ@paquier.xyz
|
|
If the client sent a query cancel request with backend PID 0, it
tripped an assertion. With assertions disabled, you got this in the
log instead:
LOG: invalid cancel request with PID 0
LOG: wrong key in cancel request for process 0
Query cancellations don't even require authentication, so we better
tolerate bogus requests. Fix by turning the assertion into a regular
runtime check.
Spotted while testing libpq behavior with a modified server that
didn't send BackendKeyData to the client.
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
For many optional libraries, we extract the -L and -l switches needed
to link the library from a helper program such as llvm-config. In
some cases we put the resulting -L switches into LDFLAGS ahead of
-L switches specified via --with-libraries. That risks breaking
the user's intention for --with-libraries.
It's not such a problem if the library's -L switch points to a
directory containing only that library, but on some platforms a
library helper may "helpfully" offer a switch such as -L/usr/lib
that points to a directory holding all standard libraries. If the
user specified --with-libraries in hopes of overriding the standard
build of some library, the -L/usr/lib switch prevents that from
happening since it will come before the user-specified directory.
To fix, avoid inserting these switches directly into LDFLAGS during
configure, instead adding them to LIBDIRS or SHLIB_LINK. They will
still eventually get added to LDFLAGS, but only after the switches
coming from --with-libraries.
The same problem exists for -I switches: those coming from
--with-includes should appear before any coming from helper programs
such as llvm-config. We have not heard field complaints about this
case, but it seems certain that a user attempting to override a
standard library could have issues.
The changes for this go well beyond configure itself, however,
because many Makefiles have occasion to manipulate CPPFLAGS to
insert locally-desirable -I switches, and some of them got it wrong.
The correct ordering is any -I switches pointing at within-the-
source-tree-or-build-tree directories, then those from the tree-wide
CPPFLAGS, then those from helper programs. There were several places
that risked pulling in a system-supplied copy of libpq headers, for
example, instead of the in-tree files. (Commit cb36f8ec2 fixed one
instance of that a few months ago, but this exercise found more.)
The Meson build scripts may or may not have any comparable problems,
but I'll leave it to someone else to investigate that.
Reported-by: Charles Samborski <demurgos@demurgos.net>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/70f2155f-27ca-4534-b33d-7750e20633d7@demurgos.net
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
The code being referred to was moved to a different function in commit
eb8312a22a8, so update the comment accordingly.
|
|
When I prepared 71c0921b6 et al yesterday, I was thinking that the
logic involving explicitly freeing the node_list output was still
needed to dodge leakage bugs in libxml2. But I was misremembering:
we introduced that only because with early 2.13.x releases we could
not trust xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory's result code, so we had to
look to see if a node list was returned or not. There's no reason
to believe that xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory will fail to clean up
the node list when required, so simplify. (This essentially
completes reverting all the non-cosmetic changes in 6082b3d5d.)
Reported-by: Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/997668.1753802857@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Per buildfarm member koel, Nathan Bossart, and David Rowley.
|
|
There've been a few complaints that it can be overly difficult to figure
out why the planner picked a Memoize plan. To help address that, here we
adjust the EXPLAIN output to display the following additional details:
1) The estimated number of cache entries that can be stored at once
2) The estimated number of unique lookup keys that we expect to see
3) The number of lookups we expect
4) The estimated hit ratio
Technically #4 can be calculated using #1, #2 and #3, but it's not a
particularly obvious calculation, so we opt to display it explicitly.
The original patch by Lukas Fittl only displayed the hit ratio, but
there was a fear that might lead to more questions about how that was
calculated. The idea with displaying all 4 is to be transparent which
may allow queries to be tuned more easily. For example, if #2 isn't
correct then maybe extended statistics or a manual n_distinct estimate can
be used to help fix poor plan choices.
Author: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya.evdokimov@tantorlabs.com>
Author: Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAP53Pky29GWAVVk3oBgKBDqhND0BRBN6yTPeguV_qSivFL5N_g%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
This mostly reverts commit 6082b3d5d, "Use xmlParseInNodeContext
not xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory". It turns out that
xmlParseInNodeContext will reject text chunks exceeding 10MB, while
(in most libxml2 versions) xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory will not.
The bleeding-edge libxml2 bug that we needed to work around a year
ago is presumably no longer a factor, and the argument that
xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory is semi-deprecated is not enough to
justify a functionality regression. Hence, go back to doing it
the old way.
Reported-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aIGknLuc8b8ega2X@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Commit ffae5cc5a6024b4e25ec920ed5c4dfac649605f8 added this hint in 2006,
but it's now obsolete and doesn't reflect what users should really check
in this situation. We were not able to agree on a new hint, so just delete
the existing one and update the comments to mention one possibility that
is known to cause problems of this kind: something other than PostgreSQL
is modifying files in the PostgreSQL data directory.
Author: Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKZiRmxNbcaL76x=09Sxf7aUmrRQJBf8drzDdUHo+j9_eM+VMg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Commit 473a575e05979b4dbb28b3f2544f4ec8f184ce65 purported to make this
function stash the error message in *syncrep_parse_result_p, but
it didn't actually.
As a result, an attempt to set synchronous_standby_names to any value
that does not parse resulted in a generic "parser failed." message
rather than anything more specific. This fixes that.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYF9wPNZ-Q_EMfib_espgHycY-eX__6Tzo2GpYpVXqCdQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
The callback added in fc415edf8ca8 used to check if there is any pending
data to flush for fixed-numbered statistics, done by looping across all
the builtin and custom stats kinds with a call to have_fixed_pending_cb,
is proving to able to show in workloads that do not report any stats
(read-only, no function calls, no WAL, no IO, etc). The code used in
v17 was cheaper than that what HEAD has introduced, relying on three
boolean checks for WAL, SLRU and IO stats.
This commit switches the code to use a more efficient approach than
fc415edf8ca8, with a single boolean flag that can be switched to "true"
by any fixed-numbered stats kinds to force pgstat_report_stat() to go
through one round of reports. The flag is reset by pgstat_report_stat()
once a full round of reports is done. The flag being false means that
fixed-numbered stats kinds saw no activity, and that there is no pending
data to flush.
ac000fca743e took one step in improving the performance by reducing the
number of stats kinds that the backend can hold. This commit takes a
more drastic step by bringing back the code efficiency to what it was
before v18 with a cheap check at the beginning of pgstat_report_stat()
for its fast-exit path.
The callback have_static_pending_cb is removed as an effect of all that.
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/eb224uegsga2hgq7dfq3ps5cduhpqej7ir2hjxzzozjthrekx5@dysei6buqthe
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
If the number of sync requests is big enough, the palloc() call in
AbsorbSyncRequests() will attempt to allocate more than 1 GB of memory,
resulting in failure. This can lead to an infinite loop in the checkpointer
process, as it repeatedly fails to absorb the pending requests.
This commit introduces the following changes to cope with this problem:
1. Turn pending checkpointer requests array in shared memory into a bounded
ring buffer.
2. Limit maximum ring buffer size to 10M items.
3. Make AbsorbSyncRequests() process requests incrementally in 10K batches.
Even #2 makes the whole queue size fit the maximum palloc() size of 1 GB.
of continuous lock holding.
This commit is for master only. Simpler fix, which just limits a request
queue size to 10M, will be backpatched.
Reported-by: Ekaterina Sokolova <e.sokolova@postgrespro.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/db4534f83a22a29ab5ee2566ad86ca92%40postgrespro.ru
Author: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
|
|
Similar checks are done for the mandatory table AM callbacks. A portion
of the index AM callbacks are optional and can be NULL; the rest is
mandatory and is documented as such in the documentation and in amapi.h.
These checks are useful to detect quickly if all the mandatory callbacks
are defined when implementing a new index access method, as the
assertions are run when loading the AM.
Author: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ME0P300MB0445795D31CEAB92C58B41FDB651A@ME0P300MB0445.AUSP300.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
|
|
Remove a bunch of PG_TRY constructs, de-volatilize related
variables, remove some PQclear calls in error paths.
Aside from making the code simpler and shorter, this should
provide some marginal performance gains.
For ease of review, I did not re-indent code within the removed
PG_TRY constructs. That'll be done in a separate patch.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2976982.1748049023@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Commit 232d8caea fixed a case where postgres_fdw could lose track
of a PGresult object, resulting in a process-lifespan memory leak.
But I have little faith that there aren't other potential PGresult
leakages, now or in future, in the backend modules that use libpq.
Therefore, this patch proposes infrastructure that makes all
PGresults returned from libpq act as though they are palloc'd
in the CurrentMemoryContext (with the option to relocate them to
another context later). This should greatly reduce the risk of
careless leaks, and it also permits removal of a bunch of code
that attempted to prevent such leaks via PG_TRY blocks.
This patch adds infrastructure that wraps each PGresult in a
"libpqsrv_PGresult" that provides a memory context reset callback
to PQclear the PGresult. Code using this abstraction is inherently
memory-safe to the same extent as we are accustomed to in most backend
code. Furthermore, we add some macros that automatically redirect
calls of the libpq functions concerned with PGresults to use this
infrastructure, so that almost no source-code changes are needed to
wheel this infrastructure into place in all the backend code that
uses libpq.
Perhaps in future we could create similar infrastructure for
PGconn objects, but there seems less need for that.
This patch just creates the infrastructure and makes relevant code
use it, including reverting 232d8caea in favor of this mechanism.
A good deal of follow-on simplification is possible now that we don't
have to be so cautious about freeing PGresults, but I'll put that in
a separate patch.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2976982.1748049023@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
This flag was effectively a no-op in EXEC_BACKEND (ie, Windows)
builds, because it was kept in the process-local HTAB struct,
and it could only ever become set in the postmaster's copy.
The simplest fix is to move it to the shared HASHHDR struct.
We could keep a copy in HTAB as well, as we do with keysize
and some other fields, but the "too much contention" argument
doesn't seem to apply here: we only examine isfixed during
element_alloc(), which had better not get hit very often for
a shared hashtable.
This oversight dates to 7c797e719 which invented the option.
But back-patching doesn't seem appropriate given the lack of
field complaints. If there is anyone running an affected
workload on Windows, they might be unhappy about the behavior
changing in a minor release.
Author: Aidar Imamov <a.imamov@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4d0cb35ff01c5c74d2b9a582ecb73823@postgrespro.ru
|
|
This changes the grammar for REINDEX, CHECKPOINT, CLUSTER, ANALYZE/ANALYSE;
they still accept the same options as before, but the grammar is written
differently for convenience of future development.
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202507231538.ir7pjzoow6oe@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
Previously, if a background worker crashed (e.g., due to a SIGKILL) and
the server restarted due to restart_after_crash being enabled,
the worker was not restarted as expected. Background workers without
the never-restart flag should automatically restart in this case.
This issue was introduced in commit 28a520c0b77, which failed to reset
the rw_pid field in the RegisteredBgWorker struct for the crashed worker.
This commit fixes the problem by resetting rw_pid for all eligible
background workers during the crash-and-restart cycle.
Back-patched to v18, where the bug was introduced.
Bug fix patches were proposed by Andrey Rudometov and ChangAo Chen,
but this commit uses a different approach.
Reported-by: Andrey Rudometov <unlimitedhikari@gmail.com>
Reported-by: ChangAo Chen <cca5507@qq.com>
Author: Andrey Rudometov <unlimitedhikari@gmail.com>
Author: ChangAo Chen <cca5507@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: ChangAo Chen <cca5507@qq.com>
Reviewed-by: Shveta Malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAF6JsWiO=i24qYitWe6ns1sXqcL86rYxdyU+pNYk-WueKPSySg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/tencent_E00A056B3953EE6440F0F40F80EC30427D09@qq.com
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
LatchWaitSetPostmasterDeathPos, the latch event position for the
postmaster death event, is initialized under IsUnderPostmaster.
WaitLatch() considered it as a valid wait target in single-user mode
(!IsUnderPostmaster), which was incorrect.
One code path found to fail with an assertion failure is a database drop
in single-user mode while waiting in WaitForProcSignalBarrier() after
the drop.
Oversight in commit 84e5b2f07a5e.
Author: Patrick Stählin <me@packi.ch>
Co-authored-by: Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunklau@aiven.io>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18996-3a2744c8140488de@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 18
|
